Effect of different mucosa thickness and resiliency on stress distribution of implant-retained overdentures-2D FEA

Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine

Volumn 92, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 213-223

  Barão, Valentim Adelino Ricardo ^a   Assunção, Wirley Gonçalves ^a   Tabata, Lucas Fernando ^a   de Sousa, Edson Antonio Capello ^a   Rocha, Eduardo Passos ^a  

^a SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Attachment; Biomechanics; Dental implants; Finite element analysis; Overdenture

Indexed keywords

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; HISTOLOGY; STRESS CONCENTRATION; STRESSES; TWO DIMENSIONAL;

ANSYS SOFTWARE; ATTACHMENT; ATTACHMENT SYSTEM; BIOMECHANICS; CORTICAL BONES; DENTAL IMPLANTS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; OVERDENTURE; RING SYSTEMS; STRESS DISTRIBUTIONS; STRESS VALUES; TWO-DIMENSIONAL FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS;

MOLECULAR BEAM EPITAXY;

ARTICLE; COMPUTER MODEL; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTURE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; MANDIBLE PROSTHESIS; MOUTH MUCOSA; SIMULATION; STRESS;

BIOMECHANICS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTURE, OVERLAY; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; MOUTH MUCOSA; SOFTWARE; STRESS, MECHANICAL; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL;

