Of magnitudes and metaphors: Explaining cognitive interactions between space, time, and number

Cortex

Volumn 64, Issue , 2015, Pages 209-224

  Winter, Bodo ^a   Marghetis, Tyler ^b   Matlock, Teenie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

ATOM; Metaphor; Numerical cognition; Spatial cognition; Temporal cognition

Indexed keywords

A THEORY OF MAGNITUDE; BRAIN ASYMMETRY; COGNITION; CONCEPTUAL METAPHOR THEORY; HUMAN; INDEPENDENCE; LANGUAGE; PERCEPTION; REVIEW; SCALE UP; THEORY; BRAIN; COMPREHENSION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; LITERATURE; PHYSIOLOGY; TIME PERCEPTION;

BRAIN; COGNITION; COMPREHENSION; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; METAPHOR; SPACE PERCEPTION; TIME PERCEPTION;

EID: 84912143298     PISSN: 00109452     EISSN: 19738102     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2014.10.015     Document Type: Review

References (194)

1. Alverson H. Semantics and experience: Universal metaphors of time in English, Mandarin, Hindi, and Sesotho 1994, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
2. Alards-Tomalin D., Leboe-McGowan J.P., Shaw J.D.M., Leboe-McGowan L.C. The effects of numerical magnitude, size, and color saturation on perceived interval duration. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition 2014, 40:555-566.
3. Anderson M.L. Neural reuse: a fundamental organizational principle of the brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2010, 33:245-313.
4. Andres M., Seron X., Olivier E. Hemispheric lateralization of number comparison. Cognitive Brain Research 2005, 25:283-290.
5. Badets A., Pesenti M. Creating number semantics through finger movement perception. Cognition 2010, 115:46-53.
6. Balci F., Gallistel C.R. Cross-domain transfer of quantitative discriminations: Is it all a matter of proportion?. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2006, 13:636-642.
7. Barcelona A. On the plausibility of claiming a metonymic motivation for conceptual metaphor. Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads 2000, 32-58. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin. A. Barcelona (Ed.).
8. Barsalou L.W. Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1999, 22:577-660.
9. Benton A.L. Gerstmann's syndrome. Archives of Neurology 1992, 49:445-447.
10. Benussi V. Versuche zur Analyse taktil erweckter Scheinbewegungen. Archiv für die gesamte Psychologie 1913, 36:58-135.
11. Bill J.C., Teft L.W. Space-time relations: effects of time on perceived visual extent. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1969, 81:196-199.
12. Bill J.C., Teft L.W. Space-time relations: the effects of variations in stimulus and interstimulus interval duration on perceived visual extent. Acta Psychologica 1972, 36:358-369.
13. Bonato M., Zorzi M., Umiltà C. When time is space: evidence for a mental time line. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 2012, 36:2257-2273.
14. Bogdanova Y., Neargarder S., Cronin-Golomb A. Mapping mental number line in physical space: vertical and horizontal visual number line orientation in asymptomatic individuals with HIV. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46:2914-2923.
15. Boroditsky L. Metaphoric structuring: understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition 2000, 75:1-28.
16. Boroditsky L. Does language shape thought? English and Mandarin speakers' conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology 2001, 43:1-22.
17. Boroditsky L., Gaby A. Remembrances of times east: absolute spatial representations of time in an Australian aboriginal community. Psychological Science 2010, 21:1635-1639.
18. Boroditsky L., Ramscar M. The roles of body and mind in abstract thought. Psychological Science 2002, 13:185-188.
19. Bottini R., Casasanto D. Implicit spatial length modulates time estimates, but not vice versa. Spatial cognition VII 2010, 152. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg.
20. Bottini R., Casasanto D. Implicit spatial length modulates time estimates, but not vice versa. Proceedings of the 32nd annual conference of the cognitive science society 2010, 1348-1353. Cognitive Science Society, Austin, TX. S. Ohlsson, R. Catrambone (Eds.).
