What causes a management article to be cited-article author, or journal?

Academy of Management Journal

Volumn 50, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 491-506

  Judge, Timothy A ^a   Cable, Daniel M ^b   Colbert, Amy E ^c   Rynes, Sara L ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547176416     PISSN: 00014273     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5465/AMJ.2007.25525577     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Baldi, S. 1998. Normative versus social constructivist processes in the allocation of citations: A network-analytic model. American Sociological Review, 63: 829-846.
2. Bedeian, A. G. 2002. Caveat emptor: The Gourman Report. Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 39(1): 32-33.
3. Bedeian, A. G., & Feild, H. S. 1980. Academic stratification in graduate management programs: Departmental prestige and faculty hiring patterns. Journal of Management, 6: 99-115.
4. Beyer, J. M., Chanove, R. G., & Fox, W. B. 1995. The review process and the fates of manuscripts submitted to AMJ. Academy of Management Journal, 38: 1219-1260.
5. Borokhovich, K. A., Bricker, R. J., & Simkins, B. J. 1999. Financial Managements success as an academic journal. Financial Management, 28(X): 76-82.
6. Cable, D. M., & Murray, B. 1999. Tournament vs. sponsored mobility determinants of job search success. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 439-449.
7. Campion, M. A. 1993. Article review checklist: A criterion checklist for reviewing research articles in applied psychology. Personnel Psychology, 46: 705-719.
8. Christenson, J. A., & Sigelman, L. 1985. Accrediting knowledge: Journal stature and citation impact in social science. Social Science Quarterly, 66: 964-975.
9. Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. 1983. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Cole, J. R., & Cole, S. 1972. The Ortega hypothesis. Science, 178: 368-375.
11. Cole, S. 1979. Age and scientific performance. American Journal of Sociology, 84: 958-977.
12. Cole, S., & Cole, J. R. 1967. Scientific output and recognition: A study in the operation of the reward system in science. American Sociological Review, 32: 377-390.
13. Cole, S., & Cole, J. R. 1973. Social stratification in science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14. Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. 1979. Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field studies. Chicago: Rand-McNally.
15. Crane, D. 1965. Scientists at major and minor universities: A study of productivity and recognition. American Sociological Review, 30: 699-714.
16. Cronin, B. 1984. The citation process. London: Taylor Graham.
17. Diamond, A. M. 1986. What is a citation worth? Journal of Human Resources, 21: 200-215.
18. Donohue, J. M., & Fox, J. B. 2000. A multi-method evaluation of journals in the decision and management sciences by US academics. Omega, 28: 17-36.
19. Dusansky, R., & Vernon, C. J. 1998. Rankings of U.S. economics departments. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12: 157-170.
20. Endler, N. S., Rushton, J. P., & Roediger, H. L. 1978. Productivity and scholarly impact. American Psychologist, 33: 1064-1082.
21. Fee, C. E., Hadlock, C. J., & Pierce, J. R. 2005. Business school rankings and business school deans: A study of nonprofit governance. Financial Management, 34: 143-166.
22. Frank, R. H., & Cook, P. 1995. The winner-take-all society. New York: Free Press.
23. Garfield, E. 1955. Citation indexes for science: A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science, 122: 108-111.
24. Garfield, E. 1987. Mapping the world of science: Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool? In D. N. Jackson & J. P. Rushton (Eds.), Scientific excellence: 18-39. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
25. Garfield, E. 2006. The history and meaning of the journal impact factor, Journal of the American Medical Association, 295: 90-93.
26. Gilbert, G. N. 1977. Referencing as persuasion. Social Studies of Science, 7: 113-122.
27. Glass, B. 1955. News and notes. Science, 21: 583-596.
28. Glick, B., McKelvey, B., Cooper, M., Huber, G., & Zmud, B. 1997. 1997 INFORMS committee review of Organization Science: Survey feedback from surveys of journal reputations (Unpublished report). INFORMS.
29. Glick, W. H., Miller, C. C., & Cardinal, L. B. In press. Making a life in the field of organization science. Journal of Organizational Behavior.
