Theoretical Directions for Studying Family Ties and Aging

Handbook of Families and Aging, Second Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 35-60

  Connidis, Ingrid Arnet ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84911893725     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (80)

1. Allen, K. R., Lloyd, S. A., & Few, A. L. (2009). Reclaiming feminist theory, method, and praxis for family studies. In S. A. Lloyd, A. L. Few, & K. R. Allen (Eds.), Handbook of feminist family studies (pp. 3-17). Los Angeles: Sage.
2. Allen, K. R., & Walker, A. J. (2009). Theorizing about families and aging from a feminist perspective. In V. L. Bengtson, M. Silverstein, N. M. Putney, & D. Gans (Eds.), Handbook of theories on aging (pp. 517-528). New York: Springer.
3. Arber, S., Davidson, K. & Ginn, J. (2003). Changing approaches to gender and later life. In S. Arber, K. Davidson, & J. Ginn (Eds.), Gender and ageing: Changing roles and relationships (pp. 1-14). Philadelphia: Open University Press.
4. Archer, M. S. (2007). Making our way through the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Baars, J., Dannefer, D., Phillipson, C., & Walker, A. (2006). Introduction: Critical perspectives in social gerontology. In J. Baars, D. Dannefer, C. Phillipson, & A.Walker (Eds.), Aging, globalization, and inequality: The new critical gerontology (pp. 1-14). Amityville, NY: Baywood.
6. Baber, K. M. (2009). Postmodern feminist perspectives and families. In S. A. Lloyd, A. L. Few, & K. R. Allen (Eds.), Handbook of feminist family studies (pp. 56-68). Los Angeles: Sage.
7. Bedford, V. H. (1989). Sibling ambivalence in adulthood. Journal of Family Issues, 10, 211-224.
8. Bell, J. M., & Hartmann, D. (2007). Diversity in everyday discourse: The cultural ambiguities and consequences of “happy talk.” American Sociological Review, 72, 895-914.
9. Bengtson, V., Giarrusso, R., Mabry, J. B., & Silverstein, M. (2002). Solidarity, conflict, and ambivalence: Complementary or competing perspectives on intergenerational relationships? Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 568-576.
10. Burr, J. A., & Mutchler, J. E. (2007). Employment in later life: A focus on race/ethnicity and gender. Generations, 31, 37-44.
11. Calasanti, T. M. (2004). Feminist gerontology and old men. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 59B, S305-S314.
12. Calasanti, T. M., & Slevin, K. F. (2001). Gender, social inequalities, and aging. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
13. Calasanti, T. M., & Slevin, K. F. (2006). Aging matters: Realigning feminist thinking. New York: Routledge.
14. Cohler, B. J. (2004). The experience of ambivalence within the family: Young adults ‘coming out’ gay or lesbian and their parents. In K. Pillemer & K. Lüscher (Eds.), Intergenerational ambivalences: New perspectives on parent-child relations in later life (pp. 255-284). New York: Elsevier.
15. Collins, P. H. (1990). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
16. Collins, P. H. (2000). It’s all in the family: Intersections of gender, race, and nation. In U. Narayan & S. Harding (Eds.), Decentering the center: Philosophy for a multicultural, postcolonial, and feminist world (pp. 156-176). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
17. Connidis, I. A. (2003a). Bringing outsiders in: Gay and lesbian family ties over the life course. In S. Arber, K. Davidson, & J. Ginn (Eds.), Gender and ageing: Changing roles and relationships (pp. 79-94). Philadelphia: Open University Press.
18. Connidis, I. A. (2003b). Divorce and union dissolution: Reverberations over three generations. Canadian Journal on Aging, 22, 353-368.
19. Connidis, I. A. (2007). Negotiating inequality among adult siblings: Two case studies. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 482-499.
20. Connidis, I. A. (2010). Family ties & aging (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: Pine Forge Press.
21. Connidis, I. A., & McMullin, J. A. (2002a). Sociological ambivalence and family ties: A critical perspective. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 558-567.
22. Connidis, I. A., & McMullin, J. A. (2002b). Ambivalence, family ties, and doing sociology. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 594-601.
23. Connidis, I. A., & Walker, A. J. (2009). (Re)Visioning gender, age, and aging in families. In S. A. Lloyd, A. L. Few, K. R. Allen (Eds.), Handbook of feminist family studies (pp. 147-159). Los Angeles: Sage.
24. Cooke, M. (2006). Policy changes and the labour force participation of older workers: Evidence from six countries. Canadian Journal on Aging, 25, 387-400.
25. Cumming, E., & Henry, W. E. (1961). Growing old: The process of disengagement. New York: Basic Books.
26. Curran, S. R. (2002). Agency, accountability, and embedded relations: What’s love got to do with it? Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 577-584.
27. Dannefer, D. (2003). Cumulative advantage/disadvantage and the life course: Crossfertilizing age and social science theory. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 58B, S327-S337.
