Supporting public involvement in research design and grant development: A case study of a public involvement award scheme managed by a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Research Design Service (RDS)

Health Expectations

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 1481-1493

  Boote, Jonathan D ^a   Twiddy, Maureen ^a   Baird, Wendy ^a   Birks, Yvonne ^a   Clarke, Clare ^a   Beever, Daniel ^a  

^a National Institute for Health Research ^*  (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Grant development; Public involvement; Research design; Support and resources

Indexed keywords

CONSUMER; COOPERATION; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; GREAT BRITAIN; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; PERSONNEL; PROCEDURES; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; PROGRAM EVALUATION;

CONSUMER PARTICIPATION; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; FINANCING, ORGANIZED; GREAT BRITAIN; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; PROGRAM EVALUATION; RESEARCH PERSONNEL; RESEARCH SUPPORT AS TOPIC;

EID: 84942296797     PISSN: 13696513     EISSN: 13697625     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/hex.12130     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. National Institutes of Health Director's Council of Public Representatives. Available at: http://www.copr.nih.gov/About COPR.SHTM, accessed 7 June 2012.
2. Consumers' Health Forum of Australia. History. Available at: https://www.chf.org.au/history.php, accessed 7 June 2012.
3. Department of Health. Research Governance Framework for Health and Social Care, 2nd edn. London: Department of Health, 2005.
4. National Institute for Health Research. Patients and public. Available at: http://www.crncc.nihr.ac.uk/ppi, accessed 7 June 2012.
5. Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Citizen Engagement Framework. Available at: http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/41753.html, accessed 7 June 2012.
6. INVOLVE. What you need to know about payment. March 2011. Available at: http://www.invo.org.uk/wpcontent/uploads/2011/06/INVOLVEpaymentdocument2011.pdf, accessed 7 June 2012.
7. Rickard W, Purtell R. Finding a way to pay in the UK: methods and mechanisms for paying service users involved in research. Disability & Society, 2011; 26: 1, 33-48.
8. Boote J, Baird W, Beecroft C. Public involvement at the design stage of primary health research: a narrative review of case examples. Health Policy, 2010; 95: 10-23.
9. Staniszewska S, Jones N, Newburn M, Marshall S. User involvement in the development of research bid: barriers, enablers and impacts. Health Expectations, 2007; 10: 173-183.
10. Boote J, Baird W, Sutton A. Public involvement in the design and conduct of clinical trials: a review. The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, 2011; 5: 91-111.
11. Boote J, Baird W, Sutton A. Public involvement in the systematic review process in health and social care: a narrative review of case examples. Health Policy, 2010; 102: 105-116.
12. Iliffe S, McGrath T, Mitchell D. The impact of patient and public involvement in the work of the Dementias & Neurodegenerative Diseases Research Network (DeNDRoN): case studies. Health Expectations, 2011; doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00728.x [Epub ahead of print].
13. NIHR Research Design Service. Available at: http://www.nihr.ac.uk/infrastructure/Pages/infrastructure research design services.aspx, accessed 7 June 2012.
14. Green G, Rein M. Building research capital to facilitate research. Health Research Policy and Systems, 2013; 11: 12.
15. Research Design Service. Available at: http://www.invo.org.uk/find-out-more/information-about-research-commissioning/research-design-services-information/, accessed 7 June 2012
16. Carter P, Beech R, Coxen D, Thomas MJ, Jinks C. Mobilising the experiential knowledge of clinicians, patients and carers for applied health-care research. Contemporary Social Science Published online: 12th March 2013. doi: 10.1080/21582041.2013.767468 [Epub ahead of print].
