From Galaxies to Universe: A Cross-Disciplinary Review and Analysis of Public Values Publications From 1969 to 2012

American Review of Public Administration

Volumn 45, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 13-28

  Van der Wal, Zeger ^a   Nabatchi, Tina ^b   De Graaf, Gjalt ^c  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^b SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

meta analysis; public values; values universe

Indexed keywords

EID: 84912096027     PISSN: 02750740     EISSN: 15523357     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0275074013488822     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Alford J.,O’Flynn J.Making sense of public value: Concepts, critiques and emergent meanings.International Journal of Public Administration. 2009;32 (3-4): 171-191
2. Andersen L. B.,Beck Jørgensen T.,Pedersen L. H.,Kjeldsen A. M.,Vrangbæk K.Public value dimensions: Developing and testing a multidimensional classification.International Journal of Public Administration. 2012;35:715-728
3. Beck Jørgensen T.,Bozeman B.Public values: An inventory.Administration & Society. 2007;39:354-381
4. Beierle T.Public participation in environmental decisions: An evaluation framework using social goals. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future; 1999:
5. Beierle T.,Konisky D.Values, conflict, and trust in participatory environmental planning.Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. 2000;19:587-602
6. Benington J.,Moore M. H.Public value: Theory and practice. London, UK: Palgrave MacMillan; 2011:
7. Beyer J. M.Handbook of organizational design. Volume 2. Remodeling organizations and their environments. Nystrom P.C.Starbuck W. H., ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1981:166-202.
8. Bozeman B.Public value failure: When efficient markets may not do.Public Administration Review. 2002;62:145-161
9. Bozeman B.Public values and public interest: Counterbalancing economic individualism. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press; 2007:
10. Bozeman B.,Su X..Paper presented at the IRSPM XVI Conference; 2012Rome, Italy; 2012
11. Buchanan B.,Millstone J.Public organizations: A value-conflict view.International Journal of Public Administration. 1979;1:261-305
12. BurrightM. (2006). Database reviews and reports: Google scholar - science & technology. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship. Retrieved from http://www.istl.org/06-winter/databases2.html.
13. CanalesR.MasseyB. C.WrzesniewskiA. (2012). Promises aren’t enough: Business schools need to do a better job teach students values. Wall Street Journal, Retrieved from http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703865704575133352776583796.html.
14. Christenson J.,Dillman D..Paper presented at the Rural Sociological Society Annual Meetings, College Park; 1973Maryland, USA; 1973
15. Corneo G.,Gruner H.Individual preferences for political redistribution.Journal of Public Economics. 2002;83:83-107
16. de Bruijn H.,Dicke W.Strategies for safeguarding public values in liberalized utility sectors.Public Administration. 2006;84:717-735
17. Deleuze G.,Guattari F.What is philosophy?. New York, NY: Columbia University Press; 1994:
18. Eskridge W. N.Public values in statutory interpretation.University of Pennsylvania Law Review. 1989;137:1007-1104
19. Fiss O. M.The death of the law?.Cornell Law Review. 1987;72:1-16
20. Gallie W. B.Essentially contested concepts.Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. 1955;56:167-198
21. Gardiner P. C.,Edwards W.Public values: Multiattribute utility measurement for social decision making. Los Angeles: Social Science Research Institute, University of Southern California; 1975:
22. Hood C. C.The “new public management” in the 1980s: Variations on a theme.Accounting, Organizations and Society. 1995;20 (3): 93-109
23. Keeney R. L.,von Winterfeldt D.,Eppel T.Eliciting public values for complex policy decisions.Management Science. 1990;36:1011-1030
24. Kernaghan K.Integrating values into public service: The values statement as centerpiece.Public Administration Review. 2003;63:711-719
25. Kluckhohn C.Toward a general theory of action: Theoretical foundations for the social sciences. Parsons T.Shils E. A., ed. New York, NY: Harper & Row; 1951:388-433.
26. Lombard M.,Snyder-Duch J.,Bracken C.Content analysis in mass communication: Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability.Human Communication Research. 2006;28:587-604
27. McConnell G.Voluntary associations. Pennock J.Chapman J., ed. New York, NY: Etherton Press; 1969:147-160.
28. McLaughlin T. H.Values, education and responsibility. Pybus E.McLaughlin T. H., ed. St. Andrews, UK: University of St. Andres Centre for Philosophy and Public Affairs; 1995:19-32.
29. Moore M. H.Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1995:
