Characteristics of protein residue-residue contacts and their application in contact prediction

Journal of Molecular Modeling

Volumn 20, Issue 11, 2014, Pages 1-17

  Wozniak, Pawel P ^a   Kotulska, Malgorzata ^a  

^a WROCLAW UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

Author keywords

CATH; Contact propensity; Contact sites; Direct coupling analysis; Protein classification; SCOP

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

ALPHA HELIX; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; DISULFIDE BOND; PREDICTION; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; ALGORITHM; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN DATABASE; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION;

ALGORITHMS; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATABASES, PROTEIN; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP;

EID: 84912061779     PISSN: 16102940     EISSN: 09485023     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00894-014-2497-9     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. The Uniprot Consortium (2014) Activities at the Universal Protein Resource (UniProt). Nucleic Acids Res 42:D191–D198. doi:10.1093/nar/gkt1140
2. Berman HM, Westbrook Z, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE (2000) The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res 28:235–242
3. Morcos F, Pagnani A, Lunt B, Bertolino B, Marks DS, Sandere C, Zecchina R, Onuchic JN, Hwa T, Weigt M (2011) Direct-coupling analysis of residue coevolution captures native contacts across many protein families. PNAS 108(49):E1293–E1301. doi:10.1073/pnas.1111471108
4. Ekeberg M, Lovkvist C, Lan Y, Weigt M, Aurell E (2013) Improved contact prediction in proteins: using pseudolikelihoods to infer Potts models. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlinear Soft Matter Phys 87(1):012707
5. Cocco S, Monasson R, Weigt M (2013) From principal component to direct coupling analysis of coevolution in proteins: low-eigenvalue modes are needed for structure prediction. PLoS Comput Biol 9(8):e1003176. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003176
6. Miyazawa S, Jernigan RL (1985) Estimation of effecitve interresidue contact energies from protein crystal structures: quasi-chemical approximation. Macromolecules 18(3):534–552
7. Keskin O, Bahar I, Badretdinov AY, Ptitsyn OB, Jernigan RL (1998) Emprical solvent-mediated potentials hold for both intra-molecular and inter-molecular inter-residue interactions. Protein Sci 7(12):2578–2586
8. Zhang C, Kim SH (2000) Environment-dependent residue contact energies for proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97(6):2550–2555
9. Adamian L, Liang J (2001) Helix-helix packing and interfacial pairwise interactions of residues in membrane proteins. J Mol Biol 311(4):891–907
10. Faure G, Bornot A, de Brevern AG (2008) Protein contacts, inter-residue interactions and side-chain modelling. Biochimie 90(4):626–639
11. Murzin AG, Brenner SE, Hubbard T, Chothia C (1995) SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J Mol Biol 247:536–540
12. Orengo CA, Michie AD, Jones S, Jones DT, Swindells MB, Thornton JM (1997) CATH - a hierarchic classification of protein domain structures. Structure 5:1093–1108
13. Hadley C, Jones DT (1999) A systematic comparison of protein structure classifications: SCOP, CATH and FSSP. Structure 7:1099–1112
14. Csaba G, Birzele F, Zimmer R (2009) Systematic comparison of SCOP and CATH: a new gold standard for protein structure analysis. BMC Struct Biol 9:23. doi:10.1186/1472-6807-9-23
15. Huang Y, Niu B, Gao Y, Fu L, Li W (2010) CD-HIT Suite: a web server for clustering and comparing biological sequences. Bioinformatics 26(5):680–682. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq003
16. Duarte JM, Sathyapriya R, Stehr H, Filippis I, Lappe M (2010) Optimal contact definition for reconstruction of contact maps. BMC Bioinforma 11:283. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-11-283
