Globalization, environmental movements, and international political opportunity structures

Organization and Environment

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 28-45

  Van Der Heijden, Hein Anton ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Environmental movements; Globalization; Political opportunity structure; World Bank; WTO

Indexed keywords

GLOBALIZATION; WORLD BANK; WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION;

EID: 32944475019     PISSN: 10860266     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1086026605285452     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Arts, B. (1998). The political influence of global NGOs. Case studies on the climate and biodiversity conventions. Utrecht: International Books.
2. Boas, M., & Vevatne, J. (2004). Sustainable development and theWorldTrade Organization. In M. Boas & M. McNeill (Eds.), Global institutions and development (pp. 95 - 107). London: Routledge.
3. Desombre, E., & Barkin, J. (2002). Turtles and trade. The WTO's acceptance of environmental trade restrictions. Global Environmental Politics, 2 (1), 12 - 18.
4. Eisinger, P. (1973). The conditions of protest behavior in American cities. American Political Science Review, 67, 11 - 28.
5. Flam, H. (Ed.). (1994). States and anti-nuclear movements. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
6. Grossman, P. (2000). Corporate interest and trade liberalization: The North American Free Trade Agreement and environmental protection. Organization & Environment, 13 (1), 61 - 85.
7. Held, D. (1996). Models of democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
8. Hoad, D. (2000). The World Trade Organisation: The events and impact of Seattle 1999. Environmental Politics, 9 (4), 123 - 128.
9. Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2001). Multi-level governance and European integration. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
10. Jordan, A. (2001). The European Union: An evolving system of multi-level governance... or government? Policy and Politics, 29 (2), 193 - 208.
11. Keck, M., & Sikkink, A. (1998). Activists beyond borders. Advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
12. Kettnaker, V. (2001). The European conflict over genetically engineered crops, 1995-1997. In D. Imig & S. Tarrow (Eds.), Contentious Europeans (pp. 205 - 230). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
13. Khagram, S. (2000). Toward democratic governance for sustainable development: Transnational civil society organizing around big dams. In A. Florini (Ed.), The third force. The rise of transnational civil society (pp. 83 - 114). Tokyo: Japan Center for International Exchange.
14. Kitschelt, H. (1986). Political opportunity structures and political protest: Anti-nuclear movements in four democracies. British Journal of Political Science, 16, 57 - 85.
15. Korten, D. (1998). Do corporations rule the world? And does it matter? Organization & Environment, 11 (4), 389 - 389.
16. Kriesi, H., et al. (1992). New social movements and political opportunities in Western Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 22 (2), 219 - 244.
17. Kriesi, H., et al. (1995). Social movements inWestern Europe. A comparative analysis. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
18. Marchak, M. (1998). Environment and resource protection: Does NAFTA make a difference? Organization & Environment, 11 (2), 133 - 154.
19. Marks, G., & McAdam, D. (1999). On the relationship of political opportunities to the forms of collective action: The case of the European Union. In D. Della Porta, H. Kriesi, & D. Rucht (Eds.), Social movements in a globalizing world (pp. 97 - 111). Houndmills: Macmillan.
20. Mason, M. (2004). Representing transnational environmental interests: New opportunities for non-governmental organisation access within theWorld Trade Organisation? Environmental Politics, 13 (3), 566 - 589.
21. Mazey, S., & Richardson, J. (1993). Interest groups in the European community. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Pressure groups (pp. 191 - 213). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22. McAdam, D. (1996). Conceptual origins, current problems, future directions. In D. McAdam, J. McCarthy, & M. Zald (Eds.), Comparative perspectives on social movements (pp. 23 - 40). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. McCarthy, J., & Zald, M. (1977). Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American Journal of Sociology, 82 (6), 1212 - 1241.
24. Passy, F. (1999). Supranational political opportunities as a channel of globalization of political conflicts. The case of the rights of indigenous peoples. In D. Della Porta, H. Kriesi, & D. Rucht (Eds.), Social movements in a globalizing world (pp. 14 - 169). Houndmills: Macmillan.
25. Porter, G., Brown, J., & Chasek, P. (2000). Global environmental politics. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
26. Rucht, D. (1997). Limits to mobilization. Environmental policy for the European Union. In J. Smith, C. Chatfield, & R. Pagnucco (Eds.), Transnational social movements and global politics (pp. 195 - 213). Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
27. Rucht, D. (2001). Lobbying or protest? Strategies to influence EU environmental policies. In D. Imig & S. Tarrow (Eds.), Contentious Europeans (pp. 125 - 142). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
28. Sbragia, A. (2000). Environmental policy. In H. Wallace & W. Wallace (Eds.), Policy-making in the European Union (pp. 293 - 316). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29. Smith, J. (1999). Global politics and transnational social movement strategies. In D. Della Porta, H. Kriesi, & D. Rucht (Eds.), Social movements in a globalizing world (pp. 170 - 188). New York: St. Martin's Press.
30. Smith, J. (2002). Globalizing resistance: The battle of Seattle and the future of social movements. In J. Smith & H. Johnston (Eds.), Globalization and resistance (pp. 207 - 227). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
31. Tamiotti, L., & Finger, M. (2001). Environmental organizations: Changing roles and functions in global politics. Global Environmental Politics, 1 (1), 56 - 76.
32. Tarrow, S. (1994). Power in movement. Social movements. Collective action and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33. van der Heijden, H. A. (1997). Political opportunity structure and the institutionalisation of the environmental movement. Environmental Politics, 6 (4), 25 - 50.
34. van der Heijden, H. A. (2002). Political parties and NGOs in global environmental politics. International Political Science Review, 23 (2), 187 - 201.
35. Wade, R. (2004). The World Bank and the environment. In M. Boas & D. McNeill (Eds.), Global institutions and development (pp. 72 - 94). London: Routledge.
36. Wallace, H., & Wallace, W. (2000). Policy-making in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37. Wapner, P. (2002). Horizontal politics: Transnational environmental activism and global cultural change. Global Environmental Politics, 2 (2), 37 - 62.
38. Webster, R. (1998). Environmental collective action: Stable patterns of cooperation and issue alliances at the European level. In J. Greenwood & M. Aspinwall (Eds.), Collective action in the European Union (pp. 176 - 195). London: Routledge.
39. Williams, M., & Ford, L. (1999). The World Trade Organization, social movements and global environmental management. Environmental Politics, 8 (1), 268 - 289.
40. Wissenburg, M. (2004). Globotopia - The antiglobalization movement and utopianism. Organization & Environment, 17 (4), 493 - 508.
41. World Bank Group. (2003). Working for a world free of poverty. New York: World Bank.
42. Wright, B. (2000). Environmental NGOsand the dolphin-tuna case. Environmental Politics, 9 (4), 82 - 103.
43. Zito, A. (2000). Creating environmental policy in the European Union. Houndmills: Macmillan.