Applications of transcranial direct current stimulation for understanding brain function

Trends in Neurosciences

Volumn 37, Issue 12, 2014, Pages 742-753

  Filmer, Hannah L ^a   Dux, Paul E ^a   Mattingley, Jason B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Memory; Neural oscillations; Neural processes; Prefrontal cortex; TDCS; Training

Indexed keywords

BRAIN FUNCTION; COGNITION; HUMAN; LEARNING; MEMORY; METHODOLOGY; NERVE EXCITABILITY; NEUROBIOLOGY; PERCEPTION; REVIEW; TRAINING; TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION; ANIMAL; BRAIN; NERVE CELL NETWORK; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION;

ANIMALS; BRAIN; COGNITION; HUMANS; MEMORY; NERVE NET; TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION;

EID: 84919470771     PISSN: 01662236     EISSN: 1878108X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tins.2014.08.003     Document Type: Review

References (131)

1. Coffman B.A., et al. Battery powered thought: enhancement of attention, learning, and memory in healthy adults using transcranial direct current stimulation. Neuroimage 2014, 85:895-908.
2. Kuo M-F., Nitsche M.A. Effects of transcranial electrical stimulation on cognition. Clin. EEG Neurosci. 2012, 43:192-199.
3. Kuo M.F., et al. Therapeutic effects of non-invasive brain stimulation with direct currents (tDCS) in neuropsychiatric diseases. Neuroimage 2014, 85:948-960.
4. Floel A. tDCS-enhanced motor and cognitive function in neurological diseases. Neuroimage 2014, 85:934-947.
5. Brunoni A.R., et al. Impact of 5-HTTLPR and BDNF polymorphisms on response to sertraline versus transcranial direct current stimulation: implications for the serotonergic system. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2013, 23:1530-1540.
6. Thibaut A., et al. tDCS in patients with disorders of consciousness sham-controlled randomized double-blind study. Neurology 2014, 82:1112-1118.
7. Chambers, C. (2013) Neuro-enhancement in the military: far-fetched or an inevitable future? The Guardian 7 October.
8. Cave H. Artificially stimulating a love of art. New Scientist 2013, 220:19.
9. Hurley, D. (2013) Jumper cables for the mind. The New York Times 1 November, p. MM50.
10. Wang, S.S. (2014) Jumper leads for the brain. The Australian 11 February.
11. Sapolsky, R. (2014) What drives us to do the right thing? The Wall Street Journal 2 January.
12. Thomson, H. (2010) Electronic brain stimulation improves maths skills. New Scientist 4 Novemeber.
13. Huang Y., et al. Automated MRI segmentation for individualized modeling of current flow in the human head. J. Neural Eng. 2013, 10:066004.
14. Russell M.J., et al. Individual differences in transcranial electrical stimulation current density. J. Biomed. Res. 2013, 27:495-508.
15. Saiote C., et al. Combining functional magnetic resonance imaging with transcranial electrical stimulation. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2013, 7:435.
16. Polania R., et al. Modulating cortico-striatal and thalamo-cortical functional connectivity with transcranial direct current stimulation. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2012, 33:2499-2508.
17. Marshall L., Binder S. Contribution of transcranial oscillatory stimulation to research on neural networks: an emphasis on hippocampo-neocortical rhythms. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2013, 7:614.
18. Filmer H.L., et al. Disrupting prefrontal cortex prevents performance gains from sensory-motor training. J. Neurosci. 2013, 33:18654-18660.
19. Iuculano T., Kadosh R.C. The mental cost of cognitive enhancement. J. Neurosci. 2013, 33:4482-4486.
20. Meinzer M., et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation over multiple days improves learning and maintenance of a novel vocabulary. Cortex 2014, 50:137-147.
21. Bindman L.J., et al. The action of brief polarizing currents on the cerebral cortex of the rat (1) during current flow and (2) in the production of long-lasting after-effects. J. Physiol. 1964, 172:369-382.
22. Purpura D.P., McMurtry J.G. Intracellular activities and evoked potential changes during polarization of motor cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 1965, 28:166-185.
23. Nitsche M.A., et al. Shaping the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 2007, 97:3109-3117.
24. Nitsche M.A., Paulus W. Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J. Physiol. 2000, 527:633-639.
