Negatively charged tangential flow ultrafiltration membranes for whey protein concentration

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 475, Issue , 2015, Pages 340-348

  Arunkumar, Abhiram ^a   Etzel, Mark R ^a  

^a Wisconsin Electric Machines and Power Electronics Consortium   (United States)

Author keywords

Charged ultrafiltration membranes; Flux enhancement; Sieving coefficient; Ultrafiltration diafiltration; Whey proteins

Indexed keywords

PROTEINS; ULTRAFILTRATION;

CHARGED ULTRAFILTRATION MEMBRANES; ELECTROSTATIC REPULSION; FLUX ENHANCEMENT; SIEVING COEFFICIENT; TANGENTIAL FLOW ULTRAFILTRATION; ULTRA-FILTRATION MEMBRANES; WHEY PROTEIN CONCENTRATE; WHEY PROTEINS;

MEMBRANES;

PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; WHEY PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONCENTRATION PROCESS; DAIRY INDUSTRY; FLOW RATE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MEMBRANE; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN PROCESSING; PROTEIN TRANSPORT; SURFACE PROPERTY; ULTRAFILTRATION MEMBRANE;

EID: 84910155863     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: 18733123     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.10.049     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Wong W.S.D., Camirand W.M., Pavlath A.E. Structures and functionality of milk proteins. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 1996, 36:807.
2. Etzel M.R. Manufacture and use of dairy protein fractions. J. Nutr. 2004, 996.
3. Serfert Y., Lamprecht C., Tan C.P., Keppler J.K., Appel E., Rosier Miranda F.J., Schroen K., Boom R.M., Gorb S., Selhuber-Unkel C., Drusch S., Schwarz K. Characterization and use of β-lactoglobulin fibrils for microencapsulation of lipophilic ingredients and oxidative stability thereof. J. Food Eng. 2014, 143:53.
4. Smithers G.W. Whey and whey proteins-from 'gutter-to-gold'. Int. Dairy J. 2008, 18:695.
5. Yee K.W.K., Wiley D., Bao J. Whey protein concentrate production by continuous ultrafiltration: operability under constant operating conditions. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 290:125.
6. Rektor A., Vatai G. Membrane filtration of mozzarella whey. Desalination 2004, 162:279.
7. Mehta A., Zydney A.L. Permeability-selectivity analysis for ultrafiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 249:245.
8. Mehta A. Performance characteristics of charged ultrafiltration membranes (Ph.D. dissertation) 2006, The Pennsylvania State University.
9. Polyakov Y.S., Zydney A.L. Ultrafiltration membrane performance: effects of pore blockage/constriction. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 434:106.
10. Maubois J.L. Ultrafiltration of whey. J. Soc. Dairy Technol. 1980, 33:55.
11. Arunkumar A., Etzel M.R. Fractionation of α-lactalbumin from β-lactoglobulin using positively charged, tangential flow ultrafiltration membranes. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2013, 105:121.
12. Arunkumar A., Etzel M.R. Fractionation of α-lactalbumin and β-lactoglobulin from bovine milk serum using staged, positively charged tangential flow ultrafiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2014, 454:488.
13. van Reis R., Brake J.M., Charkoudian J., Burns D.B., Zydney A.L. High performance tangential flow filtration using charged membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1999, 159:133.
14. Lebreton B., Brown A., van Reis R. Application of high-performance tangential flow filtration (HPTFF) to the purification of a human pharmaceutical antibody expressed in Escherichia coli. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2008, 100:964.
15. Kurnik R.T., Yu A.W., Blank G.S., Burton B.R., Smith D., Athalye A.M., van Reis R. Buffer exchange using size exclusion chromatography, counter-current dialysis and tangential flow filtration: models, development and industrial application. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1995, 45:149.
16. Etzel M.R. Charged ultrafiltration and microfiltration membranes in antibody purification. Process Scale Purification of Antibodies 2008, 325-347. John Wiley and Sons, New Jersey. U. Gottschalk (Ed.).
17. Bakhshayeshi M., Teella A., Zhou H., Olsen C., Yuan W., Zydney A.L. Development of an optimized dextran retention test for large pore size hollow fiber ultrafiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 421:32.
18. Piry A., Kuhnl W., Grein T., Tolkach A., Ripperger S., Kulozik U. Length dependency of flux and protein permeation in crossflow microfiltration of skimmed milk. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 325:887.
19. Metsämuuronen S., Nyström M. Enrichment of α-lactalbumin from diluted whey with polymeric ultrafiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 337:248.
20. Raubiller-Baudry M., Gesan-Guiziou G., Roldan-Calbo D., Beaulieu S., Michel F. Limiting flux in skimmed milk ultrafiltration: impact of electrostatic repulsion due to casein micelles. Desalination 2005, 175:49.
21. Piry A., Heino A., Kuhnl W., Grein T., Ripperger S., Kulozik U. Effect of membrane length, membrane resistance and filtration conditions on the fractionation of milk proteins by microfiltration. J. Dairy Sci. 2012, 95:1590.
22. Aimar P., Taddei C., Lafaille J., Sanchez V. Mass transfer limitations during the ultrafiltration of cheese whey with inorganic membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1988, 38:203.
23. wall ultrafiltration process control. J. Membr. Sci. 1997, 130:123.
24. Riordan W., Heilmann S., Brorson K., Seshadri K., He Y., Etzel M.R. Design of salt-tolerant membrane adsorbers for viral clearance. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2009, 103:920.
25. Doultani S., Turhan K.N., Etzel M.R. Whey protein isolate and glycomacropeptide recovery from whey using ion-exchange chromatography. J. Food Sci. 2003, 68:1389.
26. Zydney A.L., Xenopoulos A. Improving dextran tests for ultrafiltration membranes: effect of device format. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 291:180.
27. van Reis R., Goodrich E.M., Yson C.L., Frautschy L.N., Dzengeleski S., Lutz H. Linear scale ultrafiltration. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1997, 55:737.
28. Holland B., Kackmar J., Corredig M. Isolation of a whey fraction rich in α-lactalbumin from skim milk using tangential flow filtration. J. Dairy Sci. 2012, 95:5604.
29. Bouchoux A., Qu P., Bacchin P., Gésan-Guiziou G. A general approach for predicting the filtration of soft and permeable colloids: the milk example. Langmuir 2014, 30:22.
30. Obermeyer H.D., Kulozik U., Kessler H.G. Controlled deposit formation to influence the retention of solutes in reverse osmosis and ultrafiltration. Desalination 1993, 90:161.
31. Miller D.J., Kasemset S., Paul D.R., Freeman B.D. Comparison of membrane fouling at constant flux and constant transmembrane pressure conditions. J. Membr. Sci. 2014, 454:505.
32. Decloux M., Tatoud L. Importance of the control mode in ultrafiltration: case of raw cane sugar remelt. J. Food Eng. 2000, 44(2):119.
33. Rohani M.M., Zydney A.L. Protein transport through zwitterionic ultrafiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 397:1.
34. Hadidi M., Zydney A.L. Fouling behavior of zwitterionic membranes: impact of electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions. J. Membr. Sci. 2014, 452:97.