What is moral reasoning?

Philosophical Psychology

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 1-20

  Saunders, Leland F ^a  

^a SEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Moral Judgment; Moral Psychology; Moral Reasoning

Indexed keywords

EID: 84910153484     PISSN: 09515089     EISSN: 1465394X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09515089.2013.801007     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Aristotle. (1999). Nicomachean ethics (2nd ed., T.Irwin, Trans.). Indianapolis: Hackett.
2. Brink, D. O. (1989). Moral realism and the foundations of ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Bucciarelli, M., Khemlani, S., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2008). The psychology of moral reasoning. Judgment and Decision Making, 3(2), 121–139.
4. Carruthers, P. (2006). The architecture of the mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
5. Cholbi, M. (2006). Belief attribution and the falsification of motive internalism. Philosophical Psychology, 19(5), 607–616.
6. Cohen, S. (2004). The nature of moral reasoning. New York: Oxford University Press.
7. Craigie, J. (2011). Thinking and feeling: Moral deliberation in a dual-process framework. Philosophical Psychology, 24(1), 53–71.
8. Cummins, R. (2000). “How does it work?” versus “what are the laws?”: Two conceptions of psychological explanation. In F. C.Keil & R. A.Wilson (Eds.), Explanation and cognition (pp. 117–144). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Cushman, F., Young, L., & Hauser, M. D. (2006). The role of conscious reasoning and intuition in moral judgments: Testing three principles of harm. Psychological Science, 17(12), 1082–1089.
10. Deigh, J. (1995). Empathy and universalizability. Ethics, 105(4), 743–763.
11. Dreier, J. (1990). Internalism and speaker relativism. Ethics, 101(1), 6–26.
12. Dwyer, S. (2006). How good is the linguistic analogy? In P.Carruthers, S.Laurence, & S.Stich (Eds.), The innate mind: Culture and cognition (Vol. 2, pp. 237–256). New York: Oxford University Press.
13. Dwyer, S. (2009). Moral dumbfounding and the linguistic analogy: Methodological implications for the study of moral judgment. Mind & Language, 24(3), 274–296.
14. Evans, J., & Over, D. (1996). Rationality and reasoning. New York: Psychology Press.
15. Fine, C. (2006). Is the emotional dog wagging its tail, or chasing it?Philosophical Explorations, 9(1), 83–98.
16. Greene, J. (2008). The secret joke of Kant's soul. In W.Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral psychology: The neuroscience of morality: Emotion, brain disorders, and development (Vol. 3, pp. 35–80). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Greene, J., Morelli, S. A., Lowenberg, K., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2008). Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment. Cognition, 107, 1144–1154.
18. Greene, J., Nystrom, L. E., Engell, A. D., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2004). The neural basis of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment. Neuron, 44, 389–400.
19. Greene, J., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293, 2105–2108.
20. Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814–834.
21. Haidt, J., & Bjorklund, F. (2008a). Social intuitionists answer six questions about morality. In W.Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral psychology: The cognitive science of morality: Intuition and diversity (Vol. 2, pp. 181–218). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. Haidt, J., & Bjorklund, F. (2008b). Social intuitionists reason, in conversation. In W.Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral psychology: The cognitive science of morality: Intuition and diversity (Vol. 2, pp. 241–254). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Haidt, J., Koller, S. H., & Dias, M. G. (1993). Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(4), 613–628.
24. Hare, R. M. (1952). The language of morals. New York: Oxford University Press.
25. Hare, R. M. (1981). Moral thinking: Its levels, method, and point. New York: Oxford University Press.
26. Harman, G., Mason, K., & Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2010). Moral reasoning. In J.Doris & M. P. R.Group (Eds.), The moral psychology handbook (pp. 206–245). New York: Oxford University Press.
27. Hauser, M. D. (2006). Moral minds. New York: Ecco.
28. Hauser, M. D., Cushman, F., Young, L., Jin, R. K.-X., & Mikhail, J. (2007). A dissocation between moral judgments and justification. Mind & Language, 22(1), 1–21.
29. Hauser, M. D., Young, L., & Cushman, F. (2008). Reviving Rawls's linguistic analogy: Operative principles and the causal structure of moral actions. In W.Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral psychology: The cognitive science of morality: Intuition and diversity (Vol. 2, pp. 107–144). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30. Herman, B. (1993). The practice of moral judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31. Horgan, T., & Timmons, M. (2007). Morphological rationalism and the psychology of moral judgment. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 10, 279–295.
32. Hughes, G. (2003). Routledge philosophy guidebook to Aristotle: On ethics. New York: Routledge.
33. Hume, D. (2000). A treatise of human nature. New York: Oxford University Press.
34. Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D. A., Knobe, J., & Bloom, P. (2009). Disgust sensitivity predicts intuitive disapproval of gays. Emotion, 2009, 435–439.
35. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2006). How we reason. New York: Oxford University Press.
36. Jones, K. (2003). Emotions, weakness of will, and the normative conception of agency. In A.Hatzimoysis (Ed.), Philosophy and the emotions (pp. 181–200). New York: Cambridge University Press.
37. Jones, K. (2006). Metaethics and emotions research: A response to Prinz. Philosophical Explorations, 9(1), 45–53.
