Activism for corporate responsibility: Conceptualizing private regulation opportunity structures

Journal of Management Studies

Volumn 51, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 1091-1117

  Mena, Sébastien ^a   Waeger, Daniel ^b,c  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Activism; Corporate responsibility; Political opportunity structures; Private regulation; Private regulatory initiatives; Social movements

Indexed keywords

EID: 84911990390     PISSN: 00222380     EISSN: 14676486     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/joms.12092     Document Type: Article

References (138)

1. Abbott, K. W. and Snidal, D. (2009a). 'Strengthening international regulation through transnational new governance: overcoming the orchestration deficit'. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 42, 501-578.
2. Abbott, K. W. and Snidal, D. (2009b). 'The governance triangle: regulatory standards institutions and the shadow of the state'. In Mattli, W. and Woods, N. (Eds), The Politics of Global Regulation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 44-88.
3. Abbott, K. W. and Snidal, D. (2010). 'International regulation without international government: improving io performance through orchestration'. Review of International Organizations, 5, 315-344.
4. Aguilera, R. V., Rupp, D. E., Williams, C. A. and Ganapathi, J. (2007). 'Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: a multilevel theory of social change in organizations'. Academy of Management Review, 32, 836-863.
5. Aldrich, H. E. (2011). 'Heroes, villains, and fools: institutional entrepreneurship, not institutional entrepreneurs'. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 1, 1-4.
6. Arjaliès, D. L. (2010). 'A social movement perspective on finance: how socially responsible investment mattered'. Journal of Business Ethics, 92, 57-78.
7. Bäckstrand, K. (2006). 'Multi-stakeholder partnerships for sustainable development: rethinking legitimacy, accountability and effectiveness'. European Environment, 16, 290-306.
8. Banerjee, B. (2007). Corporate Social Responsibility: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
9. Barnett, M. L. (2006). 'Finding a working balance between competitive and communal strategies'. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 1753-1773.
10. Baron, D. P. (2001). 'Private politics, corporate social responsibility, and integrated strategy'. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 10, 7-45.
11. Baron, D. P. (2003). 'Private politics'. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 12, 31-66.
12. Baron, D. P. (2009). 'Clubs, credence standards, and social pressure'. In Potoski, M. and Prakash, A. (Eds), Voluntary Programs: A Club Theory Perspective. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 41-86.
13. Bartley, T. (2007). 'Institutional emergence in an era of globalization: the rise of transnational private regulation of labor and environmental conditions'. American Journal of Sociology, 113, 297-351.
14. Bartley, T. (2011). 'Certification as a mode of social regulation'. In Levi-Faur, D. (Ed.), Handbook on the Politics of Regulation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 441-452.
15. Bartley, T. and Child, C. (2011). Shaming the Corporation: Globalization, Reputation, and the Dynamics of Anti-Corporate Movements. Working Paper, Indiana University.
16. Behnam, M. and MacLean, T. (2011). 'Where is the accountability in international accountability standards? A decoupling perspective'. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21, 45-72.
17. Black, J. (2008). 'Constructing and contesting legitimacy and accountability in polycentric regulatory regimes'. Regulation & Governance, 2, 137-164.
18. Böhm, S., Spicer, A. and Fleming, P. (2008). 'Infra-political dimensions of resistance to international business: a neo-gramscian approach'. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 24, 169-182.
19. Bonardi, J.-P. and Keim, G. D. (2005). 'Corporate political strategies for widely salient issues'. Academy of Management Review, 30, 555-576.
20. Cashore, B., Van Kooten, G. C., Vertinsky, I., Auld, G. and Affolderbach, J. (2005). 'Private or self-regulation? A comparative study of forest certification choices in Canada, the United States and Germany'. Forest Policy and Economics, 7, 53-69.
21. de Bakker, F. G. A. (2012). 'Exploring networks of activism on corporate social responsibility: suggestions for a research agenda'. Creativity and Innovation Management, 21, 212-223.
