Applying principal components analysis to event-related potentials: A tutorial

Developmental Neuropsychology

Volumn 37, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 497-517

  Dien, Joseph ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED RESPONSE; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

ARTIFACTS; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; HUMANS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

EID: 84865205644     PISSN: 87565641     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/87565641.2012.697503     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Bell, A. J., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1995). An information-maximisation approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution. Neural Computation, 7(6), 1129-1159.
2. Carretie, L., Tapia, M., Mercado, F., Albert, J., Lopez-Martin, S., & de la Serna, J. M. (2004). Voltage-based versus factor score-based source localization analyses of electrophysiological brain activity: A comparison. Brain Topography, 17(2), 109-115.
3. Curry, S. H., Cooper, R., McCallum, W. C., Pocock, P. V., Papakostopoulos, D., Skidmore, S., & Newton, P. (1983). The principal components of auditory target detection. In A.W. K. Gaillard & W. Ritter (Eds.), Tutorials in ERP research: Endogenous components (pp. 79-117). Amsterdam, Netherlands: North-Holland Publishing Company.
4. Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004). EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134, 9-21. (Pubitemid 38224183)
5. De Lucia, M.,Michel, C. M., & Murray, M. M. (2010). Comparing ICA-based and single-trial topographic ERP analyses. Brain Topography, 23(2), 119-127.
6. Dien, J. (1998a). Addressing misallocation of variance in principal components analysis of event-related potentials. Brain Topography, 11(1), 43-55. (Pubitemid 28458760)
7. Dien, J. (1998b). Issues in the application of the average reference: Review, critiques, and recommendations. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 30(1), 34-43. (Pubitemid 128683388)
8. Dien, J. (2006). Progressing towards a consensus on PCA of ERPs. Clinical Neurophysiology, 117(3), 699-702; author reply 703-707. (Pubitemid 43344007)
9. Dien, J. (2010a). Evaluating two-step PCA of ERP data with Geomin, Infomax, Oblimin, Promax, and Varimax rotations. Psychophysiology, 47(1), 170-183.
10. Dien, J. (2010b). The ERP PCA Toolkit: An open source program for advanced statistical analysis of event related potential data. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 187(1), 138-145.
11. Dien, J., Beal, D. J., & Berg, P. (2005). Optimizing principal components analysis of event-related potential analysis: Matrix type, factor loading weighting, extraction, and rotations. Clinical Neurophysiology, 116(8), 1808-1825. (Pubitemid 41040049)
12. Dien, J., & Frishkoff, G. A. (2005). Principal components analysis of event-related potential datasets. In T. Handy (Ed.), Event-related potentials: A methods handbook (pp. 189-208). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. Dien, J., Frishkoff, G. A., Cerbone, A., & Tucker, D. M. (2003). Parametric analysis of event-related potentials in semantic comprehension: Evidence for parallel brain mechanisms. Cognitive Brain Research, 15, 137-153. (Pubitemid 35335784)
14. Dien, J., Khoe, W., & Mangun, G. R. (2007). Evaluation of PCA and ICA of simulated ERPs: Promax versus Infomax rotations. Human Brain Mapping, 28(8), 742-763. (Pubitemid 47255125)
15. Dien, J., & O'Hare, A.J.. (2008). Evidence for automatic sentence priming in the fusiform semantic area: Convergent ERP and fMRI findings. Brain Research, 1243, 134-145.
16. Dien, J., Spencer, K. M., & Donchin, E. (2003). Localization of the event-related potential novelty response as defined by principal components analysis. Cognitive Brain Research, 17, 637-650. (Pubitemid 38373369)
17. Dien, J., Spencer, K. M., & Donchin, E. (2004). Parsing the "Late Positive Complex": Mental chronometry and the ERP components that inhabit the neighborhood of the P300. Psychophysiology, 41(5), 665-678. (Pubitemid 39295493)
18. Dien, J., Tucker, D. M., Potts, G., & Hartry, A. (1997). Localization of auditory evoked potentials related to selective intermodal attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9(6), 799-823. (Pubitemid 28025195)
19. Donchin, E. (1966). A multivariate approach to the analysis of average evoked potentials. IEEE Transactions on Bio- Medical Engineering, BME-13, 131-139.