17. Ali K, Roffe C, Crome P. What patients want: consumer involvement in the design of a randomised controlled trial of routine oxygen supplementation after acute stroke. Stroke, 2006; 37: 865-871.
18. Corneli AL, Piwoz EG, Bentley ME et al. Involving communities in the design of clinical trial protocols: the BAN Study in Lilongwe, Malawi. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 2007; 28: 59-67.
19. Guarino P, Elbourne D, Carpenter J, Peduzzi P. Consumer involvement in consent document development: a multicenter cluster randomized trial to assess study participants' understanding. Clinical Trials, 2006; 3: 19-30.
20. Marsden J, Bradburn J. Patient and clinician collaboration in the design of a national randomized breast cancer trial. Health Expectations, 2004; 7: 6-17.
21. Morris MC, Nadkarni VM, Ward FR, Nelson RM. Exception from informed consent for pediatric resuscitation research: community consultation for a trial of brain cooling after in-hospital cardiac arrest. Pediatrics, 2004; 114: 776-781.
22. Koops L, Lindley RI. Thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke: consumer involvement in design of new randomised controlled trial. British Medical Journal, 2002; 325: 415-417.
23. Edwards V, Wyatt K, Logan S, Britten N. Consulting parents about the design of a randomised controlled trial of osteopathy for children with cerebral palsy. Health Expectations, 2011; 14: 429-438.
24. NIHR Clinical Research Network Portfolio. Available at: http://www.crncc.nihr.ac.uk/about_us/processes/portfolio, accessed 7 June 2012.
25. NIHR RDS YH Public Involvement in Grant Applications Funding Award. Available at: http://www.rds-yh.nihr.ac.uk/rdsyh-public-involvement-in-grant-applications-funding-award.aspx, accessed 7 June 2012
26. NIHR RDS YH Patient and Public Involvement Forum. Available at: http://www.rds-yh.nihr.ac.uk/patient-and-public-involvement/ppi-forum.aspx, accessed 7 June 2012.
27. NIHR Research for Patient Benefit. Available at: http://www.ccf.nihr.ac.uk/RfPB/Pages/Home.aspx/, accessed 7 June 2012.
28. NIHR Programme Grants for Applied Research Available at: http://www.ccf.nihr.ac.uk/PGfAR/Pages/Home.aspx/, accessed 7 June 2012.
29. Julious S, Lai J, Boote J, Elphick H, Smithson H. A report of a Patient and Public Involvement Consultation Event with Children with Asthma and their Parents to Review a Proposal for a Primary Care Intervention around the September School Return. School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR). University of Sheffield. ScHARR, University of Sheffield. ScHARR Report Series No: 25.(2011) ISBSN 1 900752.
30. NIHR HTA Clinical Evaluation and Trials. Available at: http://www.hta.ac.uk/Funding/clinicaltrials/index.shtml, accessed 7 June 2012.
31. MRC Developmental Pathway Funding Scheme. Available at: http://www.mrc.ac.uk/Fundingopportunities/Grants/DPFS/index.htm, accessed 7 June 2012.
32. NIHR Invention for Innovation Stage 2. Available at: http://www.ccf.nihr.ac.uk/i4i/Pages/Home.aspx/, accessed 7 June 2012.
33. Tiernan J, Hind D, Bradburn M, Wailoo A, Watson A, Brown B. A report of a patient and public involvement consultation event with patients who have undergone rubber band ligation or haemorrhoidal artery ligation to review a proposed randomised controlled trial. Available at: http://www.rds-yh.nihr.ac.uk/rdsyh-public-involvement-in-grant-applications-funding-award.aspx, accessed 7 June 2012.
34. Littlewood C, Ashton J, Scott E, Mawson S, May S, Walters S. Developing the SELF study: a focus group with patients and the public. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 2013; 20: 200-206.
35. Purtell R, Wyatt K. Measuring something real and useful in consumer involvement in health and social care research. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 2011; 35: 605-608.
36. Boote J, Dalgleish M, Freeman J, Jones Z, Miles M, Rodgers H. "But is it a question worth asking?" A reflective case study describing how public involvement can lead to researchers' ideas being abandoned. Health Expectations, 2012; doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00771.x [Epub ahead of print].