Postmodern feminist perspectives and families

Handbook of Feminist Family Studies

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 56-68

  Baber, Kristine M ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE   (United States)

^b UNH Center on Adolescence   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80455171878     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781412982801.n5     Document Type: Chapter

References (65)

1. Allen, K. R. A conscious and inclusive family studies. Journal of Marriage and the Family 62 4-17. (2000).
2. Allen, K. R. (2005). Pushing the boundaries of the sourcebook. In V. L. Bengtson, A. C. Acock, K. R. Allen, P. Dilworth-Anderson, & D. M. Klein (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theory and research (pp. 628-629). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3. Allen, K. R., Baber, K. M. Ethical and epistemological tensions in applying a postmodern perspective to feminist research. Psychology of Women Quarterly 16 1-15. (1992). doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1992.tb00236.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1992.tb00236.x
4. Baber, K. M. (1994). Studying women's sexualities: Feminist transformations. In L. Leslie & D. Sollie (Eds.), Feminism and the study of family and close relationships: Conceptual and methodological issues in current research (pp. 50-73). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5. Baber, K. M. (2000). Women's sexualities. In M. Biaggio & M. Hersen (Eds.), Issues in the psychology of women: An introductory text (pp. 145-171). New York: Plenum Press.
6. Baber, K. M. (2005). Integrating youth into our feminist theory, research, and practice. In V. L. Bengtson, A. C. Acock, K. R. Allen, P. Dilworth-Anderson, & D. M. Klein (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theory and research (pp. 463-465). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781412990172 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412990172
7. Baber, K. M., & Allen, K. R. (1992). Women and families: Feminist reconstructions. New York: Guilford Press.
8. Baber, K. M., Murray, C. I. A postmodern feminist approach to teaching human sexuality. Family Relations 50 23-33. (2001). doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2001.00023.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2001.00023.x
9. Baber, K. M., Tucker, C. J. The social roles questionnaire: A new approach to measuring attitudes about gender. Sex Roles 54 359-367. (2006).
10. Bamshad, M. J., Olson, S. E. Does race exist? Scientific American 289(6)78-85. (2003, December). doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1203-78 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican1203-78
11. Bengtson, V. L., Allen, K. R., Klein, D. M., Dilworth-Anderson, P., & Acock, A. C. (2005a). Controversies and firestorms. In V. L. Bengtson, A. C. Acock, K. R. Allen, P. Dilworth-Anderson, & D. M. Klein (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theory and research (pp. 613-630). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781412990172 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412990172
12. Bengtson, V. L., Acock, A. C., Allen, K. R., Dilworth-Anderson, P., & Klein, D. M. (Eds.). (2005b). Sourcebook of family theory and research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781412990172 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412990172
13. Blume, L. B., Blume, T. W. Toward a dialectical model of family gender discourse: Body, identity, and sexuality. Journal of Marriage and Family 65 785-794. (2003). doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.00785.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.00785.x
14. Bohan, J. S. Sex differences and/in the self: Classic themes, feminist variations, postmodern challenges. Psychology of Women Quarterly 26 74-88. (2002). doi:10.1111/1471-6402.00045 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-6402.00045
15. Bordo, S. (1990). Feminism, postmodernism, and gender-scepticism. In L. J. Nicholson (Ed.), Feminism/postmodernism (pp. 133-156). New York: Routledge.
16. Butler, J. (2004). Undoing gender. New York: Routledge.
17. Collins, P. H. (1998). Fighting words: Black women and the search for justice. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
18. Crawford, M., Kimmel, E. Promoting methodological diversity in feminist research. Psychology of Women Quarterly 23 1-6. (1999). doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1999.tb00337.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1999.tb00337.x