EID: 52949145626     PISSN: 01692607     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2008.07.009     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Batenburg R.H., Meijer H.J., Raghoebar G.M., and Vissink A. Treatment concept for mandibular overdentures supported by endosseous implants: a literature review. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 13 (1998) 539-545
2. Batenburg R.H., Raghoebar G.M., Van Oort R.P., Heijdenrijk K., and Boering G. Mandibular overdentures supported by two or four endosteal implants. A prospective, comparative study. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 27 (1998) 435-439
3. Wismeijer D., Van Waas M.A., Vermeeren J.I., Mulder J., and Kalk W. Patient satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures. A comparison of three treatment strategies with ITI-dental implants. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 26 (1997) 263-267
4. Visser A., Raghoebar G.M., Meijer H.J., Batenburg R.H., and Vissinki A. Mandibular overdentures supported by two or four endosseous implants. A 5-year prospective study. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 16 (2005) 19-25
5. Feine J.S., Carlsson G.E., Awad M.A., Chechade A., Duncan W.J., Gizani S., Head T., Heydecke G., Lund J.P., MacEntee M., Mericske-Stern R., Mojon P., Morais J.A., Naert I., Payne A.G., Penrod J., Stoker G.T., Tawse-Smith A., Taylor T.D., Thomason J.M., Thomson W.M., and Wismeijer D. The McGill consensus statement on overdentures. Mandibular two-implant overdentures as first choice standard of care for edentulous patient. Gerodontology 19 (2002) 3-4
6. Mericske-Stern R., and Zarb G.A. Overdentures: an alternative implant methodology for edentulous patients. Int. J. Prosthodont. 6 (1993) 203-208
7. Mericske-Stern R. Clinical evaluation of overdenture restorations supported by osseointegrated titanium implants: a retrospective study. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 5 (1990) 375-383
8. Spiekermann H., Jansen U.K., and Richter E.J. A 10-year follow-up study of IMZ and TPS implants in the edentulous mandible using bar-retained overdentures. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 10 (1995) 231-243
9. Davis D.M., Rogers J.O., and Packer M.E. The extent of maintenance required by implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 3-year report. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 11 (1996) 767-774
10. Ichikawa T., Horiuchi M., Wigianto R., and Matsumoto N. In vitro study of mandibular implant-retained overdentures: the influence of stud attachments on load transfer to the implant and soft tissue. Int. J. Prosthodont. 9 (1996) 394-399
11. Watson C.J., Tinsley D., and Sharma S. Implant complications and failures: the complete overdenture. Dent. Update 28 (2001) 234-238 240
12. Cune M.S., de Putter C., and Hoogstraten J. Characteristics of 5410 edentulous implant candidates and the treatment they receive. Community Dent. Oral Epidemiol. 23 (1995) 110-113
13. Heckmann S.M., Winter W., Meyer M., Weber H.P., and Wichmann M.G. Overdenture attachment selection and the loading of implant and denture-bearing area. Part 2. A methodical study using five types of attachments. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 12 (2001) 640-647
14. Payne A.G., and Solomons Y.F. The prosthodontic maintenance requirements of mandibular mucosa- and implant-supported overdentures: a review of the literature. Int. J. Prosthodont. 13 (2000) 238-245
15. van Kampen F., Cune M., and van der Bilt A. Retention and postinsertion maintenance of bar-clip, ball and magnet attachments in mandibular implant overdenture treatment: an in vivo comparison after 3 months of function. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 14 (2003) 720-726
16. MacEntee M., Walton J.N., and Glick N. A clinical trial of patient satisfaction and prosthodontic needs with ball and bar attachments for implant-retained complete overdentures: three-year results. J. Prosthet. Dent. 93 (2005) 28-37
17. Trakas T., Konstantinos M., Kang K., and Hirayama H. Attachment systems for implant retained overdentures: a literature review. Implant Dent. 15 (2006) 24-34
18. Celik G., and Uludag B. Photoelastic stress analysis of various retention mechanisms on 3-implant-retained mandibular overdentures. J. Prosthet. Dent. 97 (2007) 229-235
19. Poter Jr. J.A., Petropoulos V.C., and Brunski J.B. Comparison of load distribution for implant overdenture attachment. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 17 (2002) 651-662
20. Gotfredson K., Berglundh T., and Lindhe J. Bone reactions adjacent to titanium implants subjected to static load of different duration. A study in the dog (III). Clin. Oral Implants Res. 12 (2001) 552-558
21. Daas M., Dubois G., Bonnet A.S., Lipinski P., and Rignon-Bret C. A complete finite element model of a mandibular implant-retained overdenture with two implants: comparison between rigid and resilient attachment configurations. Med. Eng. Phys. 30 (2008) 218-225
22. Mericske-Stern R. Three-dimensional force measurements with mandibular overdentures connected to implants by ball-shaped retentive anchors. A clinical study. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 13 (1998) 36-43
23. Mericske-Stern R., Piotti M., and Sirtes G. 3D in vivo force measurements on mandibular implants supporting overdentures. A comparative study. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 7 (1996) 387-396
24. Geng J.P., Tan K.B., and Liu G.R. Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: a review of the literature. J. Prosthet. Dent. 85 (2001) 99-119
25. Payne A.G., and Solomons Y.F. Mandibular implant-supported overdentures: a prospective evaluation of the burden of prosthodontic maintenance with 3 different attachment systems. Int. J. Prosthodont. 13 (2000) 246-253
26. Meniccuci G., Lorenzetti M., Pera P., and Preti G. Mandibular implant-retained overdenture: finite element analysis of two anchorage systems. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 13 (1998) 369-376
27. Batenburg R.H.K., Meijer H.J.A., Raghoebar G.M., Van Oort R.P., and Boering G. Mandibular overdentures supported by two Branemark, IMZ or ITI implants. A prospective comparative preliminary study: one-year results. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 9 (1998) 374-383
28. Tanino F., Hayakawa I., Hirano S., and Minakuchi S. Finite element analysis of stress-breaking attachments on maxillary implant-retained overdentures. Int. J. Prosthodont. 20 (2007) 193-198
29. Ko C.C., Chu C.S., Chung K.H., and Lee M.C. Effects of posts on dentin stress distribution in pulpless teeth. J. Prosthet. Dent. 68 (1992) 421-427
30. Barbier L., Vander Sloten J., Krzesinski E., Schepers E., and van Der Perre G. Finite element analysis of non-axial versus axial loading of oral implants in the mandible of dog. J. Oral Rehabil. 25 (1998) 847-858
31. Sertgoz A., and Gunever S. Finite element analysis of the effect of cantilever and implant length on stress distribution in an implant-supported prosthesis. J. Prosthet. Dent. 76 (1996) 165-169
32. Caglar A., Aydin C., Ozen J., Yilmaz C., and Korkmaz T. Effects of mesiodistal inclination of implants on stress distribution in implant-supported fixed prostheses. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 21 (2006) 36-44
33. Chun H.J., Park D.N., Han C.H., Heo S.J., Heo M.S., and Koak J.Y. Stress distributions in maxillary bone surrounding overdenture implants with different overdenture attachments. J. Oral Rehabil. 32 (2005) 193-205
34. Meijer H.J.A., Kuiper J.H., Starmans F.J.M., and Bosman F. Stress distribution around dental implants: influence on superstructure, length of implants, and height of mandible. J. Prosthet. Dent. 68 (1992) 96-102
35. Saab X.E., Griggs J.A., Powers J.M., and Engelmeier R.L. Effect of abutment angulation on the strain on the bone around an implant in the anterior maxilla: a finite element study. J. Prosthet. Dent. 97 (2007) 85-92
36. Ben-Ur Z., Gorfil C., and Shifman A. Anterior implant-supported overdentures. Quintessence Int. 27 (1996) 603-606
37. Tokuhisa M., Matsushita Y., and Koyano K. In vitro study of mandibular implant overdenture retained with ball, magnet, or bar attachments: comparison of load transfer and denture stability. Int. J. Prosthodont. 16 (2003) 128-134
38. Sadowsky S.J., and Caputo A.A. Stress transfer of four mandibular implant overdenture cantilever designs. J. Prosthet. Dent. 92 (2004) 328-336
39. Song W.Z., Yin W.Z., and Li M.H. Energy relieving effect of different thickness of mucosa beneath mandibular complete denture. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 39 (2004) 57-59
40. Yokoyama S., Wakabayashi N., Shiota M., and Ohyama T. Stress analysis in edentulous mandibular bone supporting implant-retained 1-piece or multiple superstructures. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 20 (2005) 578-583
41. Chao Y.L., Meijer H.J., van Oort R.P., and Versteegh P.A.M. The incomprehensible success of the implant stabilized overdenture in the edentulous mandible: a literature review on transfer of chewing forces to bone surrounding implants. Eur. J. Prosthodont. Res. Dent. 3 (1995) 255-261
42. Hobkirk J.A., and Schwab J. Mandibular deformation in subjects with osseointegrated implants. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 6 (1991) 319-328
43. Ochiai K.T., Willians B.H., Hojo S., Nishimura R., and Caputo A.A. Photoelastic analysis of the effect of palatal support on various implant-supported overdenture designs. J. Prosthet. Dent. 91 (2004) 421-427