Scholarly impact: A pluralist conceptualization

Academy of Management Learning and Education

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 623-639

  Aguinis, Herman ^a   Shapiro, Debra L ^b   Antonacopoulou, Elena P ^c   Cummings, Thomas G ^d  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920041556     PISSN: 1537260X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5465/amle.2014.0121     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Academy of Management Discoveries. 2013. Retrieved from http://aom.org/amd/. Accessed on 21 November 2013.
2. Academy of Management Strategic Plan. 2010. Explore the full plan. Retrieved from http://strategicplan.aomonline.org/plan/full. Accessed on November 18, 2013.
3. Adler, N. J., & Harzing, A. 2009. When knowledge wins: Transcending the sense and nonsense of academic rankings. Academy of Management Learning & Education. 8: 72-95.
4. Aguinis, H. 2013. Performance management, (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson: Prentice Hall.
5. Aguinis, H., & Edwards, J. R. 2014. Methodological wishes for the next decade and how to make wishes come true. Journal of Management Studies, 51: 143-174.
6. Aguinis, H., Gottfredson, R. K., Culpepper, S. A., Dalton, D. R., & de Bruin, G. P. 2013. Doing good and doing well: On the multiple contributions of journal editors. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 12: 564-578.
7. Aguinis, H., Gottfredson, R. K., & Joo, H. 2012. Using performance management to win the talent war. Business Horizons, 55: 609-616.
8. Aguinis, H., Henle, C. A., & Ostroff, C. 2001. Measurement in work and organizational psychology. In N. Anderson, D. S. Ones H. K. Sinangil & C. Viswesvaran (Eds.), Handbook of industrial, work and organizational psychology, vol. 1: 27-50. London, U.K: Sage.
9. Aguinis, H., Suarez-González, I., Lannelongue, G., & Joo, H. 2012. Scholarly impact revisited. Academy of Management Perspectives, 26: 105-132.
10. Aguinis, H., & Vandenberg, R. J. 2014. An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure: Improving research quality before data collection. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1: 1-27.
11. Antonacopoulou, E. P. 2009. Impact and scholarship: Unlearning and practising to co-create actionable knowledge. Management Learning, 40: 421-430.
12. Antonacopoulou, E. P. 2010. Making the business school more "critical": Reflexive critique based on phronesis as a foundation for impact. British Journal of Management, 21: 6-25.
13. Antonacopoulou, E. P., Dehlin, E., & Zundel, M. 2011. The challenge of delivering impact: Making waves through the ODC scholarship. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 47: 33-52.
14. Ashford, S. J. 2013. Having scholarly impact: The art of hitting academic home runs. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 12: 623-633.
15. Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business. 2008. Final report of the AACSB International Impact of Research Task Force. Tampa, FL: AACSB International.]
16. Bartunek, J. M. 2007. Academic-practitioner collaboration need not require joint or relevant research: Towards a relational scholarship of integration. Academy of Management Journal, 50: 1323-1333.
17. Bartunek, J. M., & Rynes, S. L. 2014. Academics and practitioners are alike and unlike: The paradoxes of academic- practitioner relationships. Journal of Management, 40: 1181-1201.
18. Bartunek, J. 2003. 2002 Presidential address: A dream for the academy. Academy of Management Review, 28: 198-203.
19. Bedeian, A. G., Taylor, S. G., & Miller, A. N. 2010. Management science on the credibility bubble: Cardinal sins and various misdemeanors. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9: 715-725.
20. Bergh, D. D., Perry, J., & Hanke, R. 2006. Some predictors of SMJ article impact. Strategic Management Journal, 27: 81-100.
21. Boyer, E. L. 1990. Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professorate. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
22. Brower, H. H. 2013. From the editors: Professor as a calling. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 12: 537-539.
23. Burke, L. A., & Rau, B. 2010. The research-teaching gap in management. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9: 132-143.
24. Cascio, W. F., & Aguinis, H. 2008. Research in industrial and organizational psychology from 1963 to 2007: Changes, choices, and trends. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93: 1062-1081.
25. Chan, H. F., Frey, B. S., Gallus, J., Schaffner, M., Torgler, B., & Whyte, S. 2013. Do the best scholars attract the highest speaking fees? An exploration of internal and external influence. Scientometrics, 101: 793-817.