28. Elder, G. H., Jr. (1991). Lives and social change. In W. R. Heinz (Ed.), Theoretical advances in life course research (pp. 58-85). Weinham: Deutscher Studies Verlag.
29. Elder, G. H., Jr. (2009). Perspectives on the life course. In W. R. Heinz, J. Huinink, & A. Weymann (Eds.), The life course reader: Individuals and societies across time (pp. 91-110). Frankfurt/New York: Campus Verlag.
30. Elder, G. H., Jr., & Johnson, M. K. (2003). The life course and aging: Challenges, lessons, and new directions. In R. Settersten, Jr. (Ed.), Invitation to the life course: Toward new understandings of later life (pp. 49-81). Amityville, NY: Baywood.
31. Estes, C. L., Biggs, S., & Phillipson, C. (2003). Social theory, social policy, and ageing: A critical introduction. Berkshire, England: Open University Press.
32. Fingerman, K. L., Hay, E. L., & Birditt, K. S. (2004). The best of ties, the worst of ties: Close, problematic, and ambivalent social relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 792-808.
33. George, L. K. (2003). Life course research: Achievements and potential. In J. T. Mortimer & M. J. Shanahan (Eds.), Handbook of the life course (pp. 671-680). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
34. Hagestad, G. O. (2009). Interdependent lives and relationships in changing times: A life-course view of families and aging. In W. R. Heinz, J. Huinink, & A. Weymann (Eds.), The life course reader: Individuals and societies across time (pp. 397-415). Frankfurt and New York: Campus Verlag.
35. Hagestad, G. O., & Dannefer, D. (2001). Concepts and theories of aging: Beyond microfication in social science approaches. In R. H. Binstock & L. K. George (Eds.), Handbook of aging and the social sciences, (5th ed., pp. 3-21). New York: Academic Press.
36. Hatch, L. R. (2000). Beyond gender differences: Adaptation to aging in life course perspective. Amityville, NY: Baywood.
37. Heinz, W. R. (2001). Work and the life course: A cosmopolitan-local perspective. In V. W. Marshall, W. R. Heinz, H. Kruger, & A. Verma (Eds.), Restructuring work and the life course (pp. 3-22). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
38. Heinz, W. R., Huinink, J., Swader, C. S., & Weymann, A. (2009). General introduction. In W. R. Heinz, J. Huinink, & A. Weymann (Eds.), The life course reader: Individuals and societies across time (pp. 15-30). Frankfurt and New York: Campus Verlag.
39. Henretta, J. C. (2001). Work and retirement. In R. H. Binstock and L. K. George (Eds.), Handbook of aging and the social sciences (5th ed., pp. 255-271). New York: Academic Press.
40. Huinink, J., & Feldhaus, M. (2009). Family research from the life course perspective. International Sociology, 24, 299-324.
41. Katz, R., Lowenstein, A., Phillips, J., & Daatland, S. O. (2005). Theorizing intergenerational family relations: Solidarity, conflict, and ambivalence in cross-national contexts. In V. L. Bengtson, A. C. Acock, K. R. Allen, P. Dilworth-Anderson, & D. M. Klein (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theory and research (pp. 393-407). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42. Katz, S. (2005). Cultural aging: Life course, life style, and senior worlds. Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press.
43. Lettke, F., & Klein, D. M. (2004). Methodological issues in assessing ambivalences in intergenerational relations. In K. Pillemer & K. Lüscher (Eds.), Intergenerational ambivalences: New perspectives on parent-child relations in later life (pp. 85-113). New York: Elsevier.
44. Lüscher, K. (2002). Intergenerational ambivalence: Further steps in theory and research. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 585-593.
45. Lüscher, K. (2004). Conceptualizing and uncovering intergenerational ambivalence. In K. Pillemer & K. Lüscher (Eds.), Intergenerational ambivalences: New perspectives on parent-child relations in later life (pp. 23-62). New York: Elsevier.
46. Lüscher, K., & Pillemer, K. (1998). Intergenerational ambivalence: A new approach to the study of parent-child relations in later life. Journal of Marriage and Family, 60, 413-425.
47. Mandell, N., Wilson, S., & Duffy, A. Connection, compromise, and control: Canadian women discuss midlife. Don Mills, Ontario: Oxford University Press.
48. Marshall, V. W. (2009). Theory informing public policy: The life course perspective as a policy tool. In V. L. Bengtson, M. Silverstein, N. M. Putney, & D. Gans (Eds.), Handbook of theories on aging (pp. 573-593). New York: Springer.
49. Marshall, V. W., & Mueller, M. M. (2003). Theoretical roots of the life course perspective. In W. R. Heinz & V. W. Marshall (Eds.), Social dynamics of the life course (pp. 3-32). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
50. Marshall, V. W., Matthews, S. H., & Rosenthal, C. R. (1993). Elusiveness of family life: A challenge for the sociology of aging. In G. L. Maddox & M. Powell Lawton (Eds.), Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 13, 37-92. New York: Springer.
51. Marshall, V. W., & Tindale, J. (1978-79). Notes for a radical gerontology. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 9, 163-175.
