The political economy of water and sanitation

The Political Economy of Water and Sanitation

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 1-252

  Krause, Matthias ^a  

^a GERMAN DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84917274055     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203876947     Document Type: Book

References (280)

1. Acemoglu, D., S. Johnson, and J. A. Robinson. 2002. Reversal of fortune: Geography and institutions in the making of the modern world income distribution. Quarterly Journal of Economics 17 (4):1231-94.
2. Ahlfeld, S., H.-R. Hemmer, and A. Lorenz. 2005. The economic growth debate- Geography versus institutions: Is there anything really new? Discussion Papers in Development Economics 34. Giessen: Justus-Liebig-Universität.
3. Alesina, A. et al. 2003. Fractionalization. Journal of Economic Growth 8 (2):155- 94.
4. Alesina, A., T. Persson, and G. E. Tabellini. 2006. Reply to Blankart and Koester's political economics versus public choice: Two views of political economy in competition. Kyklos 59 (2):201-08.
5. Alt, J. E., and A. Alesina. 1996. Political economy: An overview. In: A new handbook of political science, eds. R. E. Goodin and H.-D. Klingemann, 645-74. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. ANDESCO. 2006. Comentarios de ANDESCO al informe de calidad del agua en Colombia-Resultados 2005. Bogotá. http://www.andesco.com (accessed November 21, 2006).
7. ángel Gómez, J. E., and J. C. Aguilera. 2002. El problema tarifario en los servicios de acueducto, alcantarillado y aseo en Colombia. Revista Regulación de Agua Potable y Saneamiento Básico (8):13-57.
8. Araque, L. A. 2004. Agencias reguladoras en los sectores agua, electricidad y telecomunicaciones en Colombia, Ecuador, Peru y Venezuela. Unpublished paper. Washington, DC.
9. Arrow, K. J., and F. H. Hahn. 1971. General competitive analysis. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.
10. Asamblea Nacional Constituyente. 1991. Constitución Política de Colombia. Gaceta Constitucional 116 (20 July 1991). Online version made available by Secretaría del Senado. República de Colombia. http://www.secretariasenado.gov.co/.
11. Atkinson, A. B. 1996. Political economy, old and new. In A new handbook of political science, eds. R. E. Goodin and H.-D. Klingemann, 702-13. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12. Atkinson, A. B., and J. E. Stiglitz. 1980. Lectures in public economics. London: McGraw-Hill.
13. Bakovic, T., B. Tenenbaum, and F. Woolf. 2003. Regulation by contract: A new way to privatize electricity distribution? World Bank Working Paper 14. Washington, DC: World Bank.
14. Barrera-Osorio, F., and M. Olivera. 2007. Does society win or lose as a result of privatization? Provision of public services and welfare of the poor: The case of water sector privatization in Colombia. Research Network Working Paper #R-525. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.
15. Barro, R. J. 1996. Democracy and growth. Journal of Economic Growth 1 (1):1- 27.
16. Basañes, F., and R. Willig, eds. 2002. Second-generation reforms in infrastructure services. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.
17. Baumol, W. J., and W. E. Oates. 1988. The theory of environmental policy. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
18. Beato, P., and J. Díaz. 2003. La participación del sector privado en los servicios de agua y saneamiento en Cartagena de Indias. Informe de trabajo. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.
19. Beck, T. et al. 2001. New tools in comparative political economy: The database of political institutions. The World Bank Economic Review 15 (1):165-76.
20. Blankart, C. B., and G. B. Koester. 2006. Political economics versus public choice: Two views of political economy in competition. Kyklos 59 (2):171-200.
21. Boland, J. J., and D. Whittington. 2000. The political economy of water tariff design in developing countries: Increasing block tariffs versus uniform price with rebate. In The political economy of water pricing reforms, ed. A. Dinar, 215-35. Washington, DC: World Bank.
22. Bollen, K. A., and P. Paxton. 2000. Subjective measures of liberal democracy. Comparative Political Studies 33 (1):58-86.
23. Braeutigam, R. R. 1989. Optimal policies for natural monopolies. In Vol. 2 of Handbook of industrial organization, eds. R. Schmalensee and R. D. Willig, 1289-346. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
24. BRC Investor Services S.A. 2004. Empresa de Acueducto y Alcantarillado de Villavicencio- E.S.P.: Revisión Anual. Bogotá: BRC Investor Services S.A.
25. Brown, A. C. 2003. Regulators, policy-makers, and the making of policy: Who does what and when do they do it? International Journal of Regulation and Governance 3 (1):1-11.
26. Budds, J., and G. McGranahan. 2003. Are the debates on water privatization missing the point? Experiences from Africa, Asia and Latin America. Environment & Urbanization 15 (2):87-113.
27. Bueno de Mesquita, B. et al. 2002. Political institutions, policy choice and the survival of leaders. British Journal of Political Science 32 (4):559-90.
28. Buitrago Restrepo, C. M. 2001. El control social en los servicios públicos domiciliarios: Expresión del principio de soberanía popular. Revista Univerciudad Online 9. http://univerciudad.redbogota.com/ediciones/indice009.htm (accessed April 5, 2006).
29. Butkiewicz, J. L., and H. Yanikkaya. 2004. Institutional quality and economic growth: Maintenance of the rule of law or democratic institutions, or both? Department of Economics Working Paper 2004-03. Newark: University of Delaware.
30. Cárdenas, M., R. Junguito, and M. Pachón. 2004. Political institutions, policy making processes, and policy outcomes: The case of Colombia. Second Draft. April 30, 2004. Unpublished paper.
31. Cárdenas, M., R. Junguito, and M. Pachón. 2006. Political institutions and policy outcomes in Colombia: The effects of the 1991 Constitution. Research Network Working Paper R-508. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.
32. Carey, J. M., and M. S. Shugart. 1995. Incentives to cultivate a personal vote: A rank-ordering of electoral formulas. Electoral Studies 14 (4):417-39.
33. Clarke, G. R. G., K. Kosec, and S. J. Wallsten. 2004. Has private participation in water and sewerage improved coverage? Empirical evidence from Latin America. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3445. Washington, DC: World Bank.
