Can research development bursaries for patient and public involvement have a positive impact on grant applications? A UK-based, small-scale service evaluation

Health Expectations

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 1474-1480

  Walker, Dawn Marie ^a   Pandya Wood, Raksha ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b DE MONTFORT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Award; Grant; Impact; Involvement; Research design

Indexed keywords

ECONOMICS; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; GREAT BRITAIN; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; MEDICAL EDUCATION; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PROCEDURES; PROGRAM EVALUATION;

FELLOWSHIPS AND SCHOLARSHIPS; GREAT BRITAIN; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PROGRAM EVALUATION; RESEARCH SUPPORT AS TOPIC;

EID: 84942295168     PISSN: 13696513     EISSN: 13697625     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/hex.12127     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. World Health Organisation. Primary Health Care. Geneva: World Health Organisation, 1978.
2. Boote J, Telford R, Cooper C. Consumer involvement in health research: a review and research agenda. Health Policy, 2002; 61: 213-236.
3. INVOLVE. What You Need To Know About Payment: An Introductory Guide for Members of the Public Who are Considering Active Involvement in NHS, Public Health or Social Care Research. Eastleigh: INVOLVE, 2011.
4. Chalmers I. What do I want from health research and researchers when I am a patient? BMJ, 1995; 310: 1315-1318.
5. National Institute for Health Research. Patient and Public Awareness 2012. Available at: www.nihr.ac.uk/awareness/Pages/default.aspx, accessed 3 October 12.
6. Staley K. Exploring Impact: Public Involvement in the NHS, Public Health and Social Care. Eastleigh: INVOLVE, 2009.
7. Entwistle VA, Renfrew MJ, Yearley S, Forrester J, Lamont T. Lay perspectives: advantages for health research. BMJ, 1998; 316: 463-466.
8. Oliver SR. How can health service users contribute to the NHS research and development programme? BMJ, 1995; 310: 1318-1320.
9. Goodare H, Smith R. The rights of patients in research. BMJ, 1995; 310: 1277-1278.
10. Minogue V, Boness J, Brown A, Girdlestone J. The impact of service user involvement in research. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 2005; 18: 103-112.
11. Oliver SR, Rees RW, Clarke-Jones L et al. A multidimensional conceptual framework for analysing public involvement in health services research. Health Expectations, 2008; 11: 72-84.
12. Barber R, Boote JD, Parry JD, Cooper CL, Yeeles P, Cook S. Can the impact of public involvement on research be evaluated? A mixed methods study Health Expectations, 2011; 15: 229-241.
13. Brett J, Staniszewska S, Mockford C, Seers K, Herron-Marx S, Bayliss H. The PIRICOM Study: A Systematic Review of the Conceptualisation, Measurement, Impact and Outcomes of Patients and Public Involvement in Health and Social Care Research. London: UKCRC, 2010.
14. Staniszewska S, Adebajo A, Barber R et al. Developing the evidence base of patient and public involvement in health and social care research: the case for measuring impact. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 2011; 35: 628-632.
15. Staniszewska S, Brett J, Mockford C, Barber R. The GRIPP Checklist: Strengthening the quality of patient and public involvement in research. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2011; 27: 391-399.
16. Mockford C, Staniszewska S, Griffiths F, Herron-Marx S. The impact of patient and public involvement on UK NHS health care: a systematic review. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 2012; 24: 28-38.
17. O'Donnell M, Entwistle V. Consumer involvement in research projects: the activities of research funders. Health Policy, 2004; 69: 229-238.
18. Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman A, Burgess RG (eds) Analyzing Qualitative Data. London: Sage, 1994; 173-194.
19. Herbert DL, Barnett AG, Graves N. Funding: Australia's grant system wastes time. Nature, 2013; 495: 314.