The impact of patient and public involvement on UK NHS health care: A systematic review

International Journal for Quality in Health Care

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 28-38

  Mockford, Carole ^a   Staniszewska, Sophie ^a   Griffiths, Frances ^b   Herron Marx, Sandra ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

^c Institute for Clean Growth and Future Mobility   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Evidence base; Health policy; Impact; Patient and public involvement; Primary care general practice; Public health

Indexed keywords

CAREGIVER; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH ECONOMICS; HEALTH PROMOTION; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; MEDLINE; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICE; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; ONLINE SYSTEM; PATIENT AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC HEALTH; QUALITY CONTROL; QUESTIONNAIRE; REVIEW; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; THEORETICAL STUDY; UNITED KINGDOM;

ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CONSUMER PARTICIPATION; GREAT BRITAIN; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HEALTH SERVICES ADMINISTRATION; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; STATE MEDICINE;

EID: 84855871355     PISSN: 13534505     EISSN: 14643677     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzr066     Document Type: Review

References (36)

1. Department of Health. NHS Constitution. London: DH, 2009.
2. Department of Health. Equity and Excellence. Liberating the NHS. London: DH, 2010.
3. Department of Health. The New NHS: Modern, Dependable. London: DH, 1997.
4. Boote J, Telford R, Cooper C. Consumer involvement in health research: a review and research agenda. Health Policy 2002;61:213-36.
5. Oliver SR, Rees RW, Clarke-Jones L et al. A multidimensional conceptual framework for analysing public involvement in health services research. Health Expect 2008;11:72-84.
6. Sitzia J, Cotterell P, Richardson A. Formative Evaluation of the Cancer Partnership Project. London: Macmillan Cancer Relief, 2004.
7. Harrison S, Dowsell G, Milewa T. Guest editorial: public and user 'involvement' in the UK National Health Service. Health Social Care Commun 2002;10:63-6.
8. Crawford MJ, Aldridge T, Bhui K et al. User involvement in the planning and delivery of mental health services: a crosssectional survey of service users and providers. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2003;107:410-4.
9. Crawford M, Rutter D, Manley C et al. Systematic review of involving patients in the planning and development of health care. BMJ 2002;325:1263-7.
10. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP). Public Health Resource Unit, 4150 Chancellor Court, Oxford Business Park South, Oxford OX4 2GX England, 2006.
11. Anderson W, Florin D. Patient and public involvement in primary care groups and trusts. City and Hackney case study. Draft report. King's Fund Primary Care Programme, 2001a.
12. Cotterell P, Sitzia J, Richardson A. Evaluating partnerships with cancer patients. Pract Nurs 2004;15:430-5.
13. Perkins R, Goddard K. Reality out of the rhetoric: increasing user involvement in a mental health trust. Mental Health Rev 2004;9:21-4.
14. Milewa T, Harrison S, Ahmad W et al. Citizen's participation in primary healthcare planning: innovative citizenship practice in empirical perspective. Crit Public Health 2002;12:39-53.
15. Murie J, Douglas-Scott G. Developing an evidence base for patient and public involvement. Clin Governance 2004;9:147-54.
16. Richardson A, Sitzia J, Cotterell P. 'Working the system'. Achieving change through partnership working: an evaluation of cancer partnership groups. Health Expect 2005;8:210-20.
17. Challans E. How can users be involved in service improvement in health and social care and why is this important? J Integr Care pathways 2006;10:49-58.
18. Berry SH (ed). Kingston Hospital and Kingston Primary Care Patient and Public Involvement Forums-The Legacy of Their Work. No 11 Publishing, Surrey, 2008.
19. Mountford L, Anderson W. Patient and public involvement in primary care groups and trusts. Central Croydon case study. Draft report. King's Fund Primary Care Programme, 2001.
20. Peck E, Gulliver P, Towel D. Information, consultation or control: user involvement in mental health services in England at the turn of the century. J Mental Health 2002;11:441-51.
21. Moore J. Survey of service user involvement in clinical audit. Clin Governance 2008;13,3:192-9.
22. Crowley P, Green J, Freake D et al. Primary care trusts involving the community: is community development the way forward? J Manag Med 2002;16:311-22.
23. Pickles J, Hide E, Maher L. Experience based design: a practical method of working with patients to redesign services. Clin Governance 2008;13:51-8.
24. Dearden-Phillips C, Fountain R. Real power: an examination of the involvement of people with learning difficulties in strategic services development in Cambridgeshire. Br J Learn Disabil 2005;33:200-4.
25. Fudge N, Wolfe CDA, McKevitt C. Assessing the promise of user involvement in health service development: ethnographic study. BMJ 2008;336:313-7.
26. Anderson W, Florin D. Patient and public involvement in primary care groups and trusts. Harrow East and Kingsbury case study. Draft report. King's Fund Primary Care Programme, 2001b.
27. Robert G, Hardacre J, Locock L et al. Redesigning mental health services: lessons on user involvement from the Mental Health Collaborative. Health Expect 2003;6:60-71.
28. Carney L, Jones L, Braddon F et al. A colorectal cancer patient focus group develops an information package. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2006;88:447-9.
29. Stewart R, Oliver S. An Example from Newborn Screening in Coren, E. Collection of Examples of Service User and Carer Participation in Systematic Reviews. London: Social Care Institute for Excellence, 2007.
30. Ripley M, Sullivan D, Evans J. The role of patient users in cancer genetic services in primary care. Fam Cancer 2007;6:241-8.
31. Anderson W, Florin D. Patient and public involvement in primary care groups and trusts. Dagenham case study. Draft report. King's Fund Primary Care Programme, 2001c.
32. Challans E. Patient involvement in clinical audit at a primary care trust. J Commun Healthcare 2008;2:218-47.
33. South J. Rising to the challenge: a study of patient and public involvement in four primary care trusts. Primary Health Care Res Dev 2004;5:125-34.
34. Alborz A. Are primary care groups and trusts consulting local communities? Health Social Care Commun 2002;10:20-7.
35. Staniszewska S, Adejabo A, Barber R et al. Developing the evidence base of patient and public involvement in health and social care research: the case for measuring impact. Int J Consumer Stud 2011;35:628-32.
36. Staniszewska S, Brett J, Mockford C et al. The GRIPP checklist: strengthening the quality of patient and public involvement reporting in research. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2011;27:391-9.