N-terminal α7 deletion of the proteasome 20S core particle substitutes for yeast PI31 function

Molecular and Cellular Biology

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 141-152

  Yashiroda, Hideki ^a   Toda, Yousuke ^a   Otsu, Saori ^b   Takagi, Kenji ^b   Mizushima, Tsunehiro ^b   Murata, Shigeo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HYOGO   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CORE PROTEIN; FUB1 PROTEIN; FUNGAL PROTEIN; PBA3 PROTEIN; PBA4 PROTEIN; PI31 PROTEIN; PROTEASOME; PROTEASOME 20S CORE PARTICLE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; FUB1 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; GLYCEROL; PROTEIN BINDING; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN;

AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; DELETION MUTANT; ENZYME ACTIVATION; ENZYME ACTIVITY; GENE INTERACTION; IMMUNOBLOTTING; IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; IN VIVO STUDY; OPEN READING FRAME; ORTHOLOGY; PHENOTYPE; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEIN DEPLETION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; ALLELE; CHEMISTRY; GENE DELETION; GENETIC COMPLEMENTATION; GENETICS; HETEROZYGOTE; METABOLISM; MUTATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PLASMID; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

ALLELES; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; GENE DELETION; GENETIC COMPLEMENTATION TEST; GLYCEROL; HETEROZYGOTE; MUTATION; PLASMIDS; PROTEASOME ENDOPEPTIDASE COMPLEX; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