17. Prlić A, Yates A, Bliven SE, Rose PW, Jacobsen J, Troshin PV, Chapman M, Gao J, Koh CH, Foisy S, Holland R, Rimsa G, Heuer ML, Brandstätter-Müller H, Bourne PE, Willis S (2012) BioJava: an open-source framework for bioinformatics in 2012. Bioinformatics 28(20):2693–2695. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts494
18. Finn RD, Bateman A, Clements J, Coggill P, Eberhardt RY, Eddy SR, Heger A, Hetherington K, Holm L, Mistry J, Sonnhammer EL, Tate J, Punta M (2014) Pfam: the protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res 42(Database issue):D222–D230. doi:10.1093/nar/gkt1223
19. Joosten RP, te Beek TAH, Krieger E, Hekkelman ML, Hooft RWW, Schneider R, Sander C, Vriend G (2011) A series of PDB related databases for everyday needs. Nucleic Acids Res 39(Database issue):D411–D419. doi:10.1093/nar/gkq1105
20. Kabsch W, Sander C (1983) Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 22(12):2577–2637
21. Eisenhaber F, Frömmel C, Argos P (1996) Prediction of secondary structural content of proteins from their amino acid composition alone. II. The paradox with secondary structural class. Proteins 25(2):169–179
22. Nakashima H, Nishikawa K, Ooi T (1986) The folding type of a protein is relevant to the amino acid composition. J Biochem 99(1):153–162
23. Betts MJ, Russell RB (2003) Amino acid properties and consequences of substitutions. In: Barnes MR, Gray C (eds) Bioinformatics for geneticists. Wiley, Chichester. doi:10.1002/0470867302.ch14
24. Xiao X, Lin WZ, Chou KC (2013) Recent advances in predicting protein classification and their applications to drug development. Curr Top Med Chem 13(14):1622–1635
25. Taylor WR, Sadowski MI (2011) Structural constraints on the covariance matrix derived from multiple aligned protein sequences. PLoS ONE 6(12):e28265. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0028265
26. Di Lena P, Nagata K, Baldi P (2012) Deep architectures for protein contact map prediction. Bioinformatics 28(19):2449–2457
27. Eickholt J, Cheng J (2012) Predicting protein residue–residue contacts using deep networks and boosting. Bioinformatics 28(23):3066–3072. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts598
28. Ding W, Xie J, Dai D, Zhang H, Xie H, Zhang W (2013) CNNcon: improved protein contact maps prediction using cascaded neural networks. PLoS ONE 8(4):e61533. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0061533
29. Skwark MJ, Abdel-Rehim A, Elofsson A (2013) PconsC: combination of direct information methods and alignments improves contact prediction. Bioinformatics 29(14):1815–1816. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btt259
30. Kamisetty H, Ovchinnikov S, Baker D (2013) Assessing the utility of coevolution-based residue–residue contact predictions in a sequence- and structure-rich era. PNAS 110(39):15674–15679. doi:10.1073/pnas.1314045110
31. Chou KC, Cai YD (2004) Predicting protein structural class by functional domain composition. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 321(4):1007–1009
32. Kurgan LA, Zhang T, Zhang H, Shen S, Ruan J (2008) Secondary structure-based assignment of the protein structural classes. Amino Acids 35(3):551–564. doi:10.1007/s00726-008-0080-3
33. Ahmadi Adl A, Nowzari-Dalini A, Xue B, Uversky VN, Qian X (2012) Accurate prediction of protein structural classes using functional domains and predicted secondary structure sequences. J Biomol Struct Dyn 29(6):623–633. doi:10.1080/07391102.2011.672626
34. Kawashima S, Ogata H, Kanehisa M (1999) AAindex: Amino Acid Index Database. Nucleic Acids Res 27:368–369
35. Godzik A, Kolinski A, Skolnick J (1995) Are proteins ideal mixtures of amino acids? Analysis of energy parameter sets. Protein Sci 4(10):2107–2217
36. Nishikawa K, Ooi T (1986) Radial locations of amino acid residues in a globular protein: correlation with the sequence. J Biochem 100(4):1043–1047
37. Glaser F, Steinberg DM, Vakser IA, Ben-Tal N (2001) Residue frequencies and pairing preferences at protein-protein interfaces. Proteins 43(2):89–102