34. Coase, R. H. 1960. The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics 3:1-44.
35. Collier, P., and S. Levitsky. 1997. Democracies with adjectives: Conceptual innovation in comparative research. World Politics 49 (2):430-51.
36. Comisión de Regulación de Agua Potable y Saneamiento Básico. 2001. Resolución CRA No. 151 de 2001: Regulación integral de los servicios de Acueducto, Alcantarillado y Aseo. Bogotá. http://www.cra.gov.co/ (accessed March 7, 2008).
37. Comisión de Regulación de Agua Potable y Saneamiento Básico. 2004. Resolución CRA No. 287 de 2004: Por la cual se establece la metodología tarifaria para regular el cálculo de los costos de prestación de los servicios de acueducto y alcantarillado. Bogotá. http://www.cra.gov.co/ (accessed March 7, 2008).
38. Comisión de Regulación de Agua Potable y Saneamiento Básico. 2005. Informe de gestión Marzo 2004-Marzo 2005. Bogotá: CRA.
39. Comisión de Regulación de Agua Potable y Saneamiento Básico. 2006. Impactos regulatorios en los sectores de acueducto, alcantarillado y aseo. Bogotá: CRA.
40. Concejo de Bogotá. 2006. Proyecto de Acuerdo 378 de 2006. Bogotá. http://www. alcaldiabogota.gov.co/sisjur//normas/Norma1.jsp?i=21496 (accessed November 6, 2006).
41. Congreso de Colombia. 1994. Ley 142 de 1994: Por la cual se establece el Régimen de los Servicios Públicos Domiciliarios y se dictan otras disposiciones. Diario Ofi cial 41433 (July 11, 1994). Updated and commented edition made available by Comisión de Regulación de Agua Potable y Saneamiento Básico on its Web page. http://www.cra.gov.co/ (accessed March 12, 2007).
42. Congreso de Colombia. 1996. Ley 286 de 1996: Por la cual se modifi can parcialmente las leyes 142 y 143 de 1994. Diaro Ofi cial 42824 (July 5, 1996).
43. Congreso de Colombia. 2000. Ley 632 de 2000: Por la cual se modifi can parcialmente las leyes 142, 143 de 1994, 223 de 1995 y 286 de 1996. Diaro Ofi cial 44275 (December 29, 2000).
44. Congreso de Colombia. 2001. Ley 715 de 2001: Por la cual se dictan normas orgánicas en materia de recursos y competencias de conformidad con los artículos 151, 288, 356 y 357 (Acto Legislativo 01 de 2001) de la Constitución Política y se dictan otras disposiciones para organizar la prestación de los servicios de educación y salud, entre otros. Diaro Ofi cial 44654 (December 21, 2001).
45. Consultoría para los Derechos Humanos y el Desplazamiento. 2005. Número de personas desplazadas por municipio de llegada por trimestre desde 1999 a 2005. July 19, 2005. Bogotá: CODHES.
46. Consumidores Colombia. 2005. Informe fi nal: Servicio público domiciliario de agua potable en Colombia. Bogotá: Consumidores Colombia.
47. Contraloría Municipal de Villavicencio. 2006. Informe de gestión 2005. Villavicencio, Colombia: Contraloría Municipal de Villavicencio.
48. Corbridge, S., and G. A. Jones. 2005. The continuing debate about urban bias: The thesis, its critics, its infl uence, and implications for poverty reduction. Research Papers in Environmental and Spatial Analysis 99. London: London School of Economics.
49. Cornes, R., and T. Sandler. 1996. The theory of externalities, public goods and club goods. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
50. Cox, G. W., and M. D. McCubbins. 2001. The institutional determinants of economic policy outcomes. In Presidents, parliaments, and policy, eds. S. Haggard and M. D. McCubbins, 21-63. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
51. Creswell, J. W. 1994. Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
52. Cubbin, J., and J. Stern. 2006. The impact of regulatory governance and privatization on electricity industry generation capacity in developing economies. The World Bank Economic Review 20 (1):115-41.
53. Cuéllar, M. M. 2005. La prueba de razonabilidad y la estabilidad de las reglas de juego. Revista de Economía Institucional 7 (12):13-42.
54. Dahl, R. A. 1989. Democracy and its critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
55. de Ferranti, D. et al. 2004. Inequality in Latin America: Breaking with history? Washington, DC: World Bank.
56. Demsetz, H. 1968. Why regulate utilities? Journal of Law and Economics 11 (1):55-65.
57. Departamento Administrativo de la Función Pública. 2003. Mecanismos jurídicos para el control social: Plan Nacional de Formación para el Control Social a la Gestión Pública. Serie Documentos de Consulta 2. Bogotá: Departamento Administrativo de la Función Pública.
58. Departamento Nacional de Planeación. 2002. Marco conceptual y resultados de progreso municipal. Vol 1 of Evaluación de la descentralización municipal en Colombia: Balance de una década. Bogotá: Departamento Nacional de Planeación.
59. Departamento Nacional de Planeación. 2004. El sistema general de participaciones en el sector de agua potable y saneamiento básico. Bogotá: Departamento Nacional de Planeación.
60. Departamento Nacional de Planeación. 2005a. El estado y su organización. Bogotá: Departamento Nacional de Planeación.
61. Departamento Nacional de Planeación. 2005b. Gestión pública local. Bogotá: Departamento Nacional de Planeación.
62. Departamento Nacional de Planeación. 2005c. Inversión privada en infraestructura 1993-2003. Actualizado: Junio 2005. Bogotá: Departamento Nacional de Planeación.
63. Departamento Nacional de Planeación. 2005d. Plan de desarrollo del sector de acueducto y alcantarillado. Documento CONPES 3383. Bogotá: Departamento Nacional de Planeación.
64. Departamento Nacional de Planeación. without year-a. Empresas descentralizadas del orden nacional. Estudio de sostenibilidad. Bogotá: Departamento Nacional de Planeación.
65. Departamento Nacional de Planeación. without year-b. Modelo de Reglamento del Comité Permanente de Estratifi cación Socioeconómica. Bogotá: Departamento Nacional de Planeación. Development Committee, International Monetary Fund, and World Bank. 2004.