30. Nabatchi T..Paper presented at the Public Value Consortium Biennial Workshop, University of Illinois-Chicago; 2012aChicago, Illinois, USA; 2012a.
31. Nabatchi T.Putting the “public” back in public values research: Designing public participation to identify and respond to public values.Public Administration Review. 2012b;72:699-708
32. O’Flynn J.From new public management to public value: Paradigmatic change and managerial implications.Australian Journal of Public Administration. 2007;66:353-366
33. O’Flynn J..Paper presented at the Public Leadership Workshop, Australian National University; 2009Canberra, Australia; 2009.
34. Osborne D.,Gaebler T.Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. New York, NY: Addison-Wesley Publishing; 1992:
35. Ozolins J.Creating public values: Schools as moral habitat.Educational Philosophy and Theory. 2010;42:410-423
36. Parsons T.,Shils E. A.Toward a general theory of action: Theoretical foundations for the social sciences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1953:
37. Pearce M.,Cunningham S. M.,Miller A.Appraising the economic and social effects of advertisement: a review of issues and evidence. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute Staff Report; 1971:
38. Perry J. L.How can we improve our science to generate more usable knowledge for public professionals?.Public Administration Review. 2012;72:479-482
39. Perry J. L.,Kraemer K. L.Research methodology in the public administration review, 1975-1984.Public Administration Review. 1986;46:215-226
40. Pollitt C.,Bouckaert G.Public management reform: A comparative analysis—New public management, governance, and the neo-Weberian state. (2011). Public management reform: A comparative analysis—New public management, governance, and the neo-Weberian state (3rd ed.). Oxford, MA: Oxford University Press.Oxford, MA: Oxford University Press; 2011:
41. Rogers J.,Kingsley G.Denying public value: The role of the public sector in accounts of the development of the internet.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2004;14:371-393
42. Rokeach M.The nature of human values. New York, NY: Free Press; 1973:
43. Rutgers M. R.Sorting out public values? On the contingency of value classifications in public administration.Administrative Theory & Praxis. 2008;30 (1): 92-113
44. Ryan M.,Scott D. A.,Reeves C.,Bate A.,van Teijlingen E. R.,Russell E. M.,Robb C. M.Eliciting public preferences for healthcare: A systematic review of techniques.Health Technology Assessment. 2001;5 (5): 1-186
45. Schwartz S. H.Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries.Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. 1992;25:1-65
46. Schwartz S. H.A theory of cultural values and some implications for work.Applied Psychology. 1999;48 (1): 23-47
47. Schwartz S. H.Prosocial motives, emotions, and behavior: The better angels of our nature. Mikulincer M.Shaver P., ed. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2010:221-241.
48. SteenhuisenB. (2009). Competing public values: Coping strategies in heavily regulated utility industries. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands.
49. Steenhuisen B.,Dicke W.,de Bruijn H.“Soft” public values in jeopardy: Reflecting on the institutionally fragmented situation in utility sectors.International Journal of Public Administration. 2009;32:491-507
50. Strike K. A.Educational policy and the just society. Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press; 1982:
51. Van der Wal Z.Value solidity, differences, similarities, and conflicts between the organizational values of government and business. Amsterdam, Netherlands: VU University; 2008:
52. Van der Wal Z.,Huberts L. W. J. C.Value solidity in government and business: Results of an empirical study on public and private sector organizational values.American Review of Public Administration. 2008;38:264-285
53. Van der Wal Z.,Huberts L. W. J. C.,van den Heuvel J. H. J.,Kolthoff E. W.Central values of government and business: Differences, similarities and conflicts.Public Administration Quarterly. 2006;30:314-364
54. Van Thiel S.,Van der Wal Z.Birds of a feather? The effect of organizational value congruence on the relationship between ministries and quangos.Public Organization Review. 2010;10:377-397
55. Van Wart M.Changing public sector values. New York, NY: Garland Publishing; 1998:
56. Weihe G.Public-private partnerships and public-private value trade-offs.Public Money & Management. 2008;28 (3): 153-158
57. Williams I.,Shearer H.Appraising public value: Past, present, and futures.Public Administration. 2011;89:1367-1384
58. Wright B. E.Public administration as an interdisciplinary field: Assessing its relationship with the fields of law, management, and political science.Public Administration Review. 2011;71 (1): 96-101