Capitalism, governance, and authority: The case of corporate social responsibility

Annual Review of Law and Social Science

Volumn 6, Issue , 2010, Pages 531-553

  Shamir, Ronen ^a  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Multinational corporations; Neoliberalism; Self regulation; Sociology of law

Indexed keywords

EID: 78049445648     PISSN: 15503585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102209-153000     Document Type: Article

References (184)

1. Aguilera RV, Rupp D, Williams C, Ganapathi J. 2007. Putting the S back in CSR: A multi-level theory of social change in organizations. Acad. Manag. Rev. 32(3):836-863
2. Albareda L, Lozano JM, TencatiA,MidttunA, Perrini F. 2008. The changing role of governments in corporate social responsibility: Drivers and responses. Bus. Ethics Eur. Rev. 17(4):347-363
3. Aupperle K, Carroll A, Hatfield J. 1985. An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability. Acad. Manag. J. 28(2):446-463
4. Ayres I, Braithwaite J. 1992. Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
5. Bartley T. 2007. Institutional emergence in an era of globalization: The rise of transnational private regulation of labor and environmental conditions. Am. J. Sociol. 113(2):297-351
6. Bauman Z. 2002. Society Under Siege. Cambridge, UK: Polity
7. Boltanski L, Chiapello E. 2005. The New Spirit of Capitalism. London: Verso
8. Bond P. 2008. Social movements and corporate social responsibility in South Africa. Dev. Change 39(6):1037-1052
9. BondyK,MattenD,Moon J. 2008. Multinational corporation codes of conduct: Governance tools for corporate social responsibility? Corp. Gov. Int. Rev. 16(4):294-311
10. Bourdieu P. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
11. Bourdieu P. 1999. The abdication of the state. In The Weight of the World: Social Suffering in Contemporary Society, ed. P Bourdieu, pp. 181-188 Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
12. Bowman DM, Hodge GA. 2009. Counting on codes: An examination of transnational codes as a regulatory governance mechanism for nanotechnologies. Regul. Gov. 3(2):145-164
13. Braithwaite J. 2002. Restorative Justice and Responsive Regulation. New York: Oxford Univ. Press
14. Braithwaite J. 2008. Regulatory Capitalism: How It Works, Ideas for Making It Work Better. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar
15. Braithwaite V, ed. 2007. Responsive regulation and taxation. Law Policy 29(Spec. Issue):3-10
16. Brammer S,Millington A. 2008. Does it pay to be different? An analysis of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Strateg. Manag. J. 29(12):1325-1343
17. Burchell G. 1993. Liberal government and techniques of the self. Econ. Soc. 22(3):267-282
18. Burke L, Logsdon JM. 1996. How corporate social responsibility pays off. Long Range Plann. 29(4):495-502
19. Callan SJ, Thomas JM. 2009. Corporate financial performance and corporate social performance: An update and reinvestigation. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 16(2):61-78
20. Campbell JL. 2007. Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Acad. Manag. Rev. 32(3):946-967
21. Campbell K, Vick D. 2007. Disclosure law and the market for corporate social responsibility. See McBarnet et al. 2007, pp. 241-278
22. Carlarne CP. 2008. Good climate governance: Only a fragmented system of international law away? Law Policy 30(4):450-480
23. Carroll AB. 1979. A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance. Acad. Manag. Rev. 4(4):497-505
24. Carroll AB. 1999. Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. Bus. Soc. 38(3):268-295
25. Chang D-S, Kuo Li-CR. 2008. The effects of sustainable development on firms' financial performance-an empirical approach. Sustain. Dev. 16(6):365-380
26. Christensen LJ. 2007. Ethics, CSR, and sustainability education in the Financial Times top 50 global business schools: baseline data and future research directions. J. Bus. Ethics 73(4):347-368
27. Clapham A, Jerbi S. 2001. Categories of corporate complicity in human rights abuses. Hastings Int. Comp. Law Rev. 24:339-349
28. Clarkson MB. 1995. A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Acad. Manag. Rev. 20(1):92-117
29. Cleek MA, Leonard S. 1998. Can corporate codes of ethics influence behavior? J. Bus. Ethics 17:619-630
30. Coglianese C. 1997. Assessing consensus: The promise and performance of negotiated rulemaking. Duke Law J. 46:1255-1349
31. Coglianese C, Lazer D. 2003. Management-based regulation: Prescribing private management to achieve public goals. Law Soc. Rev. 37(4):691-730
