Do 21st century students dream of electric sheep? a mobile social media framework for creative pedagogies

30th Annual conference on Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education, ASCILITE 2013

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 151-161

  Cochrane, Thomas ^a   Withell, Andrew ^a  

^a AUCKLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Heutagogy; Mobile Social Media; Pedagogy

Indexed keywords

BRAIN; COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; MOBILE DEVICES; SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE); TEACHING;

BRAIN ACTIVITY; HEUTAGOGY; INTERACTIVE ACTIVITIES; INTERACTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT; MOBILE SOCIAL MEDIAS; PEDAGOGY; PUBLIC TRANSPORT; SITUATED LEARNING;

STUDENTS;

EID: 84913552111     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Attewell, J., Savill-Smith, C., Douch, R., & Parker, G. (2010). Modernising education and training: Mobilising technology for learning Available from http://www.talpalink.co.uk/resources/Modernising+education+and+training$2C+mobilising+technology+for+learning.pdf
2. Balsamo, A. (2011). Designing Culture: The Technological Imagination at Work. USA: Duke University Press.
3. Bauer, R., & Eagen, W. (2008). Design thinking: Epistemic plurality in management and organization. Aesthesis, 2(3).
4. Blaschke, L. M. (2012). Heutagogy and lifelong learning: A review of heutagogical practice and self-determined learning. [Research Article]. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(1), 56-71.
5. Buchem, I., Cochrane, T., Gordon, A., Keegan, H., & Camacho, M. (2012). Mlearning 2.0: The potential and challenges of collaborative mobile learning in participatory curriculum development in higher education. In I. A. Sánchez & P. Isaias (Eds.), Proceedings of the IADIS International Conference on Mobile Learning 2012 (pp. 311-314). Berlin, Germany: IADIS International Association for Development of the Information Society.
6. Cochrane, T. (2013). A summary and critique of mlearning research and practice. In Z. Berge & L. Muilenburg (Eds.), Handbook of mobile learning (pp. 24-34): Routledge.
7. Cochrane, T., & Withell, A. (2013). Augmenting design education with mobile social media: A transferable framework. Journal of the NUS teaching academy (JNUSTA), in press.
8. Cochrane, T., & Bateman, R. (2013). A mobile web 2.0 framework: Reconceptualizing teaching and learning. In M. Repetto & G. Trentin (Eds.), Using network and mobile technology to bridge formal and informal learning (pp. 57-92). Oxford, Cambridge: Chandos Publishing.
9. Cochrane, T. (2012a). Critical success factors for transforming pedagogy with mobile Web 2.0. British Journal of Educational Technology (in pre-print doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01384.x).
10. Cochrane, T. (2012b). Secrets of mlearning failures: Confronting reality. In D. Hawkridge, S. Verjans & G. Wilson (Eds.), Proceedings of ALT-C 2012 - a confrontation with reality: The 19th international conference of the Association for Learning Technology (pp. 123-134). University of Manchester, UK: ALT Association for Learning Technology.
11. Cochrane, T. (2010). Exploring Mobile Learning success factors. ALT-J, Research in Learning Technology, 18(2), 133-148.
12. Colomina, B., Choi, E., Galan, I. G., & Meister, A.-M. (2012, 28 September). Radical pedagogies in architectural education. The Architecture Review, 28 September.
13. Danvers, J. (2003). Towards a radical pedagogy: Provisional notes on learning and teaching in art & design. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 22(1), 47-57.
14. Dick, P. K. (1968). Do androids dream of electric sheep? (1996 ed.). New York, USA: Ballantine Books.
15. International Telecommunication Union. (2011, 16 November). Key Global Telecom Indicators for the World Telecommunication Service Sector. Retrieved 1 June, 2012, from http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/ict/statistics/at_glance/KeyTelecom.html
16. Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2010). Mobile learning as a catalyst for change. Open Learning: The Journal of Open and Distance Learning, 25(3), 181-185.
17. Luckin, R., Clark, W., Garnett, F., Whitworth, A., Akass, J., Cook, J., et al. (2010). Learner-Generated Contexts: A Framework to Support the Effective Use of Technology for Learning. In M. Lee & C. McLoughlin (Eds.), Web 2.0-Based E-Learning: Applying Social Informatics for Tertiary Teaching (pp. 70-84). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
18. Mazur, E. (2012). The scientific approach to teaching: research as a basis for course design. Paper presented at the Proceedings of ALT-C 2012 - a confrontation with reality: The 19th international conference of the Association for Learning Technology. Retrieved from http://mazur.harvard.edu/email/download.php?type=t&r=1815
19. Mitchell, G., Matthews, G., Pospisil, R., & White, B. (2009, 6th-9th July). Space Matters - Particularly when you don't have a lot. Paper presented at the HERDSA, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Australia.
20. Puentedura, R. (2006). Transformation, Technology, and Education. Retrieved 18 February 2013, from http://hippasus.com/resources/tte/puentedura_tte.pdf
21. Sternberg, R. J., Kaufman, J. C., & Pretz, J. E. (2002). The creativity conundrum: A propulsion model of kinds of creative contributions. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
22. Swantz, M. L. (2008). Participatory Action Research as Practice. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice (Second ed., pp. 31-48). London: SAGE Publications.
23. Withell, A., Cochrane, T., Reay, S., Gaziulusoy, I., & Inder, S. (2012). Augmenting the Design Thinking Studio. In M. Brown (Ed.), ascilite 2012: Future challenges, sustainable futures (pp. 1071-1081). Wellington, New Zealand: ascilite
24. Yagou, A. (2007). Design Pedagogy. Designophy, 2013, from http://www.designophy.com/designpedia/design-term-1000000000-design-pedagogy.htm