Estimating optimal species trees from incomplete gene trees under deep coalescence

Journal of Computational Biology

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 591-605

  Shamsuzzoha Bayzid, M D ^a   Warnow, Tandy ^a  

^a University of Texas at Austin   (United States)

Author keywords

algorithms

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENE DUPLICATION; HORIZONTAL GENE TRANSFER; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENE DUPLICATION; GENE TRANSFER, HORIZONTAL; GENETIC SPECIATION; MODELS, GENETIC; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT;

EID: 84862568674     PISSN: 10665277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0037     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Baum, B.R. 1992. Combining trees as a way of combining data sets for phylogenetic inference, and the desirability of combining gene trees. Taxon 41, 3-10.
2. Bryant, D. 1991. A Classification of Consensus Methods for Phylogenetics. DIMACS Series in Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science. Bioconsensus: DIMACS working group meetings on Bioconsensus, Oct. 25-26, 2003, AMS, 61, 163-184.
3. Chaudhary, R., Bansal, M.S. Wehe, A., et al. 2010. iGTP: a software package for large-scale gene tree parsimony analysis. BMC Bioinform, 11, 574.
4. Chung, Y., and Ané, C. 2011. Comparing two Bayesian methods for gene tree/species tree reconstruction: a simulation with incomplete lineage sorting and horizontal gene transfer. Syst. Biol. 60, 261-275.
5. Cryan, M., Goldberg, L., and Goldberg, P. 1998. Evolutionary trees can be learned in polynomial time in the two-state general markov model. Proc. IEEE Symp. Found. Comput. Sci. (FOCS98) 436-445.
6. Csür}os M., and M-Y Kao. 1999. Recovering evolutionary trees through harmonic greedy triplets. Proc. 10th Annu. ACM/SIAM Symp. Discr. Algorithms (SODA99) 261-270.
7. Daskalakis, C., Mossel, E., and Roch, S. 2011. Phylogenies without branch bounds: contracting the short, pruning the deep. SIAM J. Discr. Math 25, 872-893.
8. Degnan, J.H., and Rosenberg, N.A. 2009. Gene tree discordance, phylogenetic inference and the multispecies coalescent. Trends Ecol. Evol. 26, 332-340.
9. Degnan, J.H., DeGiorgio, M., Bryant, D., et al. 2009. Properties of consensus methods for inferring species trees from gene trees. Syst. Biol. 58, 35-54.
10. Edwards, S.V. 2009. Is a new and general theory of molecular systematics emerging? Evolution 63, 1-19.
11. Erdos, P.L., Steel, M.A., Székely, L., et al. 1999a. A few logs suffice to build (almost) all trees (i). Random Struct. Algorithms 14 153-184.
12. Erdos, P.L., Steel, M.A., Székely, L., et al. 1999b. A few logs suffice to build (almost) all trees (ii). Theor. Comput. Sci. 221, 77-118.
13. Gronau, I., Moran, S., and Snir, S. 2011. Fast and reliable reconstruction of phylogenetic trees with indistinguishable edges. Random Struct. Algorithms. 40, 350-384.
14. Guindon, S., Dufayard, J.F., Lefort, V., et al. 2010. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of phyml 3.0. Syst. Biol. 59 307-321.
15. Heled, J., and Drummond, A.J. 2010. Bayesian inference of species trees from multilocus data. Mol. Biol. Evol. 27, 570-580.
16. Huson, D., Nettles, S., and Warnow T. 1999. Disk-covering, a fast converging method for phylogenetic tree reconstruction. J. Comput. Biol. 6, 369-386.
17. Kannan, S.K., Warnow, T., and Yooseph S. 1995. Computing the local consensus of trees. Proc. 6th Annu. ACM-SIAM Symp. Discr. Algorithms 68-77.
18. Katoh, K., Kuma, K., Miyata, T., et al. 2005a. Improvement in the acccuracy of multiple sequence alignment mafft. Genome Inform. 16 22-33.
19. Katoh, K., Kuma, K., Toh, H., et al. 2005b. MAFFT version 5: improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignment. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, 511-518.
20. Kupczok, A., Schmidt, H., and von Haeseler, A. 2010. Accuracy of phylogeny reconstruction methods combining overlapping gene data sets. Algorithms Mol. Biol. 5, 37-53.
21. Larget, B., Kotha, S.K., Dewey, C.N., et al. 2010. BUCKy: Gene tree/species tree reconciliation with the Bayesian concordance analysis. Bioinformatics 26, 2910-2911.
22. Lehtonen, S. 2008. Phylogeny estimation and alignment via POY verss Clustal + PAUP*: a response to Ogden and Rosenberg. Syst. Biol. 57, 653-657.
23. Liu K., and Warnow, T. 2012. Treelength optimization for phylogeny estimation. PLoS ONE 7, e33104.
24. Liu, K., Nelesen, S., Raghavan, S., et al. 2009a. Barking up the wrong treelength: the impact of gap penalty on alignment and tree accuracy. IEEE Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform. 6, 7-21.
