On the experiential link between spatial and temporal language

Cognitive Science

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 655-664

  Matlock, Teenie ^a   Ramscar, Michael ^a   Boroditsky, Lera ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Imagery; Mental representation; Metaphor; Semantics; Spatial language

Indexed keywords

EID: 24044515908     PISSN: 03640213     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_17     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Boroditsky, L. (2000). Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition, 75, 1-28.
2. Boroditsky, L., & Ramscar, M. (2002). The roles of body and mind in abstract thought. Psychological Science, 13, 185-188.
3. Clark, H. H. (1973). Space, time, semantics, and the child. In T. E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language. San Diego: Academic.
4. Gibbs, R. W. (1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. New York: Cambridge.
5. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
6. Langacker, R. W. (2000). Virtual reality. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 29, 77-103.
7. Matlock, T. (2004). Fictive motion as cognitive simulation. Memory & Cognition, 32, 1389-1400.
8. McGlone, M. S., & Harding, J. L. (1998). Back (or forward?) to the future: The role of perspective in temporal language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 24, 1211-1223.
9. Miller, G. A., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1976). Language and perception. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10. Radden, G. (1996). Motion metaphorized: The case of "coming" and "going." In E. Casad (Ed.), Cognitive linguistics in the redwoods: The expansion of a new paradigm in linguistics (pp. 423-458). New York: de Gruyter.
11. Talmy, L. (2000). Towards a cognitive semantics: Vol. I. Conceptual structuring systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.