Insights into chiral recognition mechanisms in supercritical fluid chromatography V. Effect of the nature and proportion of alcohol mobile phase modifier with amylose and cellulose tris-(3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate) stationary phases

Journal of Chromatography A

Volumn 1373, Issue , 2014, Pages 197-210

  Khater, Syame ^a   West, Caroline ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ D'ORLÉANS   (France)

Author keywords

Alcoholic modifier; Chemometrics; Enantiomer separation; Polysaccharide chiral stationary phase; Solvation parameter model

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; CELLULOSE; EFFLUENT TREATMENT; ENANTIOSELECTIVITY; ETHANOL; GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY; METHANOL; MIXTURES; SUPERCRITICAL FLUID EXTRACTION; SUPERCRITICAL FLUIDS;

ALCOHOLIC MODIFIER; CHEMOMETRICS; CHIRAL STATIONARY PHASE; ENANTIOMER SEPARATION; SOLVATION PARAMETER MODELS;

ORGANIC SOLVENTS;

2 PROPANOL; ALCOHOL; AMYLOSE; BUTANOL; CARBON DIOXIDE; CELLULOSE TRIS(3,5 DIMETHYLPHENYLCARBAMATE); METHANOL; PROPANOL; 3,5-DIMETHYLPHENYLCARBAMATE; ALCOHOL DERIVATIVE; CARBAMIC ACID DERIVATIVE; CELLULOSE; CHIRALPAK AD; ORGANIC COMPOUND; ORGANOPHOSPHATE; SOLVENT; TRIS(2,3-DIBROMOPROPYL)PHOSPHATE;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; CHEMICAL INTERACTION; CHEMOMETRIC ANALYSIS; CHIRALITY; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); ELUTION; ENANTIOSELECTIVITY; HYDROGEN BOND; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; PHASE SEPARATION; POLARIZATION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RACEMIC MIXTURE; SUPERCRITICAL FLUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; ANALOGS AND DERIVATIVES; CHEMISTRY; PROCEDURES; STEREOISOMERISM;

ALCOHOLS; AMYLOSE; CELLULOSE; CHROMATOGRAPHY, SUPERCRITICAL FLUID; ORGANIC CHEMICALS; ORGANOPHOSPHATES; PHENYLCARBAMATES; SOLVENTS; STEREOISOMERISM;