26. Cheung, M. K. 2013. Alt-metrics: Too soon for use in assessment. Nature, 494: 176.
27. Colquitt, J. A. 2011. From the editors: The next three years at AMJ-Maintaining the mission while expanding the journal. Academy of Management Journal, 54: 9-14.
28. Costas, R., Zahedi, Z., & Wouters, P. 2014. Do "alt-metrics" correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of alt-metric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspec-tive. Cornell University Library. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1401.4321.
29. Cummings, T. G. 2007. 2006 Presidential address: Quest for an engaged Academy. Academy of Management Review, 32: 355-360.
30. Cummings, T. G. 2011. How business schools shape (misshape) management research. In Mohrman, S. A., & Lawler, E. E., (Eds.), Useful research: Advancing theory and practice: 331-350. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
31. DeNisi, A. S. 2010, 2009 Presidential address: Challenges and opportunities for the Academy in the next decade. Academy of Management Review, 35: 190-201.
32. DeTienne, D. R. 2013. Assessing scholarly impact in the world of Google. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 12: 1-3.
33. Egri, C. P. 2012. Introduction: Toward a more balanced perspective on academic contributions. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11: 302.
34. Fenner, M. 2014. Alt-metrics and other novel measures for scientific impact. In S. Bartling & S. Friesike (Eds.), Opening science: 179-189. New York: Springer.
35. Galloway, L. M., Pease, J. L., & Rauh, A. 2014. Introduction to alt-metrics for science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) librarians. Science and Technology Libraries, 32: 335-345.
36. Gupta, N., & Shaw, J. D. 2014. Employee compensation: The neglected area of HRM research. Human Resource Management Review, 24: 1-4.
37. Hambrick, D. C. 1994. 1993 Presidential address: What if the Academy actually mattered? Academy of Management Review, 19: 11-16.
38. Haustein, S., Peters, I., Bar-Ilan, J., Priem, J., Shema, H., & Terliesner, J. 2014. Coverage and adoption of alt-metric sources in the bobliometric community. Scientometrics, 101: 1145-1163.
39. Hitt, M. A., & Greer, C. R. 2012. The value of research and its evaluation in business schools: Killing the goose that laid the golden egg? Journal of Management Inquiry, 21: 236-240.
40. Honig, B., Lampel, J., Siegel, D., & Drnevich, P. In press. Ethics in management research: Collusion, competition, or collaboration? Academy of Management Learning & Education. Available at http://aom.org/Publications/AMLE/AMLENews.aspx.
41. Jenkins, G. D., Mitra, A., Gupta, N., & Shaw, J. D. 1998. Are financial incentives related to performance? A metaanalytic review of empirical research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83: 777-787.
42. Judge, T. A., Colbert, A., Cable, D. M., & Rynes, S. L. 2007. What causes a management article to be cited-Article, author, or journal? Academy of Management Journal, 50: 491-506.
43. Kacmar, K. M., & Whitfield, J. M. 2000. An additional rating method for journal articles in the field of management. Organizational Research Methods, 3: 392-406.
44. Konkiel, S. 2013. Alt-metrics: A 21st-century solution to determining research quality. In Online searcher, July-August: 11-15.
45. Lewin, K. 1946. Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2: 34-46.
46. Li, X., Thelwall, M., & Giustini, D. 2011. Validating online reference managers for scholarly impact measurement. Scientometrics, 91: 461-471.
47. Lockett, A., & McWilliams, A. 2005. The balance of trade between disciplines: Do we effectively manage knowledge? Journal of Management Inquiry, 14: 139-150.
48. Mohrman, S. A., & Lawler, E. E., (Eds.). 2011. Useful research: Advancing theory and practice. San Francisco, CA: Berrett- Koehler.
49. Morgeson, F. P., & Nahrgang, J. D. 2008. Same as it ever was: Recognizing stability in the BusinessWeek rankings. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 7: 26-41.
50. Munnolli, S. S., & Pujar, S. M. 2013. Eugene to alt-metrics: A chase for virtual foot prints! Annals of Library and Information Studies, 60: 134-139.
