Comparison between mainly mucosa-supported and combined mucosa-implant-supported mandibular overdentures

Implant Dentistry

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 386-394

  Assad, Ahmed S ^a,c   Abd El Dayem, Mohamed A ^b   Badawy, Magdy M ^a  

^a Al Azhar University   (Egypt)

^b ZAGAZIG UNIVERSITY   (Egypt)

^c NONE   (Egypt)

Author keywords

Attachment; Dental implant; Overdenture; Support

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DENTURE; EDENTULOUSNESS; EVALUATION; GINGIVA; HUMAN; INFLAMMATION; MAGNET; MANDIBLE; MUCOSA; OSTEOLYSIS; RADIOGRAPHY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PLAQUE;

ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; DENTAL IMPLANTATION; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL PLAQUE; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; DENTURE DESIGN; DENTURE RETENTION; DENTURE, OVERLAY; FEMALE; GINGIVITIS; HUMANS; JAW, EDENTULOUS; MAGNETICS; MALE; MANDIBLE; MIDDLE AGED; MOUTH MUCOSA;

EID: 11444268678     PISSN: 10566163     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.id.0000144512.43654.08     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Fredrickson EJ, Stevens PJ, Gress ML. Implant Prosthodontics. Clinical and Laboratory Procedures. St. Louis: Mosby; 1995:114-133.
2. Van Waas MA, Denissen HW, De Koomen HA, et al. Dutch consensus on guidelines for superstructures on endosseous implants in the edentulous mandible. J Oral Implantol. 1991;17:390-392.
3. Batenburg RHK, Van Oort RP, Reintsema H, et al. Overdentures supported by two IMZ implants in the lower jaw; a retrospective study of peri-implant tissues. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1994;5:207-212.
4. Wismeijer D, Van Waas MAJ, Kalk W. Factors to consider in selecting an occlusal concept for patients with implants in the edentulous mandible. J Prosthetic Dent. 1995;74:380-384.
5. Wismeijer D, Van Waas MAJ, Mulder J, et al. Clinical and radiological results of patients treated with three treatment modalities for overdentures on implants of the ITI dental implant System. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1999;10:297-306.
6. Stern MR. Clinical evaluation of overdenture restoration supported by osseointegrated titanium implants: a retrospective study. J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1990;5:375-383.
7. Block MS, Kent JN, Finger IM. Use of the integral implant for overdenture stabilization. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1990;5:140-147.
8. Cranine AN, Klein M, Simson A. Atlas of Oral Implantology. New York: Theme Medical Publishers, Inc; 1993:42-43.
9. Meijer HJ, Starmans FJ, Steen WH, et al. Location of implants in the interforaminal region of the mandible and the consequences for the design of the superstructure. J Oral Rehabil. 1994;21:47-56.
10. Block MS, Kent JN. Endosseous Implants for Maxillofacial Reconstruction, 1st ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co; 1995:158-192.
11. Tokuhisa M, Matsushita Y, Koyano K. In vitro study of a mandibular implant overdenture retained with ball, magnet, or bar attachments: comparison of load transfer and denture stability. Int J Prosthodont. 2003;16:128-134.
12. Behrman SJ. The implantation of magnets in the jaw to aid denture retention. J Prosthet Dent. 1960;68:807-841.
13. Laird WRE, Smith GA, Grant AA. The use of magnetic forces in prosthetic dentistry. J Dentistry. 1981;9:328-335.
14. Abdel-Monem AM. Ball and silicone socket attachments for implant-retained overdentures: a prosthetic management of peri-implant bone resorption. Egyptian Dental J. 1998;44:2713-2717.
15. Loe H, Silness J. Periodontal disease in pregnancy. Prevalence and severity. Acta Odontogia Scand. 1963;21:533-551.
16. Mombelli A, Buser D, Lang NP. Colonization of osseointegrated titanium implants in edentulous patients. Early results. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 1988;3:113-120.
17. Wenzel A. Effect of image enhancement for delectability of bone lesion in digitized intraoral radiographs. Scand J Dent Res. 1991;46:199-205.
18. El-Guindy M, El-Tonsy M, Abdel Razzak Y. Longitudinal evaluation of tricalcium phosphate ceramic combined with tetracycline HCL root conditioning in treatment of periodontal osseous defects. Med Cairo Univ. 1996;64:195-205.
19. Awad MA, Lund JP, Dufresne E, et al. Comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-retained overdentures and conventional dentures middle aged edentulous patients: satisfaction and functional assessment. J Prosthet Dentistry. 2003;89:93-96.
20. Burns DR, Unger JW, Elswick RK, et al. Prospective clinical evaluation of mandibular implant overdentures. Part II: patient satisfaction and preference. J Prosthet Dentistry. 1995;73:364-369.
21. Dewijs FLJA, Cune MS, De Putter C. Delayed implants in the anterior maxilla with the IMZ-implant system. J Oral Rehabil. 1995;22:319-325.
22. Abou El-Fotauh H, Zekry K. Two-year study of unilateral subperiosteal implant. Egyptian Dent J. 1988;34:287-292.
23. Johns RB, Jemt T, Heath MR, et al. A multicenter study of overdenture supported by Branemark implants. Inter J Oral Maxillofacial Implants. 1992;7:513-522.
24. Burns DR. Mandibular implant overdenture treatment: consensus and controversy. J Prosthodon. 2000;9:37-46.
25. Akagawa Y, Ichikawa Y, Nikai H, et al. Interface histology of unloaded and early loaded partially stabilized zirconia endosseous implant in initial bone healing. J Prosthet Dentistry. 1993;69:599-604.
26. Naert I, Quirynen M, Theuniers G, et al. Prosthetic aspects of osseointegrated fixtures supporting overdentures. A 4-year report. J Prosthet Dentistry. 1991;65:671-680.
27. Naert I, Gizani S, Vuylsteke M, et al. A 5-year randomized clinical trial on the influence of splinted and unsplinted oral implants in the mandibular overdenture therapy. Part I: peri-implant outcome. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1998;9:170-177.
28. Behneke A, Behneke N, d'Hoedt B. A 5-year longitudinal study of the clinical effectiveness of ITI solid-screw implants in the treatment of mandibular edentulism.J Dent Res. 2003;82:53-58.
29. Naert I, Quirynen M, Hooghe M, et al. A comparative prospective study of splinted and unsplinted Brånemark implants in mandibular overdenture therapy: a preliminary report. J Prosthet Dentistry. 1994;71:486-492.
30. Wowern N Von, Hjorting-Hansen E. The mandibular bone mineral content in relation to vestibular sulcoplasty. A 2-year follow-up. J Prosthet Dentistry. 1991;65:804-808.