Opportunities and challenges in next generation standards

Science

Volumn 340, Issue 6130, 2013, Pages 276-277

  Stage, E K ^a   Asturias, H ^a   Cheuk, T ^b   Daro, P A ^c   Hampton, S B ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c National Center on Education and the Economy   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDUCATION POLICY; EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT; LITERACY;

CAREER PLANNING; CLIMATE; EDUCATION; EVOLUTION; HUMAN; HUMAN ACTIVITIES; HUMAN RELATION; INFORMATION LITERACY; LEARNING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC FIGURE; REVIEW; SCIENCE; ARTICLE; ENGINEERING; LANGUAGE; MATHEMATICS; ORGANIZATION; SCHOOL; STANDARD; UNITED STATES;

ENGINEERING; LANGUAGE ARTS; MATHEMATICS; NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES (U.S.); SCHOOLS; SCIENCE; UNITED STATES;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84876310686     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: 10959203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.1234011     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. Board on Science Education, National Research Council (NRC), A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas (National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2011).
2. National Academy of Engineering and Committee on Standards for K-12 Engineering Education, NRC, K-12 Standards for Engineering? (National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2010).
3. Center for Best Practices, National Governors Association (NGA), and Council of Chief State School Officers, Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts (NGA, Washington, DC, 2010); www.corestandards.org/ELA-Literacy.
4. Center for Best Practices, NGA, and Council of Chief State School Officers, Common Core State Standards for Mathematics (NGA, Washington, DC, 2010); www.corestandards.org/Math.
5. Next Generation Science Standards, www.nextgenscience.org/next- generation-science-standards.
6. American Association for the Advancement of Science, Project 2061, Benchmarks for Science Literacy (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 1993).
7. National Committee for Science Education Standards and Assessment, NRC, National Science Education Standards (National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 1996).
8. Commission on Mathematics and Science Education, The Opportunity Equation: Transforming Mathematics and Science Education for Citizenship and the Global Economy (Carnegie Corporation of New York, New York, 2009).
9. Common Core, www.corestandards.org/about-the-standards/key-points-in- english-language-arts.
10. W. H. Schmidt, C. C. McKnight, S. A. Raizen, A Splintered Vision: An Investigation of U.S. Science and Mathematics Education (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA, 1997).
11. J. Coffey, B. Alberts, Science 339, 489 (2013).
12. T. Cheuk, Comparison of the three content standards: CCSS-ELA, CCSS-Mathematics, and NGSS (2012); http://ell.stanford.edu/content/science.
13. E. R. Banilower et al., Report of the 2012 National Survey of Science and Mathematics Education (Horizon Research, Chapel Hill, NC, 2013)
14. C. Gewertz, Educ. Week 32(12), S2 (2012).
15. P. D. Pearson, E. Moje, C. Greenleaf, Science 328, 459 (2010).
16. E. W. Robelen, Educ. Week 32(19), 13 (2013).
17. C. Weiman, Issues Sci. Technol. 2012 (Fall) (2012).
18. R. H. Tai, C. Qi Liu, A. V. Maltese, X. Fan, Science 312, 1143 (2006).
19. President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, Prepare and Inspire: K-12 Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) for America's Future (Office of the President, Washington, DC, 2010).