Scholarship with impact

British Journal of Management

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 347-354

  Pettigrew, Andrew M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860397592     PISSN: 10453172     EISSN: 14678551     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2011.00769.x     Document Type: Note

References (37)

1. AACSB (2008). Final Report of the AACSB International Impact of Research Task Force. Tampa, FL: AACSB.
2. Adler, N., A. B. Shani and A. Styhre (2004). Collaborative Research in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3. Beech, N., R. MacIntosh and D. MacLean (2010). 'Dialogues between academics and practitioners: the role of generative dialogue encounters', Organization Studies, 31, pp. 1341-1367.
4. British Academy (2004). That Full Complement of Riches: The Contribution of the Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences to the Nation's Wealth. London: British Academy.
5. Collini, S. (2009). 'Commentary: impact on humanities', The Times Literary Supplement, 13 November, pp. 18-19.
6. Davies, H., S. Nutley and I. Walter (2005). 'Approaches to assessing the non-academic impact of social science research'. Report of an ESRC Symposium dated 12-13 May 2005, and available from the ESRC and the School of Management, University of St Andrews.
7. ESRC (1994). Building Partnerships: Enhancing the Quality of Management Research. Swindon: Economic and Social Research Council.
8. ESRC (2009). Taking Stock: A Summary of the ESRC's Work to Evaluate the Impact of Research on Policy and Practice. ESRC Society Today website.
9. ESRC (2011). Branching Out: New Directions in Impact Evaluations from the ESRC Evaluation Committee. ESRC Society Today website.
10. Hambrick, D. C. (1994). 'What if the academy actually mattered?', Academy of Management Review, 19, pp. 11-16.
11. HEFCE (2011). Decisions on Assessing Research Impact, REF 01.2011. Bristol: Higher Education Funding Council.
12. Hodgkinson, G. P. (ed.) (2001). Facing the Future: The Nature and Purpose of Management Research Re-assessed, British Journal of Management Special Issue, 12.
13. Hodgkinson, G. P. and D. M. Rousseau (2009). 'Bridging the rigour-relevance gap in management research: it's already happening', Journal of Management Studies, 46, pp. 534-546.
14. Jasanoff, S. (1990). The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15. Jasanoff, S. (ed.) (2006). States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and Social Order. London: Routledge.
16. Journal of Management Studies (2009). Special Issue on Management Research, 46.
17. Kieser, A. and L. Leiner (2009). 'Why the rigour-relevance gap in management research is unbridgeable', Journal of Management Studies, 46, pp. 516-533.
18. Kieser, A. and L. Leiner (2010). 'On the social construction of relevance: a rejoinder', Journal of Management Studies, 48, pp. 891-898.
19. Ladyman, J. (2009). 'Against impact', Oxford Magazine, No. 294, pp. 4-5.
20. Lynd, R. S. (1939). Knowledge for What? The Place of Social Science in American Culture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
21. Meagher, L. R. (2009). 'Impact evaluation of the PACCIT programme'. Unpublished report prepared for the Evaluation Committee of the ESRC.
22. Meagher, L. R., C. Lyall and S. Nutley (2008). 'Flows of knowledge, expertise and influence: a method for assessing policy and practice impacts from social science research', Research Evaluation, 17, pp. 163-173.
23. Nowotny, H., P. Scott and M. Gibbons (2001). Rethinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press.
24. Nutley, S., I. Walter and H. Davies (2007). Using Evidence: How Research can Inform Public Services. Bristol: Policy Press.
25. Pettigrew, A. M. (1985). The Awakening Giant, Continuity and Change in ICI. Oxford: Basil Blackwell (reissued by Routledge, 2011).
26. Pettigrew, A. M. (1987). 'Context and action in the transformation of the firm', Journal of Management Studies, 24, pp. 649-670.
27. Pettigrew, A. M. (1997). 'The double hurdles for management research'. In T. Clarke (ed.), Advancement in Organizational Behaviour: Essays in Honour of D. S. Pugh, pp. 277-296. London: Dartmouth Press.
28. Pettigrew, A. M. (2001). 'Management research after modernism', British Journal of Management, 12 Special Issue, pp. S61-S70.
29. Pettigrew, A. M. (2002). 'Leading organisational change: frameworks and findings from Warwick research, 1985-2002'. Unpublished report prepared for the Prime Minister's Office, 10 Downing Street, London, July. Available from andrew.pettigrew@sbs.ox.ac.uk.
30. Pettigrew, A. M. (2003). 'Co-producing knowledge and the challenges of international collaborative research'. In A. M. Pettigrew, R. Whittington, L. Melin, C. Sanchez-Runde, F. Van Den Bosch, W. Ruigrok and T. Numagami (eds), Innovative Forms of Organizing: International Perspectives, pp. 352-374. London: Sage.
31. Pettigrew, A. M., E. Ferlie and L. McKee (1992). Shaping Strategic Change: The Case of the NHS. London: Sage.
32. Power, M. (1999). The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33. Starkey, K. and P. Madan (2001). 'Bridging the relevance gaps: aligning stakeholders in the future of management research', British Journal of Management, 12 Special Issue, pp. S3-S26.
34. Starkey, K., A. Hatchuel and S. Tempest (2009). 'Management research and the new logics of discovery and engagement', Journal of Management Studies, 46, pp. 547-558.
35. Tranfield, D. and K. Starkey (1998). 'The nature, social organization and promotion of management research', British Journal of Management, 9, pp. 341-353.
36. Van de Ven, A. H. (2007). Engaged Scholarship: A Guide for Organizational and Social Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37. Weiss, C. H. (1980). 'Knowledge creep and decision accretion', Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 1, pp. 381-404.