A genetic screen for Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutants affecting proteasome function, using a ubiquitin-independent substrate

Yeast

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 199-217

  Hoyt, Martin A ^a   McDonough, Stephen ^a   Pimpl, Stephan A ^a   Scheel, Hartmut ^b   Hofmann, Kay ^b   Coffino, Philip ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b MILTENYI BIOTEC GMBH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Ornithine decarboxylase; Poc3; Poc4; Proteasome; Ubiquitin

Indexed keywords

CELL PROTEIN; ORNITHINE DECARBOXYLASE; PHOSPHOPROTEIN PHOSPHATASE; PROTEASOME; PROTEIN REG1; PROTEIN SUBUNIT; REGULATOR PROTEIN; UBIQUITIN; UBIQUITIN RELATED MODIFIER 1; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DELETION MUTANT; ENZYME SPECIFICITY; EUKARYOTE; GENETIC SCREENING; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ASSEMBLY; PROTEIN DEFECT; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN MODIFICATION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; UBIQUITINATION;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMALS; MICE; MOLECULAR CHAPERONES; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; ORNITHINE DECARBOXYLASE; PROTEASOME ENDOPEPTIDASE COMPLEX; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE DELETION; SUBSTRATE SPECIFICITY; UBIQUITIN;

EUKARYOTA; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 41549109801     PISSN: 0749503X     EISSN: 10970061     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/yea.1579     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Almrud JJ, Oliveira MA, Kern AD, et al. 2000. Crystal structure of human ornithine decarboxylase at 2.1 A resolution: structural insights to antizyme binding. J Mol Biol 295: 7-16.
2. Alvaro D, Sunjevaric I, Reid RJ, et al. 2006. Systematic hybrid LOH: a new method to reduce false positives and negatives during screening of yeast gene deletion libraries. Yeast 23: 1097-1106.
3. Amerik AY, Hochstrasser M. 2004. Mechanism and function of deubiquitinating enzymes. Biochim Biophys Acta 1695: 189-207.
4. Brachmann CB, Davies A, Cost GJ, et al. 1998. Designer deletion strains derived from Saccharomyces cerevisiae S288C: a useful set of strains and plasmids for PCR-mediated gene disruption and other applications. Yeast 14: 115-132.
5. Bucher P, Karplus K, Moeri N, et al. 1996. A flexible motif search technique based on generalized profiles. Comput Chem 20: 3-23.
6. Chau V, Tobias JW, Bachmair A, et al. 1989. A multiubiquitin chain is confined to specific lysine in a targeted short-lived protein. Science 243: 1576-1583.
7. Chen P, Hochstrasser M. 1996. Autocatalytic subunit processing couples active site formation in the 20S proteasome to completion of assembly. Cell 86: 961-972.
8. Coffino P. 2001. Regulation of cellular polyamines by antizyme. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2: 188-194.
9. Deveraux Q, Ustrell V, Pickart C, et al. 1994. A 26 S protease subunit that binds ubiquitin conjugates. J Biol Chem 269: 7059-7061.
10. Elsasser S, Chandler-Militello D, Muller B, et al. 2004. Rad23 and Rpn10 serve as alternative ubiquitin receptors for the proteasome. J Biol Chem 279: 26817-26822.
11. Emori Y, Tsukahara T, Kawasaki H, et al. 1991. Molecular cloning and functional analysis of three subunits of yeast proteasome. Mol Cell Biol 11: 344-353.
12. Esberg A, Huang B, Johansson MJ, et al. 2006. Elevated levels of two tRNA species bypass the requirement for elongator complex in transcription and exocytosis. Mol Cell 24: 139-148.
13. Funakoshi M, Li X, Velichutina I, et al. 2004. Sem1, the yeast ortholog of a human BRCA2-binding protein, is a component of the proteasome regulatory particle that enhances proteasome stability. J Cell Sci 117: 6447-6454.
