메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 56, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 491-497

'Best practice' in focus group research: Making sense of different views

Author keywords

Best practice; Discussion paper; Evaluation research; Focus groups; Nursing

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; METHODOLOGY; NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT;

EID: 33750593838     PISSN: 03092402     EISSN: 13652648     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.04043.x     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (306)

References (24)
  • 1
    • 0035810567 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Checklists for improving the rigour in qualitative research: A case of the tail wagging the dog?
    • Barbour R. (2001) Checklists for improving the rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog? British Medical Journal 322, 1115-1117.
    • (2001) British Medical Journal , vol.322 , pp. 1115-1117
    • Barbour, R.1
  • 4
    • 0003170822 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Criteria for the evaluation of qualitative research
    • Blaxter M. (1996) Criteria for the evaluation of qualitative research. Medical Sociology News 22, 68-71.
    • (1996) Medical Sociology News , vol.22 , pp. 68-71
    • Blaxter, M.1
  • 7
    • 0002397240 scopus 로고
    • Deconstructing the qualitative-quantitative divide
    • (Brannen J., ed.), Avebury, Aldershott
    • Hammersley M. (1992) Deconstructing the qualitative-quantitative divide. In Mixing Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Research (Brannen J., ed.), Avebury, Aldershott, pp. 39-55.
    • (1992) Mixing Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Research , pp. 39-55
    • Hammersley, M.1
  • 8
    • 84995024293 scopus 로고
    • The methodology of focus group interviews: The importance of interaction between research participants
    • Kitzinger J. (1994) The methodology of focus group interviews: the importance of interaction between research participants. Sociology of Health and Illness 16, 103-121.
    • (1994) Sociology of Health and Illness , vol.16 , pp. 103-121
    • Kitzinger, J.1
  • 9
    • 84971585775 scopus 로고
    • Qualitative research: Introducing focus groups
    • Kitzinger J. (1995) Qualitative research: introducing focus groups. British Medical Journal 311, 299-302.
    • (1995) British Medical Journal , vol.311 , pp. 299-302
    • Kitzinger, J.1
  • 14
    • 0034132884 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Objectivity and reliability in qualitative analysis: Realist, contextualist and radical constructionist epistemologies
    • Madill A., Jordan A. & Shirley C. (2000) Objectivity and reliability in qualitative analysis: realist, contextualist and radical constructionist epistemologies. British Journal of Psychology 91, 1-20.
    • (2000) British Journal of Psychology , vol.91 , pp. 1-20
    • Madill, A.1    Jordan, A.2    Shirley, C.3
  • 15
    • 84889956689 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Quality in qualitative health research
    • (Pope C. & Mays N., eds), BMJ Books, London
    • Mays N. & Pope C. (2000) Quality in qualitative health research. In Qualitative Research in Health Care, 2nd edn (Pope C. & Mays N., eds), BMJ Books, London, pp. 89-101.
    • (2000) Qualitative Research in Health Care, 2nd Edn , pp. 89-101
    • Mays, N.1    Pope, C.2
  • 23
    • 0004464707 scopus 로고
    • The role of reflexivity in feminist psychology
    • Wilkinson S. (1988) The role of reflexivity in feminist psychology. Women's Studies International Forum 11, 493-502.
    • (1988) Women's Studies International Forum , vol.11 , pp. 493-502
    • Wilkinson, S.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.