A systematic approach of partner selection for open innovation

Industrial Management and Data Systems

Volumn 114, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 1068-1093

  Yoon, Byungun ^a   Song, Bomi ^b  

^a Dongguk University   (South Korea)

^b Seoul National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Generative topology map; Morphology analysis; Open innovation; Patent analysis; Technological cooperation; Text mining

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; LIGHT EMITTING DIODES; MORPHOLOGY; TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING; TEXT MINING; TOPOLOGY;

DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH; MORPHOLOGY ANALYSIS; OPEN INNOVATION; PATENT ANALYSIS; QUALITATIVE METHODOLOGIES; TECHNOLOGICAL COLLABORATION; TECHNOLOGICAL COOPERATION; TECHNOLOGICAL OPPORTUNITY;

PATENTS AND INVENTIONS;

EID: 84918569397     PISSN: 02635577     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/IMDS-03-2014-0086     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Abbas, A., Zhang, L. and Khan, S. (2014), "A literature review on the state-of-the-art in patent analysis", World Patent Information, Vol. 37, pp. 3-13.
2. Anand, B.N. and Khanna, T. (2000), "Do firms learn to create value? The case of alliances", Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 295-315.
3. Andersen, B. (1999), "The hunt for S-shaped growth paths in technological innovation: a patent study", Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Vol. 9 No. 4, pp. 487-526.
4. Blackman, M. (1995), "Provision of patent information: a national patent office perspective", World Patent Information, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 115-123.
5. Büyüközkan, G., Feyzioʇlu, O. and Nebol, E. (2008), "Selection of the strategic alliance partner in logistics value chain", International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 113 No. 1, pp. 148-158.
6. Cassiman, B. and Veugelers, R. (2002), "R&D cooperation and spillovers: some empirical evidence from Belgium", American Economic Review, Vol. 92 No. 4, pp. 1169-1184.
7. Chen, S.H.,Wang, P.W., Chen, C.M. and Lee, H.T. (2010), "An analytic hierarchy process approach with linguistic variables for selection of an R&D strategic alliance partner", Computers & Industrial Engineering, Vol. 58 No. 2, pp. 278-287.
8. Chesbrough, H. (2003), Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
9. Chesbrough, H. and Bogers, M. (2014), "Explicating open innovation: clarifying an emerging paradigm for understanding innovation", in Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W. and West, J. (Eds), New Frontiers in Open Innovation, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
10. Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W. and West, J. (2006), Open Innovation: Researching A New Paradigm, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
11. Child, J. and Faulkner, D. (1998), Strategies of Cooperation: Managing Alliances, Networks and Joint Ventures, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
12. Das, T.K. and Kumar, R. (2007), "Learning dynamics in the alliance development process", Management Decision, Vol. 45 No. 4, pp. 684-707.
13. Du, J., Leten, B. and Vanhaverbeke, W. (2014), "Managing open innovation projects with science-based and market-based partners", Research Policy, Vol. 43 No. 5, pp. 828-840.
14. Emden, Z., Calantone, R.J. and Droge, C. (2006), "Collaborating for new product development: selecting the partner with maximum potential to create value", Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 23 No. 4, pp. 330-341.
15. Erden, Z., Von Krogh, G. and Kim, S. (2012), "Knowledge sharing in an online community of volunteers: the role of community munificence", European Management Review, Vol. 9 No. 4, pp. 213-227.
16. Ernst, H. (1997), "The use of patent data for technological forecasting: the diffusion of CNC-technology in the machine tool industry", Small Business Economics, Vol. 9 No. 4, pp. 361-381.
17. Ernst, H. (2001), "Patent applications and subsequent changes of performance: evidence from time-series cross-section analysis on the firm level", Research Policy, Vol. 30 No. 1, pp. 143-157.
18. Ernst, H. (2003), "Patent information for strategic technology management", World Patent Information, Vol. 25 No. 3, pp. 223-242.
19. Fabrizio, K.R. (2009), "Absorptive capacity and the search for innovation", Research Policy, Vol. 38 No. 2, pp. 255-267.
20. Farr, C.M. and Fisher, A.W. (1992), "Managing international high technology cooperative projects", R&D Management, Vol. 22 No. 1, pp. 55-67.
21. Feng, B., Fan, Z.P. and Ma, J. (2010), "A method for partner selection of codevelopment alliances using individual and collaborative utilities", International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 124 No. 1, pp. 159-170.
22. Fischer, M., Jahn, H. and Teich, T. (2004), "Optimizing the selection of partners in production networks", Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, Vol. 20 No. 6, pp. 593-601.
23. Fuchs, C. and Schreier, M. (2011), "Customer empowerment in new product development", Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 28 No. 1, pp. 17-32.
24. Gassmann, O., Enkel, E. and Chesbrough, H. (2010), "The future of open innovation", R&D Management, Vol. 40 No. 3, pp. 213-221.
25. Geringer, J.M. (1988), Joint Venture Partner Selection: Strategies for Developed Countries, Quorum Books, Westport, New York, NY.
26. Hung, K.P. and Chiang, Y.H. (2010), "Open innovation proclivity, entrepreneurial orientation and perceived firm performance", International Journal of Technology Management, Vol. 52 Nos 3/4, pp. 257-274.
27. Jaspers, F. and Ende, J.V.D. (2010), "Open innovation and systems integration: how and why firms know more than they make", International Journal of Technology Management, Vol. 52 Nos 3/4, pp. 275-294.
28. Jun, S., Park, S.S. and Jang, D.S. (2012), "Technology forecasting using matrix map and patent clustering", Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 112 No. 5, pp. 786-807.
