Uncemented femoral revision arthroplasty using a modular tapered, fluted titanium stem: 5- to 16-year results of 163 cases

Acta Orthopaedica

Volumn 85, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 562-569

  Wirtz, Dieter C ^a   Gravius, Sascha ^a   Ascherl, Rudolf ^b   Thorweihe, Miguel ^a   Forst, Raimund ^d   Noeth, Ulrich ^c   Maus, Uwe M ^e   Wimmer, Matthias D ^a   Zeiler, Günther ^f   Deml, Moritz C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL BONN   (Germany)

^b Zeisigwald Clinics Bethanien   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ERLANGEN   (Germany)

^e PIUS HOSPITAL   (Germany)

^f Orthopedic Hospital Rummelsberg   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TITANIUM;

ADULT; ADVERSE EFFECTS; AGED; CEMENTATION; DEVICE FAILURE ANALYSIS; DEVICES; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HIP PROSTHESIS; HIP REPLACEMENT; HUMAN; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROCEDURES; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; CEMENTATION; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TITANIUM;

EID: 84911110732     PISSN: 17453674     EISSN: 17453682     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/17453674.2014.958809     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Altman D G, Machin D, Bryant T N, Gardner M J. Statistics with Confidence: Confidence Intervals and Statistical Guidelines, 2nd edition. British Medical Journal, Wiley 2000.
2. Berry D J. Femoral revision: distal fixation with fluted, tapered grit-blasted stems. J Arthroplast 2002; 17: 142-6.
3. Böhm P, Bischel O. Femoral revision with the Wagner SL revision stem: evaluation of one hundred and twenty-nine revisions followed for a mean of 4.8 years. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2001; 83: 1023-31.
4. Charnley J. The long-term results of low-friction arthroplasty of the hip performed as a primary intervention. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1972; 54: 61-76.
5. Dohmae Y, Bechthold J E, Sherman R E, Puno R M, Gustilo R B. Reduction in cement-bone interface shear strength between primary and revision arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1988; (36): 214-20.
6. Engh C A, Massin P, Suthers K E. Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral components. Clin Orthop 1990; (257): 107-28.
7. Engh CA Jr, Ellis TJ, Koralewicz LM, McAuley JP, Engh CA Sr. Extensively porous-coated femoral revision for severe femoral bone loss: minimum 10-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 2002; 17: 955-960.
8. Fink B, Grossmann A, Schubring S, Schulz M S, Fuerst M. Short-term results of hip revisions with a curved cementless modular stem in association with the surgical approach. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2009; 129 (1): 65-73.
9. Franklin J, Malchau H. Risk factors for periprosthetic femoral fracture. Injury 2007; 38 (6): 655-60.
10. Gravius S, Mumme T, Andereya S, Maus U, Müller-Rath R, Wirtz D C. The morse taper junction in modular revision hip replacement. Z Orthop Unfall 2007; 145 (2): 157-60.
11. Gravius S, Randau T, Wirtz D C. What can be done when hip prostheses fail? New trends in revision endoprosthetics. Orthopade 2011; 40 (12): 1084-94.
12. Grunig R, Morscher E, Ochsner P E. Three- to 7-year results with the uncemented SL femoral revision prosthesis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1997; 116 (4): 187-97.
13. Gutierrez Del Alamo J, Garcia-Cimbrelo E, Castellanos V, Gil-Garay E. Radiographic bone regeneration and clinical outcome with the Wagner SL revision stem: a 5-year to 12-year follow-up study. J Arthroplast 2007; 22: 515-24.
14. Head W C, Emerson R H Jr, Higgins L L. A titanium cementless calcar replacement prosthesis in revision surgery of the femur: 13-year experience. J Arthroplasty 2001; 16: 183-7.
15. Kavanagh B F, Fitzgerald R H Jr. Clinical and roentgenographic assessment of total hip arthroplasty. A new hip score. Clin Orthop 1985; (193): 133-40.