EID: 84920055188     PISSN: 02707306     EISSN: 10985549     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.00582-14     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Tanaka K. 2009. The proteasome: overview of structure and functions. Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci 85:12-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.2183/pjab.85.12.
2. Groll M, Ditzel L, Lowe J, Stock D, Bochtler M, Bartunik HD, Huber R. 1997. Structure of 20S proteasome from yeast at 2.4 A resolution. Nature 386:463-471. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/386463a0.
3. Forster A, Masters EI, Whitby FG, Robinson H, Hill CP. 2005. The 1.9 A structure of a proteasome-11S activator complex and implications for proteasome-PAN/PA700 interactions. Mol Cell 18:589-599. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2005.04.016.
4. Lowe J, Stock D, Jap B, Zwickl P, Baumeister W, Huber R. 1995. Crystal structure of the 20S proteasome from the archaeon T. acidophilum at 3.4 A resolution. Science 268:533-539. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.7725097.
5. Groll M, Bajorek M, Kohler A, Moroder L, Rubin DM, Huber R, Glickman MH, Finley D. 2000. A gated channel into the proteasome core particle. Nat Struct Biol 7:1062-1067. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/80992.
6. Stadtmueller BM, Ferrell K, Whitby FG, Heroux A, Robinson H, Myszka DG, Hill CP. 2010. Structural models for interactions between the 20S proteasome and its PAN/19S activators. J Biol Chem 285:13-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc. C109.070425.
7. Yu Y, Smith DM, Kim HM, Rodriguez V, Goldberg AL, Cheng Y. 2010. Interactions of PAN=s C-termini with archaeal 20S proteasome and implications for the eukaryotic proteasome-ATPase interactions. EMBO J 29:692-702. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2009.382.
8. Bedford L, Paine S, Sheppard PW, Mayer RJ, Roelofs J. 2010. Assembly, structure, and function of the 26S proteasome. Trends Cell Biol. 20:391-401. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2010.03.007.
9. Kusmierczyk AR, Hochstrasser M. 2008. Some assembly required: dedicated chaperones in eukaryotic proteasome biogenesis. Biol Chem 389: 1143-1151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/BC.2008.130.
10. Ramos PC, Dohmen RJ. 2008. PACemakers of proteasome core particle assembly. Structure 16:1296-1304. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2008.07.001.
11. Rosenzweig R, Glickman MH. 2008. Chaperone-driven proteasome assembly. Biochem Soc Trans 36:807-812. http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/BST0360807.
12. Murata S, Yashiroda H, Tanaka K. 2009. Molecular mechanisms of proteasome assembly. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 10:104-115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm2630.
13. Matias AC, Ramos PC, Dohmen RJ. 2010. Chaperone-assisted assembly of the proteasome core particle. Biochem Soc Trans 38:29-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/BST0380029.
14. Hirano Y, Hayashi H, Iemura S, Hendil KB, Niwa S, Kishimoto T, Kasahara M, Natsume T, Tanaka K, Murata S. 2006. Cooperation of multiple chaperones required for the assembly of mammalian 20S proteasomes. Mol Cell 24:977-984. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2006.11.015.
15. Hirano Y, Hendil KB, Yashiroda H, Iemura S, Nagane R, Hioki Y, Natsume T, Tanaka K, Murata S. 2005. A heterodimeric complex that promotes the assembly of mammalian 20S proteasomes. Nature 437: 1381-1385. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature04106.
16. Kusmierczyk AR, Kunjappu MJ, Funakoshi M, Hochstrasser M. 2008. A multimeric assembly factor controls the formation of alternative 20S proteasomes. Nat Struct Mol Biol 15:237-244. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.1389.
17. Yashiroda H, Mizushima T, Okamoto K, Kameyama T, Hayashi H, Kishimoto T, Niwa S, Kasahara M, Kurimoto E, Sakata E, Takagi K, Suzuki A, Hirano Y, Murata S, Kato K, Yamane T, Tanaka K. 2008. Crystal structure of a chaperone complex that contributes to the assembly of yeast 20S proteasomes. Nat Struct Mol Biol 15:228-236. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.1386.
18. Hoyt MA, McDonough S, Pimpl SA, Scheel H, Hofmann K, Coffino P. 2008. A genetic screen for Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutants affecting proteasome function, using a ubiquitin-independent substrate. Yeast 25: 199-217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/yea.1579.
19. Le Tallec B, Barrault MB, Courbeyrette R, Guerois R, Marsolier- Kergoat MC, Peyroche A. 2007. 20S proteasome assembly is orchestrated by two distinct pairs of chaperones in yeast and in mammals. Mol Cell 27:660-674. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2007.06.025.
20. Chu-Ping M, Slaughter CA, DeMartino GN. 1992. Purification and characterization of a protein inhibitor of the 20S proteasome (macropain). Biochim Biophys Acta 1119:303-311. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0167-4838(92)90218-3.
21. McCutchen-Maloney SL, Matsuda K, Shimbara N, Binns DD, Tanaka K, Slaughter CA, DeMartino GN. 2000. cDNA cloning, expression, and functional characterization of PI31, a proline-rich inhibitor of the proteasome. J Biol Chem 275:18557-18565. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc. M001697200.
22. Zaiss DM, Standera S, Holzhutter H, Kloetzel P, Sijts AJ. 1999. The proteasome inhibitor PI31 competes with PA28 for binding to 20S proteasomes. FEBS Lett 457:333-338. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0014-5793(99)01072-8.
