Erratum to A Meta-Analysis of Writing Instruction for Students in the Elementary Grades [Journal of Educational Psychology, (2012)] DOI: 10.1037/a0029185;A meta-analysis of writing instruction for students in the elementary grades

Journal of Educational Psychology

Volumn 104, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 879-896

  Graham, Steve ^a   McKeown, Debra ^b   Kiuhara, Sharlene ^c   Harris, Karen R ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Westminster College   (United States)

Author keywords

Composition; Elementary grades; Instruction; Meta analysis; Writing

Indexed keywords

EID: 84874447508     PISSN: 00220663     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0029939     Document Type: Erratum

References (138)

1. Alexander, P. (1997). Mapping the multidimensional nature of domain learning: The interplay of cognitive, motivational, and strategic forces. In M. L. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 10, pp. 213-250). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
2. Anderson, A. A. (1997). The effects of sociocognitive writing strategy instruction on the writing achievement and writing self-efficacy of students with disabilities and typical achievement in an urban elementary school (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Houston, Houston, TX.
3. Bangert-Drowns, R. L. (1993). The word processor as an instructional tool: A meta-analysis of word processing in writing instruction. Review of Educational Research, 63, 69-93.
4. Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Hurley, M. M., & Wilkinson, B. (2004). The effects of school-based writing-to-learn interventions on academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 74, 29-58. doi:10.3102/00346543074001029
5. Berninger, V. W., Rutbert, J. E., Abbott, R. D., Garcia, N., Anderson-Youngstrom, M., Brooks, A., & Fulton, C. (2006). Tier 1 and Tier 2 early intervention for handwriting and composing. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 3-30. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2005.12.003
6. Berninger, V. W., Vaughan, K., Abbott, R. D., Begay, K., Coleman, K. B., Curtain, G., . . . Graham, S. (2002). Teaching spelling and composition alone and together: Implications for the simple view of writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 291-304. doi:10.1037/ 0022-0663.94.2.291
7. Brunstein, J. C., & Glaser, C. (2011). Testing a path-analytic mediation model of how self-regulated writing strategies improve fourth graders' composition skills: A randomized control trial. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 922-938. doi:10.1037/a0024622
8. Bui, Y. N., Schumaker, J. B., & Deshler, D. D. (2006). The effects of strategic writing program for students with and without learning disabilities in inclusive fifth-grade classes. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 21, 244-260. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2006.00221.x
9. Carr, E., Bigler, M., & Morningstar, C. (1991). The effects of the CVS strategy on children's learning. In J. Zutell, S. McCormick, L. L. A. Caton, & P. O'Keefe (Eds.), Learning factors/teacher factors: Issues in literacy research and instruction (pp. 193-200). Oak Creek, WI: National Reading Conference.
10. Cheever, M. S. (1987). The effects of using a word processor on the acquisition of composition skills by the elementary student (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
11. Clippard, D., & Nicaise, M. (1998). Efficacy of writers' workshop for students with significant writing deficits. Journal of Research in Child-hood Education, 13, 7-26. doi:10.1080/02568549809594723
12. Collopy, R. M. B. (2008). Professional development and student growth in writing. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 23, 163-178. doi:10.1080/02568540809594653
13. Cortina, J. M., & Nouri, H. (2000). Effect size for ANOVA designs. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14. Croes, M. J. (1990). The efficacy of employing a writing process approach for the instruction of language arts with learning disabled elementary students (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Baylor University, Waco, TX.
15. Crowhurst, M. (1991). Interrelationships between reading and writing persuasive discourse. Research in the Teaching of English, 25, 314-338.
16. Curry, K. A. (1997). A comparison of the writing products of students with learning disabilities in inclusive and resource room settings using different writing instruction approaches (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL
17. Doan, N. K. (2008). The effects of the Internet on students' essay scores (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Virginia, Charlottes-ville.
18. Dougans, J. Y. (1993). Teaching writing to fifth-grade children: The process/conference approach versus the traditional method (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.
