A prospective study of hip revision surgery using the Exeter long-stem prosthesis: Function, subsidence, and complications for 57 patients

Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 159-165

  Randhawa, K ^a   Hossain, F S ^a   Smith, B ^a   Mauffrey, Cyril ^a,b   Lawrence, T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS BIRMINGHAM NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^b SOLIHULL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Exeter long stem; Revision hip arthroplasty; Subsidence

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL TRIAL; DEEP INFECTION; DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS; DISLOCATION; FEMALE; HIP PROSTHESIS; HIP SURGERY; HUMAN; LONG STEM EXETER HIP PROSTHESIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; QUESTIONNAIRE; RECURRENT DISEASE; REOPERATION; SCORING SYSTEM; SUPERFICIAL INFECTION; WESTERN ONTARIO AND MCMASTER OSTEOARTHRITIS INDEX PAIN SCORING SYSTEM;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HIP DISLOCATION; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; OSTEOLYSIS; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; PROSTHESIS-RELATED INFECTIONS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REOPERATION;

EID: 72349089242     PISSN: 15909921     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10195-009-0068-0     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. PC Coyte W Young JI Williams 1998 Devolution of hip and knee replacement surgery? Can J Plast Surg 39 5 373 378
2. DS Hungerford LC Jones 1988 The rationale of cementless revision of cemented arthroplasty failures Clin Orthop Relat Res 235 12 24 3416519
3. P Li P Ingle J Dowell 1996 Cement within cement revision hip arthroplasty; should it be done? J Bone Joint Surg Br 78 5 809 811 8836076 1:STN:280:DyaK28vjtlSnug%3D%3D
4. DG Mandziak DW Howie, et al. 2007 Cement-within-cement stem exchange using the collarless polished double-taper stem J Arthroplasty 22 7 1000 1006 10.1016/j.arth.2007.06.001 17920472 (Pubitemid 47498934)
5. DD D'Lima CS Oishi, et al. 1998 100 cemented versus 100 noncemented stems with comparison of 25 matched pairs Clin Orthop Relat Res 348 140 148 10.1097/00003086-199803000-00023 9553546
6. E Tsiridis AA Narvani FS Haddad, et al. 2004 Impaction femoral allografting and cemented revision for periprosthetic femoral fractures J Bone Joint Surg Br 86 8 1124 1132 10.1302/0301-620X.86B8.14854 15568524 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2crpsFWkug%3D%3D (Pubitemid 39545600)
7. DS Garbuz A Toms, et al. 2006 Improved outcome in femoral revision arthroplasty with tapered fluted modular titanium stems Clin Orthop Relat Res 453 199 202 10.1097/01.blo.0000238875.86519.cf 17312593 (Pubitemid 44900984)
8. P Hultmark J Karrholm, et al. 2000 Cemented first-time revisions of the femoral component: prospective 7 to 13 years' follow-up using second-generation and third-generation technique J Arthroplasty 15 5 551 561 10.1054/arth.2000. 4811 10959991 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7gvFagsA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 30622631)
9. J Franklin O Robertsson, et al. 2003 Revision and complication rates in 654 Exeter total hip replacements, with a maximum follow-up of 20 years BMC Musculoskelet Disord 4 6 10.1186/1471-2474-4-6 12659648
10. N Bellamy 2005 The WOMAC knee and hip osteoarthritis indices: development, validation, globalization and influence on the development of the AUSCAN hand osteoarthritis indices Clin Exp Rheumatol 23 5 Suppl 39 S148 S153 16273799 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2MrpsV2qsg%3D%3D
11. Callaghan JJ, Salvati EA, Pellicci PM et al (1985) Two to five year results of revision total hip replacement. AAOS 52nd Annual Meeting
12. PM Pellicci PD Wilson Jr, et al. 1982 Revision total hip arthroplasty Clin Orthop Relat Res 170 34 41 7127962
13. PM Pellicci PD Wilson Jr, et al. 1985 Long-term results of revision total hip replacement. A follow-up report J Bone Joint Surg Am 67 4 513 516 3980494 1:STN:280:DyaL2M7lslKntg%3D%3D
14. GA Gie L Linder, et al. 1993 Impacted cancellous allografts and cement for revision total hip arthroplasty J Bone Joint Surg Br 75 1 14 21 8421012 1:STN:280:DyaK3s7jt1Shtg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 23052407)
15. RS Ling AJ Timperley L Linder 1993 Histology of cancellous impaction grafting in the femur. A case report J Bone Joint Surg Br 75 5 693 696 8376422 1:STN:280:DyaK3szovVKmtQ%3D%3D
16. TJ Slooff P Buma, et al. 1996 Acetabular and femoral reconstruction with impacted graft and cement Clin Orthop Relat Res 324 108 115 10.1097/00003086- 199603000-00013 8595745
17. Kavanagh BF, Fitzgerald RH Jr (1987) Multiple revisions for failed total hip arthroplasty not associated with infection. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69(8):1144-1149