21. Bottini R., Casasanto D. Space and time in the child's mind: metaphoric or ATOMic?. Frontiers in Psychology 2013, 4.
22. Bottini R., Guarino C., Casasanto D. Space is special: a domain-specific mapping between time and nontemporal magnitude. Proceedings of the 35th annual conference of the cognitive science society 2013, 233-238. Cognitive Science Society, Austin, TX. M. Knauff, M. Pauen, N. Sebanz, I. Wachsmuth (Eds.).
23. Brown S.W. Attentional resources in timing: interference effects in concurrent temporal and non temporal working memory tasks. Perception & Psychophysics 1997, 5:1118-1140.
24. Bryant P., Squire S. Children's mathematics: lost and found in space. Spatial schemas and abstract thought 2001, 175-201. MIT Press, Cambridge. M. Gattis (Ed.).
25. Bueti D., Walsh V. The parietal cortex and the representation of time, space, number and other magnitudes. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2009, 12:1831-1840.
26. Butterworth B., Varma S., Laurillard D. Dyscalculia: from brain to education. Science 2011, 332:1049-1053.
27. Buhusi C.V., Meck W.H. What makes us tick? Functional and neural mechanisms of interval timing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2005, 6:755-765.
28. Cappelletti M., Freeman E.D., Cipolotti L. Dissociations and interactions between time, numerosity and space processing. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47:2732-2748.
29. Cantlon J.F., Platt M.L., Brannon E.M. Beyond the number domain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2009, 13:83-91.
30. Casasanto D. Similarity and Proximity: when does close in space mean close in mind?. Memory & Cognition 2008, 36:1047-1056.
31. Casasanto D. Who's afraid of the big bad Whorf? Crosslinguistic differences in temporal language and thought. Language Learning 2008, 58:63-79.
32. Casasanto D. Development of metaphorical thinking: the role of language. Language and the creative mind 2014, CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA. M. Borkent, J. Hinnell, B. Dancygier (Eds.).
33. Casasanto D., Boroditsky L. Time in the mind: using space to think about time. Cognition 2008, 106:579-593.
34. Casasanto D., Bottini R. Spatial language and abstract concepts. WIREs Cognitive Science 2014, 5:139-149.
35. Casasanto D., Dijkstra K. Motor action and emotional memory. Cognition 2010, 115:179-185.
36. Casasanto D., Fotakopoulou O., Boroditsky L. Space and time in the child's mind: evidence for a cross-dimensional asymmetry. Cognitive Science 2010, 34:387-405.
37. Casasanto D., Jasmin K. The hands of time: temporal gestures in English speakers. Cognitive Linguistics 2012, 23:643-674.
38. Cipora K., Nuerk H.C. Is the SNARC effect related to the level of mathematics? No systematic relationship observed despite more power, more repetitions, and more direct assessment of arithmetic skill. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2013, 66:1974-1991.
39. Clark H.H. Space, time, semantics, and the child. Cognitive development and the acquisition of language 1973, 27-63. Academic Press, New York. T. Moore (Ed.).
40. Clark H.H. Using language 1996, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
41. Cohen Kadosh R., Cohen Kadosh K., Linden D.E.J., Gever W., Berger A., Henik A. The brain locus of interaction between number and size: a combined functional magnetic resonance imaging and event-related potential study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2007, 19:957-970.
42. Cohen Kadosh R., Cohen Kadosh K., Schuhmann T., Kaas A., Goebel R., Henik A., et al. Virtual dyscalculia induced by parietal-lobe TMS impairs automatic magnitude processing. Current Biology 2007, 17:689-693.
43. Cooperrider K., Núñez R. Across time, across the body: transversal temporal gestures. Gesture 2009, 9:181-206.
44. Coull J.T., Nobre A.C. Where and when to pay attention: the neural systems for directing attention to spatial locations and to time intervals as revealed by both PET and fMRI. The Journal of Neuroscience 1998, 18:7426-7435.