38. Kahneman, D. (2002). Maps of bounded rationality: A perspective on intuitive judgment and choice. Nobel Prize Lecture, 8, 351–401.
39. Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58(9), 697–720.
40. Kant, I. (1996). Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals. (M. J. Gregor, Trans.). In M. J.Gregor (Ed.), The Cambridge edition of the works of Immanuel Kant: Practical philosophy (pp. 37–107). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1785).
41. Kennett, J. (2006). Do psychopaths really threaten moral rationalism?Philosophical Explorations, 9, 69–82.
42. Kennett, J., & Fine, C. (2009). Will the real moral judgment please stand up? The implications of the social intuitionist models of cognition for meta-ethics and moral psychology. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 12(1), 77–96.
43. Koenigs, M., Young, L., Adolphs, R., Tranel, D., Cushman, F., Hauser, M. D., & Damasio, A. (2007). Damage to the prefrontal cortex increases utilitarian moral judgments. Nature, 446, 908–911.
44. Kohlberg, L. (1984). The psychology of moral development: The nature and validity of moral stages. New York: Harper & Row.
45. Kohlberg, L., Levine, C., & Hewer, A. (1983). Moral stages: A current formulation and a response to critics. New York: Basel.
46. Korsgaard, C. M. (1986). Skepticism about practical reason. The Journal of Philosophy, 83(1), 311–344.
47. Marr, D. (2010). Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
48. Mikhail, J. (2000). Rawls' linguistic analogy: A study of the “generative grammar” model of moral theory described by John Rawls in A theory of justice. (Doctoral dissertation). Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
49. Mikhail, J. (2007). Universal moral grammar: Theory, evidence and the future. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(4), 143–152.
50. Mikhail, J. (2009). Moral grammar and intuitive jurisprudence. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 50, 27–100.
51. Moll, J., de Oliviera-Souza, R., Eslinger, P. J., Bramati, I. E., Mourao-Miranda, J., Andreiuolo, P. A., & Pessoa, L. (2002). The neural correlates of moral sensitivity: A functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation of basic and moral emotions. The Journal of Neuroscience, 22(7), 2730–2736.
52. Moll, J., Eslinger, P. J., & de Oliviera-Souza, R. (2001). Frontopolar and anterior temporal cortex activation in a moral judgment task. Arq Neuropsiquiatr, 59(3B), 657–664.
53. Nagel, T. (1979). The possibility of altruism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
54. Nichols, S. (2002). How psychopaths threaten moral rationalism: Is it irrational to be amoral?The Monist, 85(2), 285–304.
55. Nichols, S. (2004). After objectivity: An empirical study of moral judgment. Philosophical Psychology, 17(1), 5–29.
56. Paxton, J. M., & Greene, J. D. (2010). Moral reasoning: Hints and allegations. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2(3), 1–17.
57. Paxton, J. M., Ungar, L., & Greene, J. D. (2011). Reflection and reasoning in moral judgment. Cognitive Science, 36(1), 163–177.
58. Piaget, J. (1965). The moral judgment of the child(M. Gabain, Trans.). New York: Free Press. (Original work published 1932).
59. Pinker, S. (1997). How the mind works. New York: Norton.
60. Prinz, J. (2006). The emotional basis of moral judgments. Philosophical Explorations, 9(1), 29–43.
61. Prinz, J. (2007). The emotional construction of morals. New York: Oxford University Press.
62. Rachels, J. (1993). Subjectivism. In P.Singer (Ed.), A companion to ethics (pp. 432–441). Oxford: Blackwell.
63. Rachels, J. (1999). The elements of moral philosophy (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
64. Roskies, A. (2003). Are ethical judgments intrinsically motivational? Lessons from “acquired sociopathy.”Philosophical Psychology, 16(1), 51–66.
65. Sacks, O. (1998). The man who mistook his wife for a hat: And other clinical tales. New York: Touchstone.
66. Saunders, L. F. (2009). Reason in the moral life: A dual process account of moral justification. In J.Evans & K.Frankish (Eds.), In two minds: Dual-Processes and beyond (pp. 335–354). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
67. Schnall, S., Haidt, J., Clore, G. L., & Jordan, A. H. (2008). Disgust as embodied moral judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(8), 1096–1109.
68. Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2008). Framing moral intuitions. In W.Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral psychology: The cognitive science of morality: Intuition and diversity (Vol. 2, pp. 47–76). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
69. Sloman, S. A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119(1), 3–22.
70. Smith, M. (1994). The moral problem. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
71. Stanovich, K. E. (1999). Who is rational? Studies of individual differences in reasoning. New York: Psychology Press.
72. Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 645–726.
73. Svavarsdottir, S. (1999). Moral cognitivism and motivation. Philosophical Review, 108(2), 161–219.
74. Toulmin, S. (1968). Reason in ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
75. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1983). Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. Psychology Review, 90, 293–315.
76. Valdesolo, P., & DeSteno, D. (2006). Manipulations of emotional context shape moral judgment. Psychological Science, 17(6), 476–477.
77. Vaughn, L. (2008). Doing ethics: Moral reasoning and contemporary issues. New York: W.W. Norton.
78. Wheatley, T., & Haidt, J. (2005). Hypnotic disgust makes moral judgments more severe. Psychological Science, 16(10), 780–784.
79. Young, L., Camprodon, J. A., Hauser, M. D., Pascual-Leone, A., & Saxe, R. (2010). Disruption of the right tempoparietal junction with transcranial magnetic simulation reduces the role of beliefs in moral judgments. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences, 107(15), 6753–6758.