Predicting the effects of actions: Interactions of Perception and Action

Psychological Science

Volumn 12, Issue 6, 2001, Pages 467-472

  Knoblich, Günther ^a,b   Flach, Rüdiger ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUT FÜR PHYSIK   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; KINESTHESIA; LEARNING; MALE; ORIENTATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; RECALL; VIDEORECORDING; VISION;

ADULT; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; KINESTHESIS; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; ORIENTATION; PROBABILITY LEARNING; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; VIDEO RECORDING; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0035514138     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00387     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Adamson, L.B., & Bakeman, R. (1991). The development of shared attention during infancy. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Annals of child development (Vol. 8, pp. 1-41). London: Kingsley.
2. Anderson, J.R., & Lebiere, C. (1998). The atomic components of thought. Mahwah. NJ: Erlhaum.
3. Annett, J. (1995). Motor imagery: Perception or action? Neuropsychologia, 33, 1395-1417.
4. Ballard, D.H., Hayhoe, M.M., Pook, P.K., & Rao, R.P.N. (1997). Deictic codes for the embodiment of cognition. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 20, 723-767.
5. Barresi, J., & Moore, C. (1996). Intentional relations and social understanding. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 19, 107-154.
6. Beardsworth, T., & Buckner, T. (1981,). The ability to recognize oneself from a video recording of one's movements without seeing one's body. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 18, 19-22.
7. Butterworth, G. (1991). The ontogeny and phylogeny of joint visual attention. In A. Whiten (Ed.), Natural theories of mind: Evolution, development and simulation of everyday mindreading (pp. 223-232). Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.
8. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Decety, J. (1996). The neurophysiological basis of motor imagery. Behavioural Brain Research, 77, 45-52.
10. Decety, J., & Grèzes, J. (1999). Neural mechanisms subserving the perception of human actions. Trends In Cognitive Sciences, 3, 172-178.
11. Erdfelder, E., Faul, F., & Buchner, A. (1996). GPOWER: A general power analysis program. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 1-11.
12. Gallese, V., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., & Rizzolatti, G. (1996). Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain, 119, 593-609.
13. Gallese, V., & Goldman, A. (1998). Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mindreading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 493-501.
14. Gibson, J.J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
15. Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (in press). The theory of event coding: A framework for perception and action. Behavioral & Brain Sciences.
16. Iacoboni, M., Woods, R.P., Brass, M., Bekkering, H., Mazziotta, J.C., & Rizzolatti, G. (1999). Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. Science, 286, 2526-2528.
17. Jeannerod, M. (1994). The representing brain: Neural correlates of motor intention and imagery. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 17, 187-245.
18. Jeannerod, M. (1997). The cognitive neuroscience of action. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
19. Jeannerod, M. (1999). The 25th Bartlett Lecture: To act or not to act: Perspectives on the representation of actions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52A, 1-29.
20. Johansson, G. (1973). Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception & Psychophysics, 14, 201-211.
21. Kandel, S., Orliaguet, J.-P., & Viviani, P. (2000). Perceptual anticipation in handwriting: The role of implicit motor competence. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 706-716.
22. Kerzel, D., & Bekkering, H. (2000). Motor activation from visible speech: Evidence from stimulus response compatibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 634-647.
23. Knoblich, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). Recognition of self-generated actions from kinematic displays of drawing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 456-465.
24. Knoblich, G., Seigerschmidt, E., & Prinz, W. (2000). Anticipation of forthcoming strokes from self- and other-generated kinematic displays. Manuscript submitted for publication.
25. Lacquaniti, F., Terzuolo, C., & Viviani, P. (1983). The law relating the kinematic and figural aspects of drawing movements. Acta Psychologica, 54, 115-130.
26. Liberman, A.M., &, Mattingly, I.G. (1985). The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition, 21, 1-36.
27. Liberman, A.M.., & Whalen, D.H. (2000). On the relation of speech to language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 187-196.
28. Macmillan, N.A., & Creelman, C.D. (1991). Detection theory: A user's guide. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
29. Marr, D. (1982). Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.
30. Meyer, D.E., & Kieras, D.E. (1997). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: I. Basic mechanisms. Psychological Review, 104, 3-65.
31. Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 129-154.
32. Repp, B.H. (1987). The sound of two hands clapping: An exploratory study. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 81, 1100-1109.
33. Rizzolatti, G., & Arbib, M. (1998). Language within our grasp. Trends in Neurosciences, 21, 188-194.
34. Viviani, P., & Stucchi, N. (1989). The effect of movement velocity on form perception: Geometric illusions in dynamic displays. Perception & Psychophysics, 46, 266-274.
35. Viviani, P., & Stucchi, N. (1992). Biological movements look uniform: Evidence of motor-perceptual interactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 603-623.
36. Wohlschlaeger, A., & Wohlschlaeger, A. (1998). Mental and manual rotation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 397-412.