Knowing and arguing in a panel debate: Speaker roles and responsivity to others

Educational Dialogues: Understanding and Promoting Productive interaction

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 13-30

  Åberg, Mikaela ^a   Mäkitalo, Åsa ^a   Säljö, Roger ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84911212143     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203863510     Document Type: Chapter

References (29)

1. Aufschnaiter, C., Erduran, S., Osborne, J. and Simon, S. (2008) 'Arguing to learn and learning to argue: case studies of how students argumentation relates to their scientific knowledge', Journal of Research in Science Education, 45:101-31.
2. Baker, M.J., Quignard, M., Lund, K. and Séjourné, A. (2003) 'Computer-supported collaborative learning in the space of debate', in B. Wasson, S. Ludvigsen and U. Hoppe (eds) Designing for Change in Networked Learning Environments: proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning 2003, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
3. Bakhtin, M. M. (1986) Speech Genres and Other Late Essays, Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
4. Bazerman, C. (1988) Shaping Written Knowledge: the genre and activity of the experimental article in science, Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
5. Bazerman, C. (1994) Constructing Experience, Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.
6. Bergqvist, K. and Säljö, R. (2004) 'Learning to plan: a study of reflexivity and discipline in modern pedagogy', in J. L. van der Linden and P. Renshaw (eds) Dialogic Learning:shifting perspectives to learning, instruction, and teaching, New York, NY: Kluwer.
7. Billig, M. (1996) Arguing and Thinking: a rhetorical approach to social psychology (2nd edn), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Cho, K. L. and Jonassen, D. H. (2002) 'The effects of argumentation scaffolds on argumentation and problem solving', Educational Technology Research and Development, 50:5-22.
9. Clark, D. and Sampson, V. (2008) 'Assessing dialogic argumentation in online environments to relate structure, grounds, and conceptual quality', Journal of Research in Science Education, 45:293-321.
10. Driver, R., Newton, P. and Osborne, J. (2000) 'Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms', Science Education, 84:287-312.
11. Edwards, D. and Mercer, N. (1987) Common Knowledge: the development of understanding in the classroom, London: Methuen.
12. Erduran, S., Simon, S. and Osborne, J. (2004) 'TAPping into argumentation: developments in the application of Toulmin's Argument Pattern for studying science discourse', Science Education, 88:915-33.
13. Furberg, A. and Ludvigsen, S. (2008) 'Students' meaning making of socioscientific issues in computer mediated settings: exploring learning through interaction trajectories', International Journal of Science Education, 30:1775-99.
14. Heath, C. and Hindmarsh, J. (2002) 'Analysing interaction: video, ethnography and situated conduct', in T. May (ed.) Qualitative Research in Practice, London: Sage.
15. Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., Bugallo Rodríguez, A. and Duschl, R. A. (2000) '"Doing the lesson" or "doing science": argument in high school genetics', Science Education, 84:757-92.
16. Jordan, B. and Henderson, A. (1995) 'Interaction analysis: foundations and practice', The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4:39-103.
17. Kolstø, S. D. (2001) 'Scientific literacy for citizenship: tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues', Science Education, 85:291-310.
18. Linell, P. (1998) Approaching Dialogue: talk, interaction and contexts in dialogical perspectives, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
19. Mäkitalo, Å., Jakobsson, A. and Säljö, R. (2009) 'Learning to reason in the context of socioscientific problems: exploring the demands on students in "new" classroom activites', in K. Kumpulainen, C. Hmelo-Silver and M. Cesar (eds) Investigating Classroom Interaction: methodologies in action, London: Sense Publishers.
20. Mercer, N. (2004) 'Sociocultural discourse analysis: analysing classroom talk as a social mode of thinking', Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1:137-68.
21. Mercer, N. and Littleton, K. (2007) Dialogue and the Development of Children's Thinking:a sociocultural approach, London: Routledge.
22. Mercer, N. and Wegerif, R. (1999) 'Is "exploratory talk" productive talk?', in K. Littleton and P. Light (eds) Learning with Computers: analysing productive interaction, London:Routledge.
23. Michaels, S., O'Connor, C. and Resnick, L. (2008) 'Deliberative discourse idealized and realized: accountable talk in the classroom and in civic life', Studies in Philosophy and Education, 27:283-97.
24. Nagel, N. (2001) Learning through Real-World Problem Solving: the power of integrative teaching, Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
25. Osborne, J., Erduran, S. and Simon, S. (2004) 'Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science', Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41:994-1020.
26. Potter, J. (1996) Representing Reality: discourse, rhetoric and social construction, London:Sage.
27. Resnick, L. (1999) 'Making America smarter', Education Week Century Series, 18:38-40. Available online at: http://ifl.lrdc.pitt.edu/ifl/media/pdf/MakingAmericaSmarter.pdf (accessed 17 February 2009).
28. Simon, S., Erduran, S. and Osborne, J. (2006) 'Learning to teach argumentation: research and development in the science classroom', International Journal of Science Education, 28:235-60.
29. Toulmin, S. (1958) The Uses of Argument, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.