66. Global Monitoring Report 2004. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund, World Bank.
67. Dollar, D., and A. Kraay. 2001. Growth is good for the poor. Policy Research Working Paper 2587. Washington, DC: World Bank.
68. Domínguez Torres, C., and E. Uribe Botero. 2005. Evolución del servicio de acueducto y alcantarillado durante la última década. Documento CEDE 2005-19. Bogotá: Universidad de los Andes.
69. Dworkin, R. 1981a. What is equality? Part 1: Equality of welfare. Philosophy and Public Affairs 10 (3):185-246.
70. Dworkin, R. 1981b. What is equality? Part 2: Equality of resources. Philosophy and Public Affairs 10 (3):283-45.
71. Echeverri, J. C. 2001. Palabras del Departamento Nacional de Planeación. In Seminario Internacional de Regulación en Agua Potable y Saneamiento Básico: Memorias y Lecturas Complementarias, ed. Ministerio de Desarrollo Económico, 285-91. Bogotá: Ministerio de Desarrollo Económico.
72. Edwards, S., and R. Steiner. 2000. On the crises hypothesis of economic reform: Colombia 1989-91. Cuadernos de Economía 37 (112):445-93.
73. Empresas Públicas de Medellín E.S.P. 2006. Comunicado a la opinión pública sobre el informe de calidad del agua en Colombia 2005 de la Superintendencia de Servicios Públicos Domiciliarios. Medellín. http://www.eeppm.com/ epmcom/contenido/boletinesprensa/boletines2006.htm (accessed November 11, 2006).
74. Erlei, M., M. Leschke, and D. Sauerland. 1999. Neue Institutionenökonomik. Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel Verlag.
75. Esrey, S. A. 1996. Water, waste, and well-being: A multicountry study. American Journal of Epidemiology 143 (6):608-23.
76. Esser, H. 1990. "Habits", "Frames" und "Rational Choice". Zeitschrift für Soziologie 19 (4):231-47.
77. Estache, A. 2004. A selected survey on recent economic literature on emerging infrastructure policy issues in developing countries. First draft August 2004. Background paper for the October 2004 Berlin meeting of the POVNET Infrastructure Working Group. http://www. ecd.org/dataoecd/34/21/36568195.pdf (accessed June 23, 2008).
78. Estache, A., and E. Kouassi. 2002. Sector organization, governance, and the ineffi ciency of African water utilities. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 2890. Washington, DC: World Bank.
79. Estache, A., and M. A. Rossi. 2002. How different is the effi ciency of public and private water companies in Asia? The World Bank Economic Review 16 (1):139-48.
80. Estache, A., B. Speciale, and D. Veredas. 2005. How much does infrastructure matter to growth in Sub-Saharan Africa? Draft 5 June 2005. http://www. ecare.ulb.ac.be/ecare/people/members/veredas/veredas/David%20Veredas% 20African%20Infrastructures%20Version%201.pdf (accessed June 23, 2008).
81. Faust, J. 2004. Good Governance, Transformationsprobleme und Entwicklungszusammenarbeit. Nord-Süd Aktuell 18 (3):486-98.
82. Faust, J. 2006. Die Dividende der Demokratie: Politische Herrschaft und gesamtwirtschaftliche Produktivität. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 47 (1):62-83.
83. Faust, J., and J. Marx. 2004. Zwischen Kultur und Kalkül? Vertrauen und Sozialkapital im Kontext der neoinstitutionalistischen Wende. Swiss Political Science Review 10 (1):29-55.
84. Federación Colombiana de Municipios. 2005. Superintendencia de Servicios revela fallas en la reestratifi cación. Artículo del rubro "noticias": February 22, 2005. http://www.fcm.org.co. (accessed April 12, 2005).
85. Fernández, D. 2004. Sector agua potable. Informes de base: Colombia; Desarrollo económico reciente en infraestructura (REDI). Washington, DC: World Bank.
86. Finger, M., and J. Allouche. 2002. Water privatisation: Trans-national corporations and the re-regulation of the water industry. London: SPON Press.
87. Foster, V. 1996. Policy issues for the water and sanitation sectors. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.
88. Foster, V. 2001a. Condominial water and sewerage systems: Costs of implementation of the model: El Alto-Bolivia pilot project. Lima: Water and Sanitation Program.
89. Foster, V. 2001b. Opciones para el marco regulador del servicio de agua y alcantarillado: Principios fundamentales y preguntas claves. In Seminario internacional de regulación en agua potable y saneamiento básico: Memorias y lecturas complementarias, ed. Ministerio de Desarrollo Económico, 295-360. Bogotá: Ministerio de Desarrollo Económico.
90. Foster, V. 2005. Ten years of water service reform in Latin America: Toward an Anglo-French model. Water Supply and Sanitation Sector Board Discussion Paper 3. Washington, DC: World Bank.
91. Fox, J. 1994. Diffi cult transition from clientelism to citizenship: Lessons from Mexico. World Politics 46 (2):151-84.
92. Franzese, R. 2002. Macroeconomic policies of developed democracies. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
93. Fraquelli, G., and F. Erbetta. 1999. Privatization in Italy: An analysis of factors productivity and technical effi ciency. Working Paper 5/1999. Turin, Italy: Ceris-CNR.
94. Freedom House. 2002. Freedom in the world: The annual survey of political rights and civil liberties 2001-2002. New York: Freedom House.
95. Freedom House. various years. Freedom in the world: The annual survey of political rights and civil liberties. New York: Freedom House.
96. Fuest, V., and W. Laube. 2004. Konzept einer armutsorientierten Entwicklungszusammenarbeit im Wassersektor. Teilgutachten 1 im Rahmen des Forschungsprojekts des Bundesministeriums für wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung: Wasser und Armut; Schlussfolgerungen für die Umsetzung des Aktionsprogramms 2015 und das Erreichen der Millennium Development Goals. Bonn: German Development Institute (DIE).
97. Fundación Seguridad y Democracia. 2004. Informe especial: Colombia: Balance de seguridad 2001-2004. Bogotá: Fundación Seguridad y Democracia.