19. Dybdahl, C. S., Shaw, D. G., & Blahous, E. (1997). The impact of the computer on writing: No simple answers. Computers in the Schools, 13, 41-53. doi:10.1300/J025v13n03_05
20. Eads, V. A. (1989). A study of the effects of teacher training in writing on students' writing abilities (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Baylor University, Waco, TX.
21. Englert, C. S., Raphael, T. E., Anderson, L. M., Anthony, H. M., & Stevens, D. D. (1991). Making strategies and self-talk visible: Writing instruction in regular and special education classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 337-372.
22. Englert, C. S., Zhao, Y., Dunsmore, K., Collings, N. Y., & Wolbers, K. (2007). Scaffolding the writing of students with disabilities through procedural facilitation: Using an Internet-based technology to improve performance. Learning Disability Quarterly, 30, 9-29. doi:10.2307/ 30035513
23. Ferretti, R. P., Lewis, W. E., & Andrews-Weckerly, S. (2009). Do goals affect the structure of students' argumentative writing strategies? Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 577-589. doi:10.1037/a0014702
24. Ferretti, R. P., MacArthur, C. A., & Dowdy, N. S. (2000). The effects of an elaborated goal on the persuasive writing of students with learning disabilities and their normally achieving peers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 694-702. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.92.4.694
25. Fisher, C. W., & Hiebert, E. H. (1990). Characteristics of tasks in two approaches to literacy instruction. Elementary School Journal, 91, 3-18. doi:10.1086/461634
26. Fitzgerald, J., & Markham, L. R. (1987). Teaching children about revision in writing. Cognition and Instruction, 4, 3-24. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci0401_1
27. Fitzgerald, J., & Shanahan, T. (2000). Reading and writing relations and their development. Educational Psychologist, 35, 39-50.
28. Fitzgerald, J., & Teasley, A. B. (1986). Effects of instruction in narrative structure on children's writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 424-432. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.78.6.424
29. Fleury, B. N. (1988). Cumulative editing writing instruction: Implications for staff development (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff.
30. Fortner, V. L. (1986). Generalization of creative productive-thinking training to LD students' written expression. Learning Disability Quarterly, 9, 274-284. doi:10.2307/1510381
31. Gambrell, L. B., & Chasen, S. P. (1991). Explicit story structure instruc-tion and the narrative writing of fourth-and fifth-grade below-average readers. Reading Research and Instruction, 31, 54-62. doi:10.1080/19388079109558071
32. Gilbert, J., & Graham, S. (2010). Teaching writing to elementary students in Grades 4-6: A national survey. Elementary School Journal, 110, 494-518. doi:10.1086/651193
33. Ginn, P. V., Keel, M. C., & Fredrick, L. D. (2002). Using "reasoning and writing" with gifted fifth-grade students. Journal of Direct Instruction, 2, 41-47.
34. Glaser, C., & Brunstein, J. C. (2007). Improving fourth-grade students' composition skills: Effects of strategy instruction and self-regulation procedures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 297-310. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.297
35. Glaser, C., Budde, S., & Brunstein, J. C. (2011). Improving writing competence in fourth-grade classrooms: Effects of a teacher-implemented self-regulated writing program on students' strategy-related knowledge, planning skills, and writing performance. Manu-script submitted for publication.
36. Goldberg, A., Russell, M., & Cook, A. (2003). The effect of computers on student writing: A meta-analysis of studies from 1992 to 2002. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 2. Retrieved from http://escholarship.bc.edu/jtla/vol2/1/
37. Gomez, R., Jr., Parker, R., Lara-Alecio, R., & Gomez, L. (1996). Process versus product writing with limited English proficient students. Bilingual Research Journal, 20, 209-233.
38. Gordon, C. J., & Braun, C. (1986). Mental processes in reading and writing: A critical look at self-reports as supportive data. Journal of Educational Research, 79, 292-301.
