Scholarly impact revisited

Academy of Management Perspectives

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 105-132

  Aguinis, Herman ^a   Suárez González, Isabel ^b   Lannelongue, Gustavo ^b   Joo, Harry ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SALAMANCA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84879466443     PISSN: 15589080     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5465/amp.2011.0088     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Academy of Management Strategic Plan (2012). Explore the full plan. Retrieved from http://strategicplan. aomonline.org/plan/full
2. Adler, N. J., & Harzing, A. (2009). When knowledge wins: Transcending the sense and nonsense of academic rankings. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 8, 72-95.
3. Aguinis, H. (2004). Regression analysis for categorical moderators. New York: Guilford.
4. Aguinis, H. (2013). Performance management (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
5. Aguinis, H., Dalton, D. R., Bosco, F. A., Pierce, C. A., & Dalton, C. M. (2011). Meta-analytic choices and judgment calls: Implications for theory building and testing, obtained effect sizes, and scholarly impact. Journal of Management, 37, 5-38.
6. Aguinis, H., & Vaschetto, S. J. (2011). Editorial responsibility: Managing the publishing process to do good and do well. Management and Organization Review, 7, 407-422.
7. Aguinis, H., Werner, S., Abbott, J. L., Angert, C., Park, J. H., & Kohlhausen, D. (2010). Customer-centric science: Reporting research results with rigor, relevance, and practical impact in mind. Organizational Research Methods, 13, 515-539.
8. Baldi, S. (1998). Normative versus social constructivist processes in the allocation of citations: A networkanalytic model. American Sociological Review, 63, 829-846.
9. Barjak, F., Li, X., & Thelwall, M. (2007). Which factors explain the web impact of scientists' personal home page? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59, 628-643.
10. Bansal, T., Bertels, S., Ewart, T., MacConnachie, P., & O'Brien, J. (2012). Bridging the research-practice gap. Academy of Management Perspectives, 26(1), 1-92.
11. Bedeian, A. G. (2005). Crossing disciplinary boundaries: An epilegomenon for Lockett and McWilliams. Journal of Management Inquiry, 14, 151-155.
12. Blackburn, R. S., & Mitchell, M. (1981). Citation analysis in the organizational sciences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 337-342.
13. Cascio, W. F., & Aguinis, H. (2008). Research in industrial and organizational psychology from 1963 to 2007: Changes, choices, and trends. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1062-1081.
14. Cascio, W. F., & Aguinis, H. (2011). Applied psychology in human resource management (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
15. Certo, S. T., Sirmon, D. G., & Brymer, R. (2010). Competition and knowledge creation in management: Investigating changes in scholarship from 1988 to 2007. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 9, 591-606.
16. Chan, K. C., Fung, H., & Leung, W. K. (2009). Influential research and institutions in international business research. Multinational Business Review, 17, 23-45.
17. Colquitt, J. A. (2011). From the editors: The next three years at AMJ-Maintaining the mission while expanding the journal. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 9-14.
18. Conway, J. M., & Huffcutt, A. I. (2003). A review and evaluation of exploratory factor analysis practices in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 6, 147-168.
19. Cortina, J. M. (2011). Editorial. Organizational Research Methods, 14, 6-9.
20. Cronin, B., Snyder, H. W., Rosenbaum, H., Martinson, A., & Callahan, E. (1998). Invoked on the Web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49, 1319-1328.
21. Crossan, M. M., Maurer, C. C., & White, R. E. (2011). Reflections on the 2009 AMR decade award: Do we have a theory of organizational learning? Academy of Management Review, 36, 446-460.
22. Endler, N. S., Rushton, J. P., & Roediger, H. L. (1978). Productivity and scholarly impact. American Psychologist, 33, 1064-1082.
23. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
24. Furrer, O., Thomas, H., & Goussevskaia, A. (2008). The structure and evolution of the strategic management field: A content analysis of 26 years of strategic management research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10, 1-23.
25. Gomez-Mejia, L., & Balkin, D. (1992). The determinants of faculty pay: An agency theory perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 921-955.
26. Hambrick, D. C. (1994). 1993 presidential address: What if the Academy actually mattered? Academy of Management Review, 19, 11-16.
27. Harzing, A., & Van Der Wal, R. A. (2009). Google Scholar h-index for journals: An alternative metric to measure journal impact in economics and business. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60, 41-46.
28. Hayton, J. C., Allen, D. G., & Scarpello, V. (2004). Factor retention decisions in exploratory factor analysis: A tutorial on parallel analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 7, 191-205.
29. Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE). (2011). Decisions on assessing research impact. Bristol: Higher Education Funding Council. Retrieved from http://www.hefce.ac.uk/research/ref/pubs/2011/01-11
30. Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 16569-16572.
31. Ilgen, D. (2007). Citations to management articles: Cautions for the science about advice for the scientist. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 507-509.
32. Judge, T. A., Colbert, A., Cable, D. M., & Rynes, S. L. (2007). What causes a management article to be cited-Article, author, or journal? Academy of Management Journal, 50, 491-506.
33. Kacmar, K. M., & Whitfield, J. M. (2000). An additional rating method for journal articles in the field of management. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 392-406.
34. Leung, K. (2007). The glory and tyranny of citation impact: An East Asian perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 510-513.
35. Link, A. N., Siegel, D. S., & Bozeman, B. (2007). An empirical analysis of the propensity of academics to engage in informal university technology transfer. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16, 641-655.
36. Lockett, A., & McWilliams, A. (2005). The balance of trade between disciplines: Do we effectively manage knowledge? Journal of Management Inquiry, 14, 139-150.
37. Molina-Azorin, J. F. (2012). Mixed methods research in strategic management: Impact and applications. Organizational Research Methods, 15, 33-56.
38. Morrison, A. J., & Inkpen, A. C. (1991). An analysis of significant contributions to the international business literature. Journal of International Business, 22, 143-154.
39. O'Boyle, E., & Aguinis, H. (2012). The best and the rest: Revisiting the norm of normality of individual performance. Personnel Psychology, 65, 79-119.
40. Partington, D., & Jenkins, M. (2007). Deconstructing scholarship: An analysis of research methods citations in the organizational sciences. Organizational Research Methods, 10, 399-416.
41. Pettigrew, A. M. (2011). Scholarship with impact. British Journal of Management, 22, 347-354.
42. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, N. P., & Bachrach, D. G. (2008). Scholarly influence in the field of management: A bibliometric analysis of the determinants of university and author impact in the management literature in the past quarter century. Journal of Management, 34, 641-720.
43. Rynes, S. L., Giluk, T. L., & Brown, K. G. (2007). The very separate worlds of academic and practitioner periodicals in human resource management: Implications for evidence-based management. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 987-1008.
44. Shane, S. A. (1997). Who is publishing in the entrepreneurship research? Journal of Management, 23, 83-95.
45. Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D., Atwater, L. E., & Link, A. (2004). Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: Qualitative evidence from the commercialization of university technologies. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 21, 115-142.
46. Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D., & Link, A. (2003). Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: An exploratory study. Research Policy, 32, 27-48.
47. Simonton, D. K. (1997). Creative productivity: A predictive and explanatory model of career trajectories and landmarks. Psychological Review, 104, 66-89.
48. Thelwall, M., & Sud, P. (2011). A comparison of methods for collecting web citation data for academic organizations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62, 1488-1497.
49. Van Fleet, D. D., McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. S. (2000). A theoretical and empirical analysis of journal rankings: The case of formal lists. Journal of Management, 26, 839-861.
50. Webmaster tools help-google.com. (February 15, 2012). Google search result count. Retrieved from http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/ answer.py?answer = 70920