Linear scale ultrafiltration

Biotechnology and Bioengineering

Volumn 55, Issue 5, 1997, Pages 737-746

  Van Reis, Robert ^a   Goodrich, Elizabeth M ^a   Yson, Christine L ^a   Frautschy, Leah N ^a   Dzengeleski, Stephen ^b   Lutz, Herb ^b  

^a GENENTECH INC   (United States)

^b MILLIPORE CORPORATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Linear scale; Membrane fouling; Proteins; Scale down; Scale up; Ultrafiltration

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MEMBRANES; BIOTECHNOLOGY; DNA; DRUG PRODUCTS; DRUG PRODUCTS PLANTS; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; FOULING; PROTEINS;

LINEAR SCALE ULTRAFILTRATION; MEMBRANE FOULING; TANGENTIAL FLOW FILTRATION;

ULTRAFILTRATION;

PROTEIN; RECOMBINANT DNA;

ARTICLE; DYNAMICS; GEOMETRY; HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; LIQUID; MEMBRANE; MODEL; SPECTROPHOTOMETER; ULTRAFILTRATION;

EID: 0031554888     PISSN: 00063592     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19970905)55:5<737::AID-BIT4>3.0.CO;2-C     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Acrivos, A., Babcock, B. D., Pigford, R. L. 1959. Flow distribution in manifolds. Chem. Eng. Sci. 10: 112-124.
2. Belfort, G. 1987. Membrane separation technology: An overview, pp. 239-297. In: Bungay, H. R., and Belfort, G. (eds.), Advanced biochemical engineering, Wiley, New York.
3. Brewster, M. E., Chung, K. Y., Belfort, G. 1993. Dean vortices with wall flux in a curved channel membrane system. 1. A new approach to membrane module design. J. Membr. Sci. 81: 127-137.
4. Brose, D., Dosmar, M., Cates, S., Hutchison, F. 1996. Studies on the Scale-Up of Crossflow Filtration Devices. PDA J. of Pharm. Sci. and Technol. 50: 252-260.
5. Colebrook, C. F. 1939. Turbulent flow in pipes with particular reference to the transition region between smooth and rough pipe laws. J. Inst. Civ. Eng. (London) 11: 133-156.
6. Da Costa, A. R., Fane, A. G., Fell, C. J. D., Franken, A. C. M. 1991. Optimal channel spacer design for ultrafiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 62: 275-291.
7. Di Leo, A. J., Allegrezza, A. E., Builder, S. E. 1992. High resolution removal of virus from protein solutions using a membrane of unique structure. Bio/Technology 10: 182-188.
8. Green, H., Meltzer, T. H. 1985. Flow and pressure, filter sizing, and filter system design, pp. 409-452. In: Meltzer, T. H. (ed.), Filtration in the pharmaceutical industry. Advances in Parenteral Sciences, Vol. 3. Marcel-Dekker, New York.
9. Heath, C. A., Belfort, G. 1992. Synthetic membranes in biotechnology: Realities and possibilities. Adv. in Biochem. Engineer. Biotechnol. 47: 45-88.
10. Kroner, K. H., Nissinen, V., Ziegler, H. 1987. Improved dynamic filtration of microbial suspensions. Bio/Technology 5: 921-926.
11. Meireles, M., Aimar, P., Sanchez, V. 1991. Albumin denaturation during ultrafiltration: Effects of operating conditions and consequences on membrane fouling. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 38: 528-534.
12. Narendranathan, T. J., Dunnill, P. 1982. The effect of shear on globular proteins during ultrafiltration: Studies of alcohol dehydrogenase. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 24: 2103-2107.
13. Sofer, G. K., Nyström, L. E. 1989. Process chromatography - A practical guide, pp. 55-66. Academic Press, San Diego.
14. Tkacik, G., Michaels, S. 1991. A rejection profile test for ultrafiltration membranes and devices. Bio/Technology 9: 941-946.
15. van Reis, R., Leonard, L. C., Hsu, C. C., Builder, S. E. 1991. Industrial scale harvest of proteins from mammalian cell culture by tangential flow filtration. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 38: 413-422.
16. van Reis, R., Goodrich, E. M., Yson, C. L., Frautschy, L. N., Whiteley, R., Zydney, A. L. 1997. Constant C wall ultrafiltration process control. J. Membr. Sci. 130.