19. De Reus, L. A., Few, A., & Blume, L. B. (2005). Multicultural and critical race feminisms: Theorizing families in the third wave. In V. L. Bengtson, A. C. Acock, K. R. Allen, P. Dilworth-Anderson, & D. M. Klein (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theory and research (pp. 447-468). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. Diamond, L. M. (2006). Rethinking positive female adolescent sexual development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
21. DiPalma, C., & Ferguson, K. E. (2006). Clearing ground and making connections: Modernism, postmodernism, feminism. In K. Davis, M. Evans, & J. Lorber (Eds.), Handbook of gender and women's studies (pp. 127-145). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781848608023 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781848608023
22. Erkut, S., Fields, J. P., Sing, R., & Marx, F. (1996). Diversity in girls’ experiences: Feeling good about who you are. In B. J. R. Leadbeater & N. Way (Eds.), Urban girls: Resisting stereotypes, creating identities (pp. 53-63). New York: New York University Press.
23. Fenstermaker, S., & West, C. (2002). Doing gender, doing difference. New York: Routledge.
24. Few, A. L., Stephens, D. P., Rouse-Arnett, M. Sister-to-sister talk: Transcending boundaries and challenges in qualitative research with Black women. Family Relations 52 205-215. (2003). doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2003.00205.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2003.00205.x
25. Flax, J. Postmodernism and gender relations in feminist theory. Signs 12 621-643. (1987). doi:10.1086/494359 http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/494359
26. Flax, J. (1990). Thinking fragments: Psychoanalysis, feminism, and postmodernism in the contemporary West. Berkeley: University of California Press.
27. Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality: An introduction (Vol. 1). New York: Vintage Books.
28. Frankenberg, R. (1993). White women, race matters: The social construction of whiteness. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
29. Fraser, N., & Nicholson, L. J. (1990). Social criticism without philosophy: An encounter between feminism and postmodernism. Feminism/postmodernism (pp. 19-38). New York: Routledge.
30. Gannon, S., & Davies, B. (2007). Postmodern, poststructural, and critical theories. In S. N. Hesse-Biber (Ed.), Handbook of feminist research: Theory and praxis (pp. 71-106). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31. Gavey, N. (1993). Technologies and effects of heterosexual coercion. In S. Wilkinson & C. Kitzinger (Eds.), Heterosexuality (pp. 93-119). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
32. Harding, J. (1998). Sex acts: Practices of masculinity and femininity. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33. Harding, S. (1987). Introduction: Is there a feminist method? In S. Harding (Ed.), Feminism & methodology: Social science issues (pp. 1-14). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
34. Harding, S. (2004). The feminist standpoint theory reader: Intellectual & political controversies. New York: Routledge.
35. Hare-Mustin, R. T., & Marecek, J. (1990). Gender and the meaning of difference: Postmodernism and psychology. In R. T. Hare-Mustin & J. Marecek (Eds.), Making a difference: Psychology and the construction of gender (pp. 22-64). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
36. Hawkesworth, M. Knowers, knowing, known: Feminist theories and claims of truth. Signs 14 533-557. (1989). doi:10.1086/494523 http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/494523
37. Hawkesworth, M. (2007). Truth and truths in feminist knowledge production. In S. N. Hesse-Biber (Ed.), Handbook of feminist research: Theory and praxis (pp. 469-491). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38. Hill, S. A. (2005). Black intimacies: A gender perspective on families and relationships. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
39. Hirschmann, N. J. (2004). Feminist standpoint as postmodern strategy. In S. Harding (Ed.), The feminist standpoint theory reader: Intellectual & political controversies (pp. 317-332). New York: Routledge.
40. Ingoldsby, B. B., Smith, S. R., & Miller, J. E. (2004). Exploring family theories. Los Angeles: Roxbury.
41. Johnson, A. G. (1997). The gender knot: Unraveling our patriarchal legacy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
