TDCS in patients with disorders of consciousness: Sham-controlled randomized double-blind study

Neurology

Volumn 82, Issue 13, 2014, Pages 1112-1118

  Thibaut, Aurore ^a,b   Bruno, Marie Aurélie ^a,b   Ledoux, Didier ^a,b   Demertzi, Athena ^a,b   Laureys, Steven ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN DAMAGE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; COMA; CONSCIOUSNESS; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GLASGOW OUTCOME SCALE; HUMAN; INJURY SEVERITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMALLY CONSCIOUS STATE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERSISTENT VEGETATIVE STATE; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; SHAM PROCEDURE; SHORT COURSE THERAPY; THERAPY EFFECT; TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION; TREATMENT RESPONSE;

ADULT; CONSCIOUSNESS; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERSISTENT VEGETATIVE STATE; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84898749989     PISSN: 00283878     EISSN: 1526632X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000260     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Bernat JL. Chronic disorders of consciousness. Lancet 2006;367:1181-1192.
2. Giacino JT, Whyte J, Bagiella E, et al. Placebo-controlled trial of amantadine for severe traumatic brain injury. N Engl J Med 2012;366:819-826.
3. Schiff ND, Giacino JT, Kalmar K, et al. Behavioural improvements with thalamic stimulation after severe traumatic brain injury. Nature 2007;448:600-603.
4. Fregni F, Boggio PS, Nitsche M, et al. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of prefrontal cortex enhances working memory. Exp Brain Res 2005;166:23-30.
5. Nelson JT, McKinley RA, Golob EJ, Warm JS, Parasuraman R. Enhancing vigilance in operators with prefrontal cortex transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Neuroimage 2014;85:909-917.
6. Kang EK, Kim DY, Paik NJ. Transcranial direct current stimulation of the left prefrontal cortex improves attention in patients with traumatic brain injury: a pilot study. J Rehabil Med 2012;44:346-350.
7. Boggio P, Ferrucci R, Rigonatti S, et al. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on working memory in patients with Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Sci 2006;249:31-38.
8. Ferrucci R, Mameli F, Guidi I, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation improves recognition memory in Alzheimer disease. Neurology 2008;71:493-498.
9. Kessler SK, Turkeltaub PE, Benson JG, Hamilton RH. Differences in the experience of active and sham transcranial direct current stimulation. Brain Stimul 2012;5:155-162.
10. The Multi-Society Task Force on PVS. Medical aspects of the persistent vegetative state (1): The Multi-Society Task Force on PVS. N Engl J Med 1994;330:1499-1508.
11. Laureys S, Celesia GG, Cohadon F, et al. Unresponsive wakefulness syndrome: a new name for the vegetative state or apallic syndrome. BMC Med 2010;8:68.
12. Giacino JT, Ashwal S, Childs N, et al. The minimally conscious state: definition and diagnostic criteria. Neurology 2002;58:349-353.
13. Nitsche MA, Liebetanz D, Lang N, Antal A, Tergau F, Paulus W. Safety criteria for transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in humans. Clin Neurophysiol 2003;114: 2220-2222; author reply 2222-2223.
14. Stagg CJ, Nitsche MA. Physiological basis of transcranial direct current stimulation. Neuroscientist 2011;17:37-53.
15. Herwig U, Satrapi P, Schonfeldt-Lecuona C. Using the international 10-20 EEG system for positioning of transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain Topogr 2003;16:95-99.
16. Keeser D, Meindl T, Bor J, et al. Prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation changes connectivity of resting-state networks during fMRI. J Neurosci 2011;31:15284-15293.
17. Nitsche MA, Paulus W. Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans. Neurology 2001;57:1899-1901.
18. Giacino JT. The vegetative and minimally conscious states: consensus-based criteria for establishing diagnosis and prognosis. NeuroRehabilitation 2004;19:293-298.
19. Jennett B, Snoek J, BondMR, Brooks N. Disability after severe head injury: observations on the use of the Glasgow Outcome Scale. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1981;44:285-293.
20. Cohen J. Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol Bull 1968;70:213-220.
21. Fregni F, Boggio PS, Lima MC, et al. A sham-controlled, phase II trial of transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of central pain in traumatic spinal cord injury. Pain 2006;122:197-209.
22. Fregni F, Liebetanz D, Monte-Silva KK, et al. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation coupled with repetitive electrical stimulation on cortical spreading depression. Exp Neurol 2007;204:462-466.
23. Voss HU, Uluc AM, Dyke JP, et al. Possible axonal regrowth in late recovery from the minimally conscious state. J Clin Invest 2006;116:2005-2011.
24. Luaute J, Maucort-Boulch D, Tell L, et al. Long-term outcomes of chronic minimally conscious and vegetative states. Neurology 2010;75:246-252.
25. Monti MM. Cognition in the vegetative state. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 2012;8:431-454.
26. D'Esposito M, Detre JA, Alsop DC, Shin RK, Atlas S, Grossman M. The neural basis of the central executive system of working memory. Nature 1995;378:279-281.
27. D'Esposito M, Aguirre GK, Zarahn E, Ballard D, Shin RK, Lease J. Functional MRI studies of spatial and nonspatial working memory. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 1998;7:1-13.
28. Devinsky O, D'Esposito M. Neurology of Cognitive and Behavioural Disorders. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2004.
29. Heekeren HR, Marrett S, Ruff DA, Bandettini PA, Ungerleider LG. Involvement of human left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in perceptual decision making is independent of response modality. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103:10023-10028.
30. Sturm W, Willmes K. On the functional neuroanatomy of intrinsic and phasic alertness. Neuroimage 2001;14: S76-S84.
31. Kang EK, Beak MJ, Kim S, Paik NJ. Non-invasive cortical stimulation improves post-stroke attention decline. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2009;27:654-650.
32. Vanhaudenhuyse A, Demertzi A, Schabus M, et al. Two distinct neuronal networks mediate the awareness of environment and of self. J Cogn Neurosci 2011;23: 570-578.
33. Thibaut A, Bruno MA, Chatelle C, et al. Metabolic activity in external and internal awareness networks in severely brain-damaged patients. J Rehabil Med 2012;44:487-494.
34. Vanhaudenhuyse A, Noirhomme Q, Tshibanda LJ, et al. Default network connectivity reflects the level of consciousness in non-communicative brain-damaged patients. Brain 2010;133:161-171.
35. Liebetanz D, Nitsche MA, Tergau F, Paulus W. Pharmacological approach to the mechanisms of transcranial DCstimulation-induced after-effects of human motor cortex excitability. Brain 2002;125:2238-2247.
36. Nitsche MA, Jaussi W, Liebetanz D, Lang N, Tergau F, Paulus W. Consolidation of human motor cortical neuroplasticity by D-cycloserine. Neuropsychopharmacology 2004;29:1573-1578.
37. Nitsche MA, Fricke K, Henschke U, et al. Pharmacological modulation of cortical excitability shifts induced by transcranial direct current stimulation in humans. J Physiol 2003;553:293-301.
38. Nitsche MA, Lampe C, Antal A, et al. Dopaminergic modulation of long-lasting direct current-induced cortical excitability changes in the human motor cortex. Eur J Neurosci 2006;23:1651-1657.
39. Pape TL, Rosenow J, Lewis G. Transcranial magnetic stimulation: a possible treatment for TBI. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2006;21:437-451.
40. Priori A, Hallett M, Rothwell JC. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation or transcranial direct current stimulation? Brain Stimul 2009;2:241-245.