14. Furukawa K, Mizushima N, Noda T, et al. 2000. A protein conjugation system in yeast with homology to biosynthetic enzyme reaction of prokaryotes. J Biol Chem 275: 7462-7465.
15. Gerards WL, Enzlin J, Haner M, et al. 1997. The human alpha-type proteasomal subunit HsC8 forms a double ringlike structure, but does not assemble into proteasome-like particles with the beta-type subunits HsDelta or HsBPROS26. J Biol Chem 272: 10080-10086.
16. Gerlinger UM, Guckel R, Hoffmann M, et al. 1997. Yeast cycloheximide-resistant crl mutants are proteasome mutants defective in protein degradation. Mol Biol Cell 8: 2487-2499.
17. Ghaemmaghami S, Huh WK, Bower K, et al. 2003. Global analysis of protein expression in yeast. Nature 425: 737-741.
18. Ghoda L, Phillips MA, Bass KE, et al. 1990. Trypanosome ornithine decarboxylase is stable because it lacks sequences found in the carboxyl terminus of the mouse enzyme which target the latter for intracellular degradation. J Biol Chem 265: 11823-11826.
19. Ghoda L, van Daalen Wetters T, Macrae M, et al. 1989. Prevention of rapid intracellular degradation of ODC by a carboxyl- terminal truncation. Science 243: 1493-1495.
20. Giaever G, Chu AM, Ni L, et al. 2002. Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Nature 418: 387-391.
21. Glickman MH, Rubin DM, Fried VA, et al. 1998. The regulatory particle of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae proteasome. Mol Cell Biol 18: 3149-3162.
22. Goehring AS, Mitchell DA, Tong AH, et al. 2003a. Synthetic lethal analysis implicates Ste20p, a p21-activated potein kinase, in polarisome activation. Mol Biol Cell 14: 1501-1516.
23. Goehring AS, Rivers DM, Sprague GF Jr. 2003b. Urmylation: a ubiquitin-like pathway that functions during invasive growth and budding in yeast. Mol Biol Cell 14: 4329-4341.
24. Groll M, Bajorek M, Kohler A, et al. 2000. A gated channel into the proteasome core particle. Nat Struct Biol 7: 1062-1067.
25. Groll M, Ditzel L, Lowe J, et al. 1997. Structure of 20S proteasome from yeast at 2.4 A resolution. Nature 386: 463-471.
26. Guthrie C, Fink GR. 2002. Guide to Yeast Genetics and Molecular and Cell Biology. Academic Press: New York.
27. Hanna J, Hathaway NA, Tone Y, et al. 2006. Deubiquitinating enzyme ubp6 functions noncatalytically to delay proteasomal degradation. Cell 127: 99-111.
28. Heinemeyer W, Ramos PC, Dohmen RJ. 2004. The ultimate nanoscale mincer: assembly, structure and active sites of the 20S proteasome core. Cell Mol Life Sci 61: 1562-1578.
29. Hershko A, Ciechanover A. 1998. The ubiquitin system. Annu Rev Biochem 67: 425-479.
30. Hiller MM, Finger A, Schweiger M, et al. 1996. ER degradation of a misfolded luminal protein by the cytosolic ubiquitin - proteasome pathway. Science 273: 1725-1728.
31. Hirano Y, Hayashi H, Iemura S, et al. 2006. Cooperation of multiple chaperones required for the assembly of mammalian 20S proteasomes. Mol Cell 24: 977-984.
32. Hirano Y, Hendil KB, Yashiroda H, et al. 2005. A heterodimeric complex that promotes the assembly of mammalian 20S proteasomes. Nature 437: 1381-1385.
33. Hochstrasser M, Varshavsky A. 1990. In vivo degradation of a transcriptional regulator: the yeast α2 repressor. Cell 61: 697-708.
34. Horak J, Regelmann J, Wolf DH. 2002. Two distinct proteolytic systems responsible for glucose-induced degradation of fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase and the Ga12p transporter in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae share the same protein components of the glucose signaling pathway. J Biol Chem 277: 8248-8254.
