Combined contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance and diffusion-weighted imaging reading adapted to the "breast Imaging Reporting and Data System" for multiparametric 3-T imaging of breast lesions

European Radiology

Volumn 23, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 1791-1802

  Pinker, K ^a   Bickel, H ^a   Helbich, T H ^a   Gruber, S ^a   Dubsky, P ^a   Pluschnig, U ^a   Rudas, M ^a   Bago Horvath, Z ^a   Weber, M ^a   Trattnig, S ^a   Bogner, W ^a  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

3 Tesla; BI RADS; Breast imaging; DWI; MRI

Indexed keywords

GADOTERATE MEGLUMINE;

ADULT; AGED; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; BREAST IMAGING REPORTING AND DATA SYSTEM; BREAST LESION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIOGRAPHY DEVICE; SENSITIVITY AND SENSIBILITY; SUSCEPTIBILITY WEIGHTED IMAGING;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AREA UNDER CURVE; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; DIFFUSION MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84879024582     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: 14321084     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-013-2771-8     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Jacobs MA, Barker PB, Bluemke DA et al (2003) Benign and malignant breast lesions: diagnosis with multiparametric MR imaging. Radiology 229:225-232
2. Pinker K, Bogner W, Gruber S et al (2011) Molecular imaging in breast cancer - potential future aspects. Breast Care (Basel) 6:110-119
3. Jacobs MA (2009) Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of breast cancer. J Am Coll Radiol 6:523-526
4. Moradi M, Salcudean SE, Chang SD, et al. (2012) Multiparametric MRI maps for detection and grading of dominant prostate tumors. J Magn Reson Imaging 35:1403-1413
5. Ei Khouli RH, Jacobs MA, Mezban SD et al (2010) Diffusion-weighted imaging improves the diagnostic accuracy of conventional 3.0-T breast MR imaging. Radiology 256:64-73
6. Partridge SC, DeMartini WB, Kurland BF, Eby PR, White SW, Lehman CD (2009) Quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging as an adjunct to conventional breast MRI for improved positive predictive value. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:1716-1722
7. Yabuuchi H, Matsuo Y, Kamitani T et al (2010) Non-mass-like enhancement on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images. Eur J Radiol 75:e126-132
8. Yabuuchi H, Matsuo Y, Okafuji T et al (2008) Enhanced mass on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images. J Magn Reson Imaging: JMRI 28:1157-1165
9. Kul S, Cansu A, Alhan E, Dinc H, Gunes G, Reis A (2011) Contribution of diffusion-weighted imaging to dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the characterization of breast tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196:210-217
10. Sardanelli F, Boetes C, Borisch B et al (2010) Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: recommendations from the EUSOMA working group. Eur J Cancer 46:1296-1316
11. American College of Radiology (ACR) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Atlas (BI-RADS® Atlas). American College of Radiology, Reston, VA. http://www.acr.org/Quality-Safety/Resources/BIRADS/Mammography
12. Bogner W, Gruber S, Pinker K et al (2009) Diffusion-weighted MR for differentiation of breast lesions at 3.0 T: how does selection of diffusion protocols affect diagnosis? Radiology 253:341-351
13. Pinker K, Grabner G, Bogner W et al (2009) A combined high temporal and high spatial resolution 3 Tesla MR imaging protocol for the assessment of breast lesions: initial results. Investig Radiol 44:553-558
14. Pinker-Domenig K, Bogner W, Gruber S et al (2012) High resolution MRI of the breast at 3 T: which BI-RADS(R) descriptors are most strongly associated with the diagnosis of breast cancer? Eur Radiol 22:322-330
15. Rosset A, Spadola L, Ratib O (2004) OsiriX: an open-source software for navigating in multidimensional dicom images. J Digit Imaging 17:205-216
16. Bogner W, Pinker K, Bickel H et al (2012) Readout-segmented echo-pianar imaging improves the diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted MR imaging breast examinations at 3.0 T. Radiology 263:64-76