32. Coglianese C, Nash J. 2001. Regulating from the Inside: Can Environmental Management Systems Achieve Policy Goals? Washington, DC: Resourc. Future
33. Collison DJ, Cobb G, PowerDM, StevensonLA. 2008. The financial performance of the FTSE4Good indices. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 15(1):14-28
34. Commission of the European Communities. 2001. Green paper: Promoting a European framework for corporate social responsibility. Presented by Comm. Eur. Communities, Brussels, July 18. http:// eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/site/en/ com/2001/com2001-0366en01.pdf
35. Commission of the European Communities. 2002. Communication from the commission concerning corporate social responsibility: A business contribution to sustainable development. Presented by Comm. Eur. Communities, Brussels, July 2. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri= COM:2002:0347:FIN:EN: PDF
36. Conley J, Williams C. 2005. Engage, embed and embellish: The theory and practice of corporate social responsibility. J. Corp. Law 31:1-38
37. Courville S. 2003. Social accountability audits: Challenging or defending democratic governance? Law Policy 25(3):269-297
38. Cromier D, Magnan M. 2003. Environmental reporting management: A continental European perspective. J. Account. Publ. Policy 22:43-62
39. Crowther D. 2004. Corporate social reporting: Genuine action or window dressing? In Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility, ed. D Crowther, L Rayman-Bacchus, pp. 140-160 London: Ashgate
40. Cutler C, Haufler V, Porter T. 1999. Private Authority and International Affairs. New York: SUNY Press
41. Dahlsrud A. 2008. How corporate social responsibility is defined: An analysis of 37 definitions. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 15(1):1-13
42. Danielsen D. 2005. How corporations govern: Taking corporate power seriously in transnational regulation and governance. Harvard Int. Law J. 46(2):411-425
43. Davidsson PA. 2002. Legal enforcement of corporate social responsibility within the EU. Columbia J. Eur. Law 8(3):529
44. De Burca G, Scott J, eds. 2006. Law and New Governance in the EU and the US. Oxford/Portland, OR: Hart
45. Deegan C. 2002. The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures-a theoretical foundation. Account. Audit. Account. J. 15(3):282-311
46. Denbo SM. 2008. Nature's business: Incorporating global studies, environmental law and literacy, and corporate social responsibility into the business school curriculum through interdisciplinary "business- science" study tour courses. J. Legal Stud. Educ. 25(2):215-240
47. DeWinter R. 2001. The anti-sweatshopmovement: Constructing corporatemoral agency in the global apparel industry. Ethics Int. Aff. 15(2):99-115
48. DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW. 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am. Sociol. Rev. 48:147-160
49. Djelic M-L. 2006. Marketization: from intellectual agenda to global policy-making. In Transnational Governance: Institutional Dynamics of Regulation, ed. M-L Djelic, K Sahlin-Andersson, pp. 53-73. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
50. Doh JP, Guay TR. 2006. Corporate social responsibility, public policy, and NGO activism in Europe and the United States: An institutional-stakeholder perspective. J. Manag. Stud. 43(1):47-73
51. Dorf M, Sabel CF. 1998. A constitution of democratic experimentalism. Columbia Law Rev. 98(2):267-367
52. EmmelhainzM, Adams R. 1999. The apparel industry response to 'sweatshop' concerns: A review and analysis of codes of conduct. J. Supply Chain Manag. 35(3):51-57
53. EurActive.com. 2007. Corporate social responsibility: back on the EU agenda? EurActive.com. Feb. 7. http://www.euractiv.com/en/socialeurope/csr- corporate-social-responsibility/article-153515
54. European Multistakeholder Forum onCSR. 2004. Corporate social responsibility: final results and recommendations. Final Rep. High-Level Meet., Brussels, June 29. http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/sustainablebusiness/ files/csr/documents/29062004/emsf-final-report-en.pdf
55. Fabian T. 1998. Social Accountability 8000 (SA 8000)-the first auditable, global standard for ethical sourcing driven by CEPAA. Counc. Econ. Prior., London. www.citinv.it/associazioni/CNMS/ archivio/lavoro/Presentazione-SA8000. html
56. Fairman R, Yapp C. 2005. Enforced self-regulation, prescription, and conceptions of compliance within small businesses: The impact of enforcement. Law Policy 27(2):491-519
57. Feaver D, Durrant N. 2008. A regulatory analysis of international climate change regulation. Law Policy 30(4):394-422