39. Graham, S. (2006a). Strategy instruction and the teaching of writing: A meta-analysis. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 187-207). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
40. Graham, S. (2006b). Writing. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 457-478). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
41. Graham, S. (in press). Writing: Grades 3 to 5. In L. Morrow, T. Shanahan, T. K. Wixson (Eds.), Teaching with the common core standards for English language arts: What educators need to know. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
42. Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2003). Students with learning disabilities and the process of writing: A meta-analysis of SRSD studies. In L. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning disabilities (pp. 323-344). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
43. Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2005, February). The impact of handwriting and spelling instruction on the writing and reading performance of at-risk first grade writers. Paper presented at the Pacific Coast Research Conference, San Diego, CA.
44. Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2006, February). The effects of goal setting in revising on the revising behavior and story writing of fourth grade struggling writers. Presentation at the Pacific Coast Research Conference, San Diego, CA.
45. Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Chorzempa, B. F. (2002). Contribution of spelling instruction to the spelling, writing, and reading of poor spellers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 669-686. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.94.4.669
46. Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Fink, B. (2000). Is handwriting causally related to learning to write? Treatment of handwriting problems in beginning writers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 620-633. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.92.4.620
47. Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Mason, L. (2005). Improving the writing performance, knowledge, and self-efficacy of struggling young writers: The effects of self-regulated strategy development. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 207-241. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004 .08.001
48. Graham, S., & Hebert, M. (2010). Writing to reading: Evidence for how writing can improve reading. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellence in Education.
49. Graham, S., Hebert, M., & Harris, K. (2011). Throw 'em out or make 'em better? State and district high-stakes writing assessments. Focus on Exceptional Children, 44(1), 1-12.
50. Graham, S., MacArthur, C., & Schwartz, S. (1995). Effects of goal setting and procedural facilitation on the revising behavior and writing performance of students with writing and learning problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 230-240. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.87.2.230
51. Graham, S., & Perrin, D. (2007a). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 445-476. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.445
52. Graham, S., & Perrin, D. (2007b). What we know, what we still need to know: Teaching adolescents to write. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 313-335. doi:10.1080/10888430701530664
53. Graham, S., & Perrin, D. (2007c). Writing next: Effective strategies to improve writing of adolescents in middle and high schools. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellence in Education.
54. Graham, S., & Sandmel, K. (2011). The process writing approach: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Research, 104, 396-407. doi: 10.1080/00220671.2010.488703
55. Green, L. C. (1991). The effects of word processing and a process approach to writing on the reading and writing achievement, revision and editing strategies, and attitudes toward writing of third-grade Mexican-American students (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Texas at Austin, Austin.
56. Grejda, G. H., & Hannafin, M. J. (1992). Effects of word processing on sixth graders' holistic writing and revisions. Journal of Education Research, 85, 144-149. doi:10.1080/00220671.1992.9944430
57. Guastello, E. F. (2001). Parents as partners: Improving children's writing. In W. M. Linek, E. G. Sturtevant, J. A. R. Dugan, & P. E. Linder (Eds.), Celebrating the voices of literacy: Yearbook of the College Reading Association (pp. 279-295). Readyville, TN: College Reading Association
58. Hamilton, A. C. (1992). Performance assessment of personal correspondence on the development of written language use and functions in traditional and process writing second-grade classrooms (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Alabama at Birmingham.
59. Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (1996). Making the writing process work: Strategies for composition and self-regulation (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
60. Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (2004, February). The effects of teacher-led SRSD instruction on the writing performance of struggling writers. Paper presented at the Pacific Coast Research Conference, San Diego, CA.
61. Harris, K. R., Graham, S., & Mason, L. H. (2006). Improving the writing knowledge and motivation of struggling young writers: Effects of self-regulated strategy development with and without peer support. American Educational Research Journal, 43, 295-340. doi:10.3102/ 00028312043002295
62. Harris, K. R., Lane, K., Driscoll, S., Graham, S., Wilson, K., & Sandmel, K. (2011). Teacher-implemented class-wide writing intervention using self-regulated strategy development for students with and without behavior concerns: A randomized controlled trial. Manuscript submitted for publication.
