Quantitative genetic analysis indicates natural selection on leaf phenotypes across wild tomato species (Solanum sect. lycopersicon; solanaceae)

Genetics

Volumn 198, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 1629-1643

  Muir, Christopher D ^a,b   Pease, James B ^b   Moyle, Leonie C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARBON; CARBON DIOXIDE;

ACCLIMATIZATION; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECOLOGICAL NICHE; EVOLUTIONARY ADAPTATION; GAS DIFFUSION; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENE LOCATION; GENE MUTATION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; INTROGRESSION; LEAF DEVELOPMENT; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NATURAL SELECTION; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PLANT EVOLUTION; PLANT LEAF; PLANT STOMA; PLEIOTROPY; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS MAPPING; STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE; TOMATO; WILD PLANT; CHROMOSOME MAP; EVOLUTION; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC SCREENING; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

LYCOPERSICON; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; SOLANACEAE; SOLANUM;

BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENETIC ASSOCIATION STUDIES; GENETIC TESTING; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; PHENOTYPE; PLANT LEAVES; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT, HERITABLE; SELECTION, GENETIC; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84915749250     PISSN: 00166731     EISSN: 19432631     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.114.169276     Document Type: Article

References (91)

1. Abràmoff, M. D., P. J. Magalhães, and S. J. Ram, 2004 Image processing with ImageJ. Biophotonics International 11(7): 36-42.
2. Anderson, E. C., and M. Slatkin, 2003 Orr's quantitative trait loci sign test under conditions of trait ascertainment. Genetics 165(1): 445-446.
3. Bartlett, M. K., C. Scoffoni, and L. Sack, 2012 The determinants of leaf turgor loss point and prediction of drought tolerance of species and biomes: a global meta-analysis. Ecol. Lett. 15(5): 393-405.
4. Benjamini, Y., and Y. Hochberg, 1995 Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc., B 57(1): 289-300.
5. Bombarely, A., N. Menda, I. Y. Tecle, R. M. Buels, S. Strickler et al., 2011 The Sol Genomics Network (solgenomics.net): growing tomatoes using Perl. Nucleic Acids Res. 39(suppl 1): D1149-D1155.
6. Chitwood, D. H., R. Kumar, L. R.Headland, A. Ranjan, M. F. Covington et al., 2013 A quantitative genetic basis for leaf morphology in a set of precisely defined tomato introgression lines. Plant Cell 25(7): 2465-2481.
7. Colosimo, P. F., K. E. Hosemann, S. Balabhadra, G. Villarreal, M. Dickson et al., 2005 Widespread parallel evolution in sticklebacks by repeated fixation of ectodysplasin alleles. Science 307 (5717): 1928-1933.
8. Cowan, I., 1977 Stomatal behaviour and environment. Adv. Bot. Res. 4: 117-228.
9. Dalziel, A. C., S. M. Rogers, and P. M. Schulte, 2009 Linking genotypes to phenotypes and fitness: how mechanistic biology can inform molecular ecology. Mol. Ecol. 18(24): 4997-5017.
10. Des Marais, D. L., L. C. Auchincloss, E. Sukamtoh, J. K. McKay, T. Logan et al., 2014 Variation in MPK12 affects water use efficiency in Arabidopsis and reveals a pleiotropic link between guard cell size and ABA response. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111(7): 2836-2841.
11. Dow, G. J., D. C. Bergmann, and J. A. Berry, 2014 An integrated model of stomatal development and leaf physiology. New Phytol. 201(4): 1218-1226.
12. Dudley, S. A., 1996 Differing selection on plant physiological traits in response to environmental water availability: a test of adaptive hypotheses. Evolution 50(1): 92-102.
13. Easlon, H. M., and J. H. Richards, 2009 Drought response in selfcompatible species of tomato (Solanaceae). Am. J. Bot. 96(3): 605-611.
