A comparative study on complete and implant retained denture treatments - A biomechanics perspective

Journal of Biomechanics

Volumn 48, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 512-519

  Chen, Junning ^a   Ahmad, Rohana ^b   Suenaga, Hanako ^c   Li, Wei ^a   Swain, Michael ^d   Li, Qing ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA   (Malaysia)

^c TOHOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Heterogeneity; Hydrostatic pressure; Hyperelastic model; Mucosa and periosteum biomechanics; Residual ridge resorption

Indexed keywords

BIOMECHANICS; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; ELASTICITY; HYDRAULICS; HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE;

COMPARATIVE STUDIES; HETEROGENEITY; HYDROSTATIC STRESS; HYPERELASTIC MATERIALS; HYPERELASTIC MODELS; RESIDUAL RIDGE RESORPTION; SUPPORTIVE TISSUE; TREATMENT PLANNING;

PATIENT TREATMENT;

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE REMODELING; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER MODEL; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATIONAL STUDY; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE; MOUTH MUCOSA; OSTEOLYSIS; OVERLAY DENTURE; TOOTH IMPLANT; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTURE; DEVICES; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FOLLOW UP; MANDIBLE; MASTICATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; BITE FORCE; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTURE RETENTION; DENTURE, OVERLAY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE; MANDIBLE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MOUTH MUCOSA; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84921436433     PISSN: 00219290     EISSN: 18732380     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.11.043     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Ahmad R., Abu-Hassan M.I., Li Q., Swain M.V. Three dimensional quantification of mandibular bone remodeling using standard tessellation language registration based superimposition. Clin. Oral Implan. Res. 2013, 24(11):1273-1279.
2. Aspenberg P., van der Vis H. Fluid pressure may cause periprosthetic osteolysis - Particles are not the only thing. Acta Orthop. Scand. 1998, 69(1):1-4.
3. Assad Ahmed S., Abd El-Dayem M.A., Badawy Magdy M. Comparison between mainly mucosa-supported and combined mucosa-implant-supported mandibular overdentures. Implant Dentistry 2004, 13(4):386-394.
4. Atwood D.A. Reduction of residual ridges - Major oral disease entity. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1971, 26(3):266-279.
5. Baca E., Yengin E., Gokcen-Rohlig B., Sato S. In vivo evaluation of occlusalcontact area and maximum bite force in patients with various types of implant-supported prostheses. Acta Odontol. Scand. 2013, 71(5):1181-1187.
6. Barão V.A.R., Assunção W.G., Tabata L.F., de Sousa E.A.C., Rocha E.P. Effect of different mucosa thickness and resiliency on stress distribution of implant-retained overdentures-2D FEA. Comput. Meth. Prog. Bio. 2008, 92(2):213-223.
7. Barao V.A.R., Delben J.A., Lima J., Cabral T., Assuncao W.G. Comparison of different designs of implant-retained overdentures and fixed full-arch implant-supported prosthesis on stress distribution in edentulous mandible - A computed tomography-based three-dimensional finite element analysis. J. Biomech. 2013, 46(7):1312-1320.
8. Bergendal T., Engquist B. Implant-supported overdentures: a longitudinal prospective study. Int. J. Oral Max. Impl. 1998, 13(2):253-262.
9. Bergomi M., Cugnoni J., Galli M., Botsis J., Belser U.C., Wiskott H.W.A. Hydro-mechanical coupling in the periodontal ligament: A porohyperelastic finite element model. J. Biomech. 2011, 44(1):34-38.
10. Blum I.R., McCord J.F. A clinical investigation of the morphological changes in the posterior mandible when implant-retained overdentures are used. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 2004, 15(6):700-708.
11. Bradley J.C. The clinical significance of age-changes in the vascular supply to the mandible. Int. J. Oral Surg. 1981, 10:71-76.
12. Carter D.R., Hayes W.C. Compressive behaviour of bone as a 2-Phase porous structure. J. Bone Joint Surg.-Am. Vol. 1977, 59(7):954-962.
13. Chen J., Rungsiyakull C., Li W., Chen Y., Swain M., Li Q. Multiscale design of surface morphological gradient for osseointegration. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2013, 20:387-397.
14. Chowdhary R., Lekha K., Patil N.P. Two-dimensional finite element analysis of stresses developed in the supporting tissues under complete dentures using teeth with different cusp angulations. Gerodontology 2008, 25(3):155-161.