22. Della Porta, D. and Tarrow, S. (2005). 'Transnational processes and social activism: an introduction'. In Della Porta, D. and Tarrow, S. (Eds), Transnational Protest and Global Activism. Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield, 1-20.
23. Delmas, M. and Toffel, M. W. (2004). 'Stakeholders and environmental management practices: an institutional framework'. Business Strategy and the Environment, 13, 209-222.
24. den Hond, F. and de Bakker, F. G. A. (2007). 'Ideologically motivated activism: how activist groups influence corporate social change activities'. Academy of Management Review, 32, 901-924.
25. Derville, T. (2005). 'Radical activist tactics: overturning public relations conceptualizations'. Public Relations Review, 31, 527-533.
26. Dingwerth, K. (2008). 'North-South parity in global governance: the affirmative procedures of the Forest Stewardship Council'. Global Governance, 14, 53-71.
27. Edward, P. and Willmott, H. (2008). 'Corporate citizenship: rise or demise of a myth?'. Academy of Management Review, 33, 771-773.
28. Edwards, B. and McCarthy, J. D. (2004). 'Resources and social movement mobilization'. In Snow, D. A., Soule, S. A. and Kriesi, H. (Eds), The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 116-151.
29. Esbenshade, J. (2004). Monitoring Sweatshops: Workers, Consumers, and the Global Apparel Industry. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
30. Fantasia, R. and Stepan-Norris, J. (2004). 'The labor movement in motion'. In Snow, D. A., Soule, S. A. and Kriesi, H. (Eds), The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 555-575.
31. Fombrun, C. J., Gardberg, N. A. and Barnett, M. L. (2000). 'Opportunity platforms and safety nets: corporate citizenship and reputational risk'. Business and Society Review, 105, 85-106.
32. Fordaq (2009). 'République du Congo: IFO, la filiale du groupe Danzer obtient la certification FSC'. Available at: http://www.fordaq.com/fordaq/news/Danzer_forestier_19586.html (accessed 26 May 2014).
33. Fransen, L. (2012). 'Multi-stakeholder governance and voluntary programme interactions: legitimation politics in the institutional design of corporate social responsibility'. Socio-Economic Review, 10, 163-192.
34. Friends of the Earth (2005). Roundtable on sustainable palm oil. Available at: http://www.foe.co.uk/news/great_ape_scandal_roundtable (accessed 24 January 2014).
35. Friends of the Earth (2009). 'Certified' palm oil not a solution. Available at: http://www.foei.org/press/archive-by-subject/food-sovereignty-press/certified-palm-oil-not-a-solution/ (accessed 24 January 2014).
36. FSC-Watch (2006). WWF and certification of Danzer: all a foregone conclusion? Available at: http://www.fsc-watch.org/archives/2006/12/11/WWF_and_certification_of_Danzer__all_a_foregone_conclusion_ (accessed 3 April 2011).
37. Gardberg, N. A. and Fombrun, C. J. (2006). 'Corporate citizenship: creating intangible assets across institutional environments'. Academy of Management Review, 31, 329-346.
38. Gereffi, G., Garcia-Johnson, R. and Sasser, E. (2001). 'The NGO-industrial complex'. Foreign Policy, 125, 56-65.
39. Gilbert, D. U. and Rasche, A. (2008). 'Opportunities and problems of standardized ethics initiatives - a stakeholder theory perspective'. Journal of Business Ethics, 83, 755-773.
40. Goldstone, J. A. (2004). 'More social movements or fewer? Beyond political opportunity structures to relational fields'. Theory and Society, 33, 333-365.
41. Goodwin, J. and Jasper, J. M. (1999). 'Caught in a winding, snarling vine: the structural bias of political process theory'. Sociological Forum, 14, 27-54.
42. Graubart, J. (2005). '"Politicizing" a new breed of "legalized" transnational political opportunity structures: labor activists uses of NAFTA's citizen-petition mechanism'. Berkeley Journal of Employment & Labor Law, 26, 97-142.