25. Nitsche M.A., Paulus W. Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans. Neurology 2001, 57:1899-1901.
26. Pellicciari M.C., et al. Excitability modulation of the motor system induced by transcranial direct current stimulation: a multimodal approach. Neuroimage 2013, 83:569-580.
27. Antal A., et al. Manipulation of phosphene thresholds by transcranial direct current stimulation in man. Exp. Brain Res. 2003, 150:375-378.
28. Antal A., et al. Excitability changes induced in the human primary visual cortex by transcranial direct current stimulation: direct electrophysiological evidence. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004, 45:702-707.
29. Jang S.H., et al. The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on the cortical activation by motor task in the human brain: an fMRI study. Neurosci. Lett. 2009, 460:117-120.
30. Kim C.R., et al. Modulation of cortical activity after anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the lower limb motor cortex: a functional MRI study. Brain Stimul. 2012, 5:462-467.
31. Kwon Y.H., Jang S.H. The enhanced cortical activation induced by transcranial direct current stimulation during hand movements. Neurosci. Lett. 2011, 492:105-108.
32. Baudewig J., et al. Regional modulation of BOLD MRI responses to human sensorimotor activation by transcranial direct current stimulation. Magn. Reson. Med. 2001, 45:196-201.
33. Turi Z., et al. Functional neuroimaging and transcranial electrical stimulation. Clin. EEG Neurosci. 2012, 43:200-208.
34. Antal A., et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation over the primary motor cortex during fMRI. Neuroimage 2011, 55:590-596.
35. Stagg C.J., et al. Modulation of movement-associated cortical activation by transcranial direct current stimulation. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2009, 30:1412-1423.
36. Batsikadze G., et al. Partially non-linear stimulation intensity-dependent effects of direct current stimulation on motor cortex excitability in humans. J. Physiol. 2013, 591:1987-2000.
37. Horvath J.C., et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation: five important issues we aren't discussing (but probably should be). Front. Syst. Neurosci. 2014, 8:2.
38. Antal A., et al. Towards unravelling task-related modulations of neuroplastic changes induced in the human motor cortex. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2007, 26:2687-2691.
39. Thirugnanasambandam N., et al. Nicotinergic impact on focal and non-focal neuroplasticity induced by non-invasive brain stimulation in non-smoking humans. Neuropsychopharmacology 2011, 36:879-886.
40. Sale M.V., et al. Factors influencing the magnitude and reproducibility of corticomotor excitability changes induced by paired associative stimulation. Exp. Brain Res. 2007, 181:6156-6226.
41. Pascual-Leone A., et al. Responses to rapid-rate transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex. Brain 1994, 117:847-858.
42. Chen R., et al. Depression of motor cortex excitability by low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurology 1997, 48:1398-1403.
43. Siebner H.R., et al. Preconditioning of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with transcranial direct current stimulation: evidence for homeostatic plasticity in the human motor cortex. J. Neurosci. 2004, 24:3379-3385.
44. Moloney T.M., Witney A.G. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) priming of 1Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) modulates experimental pain thresholds. Neurosci. Lett. 2013, 534:289-294.
45. Bocci T., et al. Evidence for metaplasticity in the human visual cortex. J. Neural Transm. 2014, 121:221-231.
46. Nitsche M.A., et al. Pharmacological modulation of cortical excitability shifts induced by transcranial direct current stimulation in humans. J. Physiol. 2003, 553:293-301.
47. Stagg C.J., Nitsche M.A. Physiological basis of transcranial direct current stimulation. Neuroscientist 2011, 17:37-53.
48. Stagg C.J., et al. Polarity-sensitive modulation of cortical neurotransmitters by transcranial stimulation. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29:5202-5206.
49. Stagg C.J., et al. Relationship between physiological measures of excitability and levels of glutamate and GABA in the human motor cortex. J. Physiol. 2011, 589:5845-5855.
50. Liebetanz D., et al. Pharmacological approach to the mechanisms of transcranial DC stimulation-induced after-effects of human motor cortex excitability. Brain 2002, 125:2238-2247.