42. Johnson-Odim, C. (2001). Who's to navigate and who's to steer? A consideration of the role of theory in feminist struggle. In M. deKoven (Ed.), Feminist locations: Global and local, theory and practice (pp. 110-126). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
43. Kimmel, M. (2000). The gendered society. New York: Oxford University Press.
44. Knapp, S. J., & Williams, C. (2005). Where does queer theory take us? In V. L. Bengtson, A. C. Acock, K. R. Allen, P. Dilworth-Anderson, & D. M. Klein (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theory and research (pp. 626-628). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
45. Knudson-Martin, C., Laughlin, M. J. Gender and sexual orientation in family therapy: Toward a postgender approach. Family Relations 54 101-115. (2005). doi:10.1111/j.0197-6664.2005.00009.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0197-6664.2005.00009.x
46. Lather, P. (1991). Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern. New York: Routledge.
47. Lazreg, M. (2001). Decolonizing feminism. In K. K. Bhavnani (Ed.), Feminism and racism (pp. 281-293). New York: Oxford University Press.
48. Lorber, J. (2001). Gender inequality: Feminist theories and politics. Los Angeles: Roxbury.
49. Lorber, J. (2006). A world without gender. In K. Davis, M. Evans, & J. Lorber (Eds.), Handbook of gender and women's studies (pp. 469-474). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781848608023 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781848608023
50. Lott, B. Cognitive and behavioral distancing from the poor. American Psychologist 57 100-110. (2002). doi:10.1037/0003-066X.57.2.100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.57.2.100
51. Martin, J. R. (2000). Coming of age in academe: Rekindling women's hopes and reforming the academy. New York: Routledge.
52. Maynard, M. (2001). "Race," gender and the concept of "difference" in feminist thought. In K. K. Bhavnani (Ed.), Feminism and racism (pp. 121-133). New York: Oxford University Press.
53. McKenna, W., & Kessler, S. (2006). Transgendering: Blurring the boundaries of gender. In K. Davis, M. Evans, & J. Lorber (Eds.), Handbook of gender and women's studies (pp. 342-353). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781848608023 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781848608023
54. Oswald, R. F., Blume, L. B., & Marks, S. R. (2005). Decentering heteronormativity: A model for family studies. In V. L. Bengtson, A. C. Acock, K. R. Allen, P. Dilworth-Anderson, & D. M. Klein (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theory and research (pp. 143-165). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781412990172 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412990172
55. Parpart, J. L., & Marchand, M. H. (2001). Exploding the canon. In K. K. Bhavnani (Ed.), Feminism and racism (pp. 516-534). New York: Oxford University Press.
56. Risman, B. J. Microstructural perspective: Men who mother. Gender & Society 1 6-32. (1987). doi:10.1177/089124387001001002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/089124387001001002
57. Rosser, S. V. (2007). The link between theory and methods. In S. N. Hesse-Biber (Ed.), Handbook of feminist research: Theory and praxis (pp. 223-256). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
58. Savin-Williams, R. C. (2005). The new gay teenager. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
59. Scott, J. W. (1994). Deconstructing equality-versus-difference: or, the uses of poststructuralist theory for feminism. In S. Seidman (Ed.), Social postmodernism: Beyond identity politics (pp. 282-298). New York: Cambridge University Press.
60. Stotko, E. M., Troyer, M. A new gender-neutral pronoun in Baltimore, Maryland: A preliminary study. American Speech 82 262-279. (2007). doi:10.1215/00031283-2007-012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00031283-2007-012
61. Tatum, B. D. (1997). "Why are all the Black kids sitting together in the cafeteria?"and other conversations about race. New York: Basic Books.
62. Walker, R. (1995). To be real. New York: Random House.
63. West, C., Zimmerman, D. Doing gender. Gender & Society 1 125-151. (1987). doi:10.1177/0891243287001002002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0891243287001002002
64. White, J. M., & Klein, D. M. (2007). Family theories (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
65. Willetts, M. A. An exploratory investigation of heterosexual licensed domestic partners. Journal of Marriage and Family 65 939-952. (2003). doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.00939.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.00939.x