43. Graz, J.-C. and Nölke, A. (Eds) (2008). Transnational Private Governance and Its Limits. London: Routledge.
44. Gusfield, J. (1981). The Culture of Public Problems: Drinking-Driving and the Symbolic Order. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
45. Haack, P., Schoeneborn, D. and Wickert, C. (2012). 'Talking the talk, moral entrapment, creeping commitment? Exploring narrative dynamics in corporate responsibility standardization'. Organization Studies, 33, 815-845.
46. Hannan, M. T. and Freeman, J. H. (1977). 'The population ecology of organizations'. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 929-964.
47. Haufler, V. (2003). 'New forms of governance: certification regimes as social regulations of the global market'. In Meidinger, E., Elliott, C. and Oesten, G. (Eds), Social and Political Dimensions of Forest Certification. Remagen-Oberwinter: Forstbuch, 237-248.
48. Helms, W. S., Oliver, C. and Webb, K. (2012). 'Antecedents of settlement on a new institutional practice: negotiation of the ISO 26000 standard on social responsibility'. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 1120-1145.
49. Hoffman, A. J. (1999). 'Institutional evolution and change: environmentalism and the US chemical industry'. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 351-371.
50. Katz, J. P., Higgins, E., Dickson, M. and Eckman, M. (2009). 'The impact of external monitoring and public reporting on business performance in a global manufacturing industry'. Business & Society, 48, 489-510.
51. Khan, F. R., Munir, K. A. and Willmott, H. (2007). 'A dark side of institutional entrepreneurship: soccer balls, child labour and postcolonial impoverishment'. Organization Studies, 7, 1055-1077.
52. King, A. A. and Lenox, M. J. (2000). 'Industry self-regulation without sanctions: the chemical industry's Responsible Care program'. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 698-716.
53. King, B. G. (2008a). 'A political mediation model of corporate response to social movement activism'. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53, 395-421.
54. King, B. G. (2008b). 'A social movement perspective of stakeholder collective action and influence'. Business & Society, 47, 21-49.
55. King, B. G. and Pearce, N. A. (2010). 'The contentiousness of markets: politics, social movements, and institutional change in markets'. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 249-267.
56. King, B. G. and Soule, S. A. (2007). 'Social movements as extra-institutional entrepreneurs: the effect of protests on stock price returns'. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52, 413-442.
57. Kitschelt, H. P. (1986). 'Political opportunity structures and political protest: anti-nuclear movements in four democracies'. British Journal of Political Science, 16, 57-85.
58. Kolk, A. and van Tulder, R. (2002). 'The effectiveness of self-regulation: corporate codes of conduct and child labour'. European Management Journal, 20, 260-271.
59. Koopmans, R. (2004). 'Protest in time and space: the evolution of waves of contention'. In Snow, D. A., Soule, S. A. and Kriesi, H. (Eds), The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 19-46.
60. Koopmans, R. and Statham, P. (1999). 'Ethnic and civic conceptions of nationhood and the differential success of the extreme right in Germany and Italy'. In Giugni, M. G., McAdam, D. and Tilly, C. (Eds), How Social Movements Matter. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minneapolis Press, 225-252.
61. Kriesi, H. (2004). 'Political context and opportunity'. In Snow, D. A., Soule, S. A. and Kriesi, H. (Eds), The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 67-90.
62. Kriesi, H., Koopmans, R., Duyvendak, J. W. and Giugni, M. G. (1992). 'New social movements and political opportunities in Western Europe'. European Journal of Political Research, 22, 219-244.
63. Kriesi, H., Koopmans, R., Duyvendak, J. W. and Giugni, M. G. (1995). New Social Movements in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
64. Locke, R., Qin, F. and Brause, A. (2007). 'Does monitoring improve labor standards? Lessons from Nike'. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 61, 3-31.
65. Lyon, T. P. and Maxwell, J. W. (2004). 'Astroturf: interest group lobbying and corporate strategy'. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 13, 561-597.