14. Ehleringer, J., O. Björkman, and H. A. Mooney, 1976 Leaf pubescence: effects on absorptance and photosynthesis in a desert shrub. Science 192(4237): 376-377.
15. Eshed, Y., and D. Zamir, 1994 A genomic library of Lycopersicon pennellii in L. esculentum: a tool for fine mapping of genes. Euphytica 79(3): 175-179.
16. Evans, J. R., G. D. Farquhar, T. D. Sharkey, and J. Berry, 1986 Carbon isotope discrimination measured concurrently with gas exchange to investigate CO2 diffusion in leaves of higher plants. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 13(2): 281-292.
17. Farquhar, G. D., and T. D. Sharkey, 1982 Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 33(1): 317-345.
18. Farquhar, G. D., and M. O'Leary, and J. A. Berry, 1982 On the relationship between carbon isotope discrimination and the inter- cellular carbon dioxide concentration in leaves. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 9(2): 121-137.
19. Farquhar, G. D., J. R. Ehleringer, and K. T. Hubick, 1989 Carbon isotope discrimination and photosynthesis. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 40: 503-537.
20. Fisher, R. A., 1922 On the interpretation of x2 from contingency tables, and the calculation of P. J. R. Stat. Soc. 85(1): 87-94.
21. Franks, P. J., and G. D. Farquhar, 2001 The effect of exogenous abscisic acid on stomatal development, stomatal mechanics, and leaf gas exchange in Tradescantia virginiana. Plant Physiol. 125(2): 935-942.
22. Gailing, O., R. Langenfeld-Heyser, A. Polle, and R. Finkeldey, 2008 Quantitative trait loci affecting stomatal density and growth in a Quercus robur progeny: implications for the adaptation to changing environments. Glob. Change Biol. 14(8): 1934-1946.
23. Galmés, J., J. Ochogavía, J. Gago, E. J. Roldán, J. Cifre et al., 2013 Leaf responses to drought stress in Mediterranean accessions of Solanum lycopersicum: anatomical adaptations in relation to gas exchange parameters. Plant Cell Environ. 36(5): 920-935.
24. Gates, D. M., 1968 Transpiration and leaf temperature. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 19(1): 211-238.
25. Givnish, T. J., and G. J. Vermeij, 1976 Sizes and shapes of liane leaves. Am. Nat. 110(975): 743-778.
26. Grabherr, M. G., B. J. Haas, M. Yassour, J. Z. Levin, D. A. Thompson et al., 2011 Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nat. Biotechnol. 29: 644-652.
27. Gudesblat, G. E., J. Schneider-Pizoń, C. Betti, J. Mayerhofer, I. Vanhoutte et al., 2012 SPEECHLESS integrates brassinosteroid and stomata signalling pathways. Nat. Cell Biol. 14(5): 548-554.
28. Gupta, V., S. Mathur, A. U. Solanke, M. K. Sharma, R. Kumar et al., 2009 Genome analysis and genetic enhancement of tomato. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 29(2): 152-181.
29. Hadfield, J. D., 2010 MCMC methods for multi-response generalized linear mixed models: the MCMCglmm R Package. J. Stat. Softw. 33(2): 1-22.
30. Hall, N., H. Griffiths, J. Corlett, H. Jones, J. Lynn et al., 2005 Relationships between water-use traits and photosynthesis in Brassica oleracea resolved by quantitative genetic analysis. Plant Breed. 124(6): 557-564.
31. Hoekstra, H. E., R. J. Hirschmann, R. A. Bundey, P. A. Insel, and J. P. Crossland, 2006 A single amino acid mutation contributes to adaptive beach mouse color pattern. Science 313(5783): 101-104.
32. Holtan, H. E., and S. Hake, 2003 Quantitative trait locus analysis of leaf dissection in tomato using Lycopersicon pennellii segmental introgression lines. Genetics 165(3): 1541-1550.
