Web-based collaboration in individual care planning challenges the user and the provider roles – Toward a power transition in caring relationships

Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare

Volumn 7, Issue , 2014, Pages 561-572

  Bjerkan, Jorunn ^a,b   Vatne, Solfrid ^c   Hollingen, Anne ^d  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^b NORD UNIVERSITY   (Norway)

^c MOLDE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE   (Norway)

^d Møre and Romsdal Health Trust   (Norway)

Author keywords

Empowerment; Integrated care; Norway; Patient participation; Role transition; System testing; Web based collaboration

Indexed keywords

ADULT; APPLICATION SERVICE PROVIDER; ARTICLE; BIOINFORMATICS; COMMUNICATION SOFTWARE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; ELECTRONIC DATA INTERCHANGE; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; INFORMATION SYSTEM; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; INTERNET; MEDICAL PRACTICE; ONLINE SYSTEM; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PERSONALIZED MEDICINE; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT; PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; SYSTEM ANALYSIS;

EID: 84916877124     PISSN: None     EISSN: 11782390     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S70470     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Kodner DL, Spreeuwenberg C. Integrated care: meaning, logic, applications, and implications – a discussion paper. Int J Integr Care. 2002;2(4):1–6.
2. Battersby M, Health-Plus-Team. Health reform through coordinated care: SA HealthPlus. BMJ. 2005;330(7492):662–665.
3. Harno K, Nykänen P, Ohtonen J, Seppälä A, Kopra K. Healthcare Information Exchange in Regional eHealth Networks Implications for Initiatives in Advancing Shared Care. International Conference on eHealth, Telemedicine, and Social Medicine, eTELEMED ’09, Cancun; 1–7 February 2009. 42–45, IEEE; 2009.
4. Sarrami-Foroushani P, Travaglia J, Debono D, Braithwaite J. Key concepts in consumer and community engagement: a scoping meta- review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14(1):250.
5. Pasient-og brukerrettighetsloven. [Patients’ rights act]. Oslo, Norway; 1999/2012.
6. Forskrift om habilitering og rehabilitering individuell plan og koordinator. [Norwegian Ministry of Health and Care Services, Regulations for Rehabilitation, Individual care plan and Coordinator]. Oslo, Norway: Norwegian Ministry of Health and Care Services; 2011.
7. Bjerkan J, Richter M, Grimsmo A, Hellesø R, Brender J. Integrated care in Norway: the state of affairs years after regulation by law. Int J Integr Care. 2011;11:1–8.
8. Normann T, Sandvin JT, Thommesen H, Stultz C, Giskeødegård IK. A holistic Approach to Rehabilitation. Oslo: Kommuneforlaget; 2004.
9. SSB SN.Statistikk ordnet etter emner [Statistics organized by topics]. 2013; Available from: http://www.ssb.no/emner/. Accessed February 22, 2013.
10. Bjerkan J, Hedlund M, Hellesø R. Patients’ contribution to the development of a web-based plan for integrated care – a participatory design study. Inform Health Social Care. 2014:1–18.
11. Lau F, Kuziemsky C, Price M, Gardner J. A review on systematic reviews of health information system studies. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010;17(6):637–645.
12. Bjerkan J, Alonso A. Patients and professionals in collaborative testing of a web-based tool for integrated care: an evaluation study. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2010;157:66–71.
13. Hansen GV. Samarbeid uten fellesskap, om individuell planer i kommunalt psykisk helsearbeid. [Coordination without Collaboration – About Individual Plans in Municipal Mental Health Services], PhD Thesis, Karlstad: University of Karlstad; 2007.
14. Simonet D. The new public management theory in the British health care system: a critical review. Admin Soc. In press 2013.
15. Freire P. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Herder & Herder; 1970.
16. Rappaport J. Terms of empowerment/exemplars of prevention: toward a theory for community psychology. Am J Community Psychol. 1987;15(2):121–148.
17. Chamberlin J, Schene AH. A working definition of empowerment. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 1997;20:43–46.
18. Lewis FM, Glanz K, Rimer BK. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2002.
19. Anderson RM, Funnell MM. Patient empowerment: myths and misconceptions. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;79(3):277–282.
20. Anderson RM, Funnell MM. Patient empowerment: reflections on the challenge of fostering the adoption of a new paradigm. Patient Educ Couns. 2005;57(2):153–157.
21. Storm M, Edwards A. Models of user involvement in the mental health context: intentions and implementation challenges. Psychiatr Q. 2013;84(3):313–327.
22. Manneråk S, Brandsnes E, Brattstrøm M, et al. Fra Bruker til Borger. En strategi for nedbygging av funksjonshemmende barrierer [From patient to citizen. Governmental strategy of reducing disabling barriers in Norway]. Olso: Det norske storting, Helsedirektoratet; 2001.
23. Ahgren B, Axelsson R. Evaluating integrated health care: a model for measurement. Int J Integr Care. 2005;5:e01.