66. MacLean, T. L. and Behnam, M. (2010). 'The dangers of decoupling: the relationship between compliance programs, legitimacy perceptions, and institutionalized misconduct'. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 1499-1520.
67. Marx, A. (2008). 'Limits to non-state market regulation: a qualitative comparative analysis of the international sport footwear industry and the FLA'. Regulation & Governance, 2, 253-273.
68. McAdam, D. (1996). 'Conceptual origins, current problems, future directions'. In McAdam, D., McCarthy, J. D. and Zald, M. N. (Eds), Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 23-40.
69. McAdam, D., McCarthy, J. D. and Zald, M. N. (1996). 'Introduction: opportunities, mobilizing structures, and framing processes - toward a synthetic, comparative perspectives on social movements'. In McAdam, D., McCarthy, J. D. and Zald, M. N. (Eds), Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1-22.
70. McAdam, D., Tarrow, S. and Tilly, C. (2001). Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
71. McCarthy, J. D. and Zald, M. N. (1977). 'Resource mobilization and social movements: a partial theory'. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 1212-1241.
72. McWilliams, A. and Siegel, D. S. (2011). 'Creating and capturing value: strategic corporate social responsibility, resource-based theory, and sustainable competitive advantage'. Journal of Management, 37, 1480-1495.
73. McWilliams, A., Siegel, D. S. and Wright, P. M. (2006). 'Corporate social responsibility: strategic implications'. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 1-18.
74. Mena, S. and Palazzo, G. (2012). 'Input and output legitimacy of multi-stakeholder initiatives'. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22, 529-599.
75. Meyer, D. S. and Minkoff, D. C. (2004). 'Conceptualizing political opportunity'. Social Forces, 82, 1457-1492.
76. Mügge, D. (2006). 'Private-public puzzles: inter-firm competition and transnational private regulation'. New Political Economy, 11, 177-200.
77. O'Rourke, D. (2006). 'Multi-stakeholder regulation: privatizing or socializing global labor standards?'. World Development, 34, 899-918.
78. Palazzo, G. and Scherer, A. G. (2008). 'Corporate social responsibility, democracy, and the politicization of the corporation'. Academy of Management Review, 33, 773-775.
79. Phillips, R. (2003). 'Stakeholder legitimacy'. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13, 25-41.
80. Proffitt, W. T. and Spicer, A. (2006). 'Shaping the shareholder activism agenda: institutional investors and global social issues'. Strategic Organization, 4, 165-190.
81. Raines, S. S. (2003). 'Perceptions of legitimacy and efficacy in international environmental management'. Global Environmental Politics, 3, 47-73.
82. Rehbein, K., Waddock, S. and Graves, S. B. (2004). 'Understanding shareholder activism: which corporations are targeted?'. Business & Society, 43, 239-267.
83. Reid, E. M. and Toffel, M. W. (2009). 'Responding to public and private politics: corporate disclosure of climate change strategies'. Strategic Management Journal, 30, 1157-1178.
84. Reinecke, J., Manning, S. and Von Hagen, O. (2012). 'The emergence of a standards market: multiplicity of sustainability standards in the global coffee industry'. Organization Studies, 33, 791-814.
85. Richardson, A. J. and Eberlein, B. (2011). 'Legitimating transnational standard-setting: the case of the International Accounting Standards Board'. Journal of Business Ethics, 98, 217-245.
86. Risse, T. (2006). 'Transnational governance and legitimacy'. In Benz, A. and Papadopoulos, I. (Eds), Governance and Democracy: Comparing National, European and International Experiences. London: Routledge, 179-299.
87. Rowley, T. J. and Moldoveanu, M. (2003). 'When will stakeholder groups act? An interest- and identity-based model of stakeholder group mobilization'. Academy of Management Review, 28, 204-219.
88. Rucht, D. (2004). 'Movement allies, adversaries, and third parties'. In Snow, D. A., Soule, S. A. and Kriesi, H. (Eds), The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 197-216.