51. Opatrný, T. 2008. Playing the system to give low-impact journal more clout. Nature, 455: 167.
52. Pettigrew, A. M. 2011. Scholarship with impact. British Journal of Management, 22: 347-354.
53. Philbrick, J. L. 2014. Measuring research impact on the social web: A look at altmetrics. Medical Library Education News, 54: 13.
54. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, N. P., & Bachrach, D. G. 2008. Scholarly influence in the field of management: A bibliometric analysis of the determinants of university and author impact in the management literature in the past quarter century. Journal of Management, 34: 641-720.
55. Priem, J., Groth, P., & Taraborelli, D. 2012. The alt-metrics collection. PLoS One, 7: e48753.
56. Research Excellence Framework. 2011. Decisions on Assessing Research Impact. Retrieved from http://www.ref.ac.uk/pubs/ 2011-01/
57. Roemer, R. C., & Borchardt, R. 2013. Institutional altmetrics and academic libraries. Information Standards Quarterly, 23: 14-19.
58. Rynes, S. L., Bartunek, J. M., & Daft, R. L. 2001. Across the great divide: Knowledge creation and transfer between practitioners and academics. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 340-355.
59. Schekman, R. 2013. How journals like Nature, Cell and Science are damaging science. The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/dec/09/howjournals-nature-science-cell-damage-science. Accessed September 26, 2014.
60. Shadish, W. R., Tolliver, D., Gray, M., & Gupta, S. K. S. 1995. Author judgments about works they cite: Three studies from psychology journals. Social Studies of Science, 25: 477-498.
61. Shapiro, D. L., Kirkman, B. L., & Courtney, H. G. 2007. Perceived causes and solutions of the translation problem in management research. Academy of Management Journal, 50: 249-266.
62. Sijtsma, K. 2012. Future of psychometrics: Ask what psychometrics can do for psychology. Psychometrika, 77: 4-20.
63. Simon, H. 1996. The sciences of the artificial, (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: MIT Press. (Original work published 1969).
64. Sud, P., & Tudwall, M. 2014. Evaluating alt-metrics. Scientometrics, 98: 1131-1143.
65. Tan, M., Jones, G., Zhu, G., Ye, J., Hong, T., Zhou, S., Zhang, S., & Zhang, L. 2009. Fellatio by fruit bats prolongs copulation time. PLoS One, 4: e7595.
66. Torres, D., Cabezas, A., & Jimenez, E. 2013. Alt-metrics: New indicators for scientific communication in Web2.0. Comunicar, 41: 53-60.
67. Trist, E. L., & Bamforth, K. W. 1951. Some social and psychological consequences of the longwall method of coal-getting. Human Relations, 4: 3-38.
68. Tsui, A. S. 2013a. 2012 Presidential address: On compassion in scholarship: Why should we care? Academy of Management Review, 31: 167-180.
69. Tsui, A. S. 2013b. Editorial: The spirit of science and socially responsible scholarship. Management and Organization Review, 9: 375-394.
70. Van Aken, J. E., & Romme, A. G. L. 2012. A design science approach to evidence-based management. In D. M. Rousseau (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidence-based management: 43-57. New York: Oxford University Press.
71. Van de Ven, A. H. 2002. 2001 Presidential address: Strategic directions for the Academy of Management: This Academy is for you! Academy of Management Review, 27: 171-184.
72. Van de Ven, A. H. 2007. Engaged scholarship: A guide for organizational and social research. New York: Oxford University Press.
73. Viney, I. 2013. Altmetrics: Research council responds. Nature, 494: 176.
74. Walsh, J. P. 2011. 2010 Presidential address: Embracing the sacred in our secular scholarly world. Academy of Management Review, 36: 215-234.
75. Walsh, J. P., Tushman, M. L., Kimberly, J. R., Starbuck, B., & Ashford, S. 2007. On the relationship between research and practice: Debate and reflections. Journal of Management Inquiry, 16: 128-154.
76. Wimbush, J. C., & Dalton, D. R. 1997. The base rate for employee theft: Convergence of multiple methods. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82: 756-763.
77. Zahedi, Z., Costas, R., & Wouters, P. 2014. How well developed are alt-metrics? A cross-disciplinary analysis of the presence of "alternative metrics" in scientific publications. Scientometrics, 101: 1491-1513.