Action Perception from a Common Coding Perspective

People Watching: Social, Perceptual, and Neurophysiological Studies of Body Perception

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages

  van der Wel, Robrecht P R D ^a   Sebanz, Natalie ^b,c   Knoblich, Günther ^b,c  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c CENTRAL EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Action perception; Auditory perception; Common coding; Embodied perception; Expertise; Ideomotor principle; Kinematics; Perception action coupling; Perceptual prediction; Simulation theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 84921259611     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195393705.003.0007     Document Type: Chapter

References (84)

1. Abernethy, B., & Zawi, K. (2007). Pick-up of essential kinematics underpins expert perception of movement patterns. Journal of Motor Behavior, 39, 353-367.
2. Abernethy, B., Zawi, K., & Jackson, R. C. (2008). Expertise and attunement to kinematic constraints. Perception, 37 (6), 931-948.
3. Aglioti, S. M., Cesari, P., Romani, M., & Urgesi, C. (2008). Action anticipation and motor resonance in elite basketball players. Nature Neuroscience, 11, 1109-1116.
4. Anderson, J. R., & Bower, G. H. (1973). Human associative memory. Washington, DC: Winston and Sons.
5. Behrmann, M., & Ewell, C. (2003). Expertise in tactile pattern recognition. Psychological Science, 14 (5), 480-486.
6. Blakemore, S. -J., & Decety, J. (2001). From the perception of action to the understanding of intention. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 2 (1), 561-567.
7. Blakemore, S. J., Wolpert, D. M., & Frith, C. D. (2002). Abnormalities in the awareness of action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6 (6), 237-242.
8. Calvo-Merino, B. (2013). Neural mechanisms for action observation. In K. L. Johnson & M. Shiffrar (Eds.), People watching: Social, perceptual, and neurophysiological studies of body perception (Chapter 16). New York: Oxford University Press.
9. Calvo-Merino, B., Glaser, D. E., Grezes, J., Passingham, R. E., & Haggard, P. (2005). Action observation and acquired motor skills: An fMRI study with expert dancers. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 1243-1249.
10. Calvo-Merino, B., Grèzes, J., Glaser, D. E., Passingham, R. E., & Haggard, P. (2006). Seeing or doing? Influence of visual and motor familiarity in action observation. Current Biology, 16, 1905-1910.
11. Cañal-Bruland, R., & Schmidt, M. (2009). Response bias in judging deceptive movements. Acta Psychologica, 130, 235-240.
12. Casile, A., & Giese, M. A. (2006). Non-visual motor learning influences the recognition of biological motion. Current Biology, 16 (1), 69-74.
13. Cross, E. S., Hamilton, A. F., & Grafton, S. T. (2006). Building a motor simulation de novo: Observation of dance by dancers. NeuroImage, 31 (3), 1257-1267.
14. Cross, E. S., Kraemer, D. J. M., Hamilton, A. F. D. C., Kelley, W. M., & Grafton, S. T. (2009). Sensitivity of the action observation network to physical and observational learning. Cerebral Cortex, 19 (2), 315-326.
15. Daprati, E., Wriessnegger, S., & Lacquaniti, F. (2007). Kinematic cues and recognition of self-generated actions. Experimental Brain Research, 177 (1), 31-44.
16. Decety, J., & Jeannerod, M. (1995). Mentally simulated movements in virtual reality: Does Fitts's law hold in motor imagery? Behavioural brain research, 72 (1-2), 127-134.
17. De'Sperati, C., & Viviani, P. (1997). The relationship between curvature and velocity in two-dimensional smooth pursuit eye movements. Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 3932-3945.
18. Deutsch, D., Kuyper, W. L., & Fisher, Y. (1987). The tritone paradox: Its presence and form of distribution in a general population. Music Perception, 5 (1), 79-92.
19. Dinstein, I., Thomas, C., Behrmann, M., & Heeger, D. J. (2008). A mirror up to nature. Current Biology, 18(1), R13-R18.
20. Dokic, J., & Proust, J. (2002). Simulation and knowledge of action. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
21. Ehrsson, H. H., Geyer, S., & Naito, E. (2003). Imagery of voluntary movement of fingers, toes, and tongue activates corresponding body-part-specific motor representations. Journal of Neurophysiology, 90 (5), 3304-3316.
22. Eskenazi, T., Grosjean, M., Humphreys, G. W., & Knoblich, G. (2009). The role of motor simulation in action perception: A neuropsychological case study. Psychological Research, 73, 477-485.
23. Eskenazi, T., Rotshtein, P., Grosjean, M., & Knoblich, G. (2012). The neural correlates of Fitts's law in action observation: An fMRI study. Social Neuroscience, 7, 30-41.
24. Fitts, P. M. (1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47 (6), 381-391.