45. Crawford E.L., Margolies S.M., Drake J.T., Murphy M.E. Affect biases memory of location: evidence for the spatial representation of affect. Cognition and Emotion 2006, 20:1153-1169.
46. Culham J.C., Valyear K.F. Human parietal cortex in action. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2006, 16:205-212.
47. Dehaene S., Bossini S., Giraux P. The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology General 1993, 122:371-396.
48. Dehaene S., Cohen L. Cultural recycling of cortical maps. Neuron 2007, 56:384-398.
49. Dormal V., Seron X., Pesenti M. Numerosity-duration interference: a Stroop experiment. Acta Psychologica 2006, 121:109-124.
50. Dormal V., Pesenti M. Numerosity-length interference-a stroop experiment. Experimental Psychology 2007, 54:289-297.
51. Droit-Volet S., Clement A., Fayol M. Time and number discrimination in a bisection task with a sequence of stimuli: a developmental approach. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 2003, 84:63-76.
52. Emmerton J., Renner J.C. Scalar effects in the visual discrimination of numerosity by pigeons. Learning & Behavior 2006, 34:176-192.
53. Evans V. The structure of time: Language, meaning and temporal cognition 2004, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
54. Evans V. Language and time: A cognitive linguistics approach 2013, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
55. Feigenson L. The equality of quantity. Trends in cognitive sciences 2007, 11:185-187.
56. Fischer M.H., Castel A.D., Dodd M.D., Pratt J. Perceiving numbers causes spatial shifts of attention. Nature Neuroscience 2003, 6:555-556.
57. Fuhrman O., McCormick K., Chen E., Jiang H., Shu D., Mao S., et al. How linguistic and cultural forces shape conceptions of time: English and Mandarin time in 3D. Cognitive Science 2011, 35:1305-1328.
58. Gerrig R.J., Gibbs R.W. Beyond the lexicon: creativity in language production. Metaphor and Symbol 1988, 3:1-19.
59. Gerstmann J. Syndrome of finger agnosia, disorientation for right and left, agraphia and acalculia. Archives of Neurology Psychiatry 1940, 44:398-408.
60. Gibbs R.W. The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding 1994, Cambridge University Press, New York.
61. Gibbs R.W. Embodiment and cognitive science 2006, Cambridge University Press, New York.
62. Gijssels T., Bottini R., Rueschemeyer S.A., Casasanto D. Space and time in the parietal cortex: fmri evidence for a neural asymmetry. Proceedings of the 35th annual conference of the cognitive science society 2013, 495-501. Cognitive Science Society, Austin TX. M. Knauff, M. Pauen, N. Sebanz, I. Wachsmuth (Eds.).
63. Goldstone R., Landy D., Son J.Y. The education of perception. Topics in Cognitive Science 2010, 2:265-284.
64. Grady J. Theories are buildings revisited. Cognitive Linguistics 1997, 8:267-290.
65. Gunderson E.A., Ramirez G., Beilock S.L., Levine S.C. The relation between spatial skill and early number knowledge: the role of the linear number line. Developmental Psychology 2012, 48:1229-1241.
66. Hartmann M., Grabherr L., Last F.W. Moving along the mental number line: interactions between whole-body motion and numerical cognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2011, 38:1416-1427.
67. Haspelmath M. From space to time: Temporal adverbials in the world's languages 1997, Lincom Europa, Munich & Newcastle.
68. Hayashi M.J., Kanai R., Tanabe H.C., Yoshida Y., Carlson S., Walsh V., et al. Interaction of numerosity and time in prefrontal and parietal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 2013, 33:883-893.
69. Hebb D.O. The organization of behavior: A neuropsychological theory 1949, Wiley, New York.
70. Henik A., Tzelgov J. Is three greater than five: the relation between physical and semantic size in comparison tasks. Memory & Cognition 1982, 10:389-395.