58. Fourcade M. 2006. The construction of a global profession: The transnationalization of economics. Am. J. Sociol. 112(1):145-194
59. Fourcade M, Healy K. 2007. Moral views of market society. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 33:285-311
60. Fourcade-Gourinchas M, Babb SL. 2002. The rebirth of the liberal creed: Paths to neoliberalism in four countries. Am. J. Sociol. 108(3):533-579
61. Friedman M. 1970. The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. NY Times Mag., Sept. 13, pp. 122-126
62. Geva A. 2008. Three models of corporate social responsibility: Interrelationships between theory, research, and practice. Bus. Soc. Rev. 113(1):1-41
63. GlinskiC. 2007. Corporate codes of conduct-moral or legal obligation? SeeMcBarnet et al. 2007, pp. 119-147
64. Grolin J. 1999. Corporate legitimacy in risk society: The case of Brent Spar. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 7(4):213-222
65. Gunningham N. 2007. Corporate environmental responsibility-law and the limits of voluntarism. See McBarnet et al.2007, pp. 476-500
66. Gunningham N, Kagan RA, Thornton D. 2003. Shades of Green: Regulation, Business, Environment. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
67. Gunningham N, Kagan RA, Thornton D. 2004. Social license and environmental protection: Why businesses go beyond compliance. Law Soc. Inq. 29(2):307-341
68. Haigh M, Jones M. 2006. The drivers of corporate social responsibility: A critical review. Bus. Rev. Cambridge 5:245-252
69. Haines F. 2009. Regulatory failures and regulatory solutions: A characteristic analysis of the aftermath of disaster. Law Soc. Inq. 34(1):31-60
70. Hart S. 1997. Beyond greening: Strategies for a sustainable world. Harvard Bus. Rev. 75(1):66-76
71. Harvard Law Review Notes. 2001. Developments in the law: International criminal law v. corporate liability for violations of international human rights law. Harvard Law Rev. 114:2025-2048
72. Haufler V. 2001. A Public Role for the Private Sector: Industry Self-Regulation in a Global Economy.Washington, DC: Carnegie Endow. Int. Peace
73. Havinga T. 2006. Regulation of food safety by supermarkets. Law Policy 28(4):515-533
74. Hemingway CA, Maclagan PW. 2004. Managers' personal values as drivers of corporate social responsibility. J. Bus. Ethics 50(1):13-31
75. Hess DW. 2008. The three pillars of corporate social reporting as new governance regulation: Disclosure, dialogue and development. Work. Pap. No.1112, Ross Sch. Bus., Univ. Mich. http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/60425
76. Hoffman AJ. 2001. From Heresy to Dogma: An Institutional History of Corporate Environmentalism. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
77. Hooghiemstra R. 2000. Corporate communication and impression management-new perspectives why companies engage in corporate social reporting. J. Bus. Ethics 27(1-2):55-68
78. Howard-Grenville JA. 2005. Explaining shades of green: Why do companies act differently on similar environmental issues? Law Soc. Inq. 30(3):551-581
79. Howard-Grenville J, Nash J, Coglianese C. 2008. Constructing the license to operate: Internal factors and their influence on corporate environmental decisions. Law Policy 30(1):73-107
80. Husted BW. 2005. Risk management, real options, corporate social responsibility. J. Bus. Ethics 60(2):175-183
81. Hutter BM, Jones CJ. 2007. From government to governance: External influences on business risk management. Regul. Gov. 1(1):27-45
82. Jessop B. 1997. Capitalism and its future: Remarks on regulation, government and governance. Rev. Int. Polit. Econ. 4(3):561-581
83. John Doe et al. v. Unocal Corporation et al., 110 F.Supp.2d 1294 (C.D. Cal. 2000)
84. Jonnergard K, Larsson U. 2007. Developing codes of conduct: Regulator conversations as means for detecting institutional change. Law Policy 29(4):460-492
85. Joseph S. 2004. Corporations and Transnational Human Rights Litigation. Oxford /Portland, OR: Hart
86. Kagan RA, Gunningham N, Thornton D. 2003. Explaining corporate environmental performance: How does regulation matter? Law Soc. Rev. 37(1):51-90
87. Kell G. 2003. The global compact: Origins, operations, progress, challenges. J. Corp. Citizsh. 11:35-49
88. King BG, Soule SA. 2007. Social movements as extra-institutional entrepreneurs: The effect of protests on stock price returns. Adm. Sci. Q. 52(3):413-442
89. Kinley D, Nolan J, Zeriel N. 2007. 'The norms are dead! Long live the norms!' The politics behind the UN human rights norms for corporations. See McBarnet et al. 2007, pp. 459-477