51. Nitsche M.A., et al. GABAergic modulation of DC stimulation-induced motor cortex excitability shifts in humans. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2004, 19. 2720-2706.
52. Medeiros L.F., et al. Neurobiological effects of transcranial direct current stimulation: a review. Front. Psychiatry 2012, 3:110.
53. McCormick D.A. GABA as an inhibitory neurotransmitter in human cerebral cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 1989, 62:1018-1027.
54. Meldrum B.S. Glutamate as a neurotransmitter in the brain: review of physiology and pathology. J. Nutr. 2000, 130:1007S-1015S.
55. Kuo M-F., et al. Boosting focally-induced brain plasticity by dopamine. Cereb. Cortex 2008, 18:648-651.
56. Monte-Silva K., et al. Dosage-dependent non-linear effect of L-dopa on human motor cortex plasticity. J. Physiol. 2010, 588:3415-3424.
57. Nitsche M.A., et al. Serotonin affects transcranial direct current-induced neuroplasticity in humans. Biol. Psychiatry 2009, 66:503-508.
58. Kuo M.F., et al. Focusing effect of acetylcholine on neuroplasticity in the human motor cortex. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27. 14442-14427.
59. Biswal B.B. Resting state fMRI: a personal history. Neuroimage 2012, 62:938-944.
60. Raichle M.E., Snyder A.Z. A default mode of brain function: a brief history of an evolving idea. Neuroimage 2007, 37:1083-1090.
61. Buckner R.L., et al. The brain's default network: anatomy, function, and relevance to disease. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2008, 1124:1-38.
62. Zanto T.P., Gazzaley A. Fronto-parietal network: flexible hub of cognitive control. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2013, 17:602-603.
63. Sestieri C., et al. Domain-general signals in the cingulo-opercular network for visuospatial attention and episodic memory. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2014, 26:551-568.
64. Sehm B., et al. Dynamic modulation of intrinsic functional connectivity by transcranial direct current stimulation. J. Neurophysiol. 2012, 108:3253-3263.
65. Keeser D., et al. Prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation changes connectivity of resting-state networks during fMRI. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31:15284-15293.
66. Amadi U., et al. Polarity-specific effects of motor transcranial direct current stimulation on fMRI resting state networks. Neuroimage 2014, 88:155-161.
67. Kirimoto H., et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation over the motor association cortex induces plastic changes in ipsilateral primary motor and somatosensory cortices. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2011, 122:777-783.
68. Feurra M., et al. Cortico-cortical connectivity between right parietal and bilateral primary motor cortices during imagined and observed actions: a combined TMS/tDCS study. Front. Neural Circuits 2011, 5:10.
69. Shafi M.M., et al. Exploration and modulation of brain network interactions with noninvasive brain stimulation in combination with neuroimaging. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2012, 35:805-825.
70. Cocchi L., et al. Dynamic cooperation and competition between brain systems during cognitive control. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2013, 17:493-501.
71. Cocchi L., et al. Complexity in relational processing predicts changes in functional brain network dynamics. Cereb. Cortex 2014, 24:2283-2296.
72. Fries P. A mechanism for cognitive dynamics: neuronal communication through neuronal coherence. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2005, 9:474-480.
73. Marshall L., et al. Boosting slow oscillations during sleep potentiates memory. Nature 2006, 444:610-613.
74. Steriade M., Timofeev I. Neuronal plasticity in thalamocortical networks during sleep and waking oscillations. Neuron 2003, 37:563-576.
75. Notturno F., et al. Local and remote effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on the electrical activity of the motor cortical network. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2014, 35:2220-2232.
76. Zaehle T., et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation of the prefrontal cortex modulates working memory performance: combined behavioural and electrophysiological evidence. BMC Neurosci. 2011, 12:1-11.
77. Antal A., et al. Oscillatory brain activity and transcranial direct current stimulation in humans. Neuroreport 2004, 15:1307-1310.