63. Hedges, L. V., & Hedberg, E. C. (2007). Intraclass correlation values for planning group-randomized trials in education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 29, 60-87. doi:10.3102/0162373707299706
64. Hillocks, G., Jr. (1986). Research on written composition: New directions for teaching. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
65. Holliway, D. R. (2004). Through the eyes of my reader: A strategy for improving audience perspective in children's descriptive writing. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 18, 334-349. doi:10.1080/ 02568540409595045
66. Jampole, E. S., Konopak, B. C., Readence, J. E., & Moser, E. B. (1991). Using mental imagery to enhance gifted elementary students' creative writing. Reading Psychology, 12, 183-197. doi:10.1080/ 0270271910120301
67. Jampole, E. S., Mathews, F. N., & Konopak, B. C. (1994). Academically gifted students' use of imagery for creative writing. Journal of Creative Behavior, 28, 1-15. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.1994.tb00715.x
68. Jones, D. (2004). Automaticity of the transcription process in the production of written text (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Queensland, Australia.
69. Jones, D., & Christensen, C. A. (1999). Relationship between automaticity in handwriting and students' ability to generate written text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 44-49. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.91.1.44
70. Kaminski, R. F. (1994). Impact of writing instruction on fourth-grade students' responses to children's literature (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
71. Kelley, K. R. (1984). The effect of writing instruction on reading comprehension and story writing ability (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
72. Kerchner, L. B., & Kistinger, B. J. (1984). Language processing/word processing: Written expression, computers and learning disabled students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 7, 329-335. doi:10.2307/1510232
73. Kirby, C. (1987). The use of language experience activities in teaching writing to elementary students of limited English proficiency (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of South Florida, Tampa.
74. Klesius, J. P., Griffith, P. L., & Zielonka, P. (1991). A whole language and traditional instruction comparison: Overall effectiveness and development of the alphabetic principle. Reading Research and Instruction, 30, 47-61. doi:10.1080/19388079109558041
75. Kozlow, M., & Bellamy, P. (2004). Experimental study on the impact of the 6+1.H110011 Trait writing model on student achievement in writing. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.
76. Kurtz, H. (1987). Effects of specific strategy training on the written expression of learning disabled students Grades 3-6 (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 8825160)
77. Lane, K., Harris, K. R., Graham, S., Driscoll, S., Sandmel, K., Morphy, P., . . . House, E. (in press). The effects of self-regulated strategy development for second grade students with writing and behavioral difficulties: A randomized control trial. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness.
78. Lanter, S., Braganca, R., & Rukavina, I. (1987). Writing with microcomputers in the elementary grades: Process, roles, attitudes, and products. Toronto, Canada: Ontario Department of Education.
79. Lipsey, M. W, & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
80. Loader, L. M. (1989). The effects of the semantic organizer on writing ability and motivation with fourth grade students (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Connecticut, Storrs.
81. MacArthur, C. A., Graham, S., Schwartz, S. S., & Schafer, W. D. (1995). Evaluation of a writing instruction model that integrated a process approach, strategy instruction, and word processing. Learning Disability Quarterly, 18, 278-291. doi:10.2307/1511234
82. MacArthur, C. A., Schwartz, S. S., & Graham, S. (1991). Effects of reciprocal peer revision strategy in special education classrooms. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 6, 201-210.
83. McNulty, D. M. (1980). An examination of the quality of fourth grade children's creative writing resulting from three approaches of motivation involving stimulus, questioning, and verbal interaction (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Iowa, Iowa City.
84. Meyer, E., Abrami, P. C., Wade, C. A., Aslan, O., & Deault, L. (2010). Improving literacy and metacognition with electronic portfolios: Teaching and learning with ePearl. Computers & Education, 55, 84-91. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.12.005
85. Midgette, E., Haria, P., & MacArthur, C. (2008). The effects of content and audience awareness goals for revision on the persuasive essays of fifth- and eighth-grade students. Reading and Writing, 21, 131-151. doi:10.1007/s11145-007-9067-9
86. Minns, G. (1989). Effects of a video program on the writing of second grade students (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.
87. Moore, B. H., & Caldwell, H. (1993). Drama and drawing for narrative writing in primary grades. Journal of Educational Research, 87, 100-110. doi:10.1080/00220671.1993.9941173
88. Moore, M. A., & Turner, S. (1988). Evaluating the use of word processors in teaching writing composition. Florida Journal of Educational Re-search, 30, 73-82.