24. Brattheim B, Faxvaag A, Toussaint P. When information sharing is not enough. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011;169:359–363.
25. Schumacher KL, Meleis AI. Transitions: a central concept in nursing. Image J Nurs Sch. 1994;26(2):119–127.
26. Schmitt N. Role transition from caregiver to case manager, part 1. Lippincotts Case Manag. 2005;10(6):294–302.
27. Schmitt N. Role transition from caregiver to case manager – part II. Prof Case Manag. 2006;11(1):37–46.
28. Holt IGS. Role transition in primary care settings. Qual Prim Care. 2008;16(2):117–126.
29. Guirguis LM, Chewning BA. Role theory: literature review and implications for patient–pharmacist interactions. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2005;1(4):483–507.
30. Worley MM, Schommer JC, Brown LM, et al. Pharmacists’ and patients’ roles in the pharmacist–patient relationship: are pharmacists and patients reading from the same relationship script? Res Social Adm Pharm. 2007;3(1):47–69.
31. Freeman T. ‘Best practice’ in focus group research: making sense of different views. J Adv Nurs. 2006;56(5):491–497.
32. Krueger RA. Focus Groups. A Practical Guide for Applied Research. Los Angeles, CA, USA: Sage; 2009.
33. Brinkmann S, Kvale S. Interviews – Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing. Los Angeles, CA, USA: Sage; 2009.
34. Dale A, Mason J. Understanding Social Research: Thinking Creatively about Method. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications; 2010.
35. Malterud K. Systematic text condensation: a strategy for qualitative analysis. Scand J Public Health. 2012;40(8):795–805.
36. Greenhalgh T. Chronic illness: beyond the expert patient. BMJ. 2009;338(7695):629–631.
37. Heldal F, Tjora A. Making sense of patient expertise. Social Theory Health. 2009;7(1):1–19.
38. Rambøll Management for Helsedirektoratet. Kartlegging av individu­elle planer i landets kommuner. [Survey of Individual Care Plans in Norway]. Oslo: Helsedirektoratet; 2011. Available from: http://helse­direktoratet.no/helse-og-omsorgstjenester/habilitering-rehabilitering/individuell-plan/Documents/kartlegging-av-individuelle-planer-i-landets-kommuner.pdf.
39. Colombo C, Moja L, Gonzalez-Lorenzo M, Liberati A, Mosconi P. Patient empowerment as a component of health system reforms: rights, benefits and vested interests. Intern Emerg Med. 2012;7(2):183–187.
40. McAllister M, Dunn G, Payne K, Davies L, Todd C. Patient empowerment: the need to consider it as a measurable patient-reported outcome for chronic conditions. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12(1):157.
41. Hughes JJ. Organization and Information at the Bed-Side: The Experience of the Medical Division of Labor by University Hospitals’ Inpatients [dissertation]. Chicago: University of Chicago, Department of Sociology; 1995.
42. Humerfelt K. Brukermedvirkning i arbeid med individuell plan, -anerkjennelse og krenkelse. [User Participation in the Work of Indi­vidual Care Plan, -Acknowledgment and Offense]. Trondheim: Faculty of Social Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology; 2012.
43. McKinlay JB. Who is really ignorant – physician or patient? J Health Soc Behav. 1975;16(1):3–11.
44. Malterud K, Thesen J. When the helper humiliates the patient: a qualitative study about unintended intimidations. Scand J Public Health. 2008;36(1):92–98.
45. Tritter JQ, McCallum A. The snakes and ladders of user involvement: moving beyond Arnstein. Health Policy. 2006;76(2):156–168.
46. Tritter JQ. Revolution or evolution: the challenges of conceptualizing patient and public involvement in a consumerist world. Health Expect. 2009;12(3):275–287.
47. Christensen M, Hewitt-Taylor J. Empowerment in nursing: paternalism or maternalism? Br J Nurs. 2006;15(13):695–699.
48. Zomorodi M, Foley BJ. The nature of advocacy vs. paternalism in nursing: clarifying the ‘thin line’. J Adv Nurs. 2009;65(8):1746–1752.
49. Orem DE, Taylor SG. Reflections on nursing practice science: the nature, the structure, and the foundation of nursing sciences. Nurs Sci Q. 2011;24(1):35–41.
50. MacGillivary H, Nelson G. Partnership in mental health: what it is and how to do it. Can J Rehabil. 1998;12(2):71–83.
51. Rush B. Mental health service user involvement in England: lessons from history. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2004;11(3):313–318.
52. Brown D, McWilliam C, Ward-Griffin C. Client-centred empowering partnering in nursing. J Adv Nurs. 2006;53(2):160–168.
53. Michaelsen R, Vatne S, Hollingen A. Koordinatorrollen ved Indviduell plan – fokus på brukermedvirkning og samarbeid. [The role of coordina­tor in an Individual Plan – focusing patient participance and cooperation]. Norsk Tidsskrift for sykepleieforskning. 2007;4(9):15–28.
54. Daniel LE. Vulnerability as a key to authenticity. Image. 1998;30(2): 191–192.
55. Holum LC. “Individual plan” in a user-oriented and empowering perspective: a qualitative study of “individual plans” in Norwegian mental health services. Nord Psychol. 2012;64(1):45–57.
56. Holum LC. “It is a good idea, but.” A qualitative study of implementa­tion of ‘Individual Plan’ in Norwegian mental health care. Int J Integr Care. 2012;12:30.