52. Mayer, K. U. (2009). New directions in life course research. American Review of Sociology, 35, 413-433.
53. McMullin, J. A. (2000). Diversity and the state of sociological aging theory. The Gerontologist, 40, 517-530.
54. McMullin, J. A. (2010). Understanding social inequality (2nd ed.). Don Mills, Ontario: Oxford University Press.
55. Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science: The reward and communications systems of science. Science, 199, 55-63.
56. Michaels, W. B. (2006). The trouble with diversity: How we learned to love identity and ignore inequality. New York: Metropolitan Books.
57. Moen, P., & Coltrane, S. (2005). Families, theories, and social policy. In V. L. Bengtson, A. C. Acock, K. R. Allen, P. Dilworth-Anderson, & D. M. Klein (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theory and research (pp. 543-556). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
58. O’Rand, A. M. (2006). Stratification and the life course: Life course capital, life course risks, and social inequality. In R. H. Binstock & L. K. George (Eds.), Handbook of aging and the social sciences (6th ed., pp. 145-162). San Diego: Elsevier.
59. Peters, A., & Liefbroer, A. C. (1997). Beyond marital status: Partner history and wellbeing in old age. Journal of Marriage and Family, 59, 687-699.
60. Peters, C. L., Hooker, K., &. Zvonkovic, A. M. (2006). Older parents’ perceptions of ambivalence in relationships with their children. Family Relations, 55, 539-551.
61. Pfohl, S. J. (1985). Images of deviance and social control: A sociological history. New York: McGraw-Hill.
62. Pillemer, K. (2004). Can’t live with ‘em, can’t live without ‘em: Older mothers’ ambivalence toward their adult children. In K. Pillemer & K. Lüscher (Eds.), Intergenerational ambivalences: New perspectives on parent-child relations in later life (pp. 115-132). New York: Elsevier.
63. Pillemer, K., & Lüscher, K. (Eds.). (2004). Intergenerational ambivalences: New perspectives on parent-child relations in later life. New York: Elsevier.
64. Pillemer, K., & Suitor, J. J. (2008). Collective ambivalence: Considering new approaches to the complexity of intergenerational relations. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 63B, S394-S396.
65. Pillemer, K., Suitor, J. J., Mock, S. E., Sabir, M., Pardo, T., & Sechrist, J. (2007). Capturing the complexity of intergenerational relations: Exploring ambivalence within later-life families. Journal of Social Issues, 63, 1-16.
66. Powell, J. L. (2006). Social theory and aging. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
67. Ray, R. E. (2006). The personal as political: The legacy of Betty Friedan. In T. M. Calasanti & K. F. Slevin (Eds.), Aging matters: Realigning feminist thinking (pp. 21-45). New York: Routledge.
68. Sarkisian, N. (2006). “Doing family ambivalence”: Nuclear and extended families in single mothers’ lives. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 804-811.
69. Scanzoni, J., & Marsiglio, W. (1993). New action theory and contemporary families. Journal of Family Issues, 1, 105-132.
70. Schellenberg, G., Turcotte, M., & Ram, B. (2005). Post-retirement employment. Perspectives, 6, 14-17. Ottawa, Ontario: Statistics Canada.
71. Settersten, R. A., Jr. (2003). Propositions and controversies in life-course scholarship. In R. A. Settersten Jr. (Ed.), Invitation to the life course: Toward new understandings of later life (pp. 15-45). Amityville, NY: Baywood.
72. Settersten, R. A., Jr. (2006). Aging and the life course. In R. H. Binstock & L. K. George (Eds.), Handbook of aging and the social sciences (pp. 3-19). Burlington, MA: Elsevier.
73. Settersten, R. A., Jr., & Mayer, K. U. (1997). The measurement of age, age structuring, and the life course. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 233-61.
74. Street, D., & Connidis, I. A. (2001). Creeping selectivity in women’s pensions. In J. Ginn, D. Street, & S. Arber (Eds.), Women, work and pensions: International issues and prospects (pp. 158-178). Philadelphia: Open University Press.
75. Van Gaalen, R. I., & Dykstra, P. A. (2006). Solidarity and conflict between adult children and parents: A latent class analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 947-960.
76. Walker, A. J. (2009). A feminist critique of family studies. In S. A. Lloyd, A. L. Few, & K. R. Allen (Eds.), Handbook of feminist family studies (pp. 18-27). Los Angeles: Sage.
77. Ward, R. A. (2008). Multiple parent-adult child relations and well-being in middle and later life. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 61B, S239-S247.
78. Ward, R. A., Deane, G., & Spitze, G. (2008). Ambivalence about ambivalence: Reply to Pillemer and Suitor. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 63B, S397-S398.
79. White, J. M., & Klein, D. M. (2008). Family theories (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.
80. Willson, A. E., Shuey, K. M., & Elder, G. H., Jr. (2003). Ambivalence in the relationship of adult children to aging parents and in-laws. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 1055-1072.