98. Fundación Seguridad y Democracia. 2006. Informe especial: La seguridad en los últimos tres períodos presidenciales 1994-2006. Bogotá: Fundación Seguridad y Democracia.
99. Furubotn, E., and R. Richter. 1991. The new institutional economics: An assessment. In The New Institutional Economics: A collection of articles from the Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, eds. E. Furubotn and R. Richter, 1-32. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
100. Galdo, V., and B. Briceño. 2005. Evaluating the impact on child mortality of a water supply and sewerage expansion in Quito: Is water enough? Offi ce of Evaluation and Oversight Working Paper. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.
101. Garcia, S., and A. Reynaud. 2004. Estimating the benefi ts of effi cient water pricing in France. Resource and Energy Economics 26 (1):1-25.
102. Gleick, P. H. 2002. Dirty water: Estimated deaths from water-related diseases 2000-2020. Oakland, CA: Pacifi c Institute.
103. Goetz, A. M., and J. Gaventa. 2001. Bringing citizens voice and client focus into service delivery. IDS Working Paper 138. Brighton, UK: Institute of Development Studies.
104. Gómez-Lobo, A., and D. Contreras. 2003. Water subsidy policies: A comparison of the Chilean and Colombian schemes. World Bank Economic Review 17 (3):391-407.
105. Gómez-Lobo, A., and M. Meléndez. 2007. Social policies and private sector participation in water supply-the case of Colombia. Draft working document. April 2007. Prepared for the UNRISD project on "Social Policy, Regulation and Private Sector Involvement in Water Supply". http://www.unrisd.org/unrisd/website/ document.nsf/ab82a6805797760f8025 6b4f005da1ab/bed05be0c8f15b69 c12572b300429f09/$FILE/Colombia_web.pdf (accessed November 24, 2007).
106. González, A., and W. Munar. 2003. The political economy of social sector reforms: Economic and sector study series. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.
107. González Salas, E. 2002. Evaluación de la descentralización: Componente de capacidad institucional. In Vol. 2 of Evaluación de la Descentralización Municipal en Colombia: Balance de Una Década, ed. Departamento Nacional de Planeación, 325-63. Bogotá: Departamento Nacional de Planeación.
108. Groenewegen, P. 1991. "Political economy" and "economics". In The new palgrave: The world of economics, eds. J. Eatwell, M. Milgate, and P. Newman, 556-62. London: Macmillan.
109. Grofman, B. 1996. Political economy: Downsian perspectives. In A new handbook of political science, eds. R. E. Goodin and H.-D. Klingemann, 691-701. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
110. Grossman, S., and O. Hart. 1986. The costs and benefi ts of ownership: A theory of vertical and lateral integration. Journal of Political Economy 94 (4):691-719.
111. Gutierrez, L. H. 2003. The effect of endogenous regulation on telecommunications expansion and effi ciency in Latin America. Journal of Regulatory Economics 23 (3):257-86.
112. Gwartney, J., R. Lawson, and E. Gartzke. 2005. Economic freedom of the world: Annual Report 2005. Vancouver, Canada: Fraser Institute.
113. Haggard, S., and M. D. McCubbins. 2001. Introduction: Political institutions and the determinants of public policy. In Presidents, Parliaments, and Policy, eds. S. Haggard and M. D. McCubbins, 1-20. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
114. Haldenwang, C. v. 2005. Systemic governance and development in Latin America. CEPAL Review 85 (April):33-49.
115. Hall, D., and E. Lubina. 2002. Water privatisation in Latin America. 2002: PSIRU Reports. London: Public Services International Research Unit: University of Greenwich.
116. Hamilton, L. C. 1991. srd1: How robust is robust regression? Stata Technical Bulletin 2:21-26.
117. Hansson, L. 2004. Water as an economic and social good: Some socio-economic principles for Indian water management. IIIEE Reports 2004:1. Lund: IIIEE: Lund University.
118. Hayek, F. A. 1945. The road to serfdom. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
119. Hemmer, H.-R. 2002. Wirtschaftsprobleme der Entwicklungsländer. 3rd. ed. Munich: Vahlen.
120. Hemmer, H.-R. and A. Lorenz. 2004. Grundlagen der Wachstumsempirie. Munich: Vahlen.
121. Henisz, W. J. 2002. The institutional environment for infrastructure investment. Industrial and Corporate Change 11 (2):355-89.
122. Henisz, W. J. and B. A. Zelner. 2001. The institutional environment for telecommunications investment. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 10 (1):123-47.
123. Henisz, W. J. and B. A. Zelner. 2004. Interest groups, veto points and electricity infrastructure deployment. William Davidson Institute Working Paper 711. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Business School.
124. Hirschman, A. O. 1970. Exit, voice and loyalty: Responses to decline in fi rms, organizations and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
125. Horrall, J. 2002. Institutions, political regime and access to telecommunications infrastructure in Africa. Public Utilities Research Center Working Paper. Gainesville: University of Florida.
126. Hutton, G., and L. Haller. 2004. Evaluation of the costs and benefi ts of water and sanitation improvements at the global level. Geneva: World Health Organization.
127. Instituto de Hidrología, Meteorología y Estudios Ambientales. without year. Estudio nacional del agua. Bogotá: IDEAM.
128. Inkota-Netzwerk e.V. and Brot für die Welt. 2004. Wasser-öffentliche Kontrolle statt Kommerz. Berlin: Brot für die Welt.
129. Irwin, T., and C. Yamamoto. 2004. Some options for improving the governance of state-owned electricity utilities. Energy and Mining Sector Board Discussion Paper 11. Washington, DC: World Bank.
130. Izaguirre, A. K. 2004. Private infrastructure: Activity down by 30 percent in 2002. Public Policy for the Private Sector No. 267. http://rru.worldbank.org/publicpolicyjournal (accessed May 24, 2008).
131. Jaggers, K., and T. Gurr. 1995. Tracking democracy's third wave with Polity III data. Journal of Peace Research 32 (4):469-82.
132. Jalan, J., and M. Ravallion. 2001. Does piped water reduce diarrhea for children in rural India? Policy Research Working Paper 2664. Washington, DC: World Bank.
