Utility of indels for species-level identification of a biologically complex plant group: a study with intergenic spacer in Citrus

Molecular Biology Reports

Volumn 41, Issue 11, 2014, Pages 7217-7222

  Mahadani, Pradosh ^a   Ghosh, Sankar Kumar ^a  

^a ASSAM UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

Citrus; DNA barcoding; Indel; Inverted repeat; Primer design; trnH psbA

Indexed keywords

CHLOROPLAST DNA; PRIMER DNA; SPACER DNA;

ARTICLE; CHLOROPLAST; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA BARCODING; GENE AMPLIFICATION; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC CODE; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; MATK GENE; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PLANT GENE; PLANT GENETICS; PLANT LEAF; PLASTID; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PROTEIN PURIFICATION; RBCL GENE; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SPECIES IDENTIFICATION; TAXONOMY; TRNH PSBA GENE; TRNL TRNF GENE; CITRUS; CLASSIFICATION; DNA SEQUENCE; GENETICS; INDEL MUTATION; INDIA; MOLECULAR GENETICS; PROCEDURES; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

CITRUS; CITRUS LIMON; CITRUS MEDICA;

BASE SEQUENCE; CITRUS; DNA BARCODING, TAXONOMIC; DNA PRIMERS; DNA, CHLOROPLAST; DNA, INTERGENIC; INDEL MUTATION; INDIA; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84917733061     PISSN: 03014851     EISSN: 15734978     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11033-014-3606-7     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Laskar BA, Bhattacharjee MJ, Dhar B, Mahadani P, Kundu S, Ghosh SK (2013) The species dilemma of Northeast Indian Mahseer (Actinopterygii: Cyprinidae): DNA barcoding in clarifying the riddle. PLoS ONE 8(1):e53704
2. Hollingsworth MP, Forrest LL, Spouge LJ, Hajibabaei M, Ratnasingham S, van der Bank M, Chase WM, Cowan SR et al (2009) A DNA barcode for land plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106(31):12794–12797
3. Luo K, Chen S, Chen K, Song J, Yao H, Ma X, Zhu Y, Pang X, Yu H, Li X, Liu Z (2010) Assessment of candidate plant DNA barcodes using the Rutaceae family. Sci China Life Sci 53(6):701–708
4. Maia VH, Mata CS, Franco LO, Cardoso MA, Cardoso SR, Hemerly AS, Ferreira PC (2012) DNA barcoding Bromeliaceae: achievements and pitfalls. PLoS ONE 7(1):e29877
5. Roy S, Tyagi A, Shukla V, Kumar A, Singh UM, Chaudhary LB, Datt B, Bag SK, Singh PK, Nair NK, Husain T, Tuli R (2010) Universal plant DNA barcode loci may not work in complex groups: a case study with Indian berberis species. PLoS ONE 5(10):e13674
6. Spooner DM (2009) DNA barcoding will frequently fail in complicated groups: an example in wild potatoes. Am J Bot 96(6):1177–1189
7. Britten RJ, Rowen L, Williams J, Cameron RA (2003) Majority of divergence between closely related DNA samples is due to indels. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100(8):4661–4665
8. Tian D, Wang Q, Zhang P, Araki H, Yang S, Kreitman M, Nagylaki T, Hudson R, Bergelson J, Chen JQ (2008) Single-nucleotide mutation rate increases close to insertions/deletions in eukaryotes. Nature 455(7209):105–108
9. Golenberg EM, Clegg MT, Durbin ML, Doebley J, Ma DP (1993) Evolution of a noncoding region of the chloroplast genome. Mol Phy Evol 2(1):52–64
10. Ingvarsson PK, Ribstein S, Taylor DR (2003) Molecular evolution of insertions and deletion in the chloroplast genome of silene. Mol Bio Evol 20(11):1737–1740
11. Blair C, Murphy RW (2011) Recent trends in molecular phylogenetic analysis: where to next? J Hered 102(1):130–138
12. Hebert PD, Cywinska A, Ball SL, deWaard JR (2003) Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc Biol Sci 270(1512):313–321
13. Liu J, Provan J, Gao L, Li D (2012) Sampling strategy and potential utility of indels for DNA barcoding of closely related plant species: a case study in Taxus. Int J Mol Sci 13(7):8740–8751
14. Bayer RJ, Mabberley DJ, Morton C, Miller CH, Sharma IK, Pfeil BE, Rich S, Hitchcock R, Sykes S (2009) A molecular phylogeny of the orange subfamily (Rutaceae: Aurantioideae) using nine cpDNA sequences. Am J Bot 96(3):668–685
15. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG (1997) The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 24:4876–4882
16. Ragupathy S, Newmaster SG, Murugesan M, Balasubramaniam V (2009) DNA barcoding discriminates a new cryptic grass species revealed in an ethnobotany study by the hill tribes of the Western Ghats in southern India. Mol Ecol Resour 9(Suppl s1):164-171
17. Simmons MP, Ochoterena H (2000) Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. Syst Biol 49(2):369–381
18. Fazekas AJ, Kesanakurti PR, Burgess KS, Percy DM, Graham SW, Barrett SC, Newmaster SG, Hajibabaei M, Husband BC (2009) Are plant species inherently harder to discriminate than animal species using DNA barcoding markers? Mol Ecol Resour 9: 130–139
19. Jena SN, Kumar S, Nair NK (2009) Molecular phylogeny in IndianCitrus L. (Rutaceae) inferred through PCR-RFLP and trnL-trnF sequence data of chloroplast DNA. Sci Hortic 119(4):403–416
20. Strochova H, Olson MS (2007) The architecture of the chloroplast psbA-trnH non coding region in angiosperms. Plant Syst Evol 268:235–256
21. Mahadani P, Sharma GD, Ghosh SK (2013) Identification of ethnomedicinal plants (Rauvolfioideae: Apocynaceae) through DNA barcoding from northeast India. Pharmacogn Mag 9(35):255–263
22. Garcia-Lor A, Curk F, Snoussi-Trifa H, Morillon R, Ancillo G, Luro F, Navarro L, Ollitrault P (2013) A nuclear phylogenetic analysis: SNPs, indels and SSRs deliver new insights into the relationships in the ‘true citrus fruit trees’ group (Citrinae, Rutaceae) and the origin of cultivated species. Ann Bot 111(1):1–19
23. Garcia-Lor A, Luro F, Navarro L, Ollitrault P (2012) Comparative use of InDel and SSR markers in deciphering the interspecific structure of cultivated citrus genetic diversity: a perspective for genetic association studies. Mol Genet Genomics 287(1):77–94
24. Hamilton MB, Braverman JM, Soria-Hernanz DF (2003) Patterns and relative rates of nucleotide and insertion/deletion evolution at six chloroplast intergenic regions in new world species of the Lecythidaceae. Mol Biol Evol 20(10):1710–1721