Values, conflict, and trust in participatory environmental planning

Journal of Policy Analysis and Management

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 587-602

  Beierle, Thomas C ^b   Konisky, David M ^a  

^a Center for Risk Management   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034396719     PISSN: 02768739     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/1520-6688(200023)19:4<587::AID-PAM4>3.0.CO;2-Q     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Arnstein, S. (1969). Ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institution of Planners, 35, 216-224.
2. Ashford, N. (1984). Advisory committees in OSHA and EPA: Their use in regulatory decisionmaking, Science, Technology, and Human Values, 9(1), 72-82.
3. Bauer, M., & Randolph, J. (1998, May 4-6). Improving environmental decisionmaking through collaborative methods. Paper prepared for the National Conference on Environmental Decision Making, Knoxville, TN.
4. Becker, M. (1996). Implementing a binational ecosystem management strategy in the great lakes basin: Will the Remedial Action Policy Process succeed in restoring the Areas of Concern? Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Environmental Studies, Duke University.
5. Beierle, T., & Konisky, D. (1999). Public participation in environmental planning in the Great Lakes region (Discussion Paper: 99-50). Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
6. Berry, J., Portney, K., & Thompson, K. (1984). Public involvement in administration: The structural determinants of effective citizen participation. Journal of Voluntary Action Research, 13, 7-23.
7. Blahna, D., & Yonts-Shepard, S. (1989). Public involvement in resource planning: Toward bridging the gap between policy and implementation. Society and Natural Resources, 2(3), 209-227.
8. Bullock, R., & Tubbs, M. (1987). The case meta-analysis method for OD. Research in Organizational Change and Development, 1, 171-228.
9. Carpenter, E. (1997). Assessment of the concerns related to the Detroit River Binational Public Advisory Committee. Chicago, IL: Clean Sites.
10. Coglianese, C. (1997). Assessing consensus: The promise and performance of negotiated rulemaking. Duke Law Journal, 46, 6, 1255-1349.
11. DOE (Department of Energy). (1997). Site-Specific Advisory Board Initiative, 1997 evaluation survey results (volume I, summary report). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy.
12. Dryzek, J. (1997). The politics of the earth: Environmental discourses. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
13. The Environmental Forum (1996, September/October). The third wave man, (interview with Mark Van Putten, National Wildlife Federation), 36-39.
14. Esty, D., & Chertow, M. (1997). Thinking ecologically: An introduction. In M. Chertow and D. Esty (Eds.), Thinking ecologically: The next generation of environmental policy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
15. Fiorino, D. (1990). Citizen participation and environmental risk: A survey of institutional mechanisms. Science, Technology and Human Values, 15(2), 226-243.
16. GAO (General Accounting Office). (1991). Designing evaluations. Washington, DC: General Accounting Office.
17. Gould, K. (1991). The sweet smell of money: Economic dependency and local environmental political mobilization. Society and Natural Resources, 4, 133-150.
18. Gurtner-Zimmermann, A. (1996). Analysis of Lower Green Bay and Fox River, Collingwood Harbour, Spanish Harbour, and the Metro Toronto and Region Remedial Action Plan (RAP) process. Environmental Management, 20(4), 449-459.
19. Hartig, J., & Zarull, M. (Eds.) (1992) Under RAPs: Towards grassroots ecological democracy in the Great Lakes Basin. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
20. Hartig, J., Zarull, M., Heidtke, T., & Shah, H. (1998). Implementing ecosystem-based management: Lessons from the Great Lakes. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 41(1), 45-75.
21. IJC (International Joint Commission) (1998). If you don't measure it, you won't manage it: Measuring and celebrating incremental progress in restoring and maintaining the Great Lakes. Manuscript based on a public meeting on October 22, 1997, Thunder Bay, Ontario.
22. Jauch, L.; Osborn, R., & Martin, T. (1980). Structured content analysis of cases: A complementary method for organizational research. Academy of Management Review, 5 (4), 517-525.
23. Kellogg, W. (1993). Ecology and community in the Great Lakes basin: The role of stakeholders and advisory committees in the environmental planning process. Doctoral dissertation, Cornell University.