33. Jones, F. C., M. G. Grabherr, Y. F. Chan, P. Russell, and E. Mauceli et al., 2012 The genomic basis of adaptive evolution in threespine sticklebacks. Nature 484(7392): 55-61.
34. Juenger, T. E., J. K. McKay, N. Hausmann, J. J. Keurentjes, S. Sen et al., 2005 Identification and characterization of QTL underlying wholeplant physiology in Arabidopsis thaliana: d13C, stomatal conductance and transpiration efficiency. Plant Cell Environ. 28(6): 697-708.
35. Kebede, H., B. Martin, J. Nienhuis, and G. King, 1994 Leaf anatomy of two Lycopersicon species with contrasting gas exchange properties. Crop Sci. 34(1): 108-113.
36. Kim, T.-W., M. Michniewicz, D. C. Bergmann, and Z.-Y. Wang, 2012 Brassinosteroid regulates stomatal development by GSK3- mediated inhibition of a MAPK pathway. Nature 482 (7385): 419-422.
37. Kimura, S., D. Koenig, J. Kang, F. Y. Yoong, and N. Sinha, 2008 Natural variation in leaf morphology results from mutation of a novel KNOX gene. Curr. Biol. 18(9): 672-677.
38. Kirkpatrick, M., and N. H. Barton, 2006 Chromosome inversions, local adaptation and speciation. Genetics 173(1): 419-434.
39. Koenig, D., J.M. Jiménez-Gómez, S. Kimura, D. Fulop, D. H. Chitwood et al., 2013 Comparative transcriptomics reveals patterns of selection in domesticated and wild tomato. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110(28): E2655-E2662.
40. Lee, Y. W., B. A. Gould, and J. R. Stinchcombe, 2014 Identifying the genes underlying quantitative traits: a rationale for the QTN programme. AoB Plants 6: plu004. DOI: 10.1093/aobpla/plu004.
41. Levin, D. A., 1973 The role of trichomes in plant defense. Q. Rev. Biol. 48: 3-15.
42. Lippman, Z. B., Y. Semel, and D. Zamir, 2007 An integrated view of quantitative trait variation using tomato interspecific introgression lines. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 17(6): 545-552.
43. Lowry, D. B., and J. H. Willis, 2010 A widespread chromosomal inversion polymorphism contributes to a major life-history transition, local adaptation, and reproductive isolation. PLoS Biol. 8(9): e1000500.
44. Löytynoja, A., and N. Goldman, 2008 Phylogeny-aware gap placement prevents errors in sequence alignment and evolutionary analysis. Science 320(5883): 1632-1635.
45. McKay, J., J. Richards, and T. Mitchell-Olds, 2003 Genetics of drought adaptation in Arabidopsis thaliana: I. Pleiotropy contributes to genetic correlations among ecological traits. Mol. Ecol. 12(5): 1137-1151.
46. McKay, J. K., J. H. Richards, K. S. Nemali, S. Sen, T. Mitchell-Olds et al., 2008 Genetics of drought adaptation in Arabidopsis thaliana II. QTL analysis of a new mapping population, Kas-1 3 Tsu-1. Evolution 62(12): 3014-3026.
47. Mott, K. A., A. C. Gibson, and J. W. O'Leary, 1982 The adaptive significance of amphistomatic leaves. Plant Cell Environ. 5(6): 455-460.
48. Moyle, L. C., and T. Nakazato, 2010 Hybrid incompatibility "snowballs" between Solanum species. Science 329(5998): 1521-1523.
49. McDonald, P., C. Fonseca, J. Overton, and M. Westoby, 2003 Leafsize divergence along rainfall and soil-nutrient gradients: Is the method of size reduction common among clades? Funct. Ecol. 17(1): 50-57.
50. Muir, C. D., and L. C. Moyle, 2009 Antagonistic epistasis for ecophysiological trait differences between Solanum species. New Phytol. 183(3): 789-802.