89. Morphy, P., & Graham, S. (2012). Word processing programs and weaker writers/readers: A meta-analysis of research findings. Reading and Writing, 25, 641-678. doi:10.1007/s11145-010-9292-5
90. National Governors Association & Council of Chief School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards. Retrieved from http:// www.corestandards.org
91. Norris, E. A., Reichard, C., & Mokhtari, K. (1997). The influence of drawing on third graders' writing performance. Reading Horizons, 38, 13-30.
92. Olson, V. B. (1990). The revising processes of sixth-grade writers with and without peer feedback. Journal of Educational Research, 84, 22-29.
93. Owston, R. D., & Wideman, H. H. (1997). Word processors and children's writing in a high-computer-access setting. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 30, 202-220
94. Pantier, T. F. (1999). A comparison of writing performance of fifth grade students using the process writing approach and the Shurley Method (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Oklahoma State University, Still-water.
95. Paquette, K. R. (2009). Integrating the 6+1 writing traits model with crossage tutoring: An investigation of elementary students' writing development. Literacy Research and Instruction, 48, 28-38. doi: 10.1080/19388070802226261
96. Pearce-Burrows, A. J. (1991). The differential effects of using the computer in a process writing program on the writing quality and quantity of third and fourth grade pupils (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
97. Peters, P. A. (1991). A self-generated writing program and its effects on the writing and reading growth in second grade children (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Boston University, Boston, MA.
98. Pritchard, R. J., & Marshall, J. C. (1994). Evaluation of a tiered model for staff development in writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 28, 259-285.
99. Raphael, T. E., Englert, C. S., & Kirschner, B. W. (1986). The impact of text structure instruction and social context on students' comprehension and production of expository text. East Lansing, MI: Institute for Research on Teaching.
100. Reece, J. E., & Cumming, G. (1996). Evaluating speech-based composition methods: Planning, dictation and the listening word processor. In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 361-380). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
101. Riley, V. J. (1997). The effects of repeated writing and story grammar instruction on the writing performance of third, fourth, and fifth grade students (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Minnesota, Twin Cities.
102. Roberts, C. (2002). The influence of teachers' professional development at the Tampa Bay Area Writing Project on student writing performance (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of South Florida, Tampa.
103. Rock, J. L. (2007). The impact of short-term use of Criterion on writing skills in ninth grade (Research Rep. No. RR-07-07). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
104. Rogers, L. A., & Graham, S. (2008). A meta-analysis of single subject design writing intervention research. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 879-906. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.4.879
105. Rosenthal, B. (2006). Improving elementary-age children's writing fluency: A comparison of improvement based on performance feedback frequency (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Disserta-tions and Theses database. (UMI No. 3242508)
106. Ross, J. A., Rolheiser, C., & Hogaboam-Gray, A. (1999). Effects of self-evaluation training on narrative writing. Assessing Writing, 6, 107-132. doi:10.1016/S1075-2935(99)00003-3
107. Rutberg, J. L. (1998). A comparison of two treatments for remediating handwriting disabilities (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Washington, Seattle.
108. Sadoski, M., Willson, V., & Norton, D. (1997). The relative contribution of research-based composition activities to writing improvement in lower and middle grades. Research in the Teaching of English, 31, 120-150.
109. Salahu-Din, D., Persky, H., & Miller, J. (2008). The nation's report card: Writing 2007 (NCES 2008-468). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics
110. Sawyer, R. J., Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (1992). Direct teaching, strategy instruction, and strategy instruction with explicit self-regulation: Effects on the composition skills and self-efficacy of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 340-352. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.340
111. Schunk, D. H., & Swartz, C. W. (1993a). Goals and progress feedback: Effects on self-efficacy and writing achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18, 337-354. doi:10.1006/ceps.1993.1024
112. Schunk, D. H., & Swartz, C. W. (1993b). Writing strategy instruction with gifted students: Effects of goals and feedback on self-efficacy and skills. Roeper Review, 15, 225-230. doi:10.1080/02783199309553512
113. Shorter, L. L. (2001). Keyboarding versus handwriting: Effects on the composition fluency and composition quality of third grade students (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of South Alabama, Mobile.