71. Helson H. The tau effect - an example of psychological relativity. Science 1930, 71:536-537.
72. de Hevia M.D., Girelli L., Bricolo E., Vallar G. The representational space of numerical magnitude: illusions of length. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2008, 61:1496-1514.
73. de Hevia M.D., Girelli L., Cassia V.M. Minds without language represent number through space: origins of the mental number line. Frontiers in Psychology 2012, 3.
74. de Hevia M.D., Izard V., Coubart A., Spelke E.S., Streri A. Representations of space, time, and number in neonates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2014, 111:4809-4813.
75. de Hevia M.D., Spelke E.S. Spontaneous mapping of number and space in adults and young children. Cognition 2009, 110:198-207.
76. de Hevia M.D., Spelke E.S. Number-space mapping in human infants. Psychological Science 2010, 21:653-660.
77. Holmes K.J., Lourenco S.F. Orienting numbers in mental space: horizontal organization trumps vertical. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2012, 65:1044-1051.
78. Hubbard E.M., Piazza M., Pinel P., Dehaene S. Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex. Nature Reviews 2005, 6:435-448.
79. Hurewitz F., Gelman R., Schnitzer B. Sometimes area counts more than number. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2006, 103:599-604.
80. Ito Y., Hatta T. Spatial structure of quantitative representation of numbers: evidence from the SNARC effect. Memory & Cognition 2004, 32:662-673.
81. Ishihara M., Keller P.E., Rossetti Y., Prinz W. Horizontal spatial representations of time: evidence for the STEARC effect. Cortex 2008, 44:454-461.
82. Ivry R.B., Spencer R.M., Zelaznik H.N., Diedrichsen J. The cerebellum and event timing. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2002, 978:302-317.
83. Jones B., Huang Y.L. Space-time dependencies in psychophysical judgment of extent and duration: algebraic models of the tau and kappa effects. Psychological Bulletin 1982, 91:128-142.
84. Jordan K.E., Brannon E.M. Weber's law influences numerical representations in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). Animal Cognition 2006, 9:159-172.
85. Jordan K.E., Brannon E.M. A common representational system governed by Weber's law: nonverbal numerical similarity judgments in 6-year-olds and rhesus macaques. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 2006, 95:215-229.
86. Kaufmann L., Vogel S.E., Wood G., Kremser C., Schocke M., Zimmerhackl L.B., et al. A developmental fMRI study of nonsymbolic numerical and spatial processing. Cortex 2008, 44:376-385.
87. Marks L.E. On associations of light and sound: the mediation of brightness, pitch, and loudness. American Journal of Psychology 1974, 87:173-188.
88. Marks L.E. On cross-modal similarity: the perceptual structure of pitch, loudness, and brightness. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance 1989, 15:586-602.
89. Mills K.J., Rousseau B.R., Gonzalez C.L.R. A cross-sectional developmental examination of the SNARC effect in a visually-guided grasping task. Neuropsychologia 2014, 58:99-106.
90. Kemmerer D. The semantics of space: integrating linguistic typology and cognitive neuroscience. Neuropsychologia 2006, 44:1607-1621.
91. Kiesel A., Vierck E. SNARC-like congruency based on number magnitude and response duration. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition 2009, 35:275-279.
92. Kinsbourne M., Warrington E.K. A study of finger agnosia. Brain 1962, 85:47-66.
93. Kövecses Z. Metaphor: A practical introduction 2002, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
94. Kövecses Z. The metaphor-metonymy relationship: correlation metaphors are based on metonymy. Metaphor and Symbol 2013, 28:75-88.
95. Lakoff G. Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind 1987, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
96. Lakoff G. The contemporary theory of metaphor. Metaphor and thought 1993, 203-251. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY. 2nd ed. A. Ortony (Ed.).
97. Lakoff G. The neural theory of metaphor. Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought 2008, 17-38. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA. R.W. Gibbs (Ed.).
