A compared R&D-based and patent-based cross impact analysis for identifying relationships between technologies

Technological Forecasting and Social Change

Volumn 77, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 1037-1050

  Thorleuchter, D ^a,b   den Poel, D Van ^b   Prinzie, A ^b,c  

^a FRAUNHOFER INT   (Germany)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Centroid vector; Compared cross impact; Cross impact analysis; Defence taxonomy; Machine learning; Multi label classification; Patent analysis; R D; Technological impact analysis

Indexed keywords

COMPARED CROSS IMPACT; CROSS-IMPACT ANALYSIS; IMPACT ANALYSIS; MACHINE-LEARNING; MULTI-LABEL; PATENT ANALYSIS;

COMPETITION; DECISION MAKING; LABELS; LEARNING SYSTEMS; PATENTS AND INVENTIONS; TAXONOMIES;

TECHNOLOGY;

ASSESSMENT METHOD; DECISION MAKING; INVESTMENT; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 77955034444     PISSN: 00401625     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2010.03.002     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Choi C., Kim S., Park Y. A patent-based cross impact analysis for quantitative estimation of technological impact: the case of information and communication technology. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2007, 74:1296-1314.
2. Narin F., Noma E. Patents as indicators of corporate technological strength. Res. Policy 1987, 16(2/4):143-155.
3. Mogee M.E., Kolar R.G. International patent analysis as a tool for corporate technology analysis and planning. Technol. Anal. Strat. Manag. 1994, 6(4):485-503.
4. Hirschey M., Richardson V.J. Are scientific indicators of patent quality useful to investors?. J. Empir. Finance 2004, 11(1):91-107.
5. Yoon B., Yoon C., Park Y. On the development and application of a self-organizing feature map-based patent map. R&D Manage. 2002, 32(4):291-300.
6. Yoon B., Park Y. A text-mining-based patent network: analytical tool for high-technology trend. J. High Technol. Manage. Res. 2004, 15(1):37-50.
7. Yoon B., Park Y. A systematic approach for identifying technology opportunities: keyword-based morphology analysis. Technol. Forecast Soc. Change 2004, 72(2):145-160.
8. Thorleuchter D. Finding technological ideas and inventions with text mining and technique philosophy. Data Analysis, Machine Learning, and Applications 2008, 413-420. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. C. Preisach, H. Burkhardt, L. Schmidt-Thieme, R. Decker (Eds.).
9. Tsoumakas G., Katakis I. Multi label classification: an overview. Int. J. of Data Warehousing and Mining 2007, 3(3):1-13.
10. Trumbach C., Payne D., Kongthon A. Technology mining for small firms: knowledge prospecting for competitive advantage. Technol. Forecast Soc. Change 2006, 73:937-949.
11. Jeong G.H., Kim S.H. A qualitative cross-impact approach to find the key technology. Technol. Forecast Soc. Change 1997, 55(3):203-214.
12. Enzer S. Cross-impact techniques in technology assessment. Futures 1972, 4(1):30-51.
13. Schuler A., Thompson W.A., Vertinsky I., Ziv Y. Cross impact analysis of technological innovation and development in the softwood lumber industry in Canada: a structural modeling approach. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 1991, 38(3):224-236.
14. Dernis H., Guellec D. Using patent counts for cross-country comparisons of technology output. STI Review 2002, vol. 27:129-146. OECD, Paris.
15. Trajtenberg M. A penny for your quotes: patent citations and the value of innovations. Patents, Citations and Innovations 2002, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. A. Jaffe, M. Trajtenberg (Eds.).
16. Gordon T., Haywood H. Initial experiments with the cross impact matrix method of forecasting. Futures 1968, 1(2):100-116.
17. Dalkey N.C. An elementary cross-impact model. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 1972, 3:341-351.
18. Duperrin J.C., Godet M. SMIC 74-a method for constructing and ranking scenarios. Futures 1975, 7(4):302-312.
19. Mitchell R.B., Tydeman J., Curnow R. Scenario generation: limitations and developments in cross-impact analysis. Futures 1977, 9(3):205-215.
20. Blanning R.W., Reinig B.A. Cross-impact analysis using group decision support systems: an application to the future of Hong Kong. Futures 1999, 31(1):39-56.
21. Caselles-Moncho A. An empirical comparison of cross-impact models for forecasting sales. Int. J. Forecast 1986, 2(3):295-303.
22. USPTO, Overview of the classification system, USPTO (2009), Available at, http://www.uspto.gov/.
23. Knoke D., Kuklinski J. Network Analysis 1982, Sage, London.
24. Gericke W., Thorleuchter D., Weck G., Reiländer F., Loß D. Vertrauliche Verarbeitung staatlich eingestufter Information - die Informationstechnologie im Geheimschutz. Informatik Spektrum 2009, 32(2):102-109.
25. Thorleuchter D., Van den Poel D., Prinzie A. Mining innovative ideas to support new product research and development. Classification as a Tool for Research 2010, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, To Appear. H. Locarek-Junge, C. Weihs (Eds.).
26. Hotho A., Nürnberger A., Paaß G. A brief survey of text mining. LDV Forum 2005, 20(1):19-26.
27. Breiman L. Classification and regression trees. The Wadsworth Statistics/Probability Series 1984, 358. Wadsworth International Group, Belmont, CA. L. Breiman, J.H. Friedman, R.A. Olshen, C.J. Stone (Eds.).
28. Han E.S., Karypis G. Centroid-based document classification: analysis and experimental results. Principles of Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 2000, 116-123. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
29. Tam V., Santoso A., Setiono R. A comparative study of centroid-based, neighborhood-based and statistical approaches for effective document categorization. 16th International Conference on Pattern Recognition 2002, Iv:235-Iv:238.
30. Weiss S.M., Indurkhya N., Zhang T., Damerau F.J. Text Mining 2005, 113. Springer, Berlin.
31. Thorleuchter D., Van den Poel D., Prinzie A. Mining Ideas from Textual Information. Expert Syst. Appl. 2010, 37(10):7182-7188.
32. Thorleuchter D., Van den Poel D., Prinzie A. Extracting consumers needs for new products-a web mining approach. Proc. WKDD 2010, IEEE Computer Society 2010, 441. Los Alamitos, CA.
33. Porter M.F. An algorithm for suffix stripping. Program 1980, 14(3):130-137.
34. Coussement K., Van den Poel D. Integrating the voice of customers through call center emails into a decision support system for churn prediction. Information & Management 2008, 45:165.
35. Abebe A.J., Guinot V., Solomatine D.P. Fuzzy alpha-cut vs. Monte Carlo techniques in assessing uncertainty in model parameters. Proc. 4-th International Conference on Hydroinformatics 2000, Iowa City, USA.