90. Kinley D, Tadaki J. 2004. From talk to walk: The emergence of human rights responsibilities for corporations at international law. Va. J. Int. Law 44(4):931-1023
91. Lankoski L. 2008. Corporate responsibility activities and economic performance: A theory of why and how they are connected. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 17(8):536-547
92. Laufer W. 2003. Social accountability and corporate greenwashing. J. Bus. Ethics 43(3):253-261
93. Lee IB. 2009. Citizenship and the corporation. Law Soc. Inq. 34(1):126-168
94. Lee M-DP. 2008. Theory of corporate social responsibility: Its evolutionary path and the road ahead. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 10(1):53-73
95. Lemke T. 2001. The birth of "bio-politics": Michel Foucault's lecture at the College de France on neo-liberal governmentality. Econ. Soc. 30(2):190-207
96. Levi-Faur D. 2005. The global diffusion of regulatory capitalism. Ann. Am. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci. 598:12-32
97. Lipschutz R, Rowe JK. 2005. Globalization, Governmentality and Global Politics: Regulation for the Rest of Us? London: Routledge
98. Livesey S. 2001. Eco-identity as discursive struggle: Royal Dutch/Shell, Brent Spar, and Nigeria. J. Bus. Commun. 38(1):58-91
99. Lo S-F, Sheu H-J. 2007. Is corporate sustainability a value-increasing strategy for business? Corp. Gov. Int. Rev. 15(2):345-358
100. LobelO. 2004. The renew deal: The fall of regulation and the rise of governance in contemporary legal thought. Minn. Law Rev. 89:342
101. Locke RM. 2003. The promise and perils of globalization: The case of Nike. In Management: Inventing and Delivering Its Future, ed. TA Kochan, R Schmalensee, pp. 39-70. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
102. Lockett A, Moon J, Visser W. 2006. Corporate social responsibility in management research: focus, nature, salience and sources of influence. J. Manag. Stud. 43(1):115-136
103. Luo X, Bhattacharya CB. 2006. Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value. J. Mark. 70(4):1-18
104. Macintyre M, Mee W, Solomon F. 2008. Evaluating social performance in the context of an "audit culture": A pilot review of a gold mine in Papua New Guinea. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 15(2):100-110
105. Margolis D, Walsh J. 2001. People and Profits? The Search for a Link Between a Company's Social and Financial Performance. New Jersey: Erlbaum
106. Markowitz L. 2007. Structural innovators and core framing tasks: how socially-responsible mutual fund companies sustain resonant frames. Sociol. Perspect. 50(1):131-154
107. Marsden C, Andriof J. 1998. Towards an understanding of corporate citizenship and how to influence it. Citizsh. Stud. 2(2):329-352
108. Marx A. 2008. Limits to non-state market regulation: A qualitative comparative analysis of the international sport footwear industry and the Fair Labor Association. Regul. Gov. 2(2):253-273
109. Marx K. 2002 (1848). The Communist Manifesto. London: Penguin Classic
110. Mascini P, Van Wijk E. 2009. Responsive regulation at the Dutch Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority: An empirical assessment of assumptions underlying the theory. Regul. Gov. 3(1):27-47
111. Matten D, Moon J. 2005. Corporate social responsibility. J. Bus. Ethics 54(4):323-337
112. McBarnet D. 2007. The new corporate accountability: Corporate social responsibility beyond law, through law, for law. See McBarnet et al. 2007, pp. 9-57
113. McBarnet D, Kurkchiyan M. 2007. Corporate social responsibility through contractual control?Global supply chains and 'other-regulation.' See McBarnet et al. 2007, pp. 59-92
114. McBarnet D, Schmidt P. 2007. Corporate accountability through creative enforcement-human rights, the Alien Tort Claims Act and the limits of legal impunity. See McBarnet et al. 2007, pp. 148-176
115. McBarnet DJ, Voiculescu A, Campbell T, eds. 2007. The New Corporate Accountability: Corporate Social Responsibility and the Law. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
116. McWilliams A, SiegelDS. 2001. Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Acad. Manag. Rev. 26:177-227
117. Meidinger E. 2003. Forest certification as a global civil society regulatory institution. In Social and Political Dimensions of Forest Certification, ed. EMeidinger,CElliott,GOesten, pp. 265-292 Remagen-Oberwinter, Ger.: Forstbuch Verlag
118. Meyer WJ, John B, Thomas GM, Ramirez FO. 1997. World society and the nation state. Am. J. Sociol. 103(1):144-181
119. Moir L. 2001. What do we mean by corporate social responsibility? Corp. Gov. 1(2):16-22