35. Hoyt MA, Coffino P. 2004. Ubiquitin-free routes into the proteasome. Cell Mol Life Sci 61: 1596-1600.
36. Hoyt MA, Zhang M, Coffino P. 2003. Ubiquitin-independent mechanisms of mouse ornithine decarboxylase degradation are conserved between mammalian and fungal cells. J Biol Chem 278: 12135-12143.
37. Huang B, Johansson MJ, Bystrom AS. 2005. An early step in wobble uridine tRNA modification requires the Elongator complex. RNA 11: 424-436.
38. James P, Halladay J, Craig EA. 1996. Genomic libraries and a host strain designed for highly efficient two-hybrid selection in yeast. Genetics 144: 1425-1436.
39. Johnson ES, Ma PC, Ota IM, et al. 1995. A proteolytic pathway that recognizes ubiquitin as a degradation signal. J Biol Chem 270: 17442-17456.
40. Knop M, Siegers K, Pereira G, et al. 1999. Epitope tagging of yeast genes using a PCR-based strategy: more tags and improved practical routines. Yeast 15: 963-972.
41. Krogan NJ, Kim M, Ahn SH, et al. 2002. RNA polymerase II elongation factors of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a targeted proteomics approach. Mol Cell Biol 22: 6979-6992.
42. Le Tallec B, Barrault MB, Courbeyrette R, et al. 2007. 20S proteasome assembly is orchestrated by two distinct pairs of chaperones in yeast and in mammals. Mol Cell 27: 660-674.
43. Leggett DS, Hanna J, Borodovsky A, et al. 2002. Multiple associated proteins regulate proteasome structure and function. Mol Cell 10: 495-507.
44. Li FN, Johnston M. 1997. Grr1 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is connected to the ubiquitin proteolysis machinery through Skp1: coupling glucose sensing to gene expression and the cell cycle. EMBO J 16: 5629-5638.
45. Li X, Kusmierczyk AR, Wong P, et al. 2007. β-Subunit appendages promote 20S proteasome assembly by overcoming an Ump1-dependent checkpoint. EMBO J 26: 2339-2349.
46. Loetscher P, Pratt G, Rechsteiner M. 1991. The C-terminus of mouse ornithine decarboxylase confers rapid degradation on dihydrofolate reductase. Support for the pest hypothesis. J Biol Chem 266: 11213-11220.
47. Mamroud-Kidron E, Kahana C. 1994. The 26S proteasome degrades mouse and yeast ornithine decarboxylase in yeast cells. FEBS Lett 356: 162-164.
48. Mannhaupt G, Schnall R, Karpov V, et al. 1999. Rpn4p acts as a transcription factor by binding to PACE, a nonamer box found upstream of 26S proteasomal and other genes in yeast. FEBS Lett 450: 27-34.
49. Mayor T, Lipford JR, Graumann J, et al. 2005. Analysis of polyubiquitin conjugates reveals that the Rpn10 substrate receptor contributes to the turnover of multiple proteasome targets. Mol Cell Proteom 4: 741-751.
50. 2/M transition in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 21: 488-500.
51. Miyazaki Y, Matsufuji S, Murakami Y, et al. 1993. Single amino-acid replacement is responsible for the stabilization of ornithine decarboxylase in HMOA cells. Eur J Biochem 214: 837-844.
52. Mumberg D, Muller R, Funk M. 1995. Yeast vectors for the controlled expression of heterologous proteins in different genetic backgrounds. Gene 156: 119-122.
53. Murakami Y, Matsufuji S, Kameji T, et al. 1992. Ornithine decarboxylase is degraded by the 26S proteasome without ubiquitination. Nature 360: 597-599.
54. Palanimurugan R, Scheel H, Hofmann K, et al. 2004. Polyamines regulate their synthesis by inducing expression and blocking degradation of ODC antizyme. EMBO J 23: 4857-4867.
55. Pan X, Ye P, Yuan DS, et al. 2006. A DNA integrity network in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell 124: 1069-1081.