133. Joskow, P. L. 2007. Regulation of natural monopoly. In Vol 2 of Handbook of law and economics, eds. A. M. Polinsky and S. Shavell, 1227-348. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
134. Joskow, P. L. and N. L. Rose. 1989. The effects of economic regulation. In Handbook of industrial organization, eds. R. Schmalensee and R. D. Willig, 1449-506. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
135. Jouravlev, A. S. 2000. Water utility regulation: Issues and options for Latin America and the Caribbean. Santiago de Chile: United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean.
136. Kahn, A. E. 1971. The economics of regulation: Principles and institutions Vol. 2. New York: Wiley.
137. Kaufmann, D., and A. Kraay. 2002. Growth without governance. Economia 3 (1):169-229.
138. Kaufmann, D., A. Kraay, and M. Mastruzzi. 2004. Governance matters III: Governance indicators for 1996-2002. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3106. Revised version 5 April 2004. Washington, DC: World Bank.
139. Keefer, P. 2002. Clientelism, credibility, and democracy. Development Research Group Working Paper. Washington, DC: World Bank.
140. Keefer, P. 2005. Database of political institutions: Changes and variable defi nitions. Washington, DC: World Bank.
141. Keefer, P., and S. Knack. 1997. Why don't poor countries catch up? A cross-national test of an institutional explanation. Economic Inquiry 35 (3):590-602.
142. Keefer, P., and D. Stasavage. 2003. The limits of delegation: Veto players, central bank independence and the credibility of monetary policy. American Political Science Review 47 (3):389-403.
143. Kessides, I. N. 2004. Reforming infrastructure: Privatization, regulation, and competition. World Bank Policy Research Report. Washington, DC: World Bank.
144. King, G., R. O. Keohane, and S. Verba. 1994. Designing social inquiry: Scientifi c inference in qualitative research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
145. Kirkpatrick, C., D. Parker, and Y.-F. Zhang. 2004. State versus private sector provision of water services in Africa: An empirical analysis. Paper presented at Centre on Regulation and Competition 3rd International Conference: Propoor regulation and competition: Issues, policies and practices. Cape Town, South Africa, 7-9 September 2004. http://www. competition-regulation.org. uk/conferences/southafrica04/kirkpatrick&parker&zhang.pdf (accessed June 23, 2008).
146. Knack, S. 2002. Governance and growth: Measurement and evidence. IRIS Discussion Papers on Institutions and Growth 02/05. College Park, MD: Center for Institutional Reform and the Informal Sector.
147. Knack, S., and P. Keefer. 1995. Institutions and economic performance: Crosscountry tests using alternative institutional measures. Economics and Politics 7 (3):207-27.
148. Komives, K. et al. 2005. Water, electricity, and the poor: Who benefi ts from utility subsidies? Washington, DC: World Bank.
149. Komives, K., D. Whittington, and X. Wu. 2003. Infrastructure coverage and the poor: A global perspective. In Infrastructure for poor people: Public policy for private provision, eds. P. J. Brook and T. Irwin, 77-124. Washington, DC: World Bank.
150. Krause, M. 2002. Restrukturierung der Stromwirtschaft: Aufgaben für Staat und Entwicklungszusammenarbeit. Berichte und Gutachten 8/2002. Bonn: German Development Institute (DIE).
151. Krause, M. 2008. The political economy of water and sanitation services in Colombia. In Water politics and development cooperation: Local power plays and global governance, eds. W. Scheumann, S. Neumann and M. Kipping, 237-58. Berlin: Springer.
152. Kreditanstalt Für Wiederaufbau. 2004. Zur Berücksichtigung der Nachhaltigkeit durch die KfW in Schlussprüfungen von Projekten der Siedlungswasserwirtschaft. Diskussionsbeiträge. Frankfurt am Main: KfW.
153. Krueger, A. 1974. The political economy of the rent-seeking society. American Economic Review 64 (3):291-303.
154. Kugler, M., and H. Rosental. 2000. Checks and balances: An assessment of the institutional separation of political powers in Colombia. Working Paper 17. Bogotá: Fedesarrollo.
155. Kydland, F., and E. Prescott. 1977. Rules rather than discretion: The inconsistency of optimal plans. Journal of Political Economy 85 (3):473-90.
156. Lake, D. A., and M. A. Baum. 2001. The invisible hand of democracy: Political control and provision of public services. Comparative Political Studies 34 (6):587-621.
157. Leal, F., and A. Dávila. 1990. Clientelismo en Colombia: El sistema político y su expresión regional. Bogotá: Tercer Mundo.
158. Leibenstein, H. 1966. Allocative effi ciency versus X-effi ciency. American Economic Review 56:392-415.
159. Levin, R. B. et al. 2002. U.S. drinking water challenges in the twenty-fi rst century. Environmental Health Perspectives 110 (Suppl 1: Febr 2002):43-52.
160. Levy, B., and P. T. Spiller. 1996. A framework for resolving the regulatory problem. In Regulations, institutions and commitment: Comparative studies of telecommunications, eds. B. Levy and P. T. Spiller, 1-35. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
161. Lobina, E. 2005. Problems with private water concessions: A review of experiences and analysis of dynamics. Water Resources Development 21 (1):55-87.
162. Lundsgaard, J. 2002. Competition and effi ciency in publicly funded services. Economics Department Working Papers 331. Paris: OECD.
163. Mainardi, S. 2003. Water availability and infrastructure development: Cross-country econometric and neural network estimates. Desalination 158 (1-3):241-54.
164. Maldonado Copello, A. 2002. Avances y resultados de la descentralización política en Colombia. In Vol. 2 of Evaluación de la descentralización municipal en Colombia: Balance de una década, ed. Departamento Nacional de Planeación, 259-321. Bogotá: Departamento Nacional de Planeación.
165. Maldonado, M. M., and G. Vargas Forero. 2001. Evaluación de la descentralización municipal en Colombia: La descentralización en el sector de agua potable y saneamiento básico. Archivos de Economía Documento 166. Bogotá: Departamento Nacional de Planeación.
166. Marshall, M. G., and K. Jaggers. 2000. Polity IV Project: Political regime characteristics and transitions 1800-1999; Dataset users manual. College Park, MD: University of Maryland.