89. Rucht, D. (2005). 'Civil society plus global governance: what can we expect?'. In Petschow, U., Rosenau, J. and Weizsäcker, E.-U. (Eds), Governance and Sustainability: New Challenges for States, Companies and Civil Society. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing, 219-230.
90. Scharpf, F. W. (1999). Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
91. Schepers, D. H. (2010). 'Challenges to legitimacy at the Forest Stewardship Council'. Journal of Business Ethics, 92, 279-290.
92. Scherer, A. G. and Palazzo, G. (2007). 'Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective'. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1096-1120.
93. Scherer, A. G. and Palazzo, G. (2011). 'The new political role of business in a globalized world: a review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance, and democracy'. Journal of Management Studies, 48, 899-931.
94. Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G. and Baumann, D. (2006). 'Global rules and private actors - towards a new role of the TNC in global governance'. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16, 505-532.
95. Schneiberg, M. and Soule, S. A. (2005). 'Institutionalization as a contested, multilevel process: the case of rate regulation in American fire insurance'. In Davis, G. F., McAdam, D., Scott, R. W. and Zald, M. N. (Eds), Social Movements and Organization Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 122-160.
96. Schrempf-Stirling, J. and Palazzo, G. (2013). 'Upstream corporate social responsibility: the evolution from contract responsibility to full producer responsibility'. Business & Society, doi: 0007650313500233.
97. Schurman, R. (2004). 'Fighting "Frankenfoods": industry opportunity structures and the efficacy of the anti-biotech movement in Western Europe'. Social Problems, 51, 243-268.
98. Sethi, S. P. (2003). Setting Global Standards: Guidelines for Creating Codes of Conduct in Multinational Corporations. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
99. Shamir, R. (2010). 'Capitalism, governance, and authority: the case of corporate social responsibility'. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 6, 531-553.
100. Sharma, S. and Henriques, I. (2005). 'Stakeholder influences on sustainability practices in the Canadian forest products industry'. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 159-180.
101. Shawki, N. (2010). 'Political opportunity structures and the outcomes of transnational campaigns: a comparison of two transnational advocacy networks'. Peace & Change, 35, 381-411.
102. Snow, D. A. and Benford, R. D. (1988). 'Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization'. International Social Movements Research, 1, 197-218.
103. Snow, D. A., Soule, S. A. and Kriesi, H. (2004). 'Mapping the terrain'. In Snow, D. A., Soule, S. A. and Kriesi, H. (Eds), The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 3-16.
104. Soule, S. A. (2009). Contention and Corporate Social Responsibility. New York: Cambridge University Press.
105. Soule, S. A. (2012a). 'Social movements and markets, industries, and firms'. Organization Studies, 33, 1715-1733.
106. Soule, S. A. (2012b). 'Targeting organizations: private and contentious politics'. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 34, 261-285.
107. Soule, S. A. and King, B. G. (2006). 'The stages of the policy process and the equal rights amendment, 1972-1982'. American Journal of Sociology, 111, 1871-1909.
108. Spar, D. L. and La Mure, L. T. (2003). 'The power of activism: assessing the impact of NGOs on global business'. California Management Review, 45, 78-101.
109. Suddaby, R. (2010). 'Challenges for institutional theory'. Journal of Management Inquiry, 19, 14-20.
110. Suddaby, R. and Greenwood, R. (2005). 'Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy'. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 35-67.
111. Tarrow, S. (1994). Power in Movement: Social Movements, Collective Action and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
112. Tarrow, S. (1998). Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
113. Tarrow, S. (2005). The New Transnational Activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
114. Tarrow, S. (2011). Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
115. Testy, K. Y. (2002). 'Linking progressive corporate law with progressive social movements'. Tulane Law Review, 76, 1227-1252.
116. Tilly, C. and Tarrow, S. (2007). Contentious Politics. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
117. Timmermans, S. and Epstein, S. (2010). 'A world of standards but not a standard world: toward a sociology of standards and standardization'. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 69-89.