51. Muir, C. D., R. P. Hangarter, L. C. Moyle, and P. A. Davis, 2014a Morphological and anatomical determinants of mesophyll conductance in wild relatives of tomato (Solanum sect. Lycopersicon, sect. Lycopersicoides; Solanaceae). Plant Cell Environ. 37(6): 1415-1426.
52. Muir, C. D., J. B. Pease, and L. C. Moyle, 2014b Data from: Quantitative genetic analysis indicates natural selection on leaf phenotypes across wild tomato species (Solanum sect. Lycopersicon; Solanaceae). Genetics, Dryad Digital Repository. Avaliable at: http:/dx.doi.org/ 10.5061/dryad.116td.
53. Nachman, M. W., H. E. Hoekstra, and S. L. D'Agostino, 2003 The genetic basis of adaptive melanism in pocket mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100(9): 5268-5273.
54. Nakazato, T., D. L. Warren, and L. C. Moyle, 2010 Ecological and geographic modes of species divergence in wild tomatoes. Am. J. Bot. 97(4): 680-693.
55. Nambara, E., and A. Marion-Poll, 2005 Abscisic acid biosynthesis and catabolism. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 56: 165-185.
56. Nicotra, A. B., A. Leigh, C. K. Boyce, C. S. Jones, K. J. Niklas et al., 2011 The evolution and functional significance of leaf shape in the angiosperms. Funct. Plant Biol. 38(7): 535-552.
57. Noor, M. A. F., K. L. Grams, L. A. Bertucci, and J. Reiland, 2001 Chromosomal inversions and the reproductive isolation of species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98(21): 12084-12088.
58. Ogburn, R. M., and E. J. Edwards, 2010 The ecological water-use strategies of succulent plants. Adv. Bot. Res. 55: 179-225.
59. Onoda, Y., M. Westoby, P. B. Adler, A. M. Choong, F. J. Clissold et al., 2011 Global patterns of leaf mechanical properties. Ecol. Lett. 14(3): 301-312.
60. Orr, H. A., 1998a The population genetics of adaptation: the distribution of factors fixed during adaptive evolution. Evolution 52(4): 935-949.
61. Orr, H. A., 1998b Testing natural selection vs. genetic drift in phenotypic evolution using quantitative trait locus data. Genetics 149(4): 2099-2104.
62. Pan, Q., Y.-S. Liu, O. Budai-Hadrian, M. Sela, L. Carmel-Goren et al., 2000 Comparative genetics of nucleotide binding siteleucine rich repeat resistance gene homologues in the genomes of two dicotyledons: tomato and Arabidopsis. Genetics 155(1): 309-322.
63. Parkhurst, D. F., 1978 The adaptive significance of stomatal occurrence on one or both surfaces of leaves. J. Ecol. 66(2): 367- 383.
64. Parkhurst, D. F., and O. Loucks, 1972 Optimal leaf size in relation to environment. J. Ecol. 60(2): 505-537.
65. Pillitteri, L. J., and K. U. Torii, 2012 Mechanisms of stomatal development. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 63: 591-614.
66. Pollard, K. S., H. N. Gilbert, Y. Ge, S. Taylor, and S. Dudoit, 2013 Multtest: resampling-based multiple hypothesis testing. R package version 2.12.0.
67. Poorter, H., Niinemets, A. Walter, F. Fiorani, and U. Schurr, 2010 A method to construct dose-response curves for a wide range of environmental factors and plant traits by means of a meta-analysis of phenotypic data. J. Exp. Bot. 61(8): 2043-2055.
68. Potato Genome Sequencing Consortium, 2011 Genome sequence and analysis of the tuber crop potato. Nature 475(7355): 189- 195.
69. Qian, P., B. Han, E. Forestier, Z. Hu, N. Gao et al., 2013 Sterols are required for cell-fate commitment and maintenance of the stomatal lineage in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 74(6): 1029-1044.