167. Martz, J. D. 1997. The politics of clientelism: Democracy and the state in Colombia. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
168. Mauro, P. 1995. Corruption and growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 110 (3):681-712.
169. McDowell, A., and N. J. Cox. 2001. How do you estimate a model when the dependent variable is a proportion? Webresource Stata Corporation: Frequently asked questions. http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/stat/logit.html (accessed February 24, 2006).
170. McIntosh, A. C. 2003. Asian water supplies: Reaching the urban poor. Manila: Asian Development Bank/IWA Publishing.
171. Media Analytics Ltd. 2004. Tariffs: Half way there. Global Water Intelligence 5 (9):8-9.
172. Meléndez, M. 2004. Subsidios al consumo de los servicios públicos en Colombia: Hacia dónde movernos? Informes de base: Colombia; Desarrollo económico reciente en infraestructura (REDI). Washington, DC: World Bank.
173. Merkel, W. 2004. Embedded and defective democracies. Democratization 11 (5):33-58.
174. Ministerio de Ambiente, Vivienda y Desarrollo Territorial. 2005. Decreto Número 1013 de 2005: Por el cual se establece la metodología para la determinación del equilibrio entre los subsudios y las contribuciones para los servicios públicos domiciliarios de acueducto, alcantarillado y aseo. Diario Ofi cial 45871 (April 6, 2005).
175. Ministerio de Ambiente, Vivienda y Desarrollo Territorial. 2006. Decreto 57 de 2006: Por el cual de establecen unas reglas para la aplicación del factor de aporte solidario para los servicios públicos domiciliarios de acueducto, altantarillado y aseo. Diario Ofi cial 46150 (January 13, 2006).
176. Ministerio de Desarrollo Económico. 2000. Resolución No. 1096 de 17 de Noviembre de 2000: Por la cual se adopta el Reglamento Técnico para el sector de Agua Potable y Saneamiento Básico-RAS. Bogotá. http://www.cra.gov.co/.
177. Ministerio de Salud. 1998. Decreto Número 475 de 1998: Por el cual se expiden normas técnicas de calidad del agua potable. Diario Ofi cial 43259 (March 16, 1998).
178. Mkandawire, T. 2004. Good governance: The itinerary of an idea. D+C Development Cooperation 31 (10/2004):380-81.
179. Munck, G. L., and J. Verkuilen. 2002. Conceptualizing and measuring democracy. Comparative Political Studies 35 (1):5-34.
180. Müller, T., and S. Pickel. 2007. Wie lässt sich Demokratie am besten messen? Zur Konzeptqualität von Demokratie-Indizes. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 48 (3):511-39.
181. Neubert, S. 2003. Methodological orientation for short-term and practical research projects in developing countries. Bonn: German Development Institute (DIE).
182. Nickson, A. 2001. Establishing and implementing a joint venture: Water and sanitation services in Cartagena, Colombia. Working paper 442 03. London: GHK International.
183. Noll, R. 2002. The economics of urban water systems. In Thirsting for effi ciency: The economics and politics of urban water system reform, ed. M. M. Shirley, 43-63. Amsterdam: Pergamon.
184. Noll, R. G. 1989. Economic perspectives on the politics of regulation. In Vol. 2 of Handbook of industrial organization, eds. R. Schmalensee and R. D. Willig, 1253-87. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
185. North, D. C. 1990. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance: The political economy of institutions and decisions. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
186. O'Donnell, G. 1994. Delegative democracy. Journal of Democracy 5 (1):55-69.
187. O'Donnell, G. 1998. Horizontal accountability in new democracies. Journal of Democracy 9 (3):112-26.
188. Observatorio del Programa Presidencial de Derechos Humanos y DIH. 2005. Algunos indicadores sobre la situación de los derechos humanos en el departamento de Meta. Bogotá: Vicepresidencia de la República.
189. Observatorio del Programa Presidencial de Derechos Humanos y DIH. 2006a. Dinámica reciente de la confrontación armada en Caldas. Bogotá: Vicepresidencia de la República.
190. Observatorio del Programa Presidencial de Derechos Humanos y DIH. 2006b. Dinámica reciente de la confrontación armada en la Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta. Bogotá: Vicepresidencia de la República.
191. Ochoa, F. 1996. Evaluación de la participación del sector privado en acueducto y alcantarillado: Enseñanzas. Noviembre de 1996. Unpublished study. Bogotá.
192. Offe, C. 1996. Political economy: Sociological perspectives. In A new handbook of political science, eds. R. E. Goodin and H.-D. Klingemann, 675-90. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
193. Olson, M. 1965. The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
194. Olson, M. 1982. The rise and decline of nations: Economic growth, stagfl ation, and social rigidities. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
195. Olson, M. 1993. Dictatorship, democracy and development. American Political Science Review 87 (3):567-76.
196. Pastor, M., and C. Wise. 1999. The politics of second-generation reform. Journal of Democracy 10 (3):34-48.
197. Paul, S. 1992. Accountability in public services: Exit, voice and control. World Development 20 (7):1047-60.
198. Perman, R. et al. 2003. Natural resource and environmental economics. 3rd ed. Harlow, UK: Pearson.
199. Plümper, T. 2001. Die Politik wirtschaftlichen Wachstums in autoritären Staaten. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 42 (1):79-100.
200. Rawls, J. 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
201. Renzetti, S. 2000. An empirical perspective on water pricing reforms. In The political economy of water pricing reforms, ed. A. Dinar, 123-40. Washington, DC: World Bank.
202. Renzetti, S., and D. Dupont. 2004. Ownership and performance of water utilities. Greener Management International 42:9-19.
203. República de Colombia. 2004. Informe anual de Derechos Humanos y Derecho Internacional Humanitario 2003. Bogotá: Vicepresidencia de la República.
204. República de Colombia. 2005. Informe anual de Derechos Humanos y Derecho Internacional Humanitario 2004. Bogotá: Vicepresidencia de la República.
205. Richter, R., and E. Furubotn. 1997. Institutions and economic theory: An introduction to and assessment of the new institutional economics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
206. Robinson, J. A. 2005. A normal Latin American country? A perspective on Colombian development. Cambridge, MA. http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~jrobins/ researchpapers/ unpublishedpapers/index.htm (accessed March 20, 2008).