78. Binder S., et al. Transcranial slow oscillation stimulation during NREM sleep enhances acquisition of the radial maze task and modulates cortical network activity in rats. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 2014, 7:220.
79. Antonenko D., et al. Napping to renew learning capacity: enhanced encoding after stimulation of sleep slow oscillations. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2013, 37:1142-1151.
80. Marshall L., et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation during sleep improves declarative memory. J. Neurosci. 2004, 24:9985-9992.
81. Kirov R., et al. Slow oscillation electrical brain stimulation during waking promotes EEG theta activity and memory encoding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106:15460-15465.
82. Hanslmayr S., et al. Prestimulus oscillatory phase at 7Hz gates cortical information flow and visual perception. Curr. Biol. 2013, 23:2273-3228.
83. VanRullen R., et al. Ongoing EEG phase as a trial-by-trial predictor of perceptual and attentional variability. Front. Psychol. 2011, 2:60.
84. Neuling T., et al. Good vibrations: oscillatory phase shapes perception. Neuroimage 2012, 63:771-778.
85. Strüber D., et al. Antiphasic 40Hz oscillatory current stimulation affects bistable motion perception. Brain Topogr. 2014, 27:158-171.
86. Kadosh R. Using transcranial electrical stimulation to enhance cognitive functions in the typical and atypical brain. Transl. Neurosci. 2013, 4:20-33.
87. Jacobson L., et al. tDCS polarity effects in motor and cognitive domains: a meta-analytical review. Exp. Brain Res. 2012, 216:1-10.
88. Clark V.P., et al. TDCS guided using fMRI significantly accelerates learning to identify concealed objects. Neuroimage 2012, 59:117-128.
89. Cohen Kadosh R., et al. Modulating neuronal activity produces specific and long-lasting changes in numerical competence. Curr. Biol. 2010, 20:2016-2020.
90. Filmer H.L., et al. Improved multitasking following prefrontal tDCS. Cortex 2013, 49:2845-2852.
91. Reis J., et al. Noninvasive cortical stimulation enhances motor skill acquisition over multiple days through an effect on consolidation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106:1590-1595.
92. Stagg C.J., et al. Polarity and timing-dependent effects of transcranial direct current stimulation in explicit motor learning. Neuropsychologia 2011, 49:800-804.
93. Ferrucci R., et al. Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation impairs the practice-dependent proficiency increase in working memory. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2008, 20:1687-1697.
94. Peters M.A., et al. Anodal tDCS to V1 blocks visual perceptual learning consolidation. Neuropsychologia 2013, 51:1234-1239.
95. Stagg C.J., et al. The role of GABA in human motor learning. Curr. Biol. 2011, 21:480-484.
96. Nitsche M.A., et al. Facilitation of implicit motor learning by weak transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex in the human. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2003, 15:619-626.
97. Stagg C.J., Johansen-Berg H. Studying the effects of transcranial direct-current stimulation in stroke recovery using magnetic resonance imaging. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2013, 7:857.
98. Marquez J., et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): does it have merit in stroke rehabilitation? A systematic review. Int. J. Stroke 2013, 10.1111/ijs.12169.
99. Floel A., et al. Noninvasive brain stimulation improves language learning. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2008, 20:1415-1422.
100. Cotelli M., et al. Treatment of primary progressive aphasias by transcranial direct current stimulation combined with language training. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2013, 39:799-808.
101. Marangolo P., et al. Something to talk about: enhancement of linguistic cohesion through tdCS in chronic non fluent aphasia. Neuropsychologia 2013, 53C:246-256.
102. Marangolo P., et al. Bihemispheric stimulation over left and right inferior frontal region enhances recovery from apraxia of speech in chronic aphasia. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2013, 38:3370-3377.
103. Sandrini M., et al. Double dissociation of working memory load effects induced by bilateral parietal modulation. Neuropsychologia 2012, 50:396-402.
104. Russo R., et al. Perception of comfort during active and sham transcranial direct current stimulation: a double blind study. Brain Stimul. 2013, 6:946-951.