98. Lakoff G. Explaining embodied cognition results. Topics in Cognitive Science 2012, 4:773-785.
99. Lakoff G., Johnson M. Metaphors we live by 1980, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
100. Lakoff G., Johnson M. Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought 1999, Basic Books, New York, NY.
101. Lakoff G., Núñez R. Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being 2000, Basic Books, New York.
102. Lakoff G., Turner M. More than cool reason: A guide to poetic metaphor 1989, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
103. Landau M.J., Meier B.P., Keefer L.A. A metaphor-enriched social cognition. Psychological Bulletin 2010, 136:1045-1067.
104. Langacker R. Concept, image, and symbol: The cognitive basis of grammar 1990, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin and New York.
105. Leon M.I., Shadlen M.N. Representation of time by neurons in the posterior parietal cortex of the macaque. Neuron 2003, 38:317-327.
106. Levinson S.C. Space in language and cognition: Explorations in cognitive diversity 2003, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
107. Lewkowicz D.J., Turkewitz G. Cross-modal equivalence in early infancy: auditory-visual intensity matching. Developmental Psychology 1980, 16:597-607.
108. Lindemann O., Abolafia J.M., Girardi G., Bekkering H. Getting a grip on numbers: numerical magnitude priming in object grasping. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance 2007, 33:1400-1409.
109. Loetscher T., Bockisch C., Nicholls M.E.R., Brugger P. Eye position predicts what number you have in mind. Current Biology 2010, 20:R264-R265.
110. Lonnemann J., Krinzinger H., Knops A., Willmes K. Spatial representations of numbers in children and their connection with calculation abilities. Cortex 2008, 44:420-428.
111. Lourenco S.F., Longo M.R. General magnitude representation in human infants. Psychological Science 2010, 21:873-881.
112. Lourenco S.F., Longo M.R. Origins and development of generalized magnitude representation. Space, time, and number in the brain: Searching for the foundations of mathematical thought 2011, 225-244. Academic Press, Waltham, MA. S. Dehaene, E. Brannon (Eds.).
113. Macar F., Lejeune H., Bonnet M., Ferrara A., Pouthas V., Vidal F., et al. Activation of the supplementary motor area and of attentional networks during temporal processing. Experimental Brain Research 2002, 142:475-485.
114. Marghetis T., Núñez R. The motion behind the symbols: a vital role for dynamism in the conceptualization of limits and continuity in expert mathematics. Topics in Cognitive Science 2013, 5:299-316.
115. Marghetis T., Núñez R., Bergen B. Doing arithmetic by hand: hand movements during exact arithmetic reveal systematic, dynamic spatial processing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2014, 67:1579-1596.
116. Marghetis T., Youngstrom K. Pierced by the number line: integers are associated with back-to-front sagittal space. Proceedings of the 36th annual conference of the cognitive science society 2014, 946-951. Cognitive Science Society, Austin, TX. P. Bello, M. Guarini, M. McShane, B. Scassellati (Eds.).
117. Matlock T., Holmes K.J., Srinivasan M., Ramscar M. Even abstract motion influences the understanding of time. Metaphor & Symbol 2011, 26:260-271.
118. Matlock T. Abstract motion is no longer abstract. Language and Cognition 2010, 2:243-260.
119. Matlock T., Ramscar M., Boroditsky L. The experiential link between spatial and temporal language. Cognitive Science 2005, 29:655-664.
120. Matthews J.L., Matlock T. Understanding the link between spatial distance and social distance. Social Psychology 2011, 42:185-192.
121. McGlone M.S., Harding J.L. Back (or forward?) to the future: the role of perspective in temporal language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition 1998, 24:1211-1223.
122. Meck W.H., Church R.M. A mode control model of counting and timing processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology Animal Behavior Processes 1983, 9:320-334.
123. Meier B.P., Robinson M.D., Clore G.L. Why good guys wear white automatic inferences about stimulus valence based on brightness. Psychological Science 2004, 15:82-87.