70. R Development Core Team, 2012 R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
71. Rae, A. M., R. Ferris, M. J. Tallis, and G. Taylor, 2006 Elucidating genomic regions determining enhanced leaf growth and delayed senescence in elevated CO2. Plant Cell Environ. 29(9): 1730- 1741.
72. Rieseberg, L. H., 2001 Chromosomal rearrangements and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16(7): 351-358.
73. Rieseberg, L. H., A. Widmer, A. M. Arntz, and J. M. Burke, 2002 Directional selection is the primary cause of phenotypic diversification. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99(19): 12242- 12245.
74. Rockman, M., 2012 The QTN program and the alleles that matter for evolution: all that's gold does not glitter. Evolution 66(1): 1-17.
75. Ruckdeschel, P., M. Kohl, T. Stabla, and F. Camphausen, 2006 S4 Classes for Distributions. R News 6(2): 2-6.
76. Sack, L., P. Cowan, N. Jaikumar, and N. Holbrook, 2003 The 'hydrology' of leaves: co-ordination of structure and function in temperate woody species. Plant Cell Environ. 26(8): 1343- 1356.
77. Schauer, N., Y. Semel, U. Roessner, A. Gur, I. Balbo et al., 2006 Comprehensive metabolic profiling and phenotyping of interspecific introgression lines for tomato improvement. Nat. Biotechnol. 24(4): 447-454.
78. Schemske, D. W., and H. Bradshaw, Jr., 1999 Pollinator preference and the evolution of floral traits in monkeyflowers (Mimulus). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96(21): 11910-11915.
79. Semel, Y., J. Nissenbaum, N. Menda, M. Zinder, U. Krieger et al., 2006 Overdominant quantitative trait loci for yield and fitness in tomato. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103(35): 12981-12986.
80. Smith, W. K., and N. M. Hughes, 2009 Progress in coupling plant form and photosynthetic function. Castanea 74(1): 1-26.
81. Smith, W. K., T. C. Vogelmann, E. H. DeLucia, D. T. Bell, and K. A. Shepherd, 1997 Leaf form and photosynthesis. Bioscience 47(11): 785-793.
82. Streisfeld, M. A., W. N. Young, and J. M. Sobel, 2013 Divergent selection drives genetic differentiation in an R2R3-Myb transcription factor that contributes to incipient speciation in Mimulus aurantiacus. PLoS Genet. 9(3): e1003385.
83. Tanaka, Y., T. Nose, Y. Jikumaru, and Y. Kamiya, 2013 ABA inhibits entry into stomatal-lineage development in Arabidopsis leaves. The Plant Journal 74(3): 448-457.
84. Terashima, I., S.-I. Miyazawa, and Y. T. Hanba, 2006 Why are sun leaves thicker than shade leaves? Consideration based on analyses of CO2 diffusion in the leaf. J. Exp. Bot. 57(2): 343-354.
85. Vile, D., E. Garnier, B. Shipley, G. Laurent, M.-L. Navas et al., 2005 Specific leaf area and dry matter content estimate thickness in laminar leaves. Ann. Bot. (Lond.) 96(6): 1129-1136.
86. Vogel, S., 2012 The Life of a Leaf, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
87. Witkowski, E., and B. B. Lamont, 1991 Leaf specific mass confounds leaf density and thickness. Oecologia 88(4): 486-493.
88. Wright, I. J., P. B. Reich, M. Westoby, D. D. Ackerly, Z. Baruch et al., 2004 The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature 428 (6985): 821-827.
89. Xu, X., B. Martin, J. P. Comstock, T. J. Vision, C. G. Tauer et al., 2008 Fine mapping a QTL for carbon isotope composition in tomato. Theor. Appl. Genet. 117(2): 221-233.
90. Yang, Z., 2007 PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24(8): 1586-1591.
91. Yuan, Y.-W., K. J. R. P. Byers, and H. D. Bradshaw, Jr., 2013 The genetic control of flower-pollinator specificity. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 16: 422-428.