Erratum to: English for Scientific Purposes (EScP): Technology, Trends, and Future Challenges for Science Education (J Sci Educ Technol, (2014), 23, 827-839, DOI 10.1007/s10956-014-9515-7);English for Scientific Purposes (EScP): Technology, Trends, and Future Challenges for Science Education

Journal of Science Education and Technology

Volumn 23, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 827-839

  Liu, Gi Zen ^a   Chiu, Wan Yu ^a   Lin, Chih Chung ^a   Barrett, Neil E ^a,b  

^a NATIONAL CHENG KUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b SOUTHERN TAIWAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

English for Specific Purposes; Science education; Scientific literacy; Trend

Indexed keywords

EID: 84912016378     PISSN: 10590145     EISSN: 15731839     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10956-015-9561-9     Document Type: Erratum

References (39)

1. Alayyar GM (2012) Developing technological pedagogical content knowledge in pre-service science teachers: support from blended learning. Austr J Educ Technol 28(8):1298–1316
2. Butler YG (2005) Content-based instruction in efl contexts: considerations for effective implementation. JALT J 27(2):227–242
3. Cargill M, O’Connor P, Li Y (2012) Educating Chinese scientists to write for international journals: addressing the divide between science and technology education and English language teaching. Engl Specif Purp 31(1):60–69
4. Chang P (2012) Using a stance corpus to learn about effective authorial stance-taking: a textlinguistic approach. ReCALL 24(2):209–236
5. Cheuk T (2012) Comparison of the three content standards: CCSS-ELA, CCSS-Mathematics, and NGSS
6. Chiu LL, Liu GZ (2013) Effects of printed, pocket electronic, and online dictionaries on high school students’ English vocabulary retention. Asia Pac Educ Res 22(4):619–634
7. Creese A (2005) Is this content-based language teaching? Linguist Educ 16:188–204
8. Donnelly D, McGarr O, O’Reilly J (2011) A framework for teachers’ integration of ICT into their classroom practice. Comput Educ 57(2):1469–1483
9. Golonka EM, Bowles AR, Frank VM, Richardson DL, Freynik S (2014) Technologies for foreign language learning: a review of technology types and their effectiveness. Comput Assist Lang Learn 27(1):70–105
10. Hamilton J, Woodward-Kron R (2010) Developing cultural awareness and intercultural communication through multimedia: a case study from medicine and the health sciences. System 38(4):560–568
11. Higgins TE, Spitulnik MW (2008) Supporting teachers’ use of technology in science instruction through professional development: a literature review. J Sci Educ Technol 17:511–521
12. Huhta M (2010) Language and communication for professional purposes: needs analysis methods in industry and business and their yield to stakeholders. Yliopistopaino, Espoo
13. Kennedy-Clark S (2011) Pre-service teachers’ perspectives on using scenario-based virtual worlds in science education. Comput Educ 57(4):2224–2235
14. Konttinen M (2012) Let’s talk business! A task-based material package of public speaking and small talk in the BELF context. M.A. Thesis of Graduate School of Department of Languages. Jyvaskyla University
15. Krajcik JS, Sutherland LM (2010) Supporting students in developing literacy in science. Science 328:456–459
16. Laborda JG (2011) Revising materials for teaching languages for specific purposes. 3L Southeast Asian J Engl Lang Stud 17(1):102–112
17. Lin L, Evans S (2012) Structural patterns in empirical research articles: a cross-disciplinary study. Engl Specif Purp 31(3):150–160
18. Liu GZ (2008) Innovating research topics in learning technology: where are the new blue oceans? Br J Educ Technol 39(4):738–747
19. Liu GZ (2011) The blended language learning course in Taiwan: issues & challenges of instructional design. In: Macalister J, Nation ISP (eds) Case studies in language curriculum design: concepts and approaches in action around the world. Routledge, New York, pp 82–100
20. Liu GZ, Chen ASW (2007) A taxonomy of internet-based technologies integrated in language curricula. Br J Educ Technol 38(5):934–938
21. Liu GZ, Liu ZH, Hwang GJ (2011) Developing multi-dimensional evaluation criteria for English learning websites with university students and professors. Comput Educ 56(1):65–79
22. Liu GZ, Wu NW, Chen YW (2013) Identifying emerging trends for implementing learning technology in special education: a state-of-the-art review of selected articles published in 2008–2012. Res Dev Disabil 34(10):3618–3628
23. Loncar M, Barrett NE, Liu GZ (2014) Towards the refinement of forum and asynchronous online discussion in educational contexts worldwide: trends and investigative approaches within a dominant research paradigm. Comput Educ 73:93–110
24. Meluso A, Zheng M, Spires HA, Lester J (2012) Enhancing 5th graders’ science content knowledge and self-efficacy through game-based learning. Comput Educ 59(2):497–504
25. Morgan B (2009) Fostering transformative practitioners for critical EAP: possibilities and challenges. J Engl Acad Purp 8(2):86–99
26. Ogata H, Miyata M, Bin H, Yano Y (2010) JAMIOLAS2: supporting Japanese mimetic words and onomatopoeia learning with wireless sensor networks for overseas students. Int J Mobile Learn Organ 4(4):333–345
27. Oswald FL, Plonsky L (2010) Meta-analysis in second language research: choices and challenges. Annu Rev Appl Linguist 30:85–110
28. Pearson PD, Moje EB, Greenleaf C (2010) Literacy and science: each in the service of the other. Science 328:459–463
29. Singer J, Marx RW, Krajcik JS, Chambers JC (2000) Constructing extended inquiry projects: curriculum materials for science education reform. Educ Psychol 35(3):165–178
30. Snow CE (2010) Academic language and the challenge of reading for learning about science. Science 328:450–452
31. Soler V (2011) Comparative and contrastive observations on scientific titles written in English and Spanish. Engl Specif Purp 30(2):124–137
32. Spence P, Liu GZ (2013) Engineering English and the high-tech industry: a case study of an English needs analysis of process integration engineers at a semiconductor manufacturing company in Taiwan. Engl Specif Purp 32(2):97–109
33. Stage EK, Asturias H, Cheuk T, Daro PA, Hampton SB (2013) Opportunities and challenges in next generation standards. Science 340:276–277
34. Thang SM, Bidmeshki L (2010) Investigating the perceptions of UKM undergraduates towards an English for science and technology online course. Comput Assist Lang Learn 23(1):1–20
35. Thøgersen J, Airey J (2011) Lecturing undergraduate science in Danish and in English: a comparison of speaking rate and rhetorical style. Engl Specif Purp 30(3):209–221
36. Williams M, Linn MC, Ammon P, Gearhart M (2004) Learning to teach inquiry science in a technology-based environment: a case study. J Sci Educ Technol 13(2):189–206
37. Wu HL, Pedersen S (2011) Integrating computer- and teacher-based scaffolds in science inquiry. Comput Educ 57(4):2352–2363
38. Yang R, Allison D (2003) Research articles in applied linguistics: moving from results to conclusions. Engl Specif Purp 22:365–385
39. Yore LD, Treagust DF (2006) Current realities and future possibilities: language and science literacy—empowering research and informing instruction. Int J Sci Educ 28(2–3):291–314