118. Turcotte, M., de Bellefeuille, S. and Den Hond, F. (2007). 'Gildan Inc. Influencing corporate governance in the textile sector'. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 27, 23-36.
119. van der Heijden, H. A. (1997). 'Political opportunity structure and the institutionalisation of the environmental movement'. Environmental Politics, 6, 25-50.
120. van der Heijden, H. A. (2006). 'Globalization, environmental movements, and international political opportunity structures'. Organization & Environment, 19, 28-45.
121. van Huijstee, M. and Glasbergen, P. (2010). 'NGOs moving business: an analysis of contrasting strategies'. Business & Society, 49, 591-618.
122. van Tulder, R. and Kolk, A. (2001). 'Multinationality and corporate ethics: codes of conduct in the sporting goods industry'. Journal of International Business Studies, 32, 267-283.
123. van Wijk, J., Stam, W., Elfring, T., Zietsma, C. and den Hond, F. (2013). 'Activists and incumbents structuring change: the interplay of agency, culture, and networks in field evolution'. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 358-386.
124. Vitols, K. (2011). 'Strengthening cooperation between NGOs and trade unions in the interests of sustainability'. In Vitols, S. and Kluge, N. (Eds), The Sustainable Company: A New Approach to Corporate Governance. Brussels: European Trade Union Institute, 185-198.
125. Vogel, D. (2010). 'The private regulation of global corporate conduct'. Business & Society, 49, 68-87.
126. Walsh, B. (2006). The great debate over certified wood: FSC, SFI, Green Globes and the USGBC. Available at: http://www.healthybuilding.net/news/060427sfi-fsc.html (accessed 28 January 2014).
127. Weber, K., Heinze, K. L. and DeSoucey, M. (2008). 'Forage for thought: mobilizing codes in the movement for grass-fed meat and dairy products'. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53, 529-567.
128. Weber, K., Rao, H. and Thomas, L. G. (2009). 'From streets to suites: how the anti-biotech movement affected German pharmaceutical firms'. American Sociological Review, 74, 106-127.
129. Whetten, D. A., Felin, T. and King, B. G. (2009). 'The practice of theory borrowing in organizational studies: current issues and future directions'. Journal of Management, 35, 537-563.
130. Williams, R. H. (1994). 'Movement dynamics and social change: transforming fundamentalist ideology and organizations'. In Marty, M. E. and Appleby, R. S. (Eds), Accounting for Fundamentalisms: The Dynamic Character of Movements. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 785-833.
131. Williams, R. H. (2004). 'The cultural contexts of collective action: constraints, opportunities, and the symbolic life of social movements'. In Snow, D. A., Soule, S. A. and Kriesi, H. (Eds), The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 91-115.
132. Wright, C. and Rwabizambuga, A. (2006). 'Institutional pressures, corporate reputation, and voluntary codes of conduct: an examination of the Equator Principles'. Business and Society Review, 111, 89-117.
133. Yaziji, M. and Doh, J. (2009). NGOs and Corporations: Conflict and Collaboration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
134. Yaziji, M. and Doh, J. P. (2013). 'The role of ideological radicalism and resource homogeneity in social movement organization campaigns against corporations'. Organization Studies, 34, 755-780.
135. Zadek, S. (2004). 'The path to corporate responsibility'. Harvard Business Review, 82, 125-132.
136. Zald, M. N. (2000). 'Ideologically structured action: an enlarged agenda for social movement research'. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 5, 1-16.
137. Zald, M. N. and Ash, R. (1966). 'Social movement organizations: growth, decay and change'. Social Forces, 44, 327-341.
138. Zietsma, C. and McKnight, B. (2009). 'Building the iron cage: institutional creation work in the context of competing proto-institutions'. In Lawrence, T. B., Suddaby, R. and Leca, B. (Eds), Institutional Work: Actors and Agency in Institutional Studies of Organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 143-177.