18. WF Mulroy WH Harris 1996 Revision total hip arthroplasty with use of so-called second-generation cementing techniques for aseptic loosening of the femoral component. A fifteen-year-average follow-up study J Bone Joint Surg Am 78 3 325 330 8613438 1:STN:280:DyaK283gtlOmtw%3D%3D
19. DJ Berry WS Harmsen, et al. 1995 Survivorship of uncemented proximally porous-coated femoral components Clin Orthop Relat Res 319 168 177 7554627
20. BD Mulliken CH Rorabeck, et al. 1996 Uncemented revision total hip arthroplasty: a 4-to-6-year review Clin Orthop Relat Res 325 156 162 10.1097/00003086-199604000-00017 8998868
21. JJ Callaghan SH Dysart, et al. 1988 The uncemented porous-coated anatomic total hip prosthesis. Two-year results of a prospective consecutive series J Bone Joint Surg Am 70 3 337 346 3346261 1:STN:280:DyaL1c7ltlyisA%3D%3D
22. B Espehaug LI Havelin, et al. 1995 Early revision among 12, 179 hip prostheses. A comparison of 10 different brands reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, 1987-1993 Acta Orthop Scand 66 6 487 493 8553813 1:STN:280:DyaK287ksVChsg%3D%3D
23. JL Fowler GA Gie, et al. 1988 Experience with the Exeter total hip replacement since 1970 Orthop Clin North Am 19 3 477 489 3269211 1:STN:280:DyaL1c3kslChtA%3D%3D
24. J Karrholm P Hultmark, et al. 1999 Subsidence of a non-polished stem in revisions of the hip using impaction allograft. Evaluation with radiostereometry and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry J Bone Joint Surg Br 81 1 135 142 10.1302/0301-620X.81B1.8922 10068021 1:STN:280:DyaK1M7msFeksA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 29043427)
25. J Alfaro-Adrian HS Gill, et al. 1999 Cement migration after THR. A comparison of Charnley elite and Exeter femoral stems using RSA J Bone Joint Surg Br 81 1 130 134 10.1302/0301-620X.81B1.8904 10068020 1:STN:280: DyaK1M7msFeksw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 29043426)
26. PS Walker SF Mai, et al. 1995 Prediction of clinical outcome of THR from migration measurements on standard radiographs. A study of cemented Charnley and Stanmore femoral stems J Bone Joint Surg Br 77 5 705 714 7559694 1:STN:280:DyaK28%2Fgslansg%3D%3D
27. M Krismer R Biedermann, et al. 1999 The prediction of failure of the stem in THR by measurement of early migration using EBRA-FCA. Einzel-Bild-Roentgen- Analyse-femoral component analysis J Bone Joint Surg Br 81 2 273 280 10.1302/0301-620X.81B2.8840 10204934 1:STN:280:DyaK1M3hvFKluw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 29327066)
28. RG Nelissen EH Garling, et al. 2005 Influence of cement viscosity and cement mantle thickness on migration of the Exeter total hip prosthesis J Arthroplasty 20 4 521 528 10.1016/j.arth.2004.09.036 16124971 (Pubitemid 40804461)
29. ET Ek PF Choong 2005 Comparison between triple-tapered and double-tapered cemented femoral stems in total hip arthroplasty: a prospective study comparing the C-Stem versus the Exeter universal early results after 5 years of clinical experience J Arthroplasty 20 1 94 100 10.1016/j.arth.2004.08.012 15660066
30. JL Knight C Helming 2000 Collarless polished tapered impaction grafting of the femur during revision total hip arthroplasty: pitfalls of the surgical technique and follow-up in 31 cases J Arthroplasty 15 2 159 165 10.1016/S0883-5403(00)90088-3 10708079 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7ntVemsA%3D%3D
31. JD Eldridge EJ Smith, et al. 1997 Massive early subsidence following femoral impaction grafting J Arthroplasty 12 5 535 540 10.1016/S0883-5403(97) 90176-5 9268793 1:STN:280:DyaK2svhtl2isA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 29021308)
32. JB Meding MA Et, et al. 1997 Impaction bone-grafting before insertion of a femoral stem with cement in revision total hip arthroplasty. A minimum two-year follow-up study J Bone Joint Surg Am 79 12 1834 1841 9409797 1:STN:280:DyaK1c%2Fnt1Cmtw%3D%3D
33. EL Masterson BA Masri, et al. 1997 The cement mantle in the Exeter impaction allografting technique. A cause for concern J Arthroplasty 12 7 759 764 10.1016/S0883-5403(97)90005-X 9355004 1:STN:280:DyaK1c%2Fhs1Khtg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 27452608)
34. JJ Elting WE Mikhail, et al. 1995 Preliminary report of impaction grafting for exchange femoral arthroplasty Clin Orthop Relat Res 319 159 167 7554625
35. G Selvik 1989 Roentgen stereophotogrammetry. A method for the study of the kinematics of the skeletal system Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 232 1 51 2686344 1:STN:280:DyaK3c%2FntFGitg%3D%3D
36. BW Schreurs JJ Arts, et al. 2005 Femoral component revision with use of impaction bone-grafting and a cemented polished stem J Bone Joint Surg Am 87 11 2499 2507 10.2106/JBJS.D.02547 16264127 (Pubitemid 41546382)