124. Meier B.P., Robinson M.D., Crawford L.E., Ahlvers W.J. When "light" and "dark" thoughts become light and dark responses: affect biases brightness judgments. Emotion 2007, 7:366-376.
125. Merritt D.J., Casasanto D., Brannon E.M. Do monkeys think in metaphors? Representations of space and time in monkeys and humans. Cognition 2010, 117:191-202.
126. Miles L.K., Betka E., Pendry L.F., Macrae C.N. Mapping temporal constructs: actions reveal that time is a place. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2010, 63:2113-2119.
127. Morgan M.J., Giora E., Solomon J.A. A single "stopwatch" for duration estimation, a single "ruler" for size. Journal of vision 2008, 8(2). 14, 1-8.
128. Müller D., Schwarz W. Is there an internal association of numbers to hands? The task set influences the nature of the SNARC effect. Memory & Cognition 2007, 35:1151-1161.
129. Murphy G.L. Reasons to doubt the present evidence for metaphoric representation. Cognition 1997, 62:99-108.
130. Nieder A., Dehaene S. Representation of number in the brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience 2009, 32:185-208.
131. Núñez R. Gesture, abstraction, and the embodied nature of mathematics. Mathematical representation at the interface of body and culture 2009, 309-328. IAP-Information Age Publishing, Charlotte NC. W.-M. Roth (Ed.).
132. Núñez R., Cooperrider K. The tangle of space and time. Trends in Cognitive Science 2013, 17:220-229.
133. Núñez R., Cooperrider K., Doan D., Wassmann J. Contours of time: topographic construals of past, present, and future in the Yupno valley of Papua New Guinea. Cognition 2012, 124:25-35.
134. Núñez R., Marghetis T. Cognitive linguistics and the concept(s) of number. Oxford handbook of numerical cognition 2014, Oxford University Press, Oxford, (in press). R. Cohen-Kadosh, K. Dowker (Eds.).
135. Núñez R., Sweetser E. With the future behind them: convergent evidence from Aymara language and gesture in the crosslinguistic comparison of spatial construals of time. Cognitive Science 2006, 30:401-450.
136. Oliveri M., Vicario C.M., Salerno S., Koch G., Turriziani P., Mangano R., et al. Perceiving numbers alters time perception. Neuroscience Letters 2008, 438:308-311.
137. Onoe H., Komori M., Onoe K., Takechi H., Tsukada H., Watanabe Y. Cortical networks recruited for time perception: a monkey positron emission tomography (PET) study. NeuroImage 2001, 13:37-45.
138. Pecher D., Boot I. Similarity is closeness: metaphorical mapping in a conceptual task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2010, 63:942-954.
139. Pecher D., Boot I. Numbers in space: differences between concrete and abstract situations. Frontiers in Psychology 2011, 2:1-11.
140. Pinel P., Piazza M., Le Bihan D., Dehaene S. Distributed and overlapping cerebral representations of number, size, and luminance during comparative judgements. Neuron 2004, 41:1-20.
141. Pinhas M., Fischer M.H. Mental movements without magnitude? A study of spatial biases in symbolic arithmetic. Cognition 2008, 109:408-415.
142. Pinhas M., Shaki S., Fischer M.H. Heed the signs: operation signs have spatial associations. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2014, (in press).
143. Radden G. How metonymic are metaphors?. Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast 2002, 407-433. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin-New York. R. Dirven, R. Pörings (Eds.).
144. Ramani G.B., Siegler R.S. Promoting broad and stable improvements in low-income children's numerical knowledge through playing number board games. Child Development 2008, 79:375-394.
145. Ranzini M., Lugli L., Anelli F., Carbone R., Nicoletti R., Borghi A.M. Graspable objects shape number processing. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2011, 5.
146. Roitman J.D., Brannon E.M., Andrews J.R., Platt M.L. Nonverbal representation of time and number in adults. Acta Psychologica 2007, 124:296-318.