EID: 84919348915     PISSN: 00219673     EISSN: 18733778     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2014.11.033     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. De Klerck K., Parewyck G., Mangelings D., Vander Heyden Y. Enantioselectivity of polysaccharide-based chiral stationary phases in supercritical fluid chromatography using methanol-containing carbon dioxide mobile phases. J. Chromatogr. A 2012, 1269:336-345.
2. Nelander H., Andersson S., Öhlén K. Evaluation of the chiral recognition properties as well as the column performance of four chiral stationary phases based on cellulose (3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate) by parallel HPLC and SFC. J. Chromatogr. A 2011, 1218:9397-9405.
3. Samuelsson J., Arnell R., Fornstedt T. Potential of adsorption isotherm measurements for closer elucidating of binding in chiral liquid chromatographic phase systems. J. Sep. Sci. 2009, 32:1491-1506.
4. West C., Guenegou G., Zhang Y., Morin-Allory L. Insights into chiral recognition mechanisms in supercritical fluid chromatography. II. Factors contributing to enantiomer separation on tris-(3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate) of amylose and cellulose stationary phases. J. Chromatogr. A 2011, 1218:2033-2057.
5. West C., Zhang Y., Morin-Allory L. Insights into chiral recognition mechanisms in supercritical fluid chromatography. I. Non-enantiospecific interactions contributing to the retention on tris-(3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate) amylose and cellulose stationary phases. J. Chromatogr. A 2011, 1218:2019-2032.
6. Khater S., Zhang Y., West C. In-depth characterization of six cellulose tris-(3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate) chiral stationary phases in supercritical fluid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2013, 1303:83-93.
7. Khater S., Zhang Y., West C. Insights into chiral recognition mechanism in supercritical fluid chromatography. IV. Chlorinated polysaccharide stationary phases. J. Chromatogr. A 2014, 1363:294-310.
8. Khater S., Zhang Y., West C. Insights into chiral recognition mechanism in supercritical fluid chromatography. III. Non-halogenated polysaccharide stationary phases. J. Chromatogr. A 2014, 1363:278-293.
9. Lämmerhofer M. Chiral recognition by enantioselective liquid chromatography: mechanisms and modern chiral stationary phases. J. Chromatogr. A 2010, 1217:814-856.
10. Ye Y.K., Lynam K.G., Stringham R.W. Effect of amine mobile phase additives on chiral subcritical fluid chromatography using polysaccharide stationary phases. J. Chromatogr. A 2004, 1041:211-217.
11. 2-expanded alcohols. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2009, 48:1302-1306.
12. 2-expanded methanol. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2007, 46:5252-5257.
13. Su B., Bao Z., Xing H., Yang Y., Ren Q. Enantioseparation of paroxetine intermediate on an amylose-derived chiral stationary phase by supercritical fluid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2009, 1216:5140-5146.
14. Toribio L., del Nozal M.J., Bernal J.L., Bernal J., Martín M.T. Study of the enantiomeric separation of an acetamide intermediate by using supercritical fluid chromatography and several polysaccharide based chiral stationary phases. J. Chromatogr. A 2011, 1218:4886-4891.
15. Zhao Y., Woo G., Thomas S., Semin D., Sandra P. Rapid method development for chiral separation in drug discovery using sample pooling and supercritical fluid chromatography-mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 2003, 1003:157-166.
16. Lindskog M.A., Nelander H., Jonson A.C., Halvarsson T. Delivering the promise of SFC: a case study. Drug Discov. Today 2014, 19:1607-1612.
17. McCalley D.V. The challenges of the analysis of basic compounds by high performance liquid chromatography: some possible approaches for improved separations. J. Chromatogr. A 2010, 1217:858-880.
18. De Klerck K., Vander Heyden Y., Mangelings D. Exploratory data analysis as a tool for similarity assessment and clustering of chiral polysaccharide-based systems used to separate pharmaceuticals in supercritical fluid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2014, 1326:110-124.
19. Miller L. Evaluation of non-traditional modifiers for analytical and preparative enantioseparations using supercritical fluid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2012, 1256:261-266.
20. DaSilva J.O., Coes B., Frey L., Mergelsberg I., McClain R., Nogle L., Welch C.J. Evaluation of non-conventional polar modifiers on immobilized chiral stationary phases for improved resolution of enantiomers by supercritical fluid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2014, 1328:98-103.
21. Poole C.F. Stationary phases for packed-column supercritical fluid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2012, 1250:157-171.
22. Tarafder A., Kaczmarski K., Ranger M., Poe D.P., Guiochon G. Use of the isopycnic plots in designing operations of supercritical fluid chromatography. IV. Pressure and density drops along columns. J. Chromatogr. A 2012, 1238:132-145.
23. Strubinger J.R., Song H., Parcher J.F. High-pressure phase distribution isotherms for supercritical fluid chromatographic systems. 2. Binary isotherms of carbon dioxide and methanol. Anal. Chem. 1991, 63:104-108.
24. Bargmann-Leyder N., Tambuté A., Caude M. A comparison of LC and SFC for cellulose- and amylose-derived chiral stationary phases. Chirality 1995, 7:311-325.
25. Blackwell J.A., Stringham R.W. Characterization of temperature dependent modifier effects in SFC using linear solvation energy relationships. Chromatographia 1997, 46:301-308.
26. West C., Lesellier E. Effects of mobile phase composition on retention and selectivity in achiral supercritical fluid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2013, 1302:152-162.
27. Blackwell J.A., Stringham R.W. Comparision of varuious bulk fluids and modifiers as near-crtical mobile phases on a polymeric column using linear solvatio energy realationships. J. High Resolut. Chromatogr. 1997, 20:631-637.
28. West C., Lesellier E. Effects of modifiers in subcritical fluid chromatography on retention with porous graphitic carbon. J. Chromatogr. A 2005, 1087:64-76.
29. Ren-Qi W., Teng-Teng O., Siu-Choon N., Weihua T. Recent advances in pharmaceutical separations with supercritical fluid chromatography using chiral stationary phases. Trends Anal. Chem. 2012, 37:83-100.
30. Abraham M.H., Ibrahim A., Zissimos A.M. Determination of sets of solute descriptors from chromatographic measurements. J. Chromatogr. A 2004, 1037:29-47.
31. Poole C.F., Poole S.K. Column selectivity from the perspective of the solvation parameter model. J. Chromatogr. A 2002, 965:263-299.
32. West C., Lesellier E. Characterization of stationary phases in subcritical fluid chromatography by the solvation parameter model. I. Alkylsiloxane-bonded stationary phases. J. Chromatogr. A 2006, 1110:181-190.
33. Abraham M.H., Chadha H.S., Leitao R.A.E., Mitchell R.C., Lambert W.J., Kaliszan R., Nasal A., Haber P. Determination of solute lipophilicity, as logP(octanol) and logP(alkane) using poly(styrene-divinylbenzene) and immobilised artificial membrane stationary phases in reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 1997, 766:35-47.
34. Kasat R.B., Zvinevich Y., Hillhouse H.W., Thomson K.T., Linda Wang N.-H., Franses E.I. Direct probing of sorbent-solvent interactions for amylose tris(3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate) using infrared spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, solid-state NMR, and DFT modeling. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110:14114-14122.
35. Wang T., Wenslow R.M. Effects of alcohol mobile-phase modifiers on the structure and chiral selectivity of amylose tris(3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate) chiral stationary phase. J. Chromatogr. A 2003, 1015:99-110.
36. Vivi Lazarescu M.J., Mulvihill L.Ma. Poster presented at the 2nd International Conference on Packed-Column SFC in Zurich 2009.
37. Ma S., Shen S., Lee H., Yee N., Senanayake C., Nafie L.A., Grinberg N. Vibrational circular dichroism of amylose carbamate: structure and solvent-induced conformational changes. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2008, 19:2111-2114.
38. O'Brien T., Crocker L., Thompson R., Thompson K., Toma P.H., Conlon D.A., Feibush B., Moeder C., Bicker G., Grinberg N. Mechanistic aspects of chiral discrimination on modified cellulose. Anal. Chem. 1997, 69:1999-2007.
39. Fletcher A.N., Heller C.A. Self-association of alcohols in nonpolar solvents. J. Phys. Chem. 1967, 71:3742-3756.
40. Ma S., Shen S., Lee H., Eriksson M., Zeng X., Xu J., Fandrick K., Yee N., Senanayake C., Grinberg N. Mechanistic studies on the chiral recognition of polysaccharide-based chiral stationary phases using liquid chromatography and vibrational circular dichroism: reversal of elution order of N-substituted alpha-methyl phenylalanine esters. J. Chromatogr. A 2009, 1216:3784-3793.