114. Sinclair, J. P. (2005). The effects of explicit instruction on the structure of urban minority children's academic writing (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3169873)
115. Slavin, R., Madden, N., & Karweit, N. (1989). Effective programs for students at risk: Conclusions for practice and policy. In R. E. Slavin, N. L. Karweit, & N. A. Madden (Eds.), Effective programs for students at risk (pp. 21-54). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
116. Soundy, C. S. (1987). Effect of writing experiences in the expressive mode on children's reading comprehension and writing ability (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick.
117. Stewart, J. A. (1999). Effects of peripheral word processing keyboards on writing achievement of fourth graders (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Baylor University, Waco, TX.
118. Stoddard, E. P. (1982). The combined effect of creative thinking and sentence-combining activities on the writing ability of above average ability fifth and sixth grade students (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.
119. Stotsky, S. (1988). Commentary. Research in the Teaching of English, 22, 89-99.
120. Swain, S. S., Graves, R. L., & Morse, D. T. (2007). Effects of NWP teaching strategies on elementary students' writing. Berkeley, CA: National Writing Project, University of California.
121. Thibodeau, A. E. (1964). Improving composition writing with grammar and organization exercises utilizing differentiated group patterns (Un-published doctoral dissertation). Boston University School of Education, Boston, MA.
122. Thibodeau, A. L. (1964). A study of the effects of elaborative thinking and vocabulary enrichment exercises on written composition (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Boston University School of Education, Boston, MA.
123. Torrance, M., Fidalgo, R., & García, J.-N. (2007). The teachability and effectiveness of cognitive self-regulation in sixth-grade writers. Learning and Instruction, 17, 265-285. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007 .02.003
124. Tracy, B., Reid, R., & Graham, S. (2009). Teaching young students strategies for planning and drafting stories: The impact of self-regulated strategy development. Journal of Educational Research, 102, 323-331. doi:10.3200/JOER.102.5.323-332
125. Troia, G. A., & Graham, S. (2002). The effectiveness of a highly explicit, teacher-directed strategy instruction routine: Changing the writing performance of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 290-305. doi:10.1177/00222194020350040101
126. Tukey, J. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
127. Umbach, B. T. (1990). A comparison of two methods of teaching written language to low-performing fourth graders in two rural schools (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Auburn University, Auburn, AL.
128. Walser, T. M. (2000). Teaching self-management of writing strategies to promote transfer (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Utah State University, Logan.
129. Warrington, J. R. (1999). A study of the effects of regular use of semantic webs on writing performance of fourth graders (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Wilmington College, Wilmington, OH.
130. Weiss, D. H. (1992). The effects of writing process instruction on the writing and reading performance of students with learning disabilities (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Florida International University, Miami.
131. Welch, M. (1992). The PLEASE strategy: A metacognitive learning strategy for improving the paragraph writing of students with mild disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 15, 119-128. doi:10.2307/ 1511013
132. Wetzel, K. A. (1985). The effect of using computer in a process writing program on the writing quality of third, fourth, and fifth grade pupils (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Oregon, Eugene.
133. Wienke, J. W. (1981). Strategies for improving elementary school students' writing skills. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED209679)
134. Wolter, D. R. (1975). Effect of feedback on performance on a creative writing task (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
135. Wong, B. Y. L., Hoskyn, M., Jai, D., Ellis, P., & Watson, K. (2008). The comparative efficacy of two approaches to teaching sixth graders opinion essay writing. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 757-784. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.12.004
136. Yarrow, F., & Topping, K. J. (2001). Collaborative writing: The effects of metacognitive prompting and structured peer interaction. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 261-282. doi: 10.1348/000709901158514
137. Young, E. A. (2000). Enhancing student writing by teaching self-assessment strategies that incorporate the criteria of good writing (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick.
138. Zhang, Y., Brooks, D. W., Fields, T., & Redelfs, M. (1995). Quality of writing by elementary students with learning disabilities. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 27, 483-499