17. Woodhams R, Matsunaga K, Kan S et al (2005) ADC mapping of benign and malignant breast tumors. J Magn Reson Med Sci 4:35-42
18. Wallis M, Tardivon A, Helbich T, Schreer I (2007) Guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging for Diagnostic Interventional Breast Procedures. Eur Radiol 17:581-588
19. Pathologists RCo (2001) NHS Cancer Screening Programmes: Guidelinesfor non-operative diagnostic procedures and reporting in breast cancer screening. NSHBSP publication, Sheffield. http://www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk/breastscreen/ publications/nhsbsp02.pdf
20. Pathology EWGoBS (2006) Quality assurance guidelines for pathologyEuropean guidelines for quality assurance in cancer screening and diagnosis, 4th edn. European Union, pp 219-312
21. Kluttig A, Trocchi P, Heinig A et al (2007) Reliability and validity of needle biopsy evaluation of breast-abnormalities using the B-categorization- design and objectives of the Diagnosis Optimisation Study (DIOS). BMC Cancer 7:100
22. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1983) A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 148:839-843
23. Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307-310
24. Pinker K, Stadlbauer A, Bogner W, Gruber S, Helbich TH (2010) Molecular imaging of cancer: MR spectroscopy and beyond. Eur J Radiol 81:566-77
25. Steyerberg E (2009) Overfitting and optimism in prediction models. Clinical Prediction Models. Statistics for Biology and Health 83-100
26. Sakamoto N, Tozaki M, Higa K et al (2008) Categorization of non-mass-like breast lesions detected by MRI. Breast Cancer 15:241-246
27. Tozaki M, Fukuda K (2006) High-spatial-resolution MRI of non-masslike breast lesions: interpretation model based on BI-RADS MRI descriptors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:330-337
28. Woodhams R, Kakita S, Hata H et al (2009) Diffusion-weighted imaging of mucinous carcinoma of the breast: evaluation of apparent diffusion coefficient and signal intensity in correlation with histologic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:260-266
29. Iima M, Le Bihan D, Okumura R et al (2011) Apparent diffusion coefficient as an MR imaging biomarker of low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ: a pilot study. Radiology 260:364-372
30. Rahbar H, Partridge SC, Eby PR et al (2011) Characterization of ductal carcinoma in situ on diffusion weighted breast MRI. Eur Radiol 21:2011-2019
31. Bianchi S, Caini S, Cattani MG, Vezzosi V, Biancalani M, Palli D (2009) Diagnostic concordance in reporting breast needle core biopsies using the B classification-A panel in Italy. Pathol Oncol Res 15:725-732
32. Bianchi S, Caini S, Renne G et al (2011) Positive predictive value for malignancy on surgical excision of breast lesions of uncertain malignant potential (B3) diagnosed by stereotactic vacuum-assisted needle core biopsy (VANCB): a large multi-institutional study in Italy. Breast 20:264-270
33. Simpson PT, Reis-Filho JS, Gale T, Lakhani SR (2005) Molecular evolution of breast cancer. J Pathol 205:248-254
34. Ellsworth RE, Ellsworth DL, Deyarmin B et al (2005) Timing of critical genetic changes in human breast disease. Ann Surg Oncol 12:1054-1060
35. Riedl CC, Ponhold L, Flory D et al (2007) Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast improves detection of invasive cancer, preinvasive cancer, and premalignant lesions during surveillance of women at high risk for breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 13:6144-6152
36. Unal O, Koparan HI, Avcu S, Kalender AM, Kisli E (2011) The diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in soft tissue abscesses. Eur J Radiol 77:490-494
37. Oto A, Schmid-Tannwald C, Agrawal G et al (2011) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of abdominopelvic abscesses. Emerg Radiol 18:515-524
38. Kuijper A, Mommers EC, van der Wall E, van Diest PJ (2001) Histopathology of fibroadenoma of the breast. Am J Clin Pathol 115:736-742
39. Kopans DB (1994) Caution on core. Radiology 193:325-326, discussion 326-328