24. Kemmis, D. (1990). Community and the politics of place, Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.
25. Kraft, M. (1995,). Citizens, experts, and democratic dialogue: Determining acceptable risks, Paper prepared for annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, (August 30).
26. Krantzberg, G. (1997). Quoted in: Statewide Public Advisory Council. Keys to successful PAC operations and examples of successful RAP activities (Meeting Minutes, August 16). Houghton Michigan: Statewide Public Advisory Council.
27. Krimsky, S., & Golding, D. (Eds.) (1992). Social theories of risk, Westport, CT: Praeger.
28. Landre, B., & Knuth, B. (1993). The role of agency goals and local context in Great Lakes water resources public involvement programs. Environmental Management, 17,(2), 153-165.
29. Larrson, R. (1993). Case survey methodology: Quantitative analysis of patterns across case studies. Academy of Management Journal, 36 (6), 1515-1546.
30. Lubell, M. (2000). Attitudinal support for environmental governance: Do institutions matter?, Paper prepared for 2000 Midwest Political Science Association annual meeting (April 27-30).
31. Lucas, W. (1974). The case survey method: Aggregating case experience (Rand Report No. R-1515-RC). Washington, DC: Rand Corporation.
32. Lynn, F., & Busenberg, G. (1995). Citizen advisory committees and environmental policy: What we know, what's left to discover. Risk Analysis, 15(2), 147-162.
33. MacKenzie, S. (1996). Integrated resource planning and management: The ecosystem approach in the Great Lakes basin. Washington, DC: Island Press.
34. Mintzberg, H., Raisinghani, D., & Theoret, A. (1976). The structure of "unstructured" decision processes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 246-275.
35. NRC (National Research Council) (1996). Understanding risk: Informing decisions in a democratic society. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
36. Peelle, E., Schweitzer, M., Munro, J., Carnes, S., & Wolfe, A. (1996). Factors favorable to public participation success. In Proceedings: National Association of Environmental Professionals, Houston, TX, June 2-5, 1996. Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
37. PRC (Pew Research Center) (1998). Deconstructing trust: how Americans view government. (http://www.people-press.org/trustrpt.html).
38. Presidential/Congressional Commission on Risk Assessment and Risk Management (PCRARM) (1997). Framework for environmental health risk management (Final Report, Vol. 1). Washington, DC: Presidential/Congressional Commission on Risk Assessment and Risk Management.
39. Reich, R. (1985). Public administration and public deliberation: An interpretive essay. Yale Law Journal, 94,(7), 1617-1641.
40. Ruckleshaus, W. (1996). Trust in government: A prescription for restoration (Webb Lecture, November 15). Washington, DC: National Academy of Public Administration.
41. Schneider, M., Teske, P., & Marschall, M. (1997). Institutional arrangements and the creation of social capital: The effects of public school choice. American Political Science Review, 91 (1), 82-93.
42. Sewell, W., & Phillips, S. (1979). Models for the evaluation of public participation programs. Natural Resources Journal, 19, 337-358.
43. Slovic, P. (1993). Perceived risk, trust, and democracy, Risk Analysis, 13(6), 675-682.
44. STATA (1997). STATA reference manual (Release 5, Volume 3, P-Z). College Station, Texas: Stata Press.
45. Stewart, T., Dennis, R., & Ely, D. (1984). Citizen participation and judgement in policy analysis: a case study of urban air quality policy. Policy Sciences, 17, 67-87.
46. Stokes, M., Davis, C., & Koch, G. (1995). Categorical data analysis using the SAS system. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc.
47. Susskind, L., & Cruikshank, J. (1987). Breaking the impasse: Consensual approaches to resolving public disputes. New York: Basic Books.
48. Webler, T. (1995). 'Right' discourse in citizen participation: An evaluative yardstick. In O. Renn; T. Webler and P. Wiedemann (Eds.), Fairness and competence in citizen participation: evaluating models for environmental discourse. Dordrecht, Germany: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
49. WCED (Western Center for Environmental Decisionmaking ). (1997). Public involvement in comparative risk projects. Boulder, CO: Western Center for Environmental Decisionmaking.
50. Yin, R., & Heald, K. (1975). Using the case survey method to analyze policy studies, Administrative Science Quarterly, 20, 371-381.
51. Yosie, T., & Herbst, T. (1998). Using stakeholder processes in environmental decisionmaking: an evaluation of lessons learned, key issues, and future challenges. Washington, DC: Ruder Finn Washington.