What can be done when hip prostheses fail? New trends in revision endoprosthetics;Was tun, wenn die Hüftendoprothese versagt? Neue Trends in der Revisionsendoprothetik

Orthopade

Volumn 40, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 1084-1094

  Gravius, S ^a   Randau, T ^a   Wirtz, D C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Biomaterials; Bone defect reconstruction; Implant design; Revision arthroplasty; Total hip replacement

Indexed keywords

DEVICE REMOVAL; EQUIPMENT; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; JOINT INSTABILITY; METHODOLOGY; PROSTHESIS; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION; REVIEW;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; DEVICE REMOVAL; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; JOINT INSTABILITY; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION;

EID: 83855161567     PISSN: 00854530     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00132-011-1844-0     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Strobel C, Bormann N, Kadow-Romacker A et al (2011) Sequential release kinetics of two (gentamicin and BMP-2) or three (gentamicin, IGF-I and BMP-2) substances from a one-component polymeric coating on implants. J Control Release 156:37-45
2. Della Valle CJ, Paprosky WG (2004) The femur in revision total hip arthroplasty evaluation and classification. Clin Orthop Relat Res 420:55-62 (Pubitemid 38436559)
3. Deml M, Ascherl R, Nöth U et al (2010) Klinische Langzeitergebnisse eines zementfreien, modularen Hüftrevisionsschaftendoprothesensystems aus einer prospektiven Multi-Center-Studie. Deutscher Kongress für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie 2010. German Medical Science GMS, Berlin
4. Erli HJ, Marx R, Paar O et al (2003) Surface pretreat-ments for medical application of adhesion. Bio-med Eng Online 2:15
5. Garbuz D, Morsi E, Mohamed N et al (1996) Classification and reconstruction in revision acetabular arthroplasty with bone stock deficiency. Clin Orthop Relat Res 324:98-107 (Pubitemid 26071755)
6. Gollwitzer H, Diehl P, Gerdesmeyer L et al (2006) Diagnostic strategies in cases of suspected peri-prosthetic infection of the knee. A review of the literature and current recommendations. Orthopade 35:904-916 (Pubitemid 44408874)
7. Goosen JH, Kums AJ, Kollen BJ et al (2009) Porous-coated femoral components with or without hy-droxyapatite in primary uncemented total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129: 1165-1169
8. Gravius S, Mumme T, Andereya S et al (2007) The morse taper junction in modular revision hip replacement. Z Orthop Unfall 145:157-160
9. Gravius S, Pagenstert G, Weber O et al (2009) Acetabular defect reconstruction in revision surgery of the hip. Autologous, homologous or metal? Orthopade 38:729-740
10. Gravius S, Wimmer M, Deml M et al (2010) Femoral revision with impaction grafting with the uncemented MRP-TITAN revision stem: results of a prospect ive controlled study of 243 patients. Swiss Med Wkly 140 (Suppl 181):25
11. Gruner A, Heller KD (2009) Revision hip arthroplastiy of the hip joint. Revision of the femur: which implant is indicated when? Orthopade 38:667-680
12. Guyen O, Pibarot V, Vaz G et al (2009) Use of a dual mobility socket to manage total hip arthroplasty instability. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:465-472
13. Habenicht G (2009) Kleben: Grundlagen, Technologien, Anwendungen. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
14. Hummel MT, Malkani AL, Yakkanti MR et al (2009) Decreased dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty using larger femoral head size and posterior capsular repair. J Arthroplasty 24:73-76
15. Issack PS, Nousiainen M, Beksac B et al (2009) Acetabular component revision in total hip arthroplasty. Part II: management of major bone loss and pelvic discontinuity. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 38:550-556
16. Izquierdo RJ, Northmore-Ball MD (1994) Long-term results of revision hip arthroplasty. Survival analysis with special reference to the femoral component. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 76:34-39 (Pubitemid 24029255)
17. Jamsen E, Huhtala H, Puolakka T et al (2009) Risk factors for infection after knee arthroplasty. A register-based analysis of 43,149 cases. J Bone Joint Surg [Am]91:38-47
18. Jasty M, Maloney WJ, Bragdon CR et al (1990) His-tomorphological studies of the long-term skeletal responses to well fixed cemented femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 72:1220-1229 (Pubitemid 20343170)
19. Katthagen BD, Prub A (2008) Bone allografting. Orthopade 37:764-771
20. Kavanagh BF, Ilstrup DM, Fitzgerald RH Jr (1985) Revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 67:517-526 (Pubitemid 15077717)
21. Ketonis C, Barr S, Adams CS et al (2011) Vancomycin bonded to bone grafts prevents bacterial colonization. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:487-494