120. Moon H, Wotipka CM. 2006. The world-wide diffusion of business education, 1881-1999. In Globalization and Organization: World Society and Organizational Change, ed. GS Drori, JW Meyer, H Hwang, pp. 121-136 Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
121. Muchlinski P. 2007. Corporate social responsibility and international law-the case of human rights and multinational enterprises. See McBarnet et al. 2007, pp. 431-458
122. Nielsen VL. 2006. Are regulators responsive? Law Policy 28(3):395-416
123. Nike v. Kasky, 539 U.S. 654 (2003)
124. Nonet P, Selznick P. 1978. Law and Society in Transition: Towards Responsive Law. New York: Harper & Row
125. O'Laughlin B. 2008. Governing capital? Corporate social responsibility and the limits of regulation. Dev. Change 39(6):945-957
126. OrlitzkyM, Schmidt FL, Rynes SL. 2003. Corporate social and financial performance: Ameta-analysis. Organ. Stud. 24(3):403-441
127. Parker C. 2002. The Open Corporation: Effective Self-Regulation and Democracy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
128. Parker C. 2006. The 'compliance' trap: The moral message in responsive regulatory enforcement. Law Soc. Rev. 40(3):591-622
129. Parker C. 2007. Meta-regulation: legal accountability for corporate social responsibility? See McBarnet et al. 2007, pp. 207-240
130. Parker C, Nielsen V. 2009. The challenge of empirical research on business compliance in regulatory capitalism. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 5:45-70
131. Porter ME, Kramer MR. 2006. Strategy & society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Bus. Rev. 84(12):78-92
132. Power M. 1999. The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
133. Power M. 2003. Evaluating the audit explosion. Law Policy 25(3):185-202
134. Power M. 2007. Organized Uncertainty: Designing a World-Risk Management. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
135. Prakash S. 2002. Corporate codes of conduct and the success of globalization. Ethics Int. Aff. 16(1):89-102
136. Prieto-Carron M. 2006. Corporate social responsibility in Latin America: Chiquita, women banana workers and structural inequalities. J. Corp. Citizsh. 21:1-10
137. Rao H. 1998. Caveat emptor: The construction of nonprofit consumer watchdog organizations. Am. J. Sociol. 103:912-961
138. Rao H, Morrill C, Zald MN. 2000. Power plays: how social movements and collective action create new organizational forms. Res. Organ. Behav. 22:239-282
139. Ratner SP. 2001. Corporations and human rights: A theory of legal responsibility. Yale Law J. 111:443-529
140. Rhodes RAW. 1996. The new governance: Governing without government. Polit. Stud. 44:652-667
141. Rodriguez-Garavito C. 2005. Nike's law: The anti-sweatshop movement, transnational corporations and the struggle over international labor rights in the Americas. In Law and Globalization from Below: Towards a Cosmopolitan Legality, ed. B Santos, C Rodriguez-Garavito, pp. 64-91. Cambridge,UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
142. Rosenau J. 2007. Governing the ungovernable: The challenge of a global disaggregation of authority. Regul. Gov. 1(1):88-97
143. Rosenau JN, Czempiel E-O, eds. 1992. Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
144. Rowe JK. 2005. Corporate social responsibility as business strategy. See Lipschutz & Rowe 2005, pp. 130-170 London: Routledge
145. Ruggie JG. 2001. Global-governance.net: The global compact as learning network. Global Gov. 7:371-378
146. Ruggie JG. 2002. The theory and practice of learning networks: Corporate social responsibility and the global compact. J. Corp. Citizsh. 5:27-36
147. Sabel C, Fung A, O'Rourke D. 2001. Stepping up labor standards. Boston Rev. 26(1):4-20
148. Sabel C, Simon W. 2006. Accountability without sovereignty. See De Burca & Scott 2006, pp. 395-412
149. Sahlin-Andersson K. 2006. Corporate social responsibility: A trend and a movement but of what and for what? Corp. Gov. Int. J. Bus. Soc. 6(5):595-608
150. Sassen S. 1996. Losing Control? Sovereignty in an Age of Globalization. New York: Columbia Univ. Press
151. Sassen S. 2006. Territory, Authority, Rights: From Medieval to Global Assemblages. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
152. Scherer G, Palazzo G. 2007. Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility-business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Acad. Manag. Rev. 32:1096-1120
153. Schneiberg M, Bartley T. 2008. Organizations, regulation, and economic behavior: regulatory dynamics and forms from the nineteenth to twenty-first century. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 4:31-61