105. O'Connell N.E., et al. Rethinking clinical trials of transcranial direct current stimulation: participant and assessor blinding is inadequate at intensities of 2mA. PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e47514.
106. Bai S., et al. A computational modelling study of transcranial direct current stimulation montages used in depression. Neuroimage 2013, 87C:332-344.
107. Bikson M., et al. Computational models of transcranial direct current stimulation. Clin. EEG Neurosci. 2012, 43:176-183.
108. Faria P. A finite element analysis of the effect of electrode area and inter-electrode distance on the spatial distribution of the current density in tDCS. J. Neural Eng. 2011, 8:066017.
109. Neuling T., et al. Finite-element model predicts current density distribution for clinical applications of tDCS and tACS. Front. Psychiatry 2012, 3:83.
110. Wagner S., et al. Investigation of tDCS volume conduction effects in a highly realistic head model. J. Neural Eng. 2013, 11:016002.
111. Wagner T., et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation: a computer-based human model study. Neuroimage 2007, 35:1113-1124.
112. Bestmann S., Feredoes E. Combined neurostimulation and neuroimaging in cognitive neuroscience: past, present, and future. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2013, 1296:11-30.
113. Sporns O. The human connectome: a complex network. Year in Cognitive Neuroscience 2011, 109-125. Blackwell Science. M.B. Miller, A. Kingstone (Eds.).
114. Simons D.J. The value of direct replication. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 2014, 9:76-80.
115. Ruff C., et al. Changing social norm compliance with noninvasive brain stimulation. Science 2013, 342:482-484.
116. Antal A., Paulus W. Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS). Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2013, 7:317.
117. Snowball A., et al. Long-term enhancement of brain function and cognition using cognitive training and brain stimulation. Curr. Biol. 2013, 23:987-992.
118. Cappelletti M., et al. Transfer of cognitive training across magnitude dimensions achieved with concurrent brain stimulation of the parietal lobe. J. Neurosci. 2013, 33:14899-14907.
119. Vanneste S., et al. Head-to-head comparison of transcranial random noise stimulation, transcranial AC stimulation, and transcranial DC stimulation for tinnitus. Front. Psychiatry 2013, 4:158.
120. Moss F., et al. Stochastic resonance and sensory information processing: a tutorial and review of application. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2004, 115:267-281.
121. Martin D.M., et al. Can transcranial direct current stimulation enhance outcomes from cognitive training? A randomized controlled trial in healthy participants. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2013, 16:1927-1936.
122. Harty S., et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation over right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex enhances error awareness in older age. J. Neurosci. 2014, 34:3646-3652.
123. Miranda P.C., et al. Modeling the current distribution during transcranial direct current stimulation. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2006, 117:1623-1629.
124. de Berker A.O., et al. Predicting the behavioral impact of transcranial direct current stimulation: issues and limitations. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2013, 7:613.
125. Coffman B.A., et al. Enhancement of object detection with transcranial direct current stimulation is associated with increased attention. BMC Neurosci. 2012, 13:108.
126. Sparing R., et al. Bidirectional alterations of interhemispheric parietal balance by non-invasive cortical stimulation. Brain 2009, 132:3011-3020.
127. Fregni F., et al. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of prefrontal cortex enhances working memory. Exp. Brain Res. 2005, 166:23-30.
128. Moos K., et al. Modulation of top-down control of visual attention by cathodal tDCS over right IPS. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32:16360-16368.
129. Olshausen B.A., Field D.J. Sparse coding with an overcomplete basis set: a strategy employed by V1?. Vision Res. 1997, 37:3311-3325.
130. Palazidou E. The neurobiology of depression. Br. Med. Bull. 2012, 101:127-145.
131. Grefkes C., Fink G.R. Reorganization of cerebral networks after stroke: new insights from neuroimaging with connectivity approaches. Brain 2011, 134:1264-1276.