15. Clelland N.L., Papazoglou E., Carr A.B., Gilat A. Comparison of strains transferred to a bone simulant among implant overdenture bars with various levels of misfit. J. Prosthodont. 1995, 4(4):243-250.
16. Esposito M., Cannizzaro G., Soardi E., Pistilli R., Plattelli M., Corvino V., Felice P. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 6mm-long, 4mm-wide implants or by longer implants in augmented bone. Preliminary results from a pilot randomised controlled trial. Eur. J. Oral Implantol. 2012, 5(1):19-33.
17. Felice P., Soardi E., Pellegrino G., Pistilli R., Marchetti C., Gessaroli M., Esposito M. Treatment of the atrophic edentulous maxilla: short implants versus bone augmentation for placing longer implants. Five-month post-loading results of a pilot randomised controlled trial. Eur. J. Oral Implantol. 2011, 4(3):191-202.
18. Field C., Li Q., Li W., Swain M. Influence of tooth removal on mandibular bone response to mastication. Arch. Oral Biol. 2008, 53(12):1129-1137.
19. Field C., Li Q., Li W., Thompson M., Swain M. Prediction of mandibular bone remodelling induced by fixed partial dentures. J. Biomech. 2010, 43(9):1771-1779.
20. Fontijn-Tekamp F.A., Slagter A.P., van't Hof M.A., Geertman M.E., Kalk W. Bite forces with mandibular implant-retained overdentures. J. Dent. Res. 1998, 77(10):1832-1839.
21. Fontijn-Tekamp F.A., Slagter A.P., Van Der Bilt A., Van T.H.M.A., Witter D.J., Kalk W., Jansen J.A. Biting and chewing in overdentures, full dentures, and natural dentitions. J. Dent. Res. 2000, 79(7):1519-1524.
22. Fueki K., Kimoto K., Ogawa T., Garrett N.R. Effect of implant-supported or retained dentures on masticatory performance: a systematic review. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2007, 98(6):470-477.
23. Geckili O., Bilhan H., Mumcu E., Dayan C., Yabul A., Tuncer N. Comparison of patient satisfaction, quality of life, and bite force between elderly edentulous patients wearing mandibular two implant-supported overdentures and conventional complete dentures after 4 years. Special Care in Dentistry 2012, 32(4):136-141.
24. Goodacre C.J., Bernal G., Rungcharassaeng K., Kan J.Y.K. Clinical complications with implants and implant prostheses. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2003, 90(2):121-132.
25. Hart R.T., Hennebel V.V., Thongpreda N., Vanbuskirk W.C., Anderson R.C. Modeling the biomechanics of the mandible - a 3-Dimensional finite-element study. J. Biomech. 1992, 25(3):261-286.
26. Jacobs R., Schotte A., van Steenberghe D., Quirynen M., Naert I. Posterior jaw bone resorption in osseointegrated implant-supported overdentures. Clin. Oral Implant Res. 1992, 3(2):63-70.
27. Jahangiri L., Devlin H., Ting K., Nishimura I. Current perspectives in residual ridge remodeling and its clinical implications: a review. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1998, 80(2):224-237.
28. Kanbara R., Nakamura Y., Ochiai K.T., Kawai T., Tanaka Y. Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis: the technique and methodology of non-linear property simulation and soft tissue loading behavior for different partial denture designs. Dent. Mater. J. 2012, 31(2):297-308.
29. Kim S.H., Park S.H., Jun J.W., Kim D.H., Shin J.W., Han J.Y., Kang Y.G., Shin J.W. Hydrostatic pressure can control osteogenesis and osteoclastogenesis when stromal cells and osteoclast precursor cells are cocultured. Tissue Eng. Regenerative Med. 2010, 7(4):388-394.
30. Kishi M. Experimental studies on the relation between area and displacement of loading surfaces in connection with displaceability in the mucosa of edentulous alveolar ridge under pressure. Shika gakuho. Dent. Sci. Rep. 1972, 72(6):17-45.
31. Klemetti E. A review of residual ridge resorption and bone density. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1996, 75(5):512-514.
32. Klemetti E., Lassila L., Lassila V. Biometric design of complete dentures related to residual ridge resorption. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1996, 75(3):281-284.
33. Kordatzis K., Wright P.S., Meijer H.J.A. Posterior mandibular residual ridge resorption in patients with conventional dentures and implant overdentures. Int. J. Oral Max. Im. 2003, 18(3):447-452.
34. Korioth T.W.P., Romilly D.P., Hannam A.G. 3-Dimensional finite element stress-analysis of the dentate human mandible. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 1992, 88(1):69-96.