154. Schnietz KE, Epstein MJ. 2005. Exploring the financial value of a reputation for corporate social responsibility during a crisis. Corp. Reput. Rev. 7:327-345
155. Scholtens B. 2007. Financial and social performance of socially responsible investments in the Netherlands. Corp. Gov. Int. Rev. 15(6):1090-1105
156. Scholtens B, Dam L. 2007. Banking on the equator: Are banks that adopted the Equator Principles different from non-adopters? World Dev. 35(8):1307-1328
157. Scott C. 2008. Reflexive governance, meta-regulation and corporate social responsibility: The Heineken effect. In Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility, ed. N Boeger, R Murray, C Villiers, pp. 170-185 Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar
158. SecchiD. 2007. Utilitarian,managerial and relational theories of corporate social responsibility. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 9(4):347-373
159. Selznick P. 2002. The Communitarian Persuasion. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press
160. Sen S, Bhattacharya CB, Korschun D. 2006. The role of corporate social responsibility in strengthening multiple stakeholder relationships: A field experiment. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 34(2):158-166
161. Shamir R. 2004. Between self-regulation and the AlienTort Claims Act: On the contested concept of corporate social responsibility. Law Soc. Rev. 38(4):635-664
162. Shamir R. 2005. Mind the gap: The commodification of corporate social responsibility. Symb. Interact. 28(2):229-253
163. Shamir R. 2008. The age of responsibilization: On market-embedded morality. Econ. Soc. 37(1):1-19
164. Silbey S. 2009. Taming Prometheus: Talk about safety and culture. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 35:341-369
165. Simon WH. 2006. Toyota jurisprudence: legal theory and rolling rule regimes. See De Burca & Scott 2006, pp. 37-64
166. Sklair L. 1997. Social movements for global capitalism: The transnational capitalist class in action. Rev. Int. Polit. Econ. 4(3):514-538
167. Sklair L. 2002. Globalization: Capitalism and Its Alternatives. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
168. Strange S. 1996. The Retreat of the State: The Diffusion of Power in the World Economy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
169. Thornton D, Kagan RA, Gunningham N. 2009. When social norms and pressures are not enough: Environmental performance in the trucking industry. Law Soc. Rev. 43(2):405-436
170. Uzzi B. 1996. The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. Am. Sociol. Rev. 61:674-698
171. Voiculescu A. 2007. The other European framework for corporate social responsibility-from the green paper to new uses of human rights instruments. See McBarnet et al. 2007, pp. 365-398
172. Vogel D. 2005. The Market for Virtue: The Potential and Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility. Washington, DC: Brookings Inst.
173. Vogel D. 2008. Private global business regulation. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 11:261-282
174. Waddock S. 2000. The multiple bottom lines of corporate citizenship: social investing, reputation, and responsibility audits. Bus. Soc. Rev. 105(3):323-345
175. Wahba H. 2008. Does the market value corporate environmental responsibility? An empirical examination. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 15(2):89-99
176. WaineG, Shadbegian R. 2005.When andwhy do plants comply: Paper mills in the 1980s. Law Policy 27:238-261
177. Walsh J, Weber K, Margolis J. 2003. Social issues in management: Our lost cause found. J. Manag. 29(6):859-881
178. Ward H. 2003. Legal issues in corporate citizenship. Prepared for Swedish Partnersh. Glob. Responsib., Feb. http://www.iied.org/pubs/pdfs/16000IIED.pdf
179. Welker MA. 2009. 'Corporate security begins in the community': mining, the corporate social responsibility industry, and environmental advocacy in Indonesia. Cult. Anthropol. 24(1):142-179
180. Winston M. 2002. NGO strategies for promoting corporate social responsibility. Ethics Int. Aff. 16(1):71-93
181. Wright C, Rwabizambuga A. 2006. Institutional pressures, corporate reputation, and voluntary codes of conduct: An examination of the equator principles. Bus. Soc. Rev. 111(1):89-114
182. Zadek S. 2001. The New Civil Corporation: The New Economy of Corporate Citizenship. London: Earthscan
183. Zadek S. 2004. The path to corporate responsibility. Harvard Bus. Rev. 82(Dec.):125-132 xx
184. Zyglidopoulos SC. 2002. The social and environmental responsibilities of multinationals: Evidence from the Brent Spar case. J. Bus. Ethics 36(1-2):141-152