30. Gomez-Mejia, L. R., & Balkin, D. B. 1992. Determinants of faculty pay: An agency theory perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 35: 921-955.
31. Gottfredson, S. D. 1978. Evaluating psychological research reports: Dimensions, reliability, and correlates of quality judgments. American Psychologist, 33: 920-934.
32. Gourman, J, 1997. The Gourman report. Los Angeles: National Education Standards.
33. Helmreich, R. L., Spence, J. T., Beane, W. E., Lucker, G. W., & Matthews, K. A. 1980. Making it in academic psychology: Demographic and personality correlates of attainment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39: 896-908.
34. Huff, A. S. 1998. Writing for scholarly publication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35. Johnson, L. J., & Podsakoff, P. M. 1994. Journal influence in the field of management: An analysis using Salancik's index in a dependency network. Academy of Management Journal, 37: 1392-1407.
36. Judge, T. A. 2003. Marginalizing the Journal of Applied Psychology. Industrial Psychologist, 40(1): 56-59.
37. Kerr, S., Tolliver, J., & Petree, D. 1977. Manuscript characteristics which influence acceptance for management and social science journals. Academy of Management Journal, 20: 132-141.
38. LaBand, D. N. 1986. Article popularity. Economic Inquiry, 24: 173-180.
39. LaBand, D. N., & Piette, M. J. 1994. A citation analysis of the impact of blinded peer review. Journal of the American Medical Association, 272: 147-149.
40. Lundberg, G. 2003. The "omnipotent" Science Citation Index impact factor. Medical Journal of Australia, 178: 253-254.
41. Martins, L. L. 2005. A model of the effects of reputational rankings on organizational change. Organization Science, 16: 701-720.
42. Merton, R. K. 1957. Priorities in scientific discovery: A chapter in the sociology of science. American Sociology Review, 22: 635-659.
43. Merton, R. K. 1963. Resistance to the systematic study of multiple discoveries in science. Archives Europeennes de Sociologie, 4: 237-282.
44. Merton, R. K. 1968. The Matthew effect in science. Science, 159: 56-63.
45. Mitra, A. C. 1970. The bibliographic reference: A review of its role. Annals of Library Science, 17: 117-123.
46. Monastersky, R. 2005. The number that's devouring science. Chronicle of Higher Education, 52(8): A12.
47. Newman, J. M., & Cooper, E. 1993. Determinants of academic recognition: The case of the Journal of Applied Psychology. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78: 518-526.
48. Nunnally, J. 1978. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
49. Perkel, J. M. 2005. The future of citation analysis. Scientist, 19: 24-25.
50. Perreault, W. D., & Leigh, L. E. 1989. Reliability of nominal data based on qualitative judgments. Journal of Marketing Research, 26: 135-148.
51. Peters, D. P., & Ceci, S. J. 1982. Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5: 187-255.
52. Pfeffer, J. 1993. Barriers to the advance of organizational science: Paradigm development as a dependent variable. Academy of Management Review, 18: 599-620.
53. Powell, W. W., & Owen-Smith, J. 1998. Universities and the market for intellectual property in the life sciences. Journal of Policy Analysis & Management, 17: 253-277.
54. Rossiter, M. W. 1993. The Matilda effect in science. Social Studies of Science, 23: 325-341.
55. Rousseau, D. M., & McCarthy, S. 2007. Educating managers from an evidence-based perspective. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 6: 84-101.
56. Seglen, P. O. 1997. Why the impact factor should not be used for evaluating research. British Medical Journal, 314: 498-502.
57. Shadish, W. R., Tolliver, D., Gray, M., & Sengupta, S. K. 1995. Author judgments about works they cite. Social Studies of Science, 25: 477-498.
58. Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. 1997. Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
59. Starbuck W. H. 2005, How much better are the most-prestigious journals? The statistics of academic publication. Organization Science, 16: 180-200.
60. Tahai, A., & Meyer, M. J. 1999. A revealed preference study of management journals' direct influences. Strategic Management Journal, 20: 279-296.
61. Turner, W. A., & Rojouan, F. 1991. Evaluating input/output relationships in a regional research network using coword analysis. Scientometrics, 22: 139-154.
62. Van Maanen, J. 1995. Style as theory. Organization Science, 6: 133-143.
63. Zell, D. 2005. Pressure for relevancy at top-tier business schools. Journal of Management Inquiry, 14: 271-274.