147. Rotzer S., Loenneker T., Kucian K., Martin E., Klaver P., von Aster M. Dysfunctional neural network of spatial working memory contributes to developmental dyscalculia. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47:2859-2865.
148. Saj A., Fuhrman O., Vuilleumier P., Boroditsky L. Patients with left spatial neglect also neglect the "left side" of time. Psychological Science 2014, 25:207-214.
149. Sakata H., Taira M., Murata A., Seiichiro M. Neural mechanisms of visual guidance of hand action in the parietal cortex of the monkey. Cerebral Cortex 1995, 5:429-438.
150. Sandrini M., Rusconi E. A brain for numbers. Cortex 2009, 45:796-803.
151. Santiago J., Lupáñez J., Pérez E., Funes M.J. Time (also) flies from left to right. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2007, 14:512-516.
152. Sawamura H., Shima K., Tanji J. Numerical representation for action in the parietal cortex of the monkey. Nature 2002, 415:918-922.
153. Schneider E., Maruyama M., Dehaene S., Sigman M. Eye gaze reveals a fast, parallel extraction of the syntax of arithmetic formulas. Cognition 2012, 125:475-490.
154. Schwarz W., Keus I.M. Moving the eyes along the mental number line: comparing SNARC effects with saccadic and manual responses. Perception and Psychophysics 2004, 66:651-664.
155. Sell A.J., Kaschak M.P. The comprehension of sentences involving quantity information affects responses on the up-down axis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2012, 19:708-714.
156. Seno T., Taya S., Yamada Y., Ihaya k., Ito H., Sunaga S. Vection (self-motion perception) alters cognitive states, cognition of time, mental number line and personality. Proceedings of the cognitive science society 2012, 2306-2309. Cognitive Science Society, Austin, TX. N. Miyake, D. Peebles, R.P. Cooper (Eds.).
157. Shaki S., Fischer M.H. Multiple spatial mappings in numerical cognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2012, 38:804-809.
158. Shaki S., Fischer M.H., Petrusic W.M. Reading habits for both words and numbers contribute to the SNARC effect. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2009, 16:328-331.
159. Siegler R.S., Ramani G.B. Playing linear numerical board games promotes low-income children's numerical development. Developmental Science 2008, 11:655-661.
160. Siegler R.S., Ramani G.B. Playing linear number board games-but not circular ones-improves low-income preschoolers' numerical understanding. Journal of Educational Psychology 2009, 101:545-560.
161. Simon T.J., Bearden C.E., Mc-Ginn D.M., Zackai E. Visuospatial and numerical cognitive deficits in children with chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. Cortex 2005, 41:145-155.
162. Simon T.J., Ding L., Bish J.P., McDonald-McGinn D.M., Zackai E.H., Gee J. Volumetric, connective, and morphologic changes in the brains of children with chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome: an integrative study. Neuroimage 2005, 25:169-180.
163. Sinha C., Silva Sinha V., Zinken J., Sampaio W. When time is not space: the social and linguistic construction of time intervals and temporal event relations in an Amazonian culture. Language and Cognition 2011, 3:137-169.
164. Song S., Miller K.D., Abbott L.F. Competitive Hebbian learning through spike-timing-dependent synaptic plasticity. Nature Neuroscience 2000, 3:919-926.
165. Stein J. The representation of egocentric space in the posterior parietal cortex. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Physiology 1989, 74:583-606.
166. Srinivasan M., Carey S. The long and the short of it: on the nature and origin of functional overlap between representations of space and time. Cognition 2010, 116:217-241.
167. Stevens S.S. Psychophysics: Introduction to its perceptual, neural, and social prospects 1975, Wiley, New York.
168. Stevens S.S., Guirao M. Subjective scaling of length and area and the matching of length to loudness and brightness. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1963, 66:177-186.
169. Stevens J.C., Marks L.E. Cross-modality matching of brightness and loudness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 1965, 54:407-411.
170. Sweetser E. From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure 1991, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
171. Teghtsoonian M. Children's scales of length and loudness: a developmental application of cross-modal matching. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 1980, 30:290-307.