20. Donchin, E., & Heffley, E. (1979).Multivariate analysis of event-related potential data: A tutorial review. In D. Otto (Ed.), Multidisciplinary perspectives in event-related potential research (EPA 600/9-77-043) (pp. 555-572). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
21. Glaser, E. M., & Ruchkin, D. S. (1976). Principles of neurobiological signal analysis. New York, NY: Academic Press.
22. Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23. Harman, H. H. (1976). Modern factor analysis (3rd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
24. Hendrickson, A. E., & White, P. O. (1964). Promax: A quick method for rotation to oblique simple structure. The British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 17, 65-70.
25. Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179-185.
26. Hyvärinen, A., Karhunen, J., & Oja, E. (2001). Independent component analysis. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
27. Kaiser, H. F. (1958). The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 23, 187-200.
28. Kayser, J., & Tenke, C. E. (2003). Optimizing PCA methodology for ERP component identification and measurement: Theoretical rationale and empirical evaluation. Clinical Neurophysiology, 114(12), 2307-2325. (Pubitemid 37498221)
29. Kayser, J., & Tenke, C. E. (2006). Consensus on PCA for ERP data, and sensibility of unrestricted solutions. Clinical Neurophysiology, 117, 695-707.
30. Lehmann, D., & Skrandies,W. (1980). Reference-free identification of components of checkerboard-evoked multichannel potential fields. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 48(6), 609-621. (Pubitemid 10091391)
31. Möcks, J. (1986). The influence of latency jitter in principal component analysis of event-related potentials. Psychophysiology, 23(4), 480-484. (Pubitemid 16023141)
32. Möcks, J., & Verleger, R. (1991).Multivariate methods in biosignal analysis: Application of principal component analysis to event-related potentials. In R. Weitkunat (Ed.), Digital biosignal processing (pp. 399-458). Amsterdam, Holland: Elsevier.
33. Nunez, P. L. (1990). Physical principles and neurophysiological mechanisms underlying event-related potentials. In J.W. Rohrbaugh, R. Parasuraman, & R. Johnson (Eds.), Event-related brain potentials: Basic issues and applications (pp. 19-36). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
34. O'Hare, A. J., Dien, J., Waterson, L., & Savage, C. R. (2008). Activation of the posterior cingulate by semantic priming: A co-registered ERP/fMRI study. Brain Research, 1189(2), 97-114. (Pubitemid 351842548)
35. Pourtois, G., Delplanque, S., Michel, C., & Vuilleumier, P. (2008). Beyond conventional event-related brain potential (ERP): Exploring the time-course of visual emotion processing using topographic and principal component analyses. Brain Topography, 20(4), 265-277.
36. Ruchkin, D. S., Munson, R., & Sutton, S. (1982). P300 and slow wave in a message consisting of two events. Psychophysiology, 19(6), 629-642. (Pubitemid 13247352)
37. Ruchkin, D. S., & Sutton, S. (1983). Positive slow wave and P300: Association and dissociation. In A. W. K. Gaillard, & W. Ritter (Eds.), Tutorials in ERP research: Endogenous components (pp. 233-250). Amsterdam, Holland: North-Holland Publishing Company.
38. Ruchkin, D. S., Villegas, J., & John, E. R. (1964). An analysis of average evoked potentials making use of least mean square techniques. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 115(2), 799-826.
39. Spencer, K. M., Dien, J., & Donchin, E. (1999). A componential analysis of the ERP elicited by novel events using a dense electrode array. Psychophysiology, 36, 409-414. (Pubitemid 29237441)
40. Spencer, K. M., Dien, J., & Donchin, E. (2001). Spatiotemporal analysis of the late ERP responses to deviant stimuli. Psychophysiology, 38(2), 343-358. (Pubitemid 32267775)
41. Squires, K. C., Donchin, E., Herning, R. I., & McCarthy, G. (1977). On the influence of task relevance and stimulus probability on event-related-potential components. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 42, 1-14. (Pubitemid 8011766)
42. Sutton, S., & Ruchkin, D. S. (1984). The late positive complex: Advances and new problems. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 425, 1-23. (Pubitemid 14061072)
43. Walter, W. G., Cooper, R., Aldridge, V. J., McCallum, W. C., & Winter, A. L. (1964). Contingent negative variation: An electrical sign of sensorimotor association and expectancy in the human brain. Nature, 203, 380-384.