Failure rates for 4762 revision total hip arthroplasties in the Norwegian arthroplasty register

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 86, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 504-509

  Lie, S A ^a   Havelin, L I ^b   Furnes, O N ^b   Engesaester L B ^b   Vollset, S E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

^b HAUKELAND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACETABULUM; ADULT; AGED; ALLOGRAFT; ARTICLE; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FEMUR; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NORWAY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS; REGISTER; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK REDUCTION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT FAILURE;

EID: 2442641610     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.86b4.14799     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Engelbrecht DJ, Weber FA, Sweet MB, Jakim I. Long-term results of revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1990;72-B:41-5.
2. Lawrence JM, Engh CA, Macalino GE, Lauro GR. Outcome of revision hip arthroplasty done without cement. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1994;76-A:965-73.
3. Pellicci PM, Wilson PD Jr, Sledge CB, et al. Revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1982;170:34-41.
4. Raut VV, Siney PD, Wroblewski BM. Long-term results of cemented Charnley revision arthroplasty for fractured stem. Clin Orthop 1994;303:165-9.
5. Eisler T, Svensson O, Iyer V, et al. Revision total hip arthroplasty using third-generation cementing technique. J Arthroplasty 2000;15:974-81.
6. Garcia-Cimbrelo E. Porous-coated cementless acetabular cups in revision surgery: a 6- to 11-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 1999;14:397-406.
7. Amstutz HC, Ma SM, Jinnah RH, Mai L. Revision of aseptic loose total hip arthroplasties. Clin Orthop 1982;170:21-33.
8. Wei SY, Klimkiewicz JJ, Lai M, Garino JP, Steinberg ME. Revision total hip arthroplasty in patients with avascular necrosis. Orthopedics 1999;22:747-57.
9. Retpen JB, Varmarken JE, Rock ND, Jensen JS. Unsatisfactory results after repeated revision of hip arthroplasty: 61 cases followed for 5 (1-10) years. Acta Orthop Scand 1992;63:120-7.
10. Ballard WT, Callaghan JJ, Johnston RC. Revision of total hip arthroplasty in octogenarians. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1995;77-A:585-9.
11. Malchau H, Herberts P, Eisler T, Garellick G, Soderman P. The Swedish Total Hip Replacement Register. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2002;84-A(Suppl 2):2-20.
12. Malchau H. Revision total hip arthroplasty: failure mechanisms and outcomes. Orthopedics 1996;19:769-70.
13. Stromberg CN, Herberts P, Palmertz B. Cemented revision hip arthroplasty: a multicenter 5-9-year study of 204 first revisions for loosening. Acta Orthop Scand 1992;63:111-9.
14. Stromberg CN, Herberts P. A multicenter 10-year study of cemented revision total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 55 years old: a follow-up report. J Arthroplasty 1994;9:595-601.
15. Mahomed NN, Barren JA, Katz JN, et al. Rates and outcomes of primary and revision total hip replacement in the United States medicare population. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2003;85-A:27-32.
16. Sloof TJ, Buma P, Schreurs BW, et al. Acetabular and femoral reconstruction with impacted graft and cement. Clin Orthop 1996;324:108-15.
17. Gie GA, Linder L, Ling RDS, et al. Impacted cancellous allografts and cement for revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1993;75-B:14-21.
18. Ornstein E. Hip revisions with impacted morselized allograft bone and cement: patient outcome, prosthetic fixation and risks. Acta Orthop Scand 2000;73:1-66.
19. Goldberg VM. Revision total hip arthroplasty using a cementless modular femoral hip design. Am J Orthop 2002;31:202-4.
20. Engh CA Jr., Ellis TJ, Koralewicz LM, McAuley JP, Engh CA Sr. Extensively porous-coated femoral revision for severe femoral bone loss: minimum 10-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 2002;17:955-60.
21. Goldberg VM. Revision of failure acetabular components with cementless acetabular components. Am J Orthop 2002;31:206-7.
22. Paprosky WG, Burnett RS. Extensively porous-coated femoral stems in revision hip arthroplasty: rationale and results, Am J Orthop 2002;31:471-4.
23. Maurer SG, Baitner AC, Di Cesare PE. Reconstruction of the failed femoral component and proximal femoral bone loss in revision hip surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2000;8:354-63.
24. Dorey FJ, Korn EL. Effective sample sizes for confidence intervals for survival probabilities. Stat Med 1987;6:679-87.
25. Schemper M, Smith TL. A note on quantifying follow-up in studies of failure time. Control Clin Trials 1996;17:343-6.
26. Havelin LI, Engesaeter LB, Espehaug B, et al. The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register: 11 years and 73,000 arthroplasties. Acta Orthop Scand 2000;71:337-53.
27. Herberts P, Malchau H. Long-term registration has improved the quality of hip replacement: a review of the Swedish THR Register comparing 160,000 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 2000;71:111-21.
28. Ripatti S, Palmgren J. Estimation of multivariate frailty models using penalized partial likelihood. Biometrics 2000;56:1016-22.
29. Aalen OO, Husebye E. Statistical analysis of repeated events forming renewal processes. Stat Med 1991;10:1227-40.