172. Thibodeau P., Durgin F.H. Productive figurative communication: conventional metaphors facilitate the comprehension of related novel metaphors. Journal of Memory and Language 2008, 58:521-540.
173. Torralbo A., Santiago J., Lupiáñez J. Flexible conceptual projection of time onto spatial frames of reference. Cognitive Science 2006, 30:745-757.
174. Traugott E. On the expression of spatio-temporal relations in language. Universals of human language 1978, Vol. III:369-400. Stanford University Press, Stanford.
175. Tudusciuc O., Nieder A. Neuronal population coding of continuous and discrete quantity in the primate posterior parietal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2007, 104:14513-14518.
176. Tversky B. Visualizing thought. Topics in Cognitive Science 2011, 3:499-535.
177. Uttal D.H., Meadow N.G., Tipton E., Hand L.L., Alden A.R., Warren C., et al. The malleability of spatial skills: a meta-analysis of training studies. Psychological Bulletin 2013, 139:352-402.
178. Uttal D.H., Miller D.I., Newcombe N.S. Exploring and enhancing spatial thinking: links to achievement in science, technology, and mathematics?. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2013, 22:367-373.
179. Vallesi A., Weisblatt Y., Semenza C., Shaki S. Cultural modulations of space-time compatibility effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2014, 21:666-669.
180. Vicario C.M., Pecoraro P., Turriziani P., Koch G., Caltagirone C. Relativistic compression and expansion of experiential time in the left and right space. PLoS One 2008, 3:e1716.
181. Wai J., Lubinski D., Benbow C.P. Spatial ability for STEM domains: aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. Journal of Educational Psychology 2009, 101:817-835.
182. Weger U.W., Pratt J. Time flies like an arrow: space-time compatibility effects suggest the use of a mental timeline. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2008, 15:426-430.
183. Williams L., Bargh J. Experiencing physical warmth promotes interpersonal warmth. Science 2008, 322:606-607.
184. Williams L.E., Bargh J.A. Keeping one's distance: the influence of spatial distance cues on affect and evaluation. Psychological Science 2008, 19:302-308.
185. Walsh V. A theory of magnitude: common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2003, 7:483-488.
186. Wilson A.J., Dehaene S., Pinel P., Revkin S.K., Cohen L., Cohen D. Principles underlying the design of "The Number Race", an adaptive computer game for remediation of dyscalculia. Behavioral and Brain Functions 2006, 2:19. (online publication).
187. Wilson A.J., Revkin S., Cohen D., Cohen L., Dehaene S. An open trial assessment of "The Number Race", an adaptive computer game for remediation of dyscalculia. Behavioral and Brain Functions 2006, 2:20. (online publication).
188. Winter B., Matlock T. Reasoning based on similarity and proximity. Metaphor & Symbol 2013, 28:219-232.
189. Winter B., Perlman M., Matlock T. Using space to talk and gesture about numbers: evidence from the TV News archive. Gesture 2014, 13:377-408.
190. Wood G., Nuerk H.C., Willmes K., Fischer M.H. On the cognitive link between space and number: a meta-analysis of the SNARC effect. Psychological Science Quarterly 2008, 50:489-525.
191. Xuan B., Zhang D., He S., Chen X. Larger stimuli are judged to last longer. Journal of Vision 2007, 7(10):1-5.
192. Zhong C.B., Leonardelli G.J. Cold and lonely: does social exclusion literally feel cold?. Psychological Science 2008, 19:838-842.
193. Zebian S. Linkages between number concepts, spatial thinking, and directionality of writing: the SNARC effect and the reverse SNARC effect in English and Arabic monoliterates, biliterates, and illiterate Arabic speakers. Journal of Cognition and Culture 2005, 5:165-190.
194. Zorzi M., Priftis K., Umiltà C. Neglect disrupts the mental number line. Nature 2002, 417:138-139.