23. Zaiss DM, Standera S, Kloetzel PM, Sijts AJ. 2002. PI31 is a modulator of proteasome formation and antigen processing. Proc Natl Acad SciUSA 99:14344-14349. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.212257299.
24. Bader M, Benjamin S, Wapinski OL, Smith DM, Goldberg AL, Steller H. 2011. A conserved F box regulatory complex controls proteasome activity in Drosophila. Cell 145:371-382. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.03.021.
25. Cho-Park PF, Steller H. 2013. Proteasome regulation by ADP-ribosylation. Cell 153:614-627. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.03.040.
26. Li X, Thompson D, Kumar B, DeMartino GN. 2014. Molecular and cellular roles of PI31 (PSMF1) protein in regulation of proteasome function. J Biol Chem 289:17392-17405. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc. M114.561183.
27. Hatanaka A, Chen B, Sun J Q, Mano Y, Funakoshi M, Kobayashi H, Ju Y, Mizutani T, Shinmyozu K, Nakayama J, Miyamoto K, Uchida H, Oki M. 2011. Fub1p, a novel protein isolated by boundary screening, binds the proteasome complex. Genes Genet Syst 86:305-314. http://dx.doi.org/10.1266/ggs.86.305.
28. Guthrie C, Fink GR (ed). 2002. Methods in enzymology, vol 350, part B. Guide to yeast genetics and molecular and cell biology. Academic Press, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
29. Burke D, Dawson D, Stearns T (ed). 2000. Methods in yeast genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
30. Saeki Y, Isono E, Toh EA. 2005. Preparation of ubiquitinated substrates by the PY motif-insertion method for monitoring 26S proteasome activity. Methods Enzymol 399:215-227. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(05)99014-9.
31. Perez J, Gomez A, Roncero C. 2010. Upregulation of the PRB1 gene in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae rim101Delta mutant produces proteolytic artefacts that differentially affect some proteins. Yeast 27:575-581. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/yea.1776.
32. Elsasser S, Schmidt M, Finley D. 2005. Characterization of the proteasome using native gel electrophoresis. Methods Enzymol 398:353-363. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(05)98029-4.
33. Kimura Y, Koitabashi S, Kakizuka A, Fujita T. 2001. Initial process of polyglutamine aggregate formation in vivo. Genes Cells 6:887-897. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2443.2001.00472.x.
34. Otwinowski Z, Minor W. 1997. Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. Methods Enzymol 276:307-326. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(97)76066-X.
35. Vagin A, Teplyakov A. 2010. Molecular replacement with MOLREP. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 66:22-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S0907444909042589.
36. Emsley P, Cowtan K. 2004. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 60:2126-2132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S0907444904019158.
37. Murshudov GN, Vagin AA, Dodson EJ. 1997. Refinement of macromolecular structures by the maximum-likelihood method. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 53:240-255. http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S0907444996012255.
38. DeLano WL. 2002. The PyMOL molecular graphics system. DeLano Scientific, San Carlos, CA. http://www.pymol.org.
39. Chatr-Aryamontri A, Breitkreutz BJ, Heinicke S, Boucher L, Winter A, Stark C, Nixon J, Ramage L, Kolas N, O'Donnell L, Reguly T, Breitkreutz A, Sellam A, Chen D, Chang C, Rust J, Livstone M, Oughtred R, Dolinski K, Tyers M. 2013. The BioGRID interaction database: 2013 update. Nucleic Acids Res 41:D816-D823. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks1158.
40. Kirk R, Laman H, Knowles PP, Murray-Rust J, Lomonosov M, Meziane EK, McDonald NQ. 2008. Structure of a conserved dimerization domain within the F-box protein Fbxo7 and the PI31 proteasome inhibitor. J Biol Chem 283:22325-22335. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc. M709900200.
41. Velichutina I, Connerly PL, Arendt CS, Li X, Hochstrasser M. 2004. Plasticity in eucaryotic 20S proteasome ring assembly revealed by a subunit deletion in yeast. EMBO J 23:500-510. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7600059.
42. Bajorek M, Finley D, Glickman MH. 2003. Proteasome disassembly and downregulation is correlated with viability during stationary phase. Curr Biol 13:1140-1144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00417-2.
43. Liu CW, Corboy MJ, DeMartino GN, Thomas PJ. 2003. Endoproteolytic activity of the proteasome. Science 299:408-411. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1079293.
44. Fredrickson EK, Rosenbaum JC, Locke MN, Milac TI, Gardner RG. 2011. Exposed hydrophobicity is a key determinant of nuclear quality control degradation. Mol Biol Cell 22:2384-2395. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc. E11-03-0256.
45. Sikorski RS, Hieter P. 1989. A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 122:19-27.
46. Yashiroda H, Tanaka K. 2004. Hub1 is an essential ubiquitin-like protein without functioning as a typical modifier in fission yeast. Genes Cells 9:1189-1197. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2443.2004.00807.x.
47. Qadota H, Ishii I, Fujiyama A, Ohya Y, Anraku Y. 1992. RHO gene products, putative small GTP-binding proteins, are important for activation of the CAL1/CDC43 gene product, a protein geranylgeranyltransferase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 8:735-741. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/yea.320080906.