16. Kwong L M, Miller A J, Lubinus P. A modular distal fixation option for proximal bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty: a 2- to 6-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 2003; 18: 94-7.
17. Lie S A, Havelin L I, Furnes O N, Engesaeter L B, Vollset S E. Failure rates for 4762 revision total hip arthroplasties in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2004; 86 (4): 504-9.
18. Mumme T, Muller-Rath R, Weisskopf M, Andereya S, Neuss M, Wirtz D C. The cement-free modular revision prosthesis MRP-hip revision stem prosthesis in clinical follow-up. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 2004; 142: 314-21.
19. Mumme T, Muller-Rath R, Andereya S, Wirtz D C. Uncemented femoral revision arthroplasty using the modular revision prosthesis MRP-TITAN revision stem. Oper Orthop Traumatol 2007; 19: 56-77.
20. Pak J H, Paprosky W G, Jablonsky W S, Lawrence J M. Femoral strut allografts in cementless revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1993; (295): 172-8.
21. Paprosky W G, Lawrence J, Cameron H. Femoral defect classification: clinical application. Orthop Rev (Suppl 9) 1990; 19: 9-17.
22. Patel P D, Klika A K, Murray T G Elsharkawy K A, Krebs V E, Barsoum W K. Influence of technique with distally fixed modular stems in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2010; 25: 926-31.
23. Rader C P, Eulert J. Verankerungstechniken. In: Modulare Revisionsendoprothetik des Hüftgelenkes (eds Thümler P, Forst R, Zeiler G (Hrsg)). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York 2005.
24. Randhawa K, Hossain F S, Smith B, Mauffrey C, Lawrence T. A prospective study of hip revision surgery using the Exeter long-stem prosthesis: function, subsidence, and complications for 57 patients. J Orthop Traumatol 2009; 10: 159-65.
25. Retpen J B, Varmarken J E, Jensen J S. Survivorship analysis of failure pattern after revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1989; 4: 311-7.
26. Salvati E A, Liebermann J R, Huk O L, Evans B G. Complications of femoral and acetabular modularity. Clin Orthop 1995; (319): 85-93.
27. Schramm M, Wirtz D C, Holzwarth U, Pitto R P. The morse taper junction in modular revision hip replacement-a biomechanical and retrieval analysis. Biomed Technik 2000; 45: 105-9.
28. Stromberg C N, Herberts P A. Cemented revision total hip arthroplasties in patients younger than 55 years old. J Arthroplasty 1996; 11: 489-99.
29. Wagner H, Wagner M. Femur revision prosthesis. Z Orthop 1993; 131 (6): 574-7.
30. Warren P J, Thompson P, Fletcher M D. Transfemoral implantation of the Wagner SL stem. The abolition of subsidence and enhancement of osteotomy union rate using Dall-Miles cables. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2002; 122: 557-60.
31. Weber K L, Callaghan J J, Goetz D D, Johnston R C. Revision of a failed cemented total hip prosthesis with insertion of an acetabular component without cement and a femoral component with cement. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1996; 78: 982-94.
32. Weeden S H, Paprosky W G. Minimal 11-year follow-up of extensively porous-coated stems in femoral revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty (Suppl 1) 2002; 17 (4): 134-7.
33. Weiss R J, Stark A, Kärrholm J. A modular cementless stem vs. cemented long-stem prostheses in revision surgery of the hip: a population-based study from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 2011; 82 (2):136-42.
34. Wimmer M D, Randau T M, Deml M C, Ascherl R, Nöth U, Forst R, Gravius N, Wirtz D, Gravius S. Impaction grafting in the femur in cementless modular revision total hip arthroplasty: a descriptive outcome analysis of 243 cases with the MRP-TITAN revision implant. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2013; 14: 19.
35. Wirtz D C, Heller K D, Holzwarth U, Siebert C, Pitto R P, Zeiler G, Blencke B A, Forst R. A modular femoral implant for uncemented stem revision in THR. Int Orthop 2000; 24 (3): 134-8.