207. Robinson, M. 1998. Corruption and development: An introduction. European Journal of Development Research 10 (1):1-14.
208. Rodríguez del Gallego, A., and J. C. Carvajal. 2004. Conceptos y medición del índice de necesidades básicas insatisfechas NBI (II). Maestría en Gestión Urbana. Papeles de Coyuntura 2. Bogotá: Universidad Piloto de Colombia.
209. Roemer, J. E. 1998. Equality of opportunity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
210. Roland, G., and J. G. Zapata. 2000. Colombia's electoral and party system: Proposals for reforms. Working Paper. Berkeley: University of California.
211. Roniger, L. 1990. Hierarchy and trust in modern Mexico and Brazil. New York: Praeger Publishers.
212. Rosen, H. S. 1992. Public fi nance. 3rd ed. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
213. Rouse, M. J. 2007. Institutional governance and regulation of water service: The essential elements. London: IWA Publishing.
214. Sappington, D. 1996. Principles of regulatory policy design. In Infrastructure delivery: Private initiative and the public good, ed. A. Mody, 79-105. Washington, DC: World Bank.
215. Sarmiento, A., and L. M. Becerra. 1998. Análisis de las relaciones entre violencia y equidad. Archivos de Macroeconomía Documento 93. Bogotá: Departamento Nacional de Planeación.
216. Sauer, J. 2003. The effi ciency of rural infrastructure-Water supply in rural areas of transition. ERSA Conference Papers ersa03p463. http://www.ersa.org/ersaconfs/ ersa03/ cdrom/papers/463.pdf (accessed March 19, 2008).
217. Sauer, J. 2005. Economies of scale and fi rm size optimum in rural water supply. Water Resources Research 41 (11):1-13.
218. Scharpf, F. W. 1997. Games real actors play: Actor-centered institutionalism in policy research. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
219. Sen, A. 1985. Commodities and capabilities. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
220. Serra, P. 2000. Subsidies in Chilean public utilities. Serie Economía del Centro de Economía Aplicada 70. Santiago de Chile: Universidad de Chile.
221. Shapiro, S., and R. Willig. 1990. Economic rationales for the scope of privatization. In The political economy of public sector reform and privatization, eds. E. N. Suleiman and J. Waterbury, 55-87. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
222. Shirley, M. M., and P. Walsh. 2000. Public versus private ownership: The current state of the debate. Working Paper 2420. Washington, DC: World Bank. Shirley, M. M. 2000. Reforming urban water systems: A tale of four cities. In Regulatory policy in Latin America: Post-privatization realities, ed. L. Manzetti, 147-70. Miami: North-South Center Press.
223. Shirley, M. M., and C. Ménard. 2002. Cities awash: A synthesis of the country cases. In Thirsting for effi ciency: The economics and politics of urban water system reform, ed. M. M. Shirley, 1-41. Amsterdam: Pergamon.
224. Siebert, H. 2004. Economics of the environment. 6th ed. Berlin: Springer.
225. Smith, W. 1997. Utility regulators: The independence debate. Public Policy for the Private Sector 12 (Dec 1997):9-12.
226. Smith, W. 2000. Regulating Infrastructure for the Poor: Perspectives on regulatory system design. Paper Presented at "Infrastructure for development: Private solutions and the poor". May 31-June 2, 2000. London.
227. Spiller, P. T., and W. Savedoff. 1999. Government opportunism and the provision of water. In Spilled water: Institutional commitment in the provision of water services, eds. W. Savedoff and P. T. Spiller, 1-34. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.
228. Stasavage, D. 2001. Electoral competition and public spending on education: Evidence from African countries. The Centre for the Study of African Economies Working Paper 155. London: London School of Economics.
229. Stern, J., and S. Holder. 1999. Regulatory governance: Criteria for assessing the performance of regulatory systems: An application to infrastructure industries in the developing countries of Asia. Utilities Policy 8 (1):33-50.
230. Superintendencia de Servicios Públicos Domiciliarios. 2001. Gestión integral para los servicios públicos domiciliarios de agua potable y saneamiento básico: Deberes y responsabilidades de alcaldes y concejales. Bogotá: SSPD.
231. Superintendencia de Servicios Públicos Domiciliarios. 2002. Acueducto, alcantarillado y aseo 1998-2001. Supercifras en m3 6:1-143.
232. Superintendencia de Servicios Públicos Domiciliarios. 2004a. Concepto SSPD-OJ-2004-272. Bogotá: SSPD.
233. Superintendencia de Servicios Públicos Domiciliarios. 2004b. Informe control de la calidad del agua en Colombia-2003. Bogotá: SSPD.
234. Superintendencia de Servicios Públicos Domiciliarios. 2004c. Manual de comités de desarrollo y control social: Participación Cuidadana en Servicios Públicos Domiciliarios Vol I. Bogotá: SSPD.
235. Superintendencia de Servicios Públicos Domiciliarios. 2004d. Manual del vocal de control de servicios públicos domiciliarios: Participación Cuidadana en Servicios Públicos Domicilarios Vol II. Bogotá: SSPD.
236. Superintendencia de Servicios Públicos Domiciliarios. 2005a. Balance entre asignaciones municipales, contribuciones y subsidios aplicados a los servicios de acueducto, alcantarillado y aseo: Colombia- 2001-2004. Bogotá: SSPD.
237. Superintendencia de Servicios Públicos Domiciliarios. 2005b. Boletín tarifario 01 de 2005: Servicios públicos de acueducto, altancarillado y aseo. Bogotá: SSPD.
238. Superintendencia de Servicios Públicos Domiciliarios. 2005c. Informe de calidad del agua en Colombia 2004, Bogotá: SSPD.
239. Superintendencia de Servicios Públicos Domiciliarios. 2006. Estudio sectorial servicios públicos de acueducto y alcantarillado 2002-2005. Documento de trabajo. Bogotá: SSPD.
240. Tirole, J. 1988. The theory of industrial organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
241. Torres, M., and C. J. Morrison Paul. 2006. Driving forces for consolidation or fragmentation of the US water utility industry: A cost function approach with endogenous output. Journal of Urban Economics 59 (1):104-20.