25. Fitts, P. M., & Peterson, J. R. (1964). Information capacity of discrete motor responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67 (2), 103-112.
26. Flach, R., Knoblich, G., & Prinz, W. (2003). Off-line authorship effects in action perception. Brain and Cognition, 53, 503-513.
27. Flach, R., Knoblich, G., & Prinz, W. (2004). Recognizing one's own clapping: The role of temporal cues in self-recognition. Psychological Research, 69, 147-156.
28. Fourneret, P., & Jeannerod, M. (1998). Limited conscious monitoring of motor performance in normal subjects. Neuropsychologia, 36, 1133-1140.
29. Gallese, V., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., & Rizzolatti, G. (1996). Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain, 119, 593-609.
30. Gallese, V., & Metzinger, T. (2003). Motor ontology: The representational reality of goals, actions, and selves. Philosophical Psychology, 13 (3), 365-388.
31. Georgieff, N., & Jeannerod, M. (1998). Beyond consciousness of external reality: A "who" system for consciousness of action and self-consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition, 7 (3), 465-477.
32. Gibson, J. J. (1954). The visual perception on objective motion and subjective movement. Psychological Review, 61, 304-314.
33. Goldman, A. (2006). Simulating minds: The philosophy, psychology, and neuroscience of mindreading. New York: Oxford University Press.
34. Greenwald, A. G. (1970). Sensory feedback mechanisms in performance control: With special reference to the ideo-motor mechanism. Psychological Review, 77, 73-99.
35. Grosjean, M., Shiffrar, M., & Knoblich, G. (2007). Fitts' law holds in action perception. Psychological Science, 18 (2), 95-99.
36. Grush, R. (2004). The emulation theory if representation: Motor control, imagery, and perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 377-442.
37. Haggard, P. (2005). Conscious intention and motor cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9 (6), 290-295.
38. Harris, P. (1995). From simulation to folk psychology: The case of development. In M. Davies, & T. Stone (Eds.), Folk psychology (pp. 207-231). Oxford, UK: Blackwells.
39. Hecht, H., Vogt, S., & Prinz, W. (2001). Motor learning enhances perceptual judgment: A case for action-perception transfer. Psychological Research, 65, 3-14.
40. Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849-937.
41. Hubbard, T. L. (1995). Environmental invariants in the representation of motion: Implied dynamics and representational momentum, gravity, friction, and centripetal force. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 322-338.
42. Hubbard, T. L. (2005). Representational momentum and related displacements in spatial memory: A review of the findings. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 822-851.
43. Jacobs, A., Pinto, J., & Shiffrar, M. (2004). Experience, context, and the visual perception of human movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 822-835.
44. Jackson, R. C., Warren S., & Abernethy, B. (2006). Anticipation skill and susceptibility to deceptive movement. Acta Psychologica, 123 (3), 355-371.
45. James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology (2 vols.). New York: Holt.
46. Jeannerod, M. (2001). Neural simulation of action: A unifying mechanism for motor cognition. NeuroImage, 14, S103-S109.
47. Jeannerod, M. (2009). The sense of agency and its disturbances in schizophrenia: A reappraisal. Experimental Brain Research, 192 (3), 527-532.
48. Jeannerod, M., & Decety, J. (1995). Mental motor imagery: A window into the representational stages of action. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 5 (6), 727-732.
49. Kandel, S., Orliaguet, J.-P., & Boe, L.-J. (2000). Detecting anticipatory events in handwriting movements. Perception, 29, 953-964.
50. Kandel, S., Orliaguet, J.-P., & Viviani, P. (2000). Perceptual anticipation in handwriting: The role of implicit motor competence. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 706-716.
51. Kerzel, D., Jordan, J. S., & Muesseler, J. (2001). The role of perceptual anticipation in the localization of the final position of a moving target. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 829-840.
52. Kieras, D., & Meyer, D. E. (1997). An overview of the EPIC architecture for cognition and performance with application to human-computer interaction. Human-Computer Interaction, 12, 391-438.
53. Kladzky, R. L. (1975). Human memory: Structures and processes. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman & Co.
54. Knoblich, G. (2008). Bodily and motor contributions to action perception. In R. Klatzky, B. MacWhinney, & M. Behrmann (Eds.), Embodiment, ego-space, and action (pp. 43-76). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