29. Laursen, K. and Salter, A. (2014), "The paradox of openness: appropriability, external search and innovation collaboration", Research Policy, Vol. 43 No. 5, pp. 867-878.
30. Lee, S., Yoon, B. and Park, Y. (2009), "An approach to discovering new technology opportunities: keyword-based patent map approach", Technovation, Vol. 29 Nos 6/7, pp. 481-497.
31. Lee, S., Geum, Y., Yoon, B., Kim, M. and Shin, J. (2010), "Strategic partner selection for collaborative R&D: literature-based technology intelligence", Proceedings of the R&D Management Conference, Manchester, June 29-July 2.
32. Lee, S.G., Trimi, S. and Kim, C. (2013), "Innovation and imitation effects' dynamics in technology adoption", Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 113 No. 6, pp. 772-799.
33. Leten, B., Vanhaverbeke, W., Roijakkers, N., Clerix, A. and Vanhelleputte, J. (2013), "Managing innovation ecosystems through IP-based orchestration models: IMEC, a public research institute in nano-electronics", California Management Review, Vol. 55 No. 4, pp. 51-64.
34. Lichtenthaler, U. (2008), "Open innovation in practice: an analysis of strategic approaches to technology transactions", IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 55 No. 1, pp. 148-157.
35. Lindqvist, S. (1994), "Changes in the technological landscape: the temporal dimension in the growth and decline of large technological systems", in Granstrand, O. (Ed.), Economics of Technology, North Holland, Amsterdam.
36. Marongiu, M.J. (2009), "Thermal management of high-power LED systems", LED Professional Review, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 47-49.
37. Mogee, M.E. and Kolar, R.G. (1994), "International patent analysis as a tool for corporate technology analysis and planning", Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, Vol. 6 No. 4, pp. 485-503.
38. Nabney, I.T. (2004), NETLAB: Algorithms for Pattern Recognition, Springer, Berlin.
39. Narin, F., Hamilton, K. and Olivastro, D. (1997), "The increasing linkage between US technology and public science", Research Policy, Vol. 26 No. 3, pp. 317-330.
40. Nijssen, E.J., Van Reekum, R. and Hulshoff, H.E. (2001), "Gathering and using information for the selection of technology partners", Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 67 Nos 2/3, pp. 221-237.
41. Powell, W.W., Koput, K.W. and Smith-Doerr, L. (1997), "Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology", Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 41 No. 1, pp. 116-145.
42. Saen, R.F. (2007), "Suppliers selection in the presence of both cardinal and ordinal data", European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 183 No. 2, pp. 741-747.
43. Sampson, R.C. (2005), "Experience effects and collaborative returns in R&D alliances", Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 26 No. 11, pp. 1009-1031.
44. Schroll, A. and Mild, A. (2011), "Open innovation modes and the role of internal R&D. An empirical study on open innovation adoption in Europe", European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 475-495.
45. Schubert, E.F. and Kim, J.K. (2005), "Solid-state light sources getting smart", Science, Vol. 308 No. 5726, pp. 1274-1278.
46. Solesvik, M.Z. and Encheva, S. (2010), "Partner selection for interfirm collaboration in ship design", Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 110 No. 5, pp. 701-717.
47. Solesvik, M.Z. and Westhead, P. (2010), "Partner selection for strategic alliances: case study insights from the maritime industry", Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 110 No. 6, pp. 841-860.
48. Thorleuchter, D., Poel, D.V.D. and Prinzie, A. (2010), "A compared R&D-based and patent-based cross impact analysis for identifying relationships between technologies", Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 77 No. 7, pp. 1037-1050.
49. Trajtenberg, M. (1990), "A penny for your quotes: patent citations and the value of innovations", The RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 172-187.
50. Trappey, A.J.C. and Trappey, C.V. (2008), "An R&D knowledge management method for patent document summarization", Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 108 No. 2, pp. 245-257.
51. Verma, R. and Pullman, M.E. (1998), "An analysis of the supplier selection process", Omega, Vol. 26 No. 6, pp. 739-750.
52. Villena, V.H., Revilla, E. and Choi, T.Y. (2011), "The dark side of buyer-supplier relationships: a social capital perspective", Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 29 No. 6, pp. 561-576.
53. Wang, T.C. and Chen, Y.H. (2007), "Applying consistent fuzzy preference relations to partnership selection", Omega, Vol. 35 No. 4, pp. 384-388.
54. West, J. and Bogers, M. (2013), "Leveraging external sources of innovation: a review of research on open innovation", Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 31 No. 4, pp. 814-831.
55. Yoon, B. and Park, Y. (2005), "A systemic approach for identifying technology opportunity: keyword-based morphology analysis", Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 72 No. 2, pp. 45-60.
56. Yoon, B. and Park, Y. (2007), "Development of new technology forecasting algorithm: hybrid approach for morphology analysis and conjoint analysis of patent information", IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 54 No. 2, pp. 588-599.
57. Yoon, B., Phaal, R. and Probert, D. (2008), "Morphology analysis for technology roadmapping: application of text mining", R&D Management, Vol. 38 No. 1, pp. 51-68.
58. Further reading Chen, S.H., Lee, H.T. and Wu, Y.F. (2008), "Applying ANP approach to partner selection for strategic alliance", Management Decision, Vol. 46 No. 3, pp. 449-465.
59. Li, S.X. and Rowley, T.J. (2002), "Inertia and evaluation mechanisms in interorganizational partner selection: syndicate formation among US investment banks", Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 45 No. 6, pp. 1104-1119.