242. Transparencia por Colombia. 2004. El control social de la administración pública en Colombia. Cuadernos de Transparencia 8. Bogotá: Transparencia por Colombia.
243. Transparencia por Colombia. 2005. índice de transparencia departamental: Resultados 2004-2005. Bogotá: Transparencia por Colombia.
244. Without year. índice de integridad de los. Without year. índice de integridad de los gobiernos, asambleas y contralorías departamentales. Resultados 2003-2004. Bogotá: Transparencia por Colombia.
245. Tsebelis, G. 2002. Veto players: How political institutions work. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
246. Ugaz, C. 2003. Consumer participation and pro-poor regulation in Latin America. In Utility privatization and regulation: A fair deal for consumers? eds. C. Ugaz and C. Waddams Price, 80-98. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
247. United Nations Development Programme. 1997. Reconceptualising governance. Management Development and Governance Division Discussion Paper No. 2. New York: United Nations Development Programme.
248. United Nations Development Programme. 2003. Human development report 2003: Millennium development goals; A compact among nations to end human poverty. New York: Oxford University Press.
249. United Nations Economic and Social Council. 2002. Substantive issues arising in the implementation of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Draft. General comment 15: The right to water. Geneva: Offi ce for the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights.
250. United Nations Human Settlements Programme. 2003. Water and sanitation in the world's cities: Local action for global goods. London: Earthscan.
251. United Nations Offi ce on Drugs and Crime. Without year. Línea base para una política trasparente. Unpublished document. Manizales, Colombia.
252. United States Department of State. 2006. Country report on Human Rights practices- Colombia. Washington, DC: United States Department of State.
253. Urquhart, P., and D. Moore. 2004. Global water scoping process. Is there a case for a multistakeholder review of private sector participation in water and sanitation? Scoping report: Executive summary. Brasilia: Associação Nacional dos Serviços Municipais de Saneamento.
254. Urrutia, M. 1991. The absence of populism in Colombia. In The macro-economics of populism in Latin America, eds. S. Edwards and R. Dornbusch, 369-87. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
255. Veeduría de Servicios Públicos. 2003. Calidad en la prestación de los servicios públicos en la ciudad de Villavicencio: Presentación Octubre de 2003. Unpublished document. Villavicencio, Colombia.
256. Vickers, J., and G. Yarrow. 1988. Privatization: An economic analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
257. Villar, R. 2001. La institucionalidad política y el tercer sector en Colombia: Notas para una refl exión. Paper preseted at 'Tercer Encuentro de ISTR-LAC'. September 12-14, 2007. Buenos Aires.
258. Wallsten, S. J. 2001. An econometric analysis of telecom competition, privatization, and regulation in Africa and Latin America. The Journal of Industrial Economics 49 (1):1-19.
259. Weiss, T. G. 2000. Governance, good governance and global governance: Conceptual and actual challenges. Third World Quarterly 21 (5):795-814.
260. Whittington, D. et al. 1992. Household demand for improved sanitation services: A case study of Kumasi, Ghana. Water and Sanitation Discussion Paper. Washington, DC: World Bank.
261. Wills Herrera, E. 2002. La relación entre la corrupción y el proceso de descentralización en Colombia. In Vol. 2 of Evaluación de la descentralización municipal en Colombia: Balance de una década, ed. Departamento Nacional de Planeación, 368-415. Bogotá: Departamento Nacional de Planeación.
262. Winpenny, J. 2003. Financing water for all: Report of the World Panel on Financing Water Infrastructure. Marseille: World Water Council.
263. Wolff, G., and E. Hallstein. 2005. Beyond privatization: Restructuring water systems to improve performance. Oakland, CA: Pacifi c Institute.
264. Wooldridge, J. M. 2006. Introductory econometrics: A modern approach. 3rd ed. Mason, OH: South-Western.
265. World Bank. 1992. Governance and development. Washington, DC: World Bank.
266. World Bank. 1994. World Development Report 1994: Infrastructure for Development. Washington, DC: World Bank.
267. World Bank. 2001. World Development Report 2000/2001: Attacking Poverty. Washington, DC: World Bank.
268. World Bank. 2003a. Effi cient, sustainable service for all? An Operation Evaluation Department review of the World Bank's assistance to water supply and sanitation. Washington, DC: World Bank.
269. World Bank. 2003b. World Development Report 2004: Making Services Work for Poor People. Washington, DC: World Bank.
270. World Bank. 2004. Public and private sector roles in water supply and sanitation services: Operational guidance for World Bank Group staff. Washington, DC: World Bank.
271. World Bank. 2005. World Development Report 2006: Equity and Development. Washington, DC: World Bank
272. World Health Organization. 2004. Guidelines for drinking-water quality: Recommendations Vol. 1. 3rd ed. Geneva: WHO.
273. World Health Organization and United Nations Children's Fund. 2000. Global water supply and sanitation assessment 2000 report. Geneva: WHO and UNICEF.
274. World Health Organization and United Nations Children's Fund. 2004. Meeting the MDG drinking water sanitation target: A midterm assessment of progress. Geneva: WHO and UNICEF.
275. World Health Organization and United Nations Children's Fund. 2005. Water for life: Making it happen. Geneva: WHO and UNICEF.
276. World Health Organization and United Nations Children's Fund. 2006. Meeting the MDG drinking water and sanitation target: The urban and rural challenge of the decade. Geneva: WHO and UNICEF.
277. Yaffee, R. A. 2002. Robust regression analysis: Some popular statistical package options. Paper of the Statistics, Social Science, and Mapping Group. New York: New York University.
278. Zakaria, F. 1997. The rise of illiberal democracy. Foreign Affairs 76 (6):22-43.
279. Zerbe, R. O., Y. Bauman, and A. Finkle. 2006. An aggregate measure for benefi tcost- analysis. Ecological Economics 58 (3):449-61.
280. Zhang, Y.-F., and C. Kirkpatrick. 2002. Electricity sector reform in developing countries: An econometric assessment of the effects of privatisation, competition and regulation. Centre on Regulation and Competition Working Paper 31. Manchester: University of Manchester.