55. Knoblich, G., & Flach, R. (2001). Predicting the effects of actions: Interactions of perception and action. Psychological Science, 12, 467-472.
56. Knoblich, G., & Repp, B. (2009). Inferring agency from sound. Cognition, 111, 248-262.
57. Knoblich, G., Seigerschmidt, E., Flach, R., & Prinz, W. (2002). Authorship effects in the prediction of handwriting strokes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A, 1027-1046.
58. Lacquaniti, F., Terzuolo, C., & Viviani, P. (1983). The law relating the kinematic and figural aspects of drawing movements. Acta Psychologica, 54, 115-130.
59. Loula, F., Prasad, S., Harber, K., & Shiffrar, M. (2005). Recognizing people from their movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 31, 210-220.
60. Marr, D. (1982). Vision. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.
61. Newell, A., Shaw, J. C., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Elements of a theory of human problem solving. Psychological Review, 23, 342-343.
62. Plamondon, R., & Alimi, A. M. (1997). Speed/accuracy trade-offs in target directed movements. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20, 279-349.
63. Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 129-154.
64. Repp, B. H., & Knoblich, G. (2007). Action can affect auditory perception. Psychological Science, 18, 6-7.
65. Repp, B. H., & Knoblich, G. (2009). Performed or observed keyboard actions affect pianists' judgements of relative pitch. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 2156-2170.
66. Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169-192.
67. Sato, A., & Yasuda, A. (2005). Illusion of self-agency: Discrepancy between the predicted and actual sensory consequences of actions modulates the sense of self-agency, but not the sense of self-ownership. Cognition, 94, 241-255.
68. Sebanz, N., & Shiffrar, M. (2009). Detecting deception in a bluffing body: The role of expertise. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 16 (1), 170-175.
69. Tsakiris, M., Prabhu, G., & Haggard, P. (2006). Having a body versus moving your body: How agency structures body-ownership. Consciousness and Cognition, 15 (2), 423-432.
70. van der Wel, R. P. R. D., Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (in press). The sense of agency during skill learning in individuals and dyads. Consciousness and Cognition.
71. van Elk, M., van Schie, H. T., Hunnius, S., Vesper, C., & Bekkering, H. (2008). You'll never crawl alone: Neurophysiological evidence for experience-dependent motor resonance in infancy. NeuroImage, 43 (4), 808-814.
72. Viviani, P. (2002). Motor competence in the perception of dynamic events. In W. Prinz, & B. Hommel (Eds.), Common mechanisms in perception and action: Attention and performance (Vol. 19, pp. 406-442). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
73. Viviani, P., Baud-Bovy, G., & Redolfi, M. (1997). Perceiving and tracking kinesthetic stimuli: Further evidence of motor-perceptual interactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1232-1252.
74. Viviani, P., Campadelli, P., & Mounoud, P. (1987). Visuo-manual pursuit tracking of human two-dimensional movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 62-78.
75. Viviani, P., & Mounoud, P. (1990). Perceptuomotor compatibility in pursuit tracking of two-dimensional movements. Journal of Motor Behavior, 22, 407-443.
76. Viviani, P., & Stucchi, N. (1989). The effect of movement velocity on form perception: Geometric illusions in dynamic displays. Perception & Psychophysics, 46, 266-274.
77. Viviani, P., & Stucchi, N. (1992). Biological movements look uniform: Evidence of motor-perceptual interactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 603-623.
78. Wegner, D. M. (2002). The illusion of conscious will. Cambridge, MA., MIT Press.
79. Wegner, D. M., Fuller, V. A., & Sparrow, B. (2003). Clever hands: Uncontrolled intelligence in facilitated communication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 5-19.
80. Wegner, D. M., & Wheatley, T. (1999). Apparent mental causation: Sources of the experience of will. American Psychologist, 54, 480-492.
81. Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 625-636.
82. Wilson, M., & Knoblich, G. (2005). The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 460-473.
83. Wolpert, D. M., Doya, K., & Kawato, M. (2003). A unifying computational framework for motor control and social interaction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 358, 593-602.
84. Wolpert, D. M., & Kawato, M. (1998). Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control. Neural Networks, 11, 1317-1329.