56. Pickart CM. 2001. Mechanisms underlying ubiquitination. Annu Rev Biochem 70: 503-533.
57. Pickart CM, Cohen RE. 2004. Proteasomes and their kin: proteases in the machine age. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 5: 177-187.
58. Ramos PC, Hockendorff J, Johnson ES, et al. 1998. Ump1p is required for proper maturation of the 20S proteasome and becomes its substrate upon completion of the assembly. Cell 92: 489-499.
59. Regelmann J, Schule T, Josupeit FS, et al. 2003. Catabolite degradation of fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a genome-wide screen identifies eight novel GID genes and indicates the existence of two degradation pathways. Mol Biol Cell 14: 1652-1663.
60. Sambrook J, Russell DW. 2001. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 3rd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
61. Schmidt M, Haas W, Crosas B, et al. 2005. The HEAT repeat protein Blm10 regulates the yeast proteasome by capping the core particle. Nat Struct Mol Biol 12: 294-303.
62. Schwartz DC, Hochstrasser M. 2003. A superfamily of protein tags: ubiquitin, SUMO and related modifiers. Trends Biochem Sci 28: 321-328.
63. Seong KM, Baek JH, Yu MH, et al. 2007. Rpn13p and Rpn14p are involved in the recognition of ubiquitinated Gcn4p by the 26S proteasome. FEBS Lett 581: 2567-2573.
64. Sone T, Saeki Y, Toh EA, et al. 2004. Sem1p is a novel subunit of the 26 S proteasome from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 279: 28807-28816.
65. Swanson R, Hochstrasser M. 2000. A viable ubiquitin-activating enzyme mutant for evaluating ubiquitin system function in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Lett 477: 193-198.
66. Takeuchi J, Chen H, Coffino P. 2007. Proteasome substrate degradation requires association plus extended peptide. EMBO J 26: 123-131.
67. Thrower JS, Hoffman L, Rechsteiner M, et al. 2000. Recognition of the polyubiquitin proteolytic signal. EMBO J 19: 94-102.
68. Toth C, Coffino P. 1999. Regulated degradation of yeast ornithine decarboxylase. J Biol Chem 274: 25921-25926.
69. Tu J, Carlson M. 1995. REG1 binds to protein phosphatase type 1 and regulates glucose repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J 14: 5939-5946.
70. Unno M, Mizushima T, Morimoto Y, et al. 2002. The structure of the mammalian 20S proteasome at 2.75 A resolution. Structure 10: 609-618.
71. van Nocker S, Sadis S, Rubin DM, et al. 1996. The multiubiquitin-chain-binding protein Mcb1 is a component of the 26S proteasome in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and plays a nonessential, substrate-specific role in protein turnover. Mol Cell Biol 16: 6020-6028.
72. Velichutina I, Connerly PL, Arendt CS, et al. 2004. Plasticity in eukaryotic 20S proteasome ring assembly revealed by a subunit deletion in yeast. EMBO J 23: 500-510.
73. Verma R, Chen S, Feldman R, et al. 2000. Proteasomal proteomics: identification of nucleotide-sensitive proteasome-interacting proteins by mass spectrometric analysis of affinity-purified proteasomes. Mol Biol Cell 11: 3425-3439.
74. Verma R, Oania R, Graumann J, et al. 2004. Multiubiquitin chain receptors define a layer of substrate selectivity in the ubiquitin - proteasome system. Cell 118: 99-110.
75. Yao Y, Toth CR, Huang L, et al. 1999. α5 subunit in Trypanosoma brucei proteasome can self-assemble to form a cylinder of four stacked heptamer rings. Biochem J 344(2): 349-358.
76. Zhang M, MacDonald AI, Hoyt MA, et al. 2004. Proteasomes begin ornithine decarboxylase digestion at the C terminus. J Biol Chem 279: 20959-20965.
77. Zhang M, Pickart CM, Coffino P. 2003. Determinants of proteasome recognition of ornithine decarboxylase, a ubiquitin-independent substrate. EMBO J 22: 1488-1496.