35. Kreisler M., Behneke N., Behneke A., d'Hoedt B. Residual ridge resorption in the edentulous maxilla in patients with implant-supported mandibular overdentures: An 8-year retrospective study. Int. J. Prosthodontics 2003, 16(3):295-300.
36. Krishnan V., Davidovitch Z.E. Cellular, molecular, and tissue-level reactions to orthodontic force. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. 2006, 129(4). (469.e461-469.e432).
37. Kydd W.L., Daly C.H. The biologic and mechanical effects of stress on oral mucosa. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1982, 47(3):317-329.
38. Li, W., C. Rungsiyakull, C. Field, D. Lin, L. Zhang, Q. Li, M. Swain, 2010. Computational biomechanics of bone's responses to dental prostheses - osseointegration, remodeling and resorption. Nineth World Congress on Computational Mechanics and Fourth Asian Pacific Congress on Computational Mechanics. N. Khalili, S. Valliappan, Q. Li and A. Russell. p. 10, IOP publishing, Sydney, Australia.
39. Li W., Swain M.V., Li Q., Ironside J., Steven G.P. Fibre reinforced composite dental bridge. Part II: numerical investigation. Biomaterials 2004, 25(20):4995-5001.
40. Li W., Swain M.V., Li Q., Steven G.P. Towards automated 3D finite element modeling of direct fiber reinforced composite dental bridge. J. Biomed. Mater. Res B: Appl. Biomater. 2005, 74B(1):520-528.
41. Lin D., Li Q., Li W., Duckmanton N., Swain M. Mandibular bone remodeling induced by dental implant. J. Biomech. 2010, 43(2):287-293.
42. Lin D., Li Q., Li W., Swain M. Dental implant induced bone remodeling and associated algorithms. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2009, 2(5):410-432.
43. Maeda Y., Wood W.W. Finite element method simulation of bone resorption beneath a complete denture. J. Dent. Res. 1989, 68(9):1370-1373.
44. Maruo Y., Nishigawa G., Irie M., Oka M., Hara T., Suzuki K., Minagi S. Stress distribution prevents ischaemia and bone resorption in residual ridge. Arch. Oral Biol. 2010, 55(11):873-878.
45. Mori S., Sato T., Hara T., Nakashima K., Minagi S. Effect of continuous pressure on histopathological changes in denture-supporting tissues. J. Oral Rehabil. 1997, 24(1):37-46.
46. Müller F., Duvernay E., Loup A., Vazquez L., Herrmann F.R., Schimmel M. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures in very old adults: a randomized controlled trial. J. Dent. Res 2013, 92:154S-160S.
47. Katayoun S., Jahangir A., Fateme H. Finite element analysis of soft-lined mandibular complete denture and its supporting structures. J. Dent. Res. Dent. Clin. Dent. Prospects 2012, 6(2):37-41.
48. O'Brien W.J. Dental Materials and their Selection 2008, Michigan, Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc.
49. Prinz J.F., de Wijk R.A., Huntjens L. Load dependency of the coefficient of friction of oral mucosa. Food Hydrocolloid 2007, 21(3):402-408.
50. Rashid F., Awad M.A., Thomason J.M., Piovano A., Spielberg G.P., Scilingo E., Mojon P., Muller F., Spielberg M., Heydecke G., Stoker G., Wismeijer D., Allen F., Feine J.S. The effectiveness of 2-implant overdentures - a pragmatic international multicentre study. J. Oral Rehabil. 2011, 38(3):176-184.
51. Rho J.Y., Ashman R.B., Turner C.H. Youngs modulus of trabecular and cortical bone material - ultrasonic and microtensile measurements. J. Biomech. 1993, 26(2):111-119.
52. Rungsiyakull C., Li Q., Sun G., Li W., Swain M.V. Surface morphology optimization for osseointegration of coated implants. Biomaterials 2010, 31(27):7196-7204.
53. Sato Y., Abe Y., Okane H., Tsuga K. Finite element analysis of stress relaxation in soft denture liner. J. Oral Rehabil. 2000, 27(8):660-663.
54. Sawada A., Wakabayashi N., Ona M., Suzuki T. Viscoelasticity of human oral mucosa: implications for masticatory biomechanics. J. Dent. Res. 2011, 90(5):590-595.
55. Tallgren A. The continuing reduction of the residual alveolar ridges in complete denture wearers: a mixed-longitudinal study covering 25 years. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1972, 27(2):120-132.
56. Wismeijer D., Waas M.A.J.V., Vermeeren J.I.J.F., Muldel J., Kalk W. Patient satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures: A comparison of three treatment strategies with ITI-dental implants. Int. J. Oral Max. 1997, 26(4):263-267.
57. Yamashita S., Sakai S., Hatch J.P., Rugh J.D. Relationship between oral function and occlusal support in denture wearers. J. Oral Rehabil 2000, 27(10):881-886.
58. Zaw K., Liu G.R., Deng B., Tan K.B.C. Rapid identification of elastic modulus of the interface tissue on dental implants surfaces using reduced-basis method and a neural network. J. Biomech. 2009, 42(5):634-641.