22. Kittinger C, Marth E, Windhager R et al (2011) Antimicrobial activity of gentamicin palmitate against high concentrations of Staphylococcus aureus. J Mater Sci Mater Med 22:1447-1453
23. Kwong LM, Jasty M, Harris WH (1993) High failure rate of bulkfemoral head allografts in total hip acetabular reconstructions at 10 years. J Arthroplasty 8:341-346 (Pubitemid 23246167)
24. Lappalainen R, Santavirta SS (2005) Potential of coatings in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 46:72-79 (Pubitemid 40096134)
25. Leopold SS, Rosenberg AG, Bhatt RD et al (1999) Cement less acetabular revision. Evaluation at an average of 10.5 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res 369: 179-186
26. Mahoney CR, Fehringer EV, Kopjar B et al (2005) Femoral revision with impaction grafting and a collarless, polished, tapered stem. Clin Orthop Relat Res432:181-187 (Pubitemid 40316179)
27. Marx R (1987) Causes of failure of adhesives in adhesive bridges. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 97:1081-1086
28. Maurer TB, Ochsner PE (2006) Infected knee arthroplasty. A treatment algorithm at the Kantons-spital Liestal, Switzerland. Orthopade 35:917-928 (Pubitemid 44408875)
29. Meding JB, Galley MR, Ritter MA (2010) High survival of uncemented proximally porous-coated titanium alloy femoral stems in osteoporotic bone. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:441-447
30. Müller-Rath R, Wirtz DC, Siebert CH et al (2008) Amphiphilic bonder improves adhesion at the acrylic bone cement-bone interface of cemented acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty: in vivo tests in an ovine model. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 128:701-707 (Pubitemid 351772745)
31. Mumme T, Gravius S, Andereya S et al (2007) Improvement of the long-term adhesive strength between bone cement and bone in cemented cup arthroplasty: ex-vivo study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 127:409-416 (Pubitemid 47103574)
32. Mumme T, Marx R, Müller-Rath R et al (2008) Surface pretreatment of endoprostheses by silica/ silane to optimise the hydrolytic stability between bone cement and metal. Total hip and knee arthroplasty. Orthopade 37:240-250
33. Mumme T, Marx R, Müller-Rath R et al (2008) Surface coating to improve the metal-cement bonding in cemented femur stems. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 128:773-781
34. Mumme T, Müller-Rath R, Andereya S et al (2007) Uncemented femoral revision arthroplasty using the modular revision prosthesis MRP-TITAN revision stem. Oper Orthop Traumatol 19:56-77 (Pubitemid 46416286)
35. Musil R, Tiller HJ (1989) Silicoater procedures after 5-year clinical trial. Zahnarztl Prax 40:124-128
36. Niehaus AJ, Anderson DE, Samii VF et al (2009) Effects of orthopedic implants with a polycapro-lactone polymer coating containing bone mor-phogenetic protein-2 on osseointegration in bones of sheep. Am J Vet Res 70:1416-1425
37. Paprosky WG, Lawrence JM, Cameron HU (1990) Acetabular defect classification: clinical application. Orthop Rev 19 (Suppl 1):3-16
38. Pekkarinen J, Alho A, Lepisto J et al (2000) Impaction bone grafting in revision hip surgery. A high incidence of complications. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 82:103-107 (Pubitemid 30060136)
39. Ritschl P, Halhammer F (2008) Experten-Statement: Protheseninfektionen in der Orthopädie. Osterr Arzteztg (Suppl 2):1-16
40. Sanchez Marquez JM, Del Sel N, Leali A et al (2009) Case reports: tantalum debris dispersion during revision of a tibial component for TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:1107-1110
41. Schramm M, Wirtz DC, Holzwarth U et al (2000) The morsetaper junction in modular revision hip replacement. A biomechanical and retrieval analysis. Biomed Tech (Berl) 45:105-109 (Pubitemid 30254013)
42. Schreurs BW, Spierings PT, Huiskes R et al (1988) Effects of preparation techniques on the porosity of acrylic cements. Acta Orthop Scand 59:403-409
43. Springer BD, Fehring TK, Griffin WL et al (2009) Why revision total hip arthroplasty fails. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:166-173
44. Starker M, Kandziora F, Jager A et al (1998) Acetabular reconstruction using acetabular reinforcement rings. Orthopade 27:366-374 (Pubitemid 28323433)
45. Steinbrink K, Frommelt L (1995) Treatment of peri-prosthetic infection of the hip using one-stage exchange surgery. Orthopade 24:335-343
46. Weeden SH, Schmidt RH (2007) The use of tantalum porous metal implants for Paprosky 3A and 3B defects. J Arthroplasty 22:151-155 (Pubitemid 47333023)
47. Wirtz DC, Niethard FU (1997) Etiology, diagnosis and therapy of aseptic hip prosthesis loosening-a status assessment. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 135:270-280 (Pubitemid 28011653)
48. Wolf CF, Gu NY, Doctor JN et al (2011) Comparison of one and two-stage revision of total hip arthroplasty complicated by infection: a Markov expec-ted-utility decision analysis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 93:631-639
49. Zimmerli W, Trampuz A, Ochsner PE (2004) Prosthetic-joint infections. N Engl J Med 351:1645-1654