25. Liu, K., Raghavan, S., Nelesen, S., et al. 2009b. Rapid and accurate large-scale coestimation of sequence alignments and phylogenetic trees. Science 324, 1561-1564.
26. Liu, K., Linder, C.R., and Warnow, T. 2010. Multiple sequence alignment: a major challenge to large-scale phylogenetics. PLoS Curr. Tree of Life Available at:http://knol.google.com/k/kevin-liu/multiple-sequence-alignment- amajor/ectabesw3uba/9. Accessed April 1, 2012.
27. Liu, K., Linder, C.R., and Warnow, T. 2011a. RAxML and FastTree: comparing two methods for large-scale maximum likelihood phylogeny estimation. PLoS ONE 6, e27731.
28. Liu, K., Warnow, T.J. Holder, M.T. et al. 2011b. SATé-II: very fast and accurate simultaneous estimation of multiple sequence alignments and phylogenetic trees. Syst. Biol. 61, 90-106.
29. Loytynoja A., and Goldman, N. 2005. An algorithm for progressive multiple alignment of sequences with insertions. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 102, 10557-10562.
30. Loytynoja A., and Goldman, N. 2009. Uniting alignments and trees. Science 324, 1528-1529.
31. Lunter, G., Drummond, A.J. Mikló s, I. et al. 2005. Statistical alignment: recent progress, new applications, and challenges, 375-406, In Nielsen, R., ed. Statistical Methods in Molecular Evolution (Statistics for Biology and Health). Springer, Berlin.
32. Maddison, W.P. 1997. Gene trees in species trees. Syst. Biol. 46, 523-536.
33. Mossel, E. 2010. Toward extracting all phylogenetic information from matrices of evolutionary distances. Science 327, 1376-1379.
34. Nakhleh, L., Roshan, U., St. John, K., et al. 2001a. Designing fast converging phylogenetic methods. Bioinformatics 17, 190-198.
35. Nakhleh, L., Roshan, U., St. John, K., et al. 2001b. The performance of phylogenetic methods on trees of bounded diameter. 2149, Lect. Notes Comput. Sci., 189-203.
36. Nakhleh, L., Moret, B.M.E. Roshan, U. et al. 2002. The accuracy of fast phylogenetic methods for large datasets. Proc. 7th Pac. Symp. Biocomput. (PSB02) 211-222.
37. Neves, D.T., Warnow, T., Sobral, J., et al. 2012. Parallelizing superfine. 27th Symp. Appli. Comput. (ACM-SAC).
38. Nguyen, N-P., Mirarab, S., and Warnow, T. 2012. MRL and SuperFine + MRL: new supertree methods. Algorithms Mol. Biol. 7.
39. Ogden, T.H., and Rosenberg, M. 2007. Alignment and topological accuracy of the direct optimization approach via POY and traditional phylogenetics via ClustalW + PAUP*. Syst. Biol. 56, 182-193.
40. Phillips C.A., and Warnow, T. 1996. The asymmetric median tree: a new model for building consensus trees. Discr. Appl. Math. 71, 311-335.
41. Price, M.N., Dehal, P.S., and Arkin, A.P. 2010. FastTree 2-approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS ONE 5, e9490.
42. Ragan, M.A. 1992. Phylogenetic inference based on matrix representation of trees. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 1, 53-58.
43. Redelings, B., and Suchard, M. 2005. Joint Bayesian estimation of alignment and phylogeny. Syst. Biol. 54, 401-418.
44. Ronquist, F., and Huelsenbeck, J.P. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics, 19, 1572-1574.
45. Stamatakis, A. 2006. RAxML-NI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22, 2688-2690.
46. Steel, M.A., and Székely, L.A. 1999. Inverting random functions. Ann. Comb. 3, 103-113.
47. Steel, M.A., and Székely, L.A. 2002. Inverting random functions. II. Explicit bounds for discrete maximum likelihood estimation, with applications. SIAM J. Discr. Math. 15, 562-575.
48. Swenson, M.S., Barbançon, F. Linder, C.R. et al. 2010. A simulation study comparing supertree and combined analysis methods using SMIDGen. Algorithms Mol. Biol. 5, 8.
49. Swenson, M.S., Suri, R., Linder, C.R. et al. 2011a. SuperFine: fast and accurate supertree estimation. Syst. Biol. Available at; http://sysbio. oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2011/09/16/sysbio.syr092.abstract. Accessed April 1, 2012.
50. Swenson, M.S., Suri, R., Linder, C.R. et al. 2011b. An experimental study of Quartets MaxCut and other supertree methods. Algorithms Mol. Biol. 6, 7.
51. Swofford, D.L. 1996. PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and Other Methods), version 4.0. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
52. Than, C.V., and Nakhleh, L. 2009. Species tree inference by minimizing deep coalescences. PLoS Comput. Biol. 5, e1000501.
53. Than, C.V., and Rosenberg, N.A. 2011. Consistency properties of species tree inference by minimizing deep coalescences. J. Comput Biol. 18, 1-15.
54. Than, C.V., Ruths, D., and Nakhleh, L. 2008. PhyloNet: a software package for analyzing and reconstructing reticulate evolutionary relationships. BMC Bioinform. 9, 322.
55. Varón, A., Vinh, L.S., Bomash, I., et al. 2007. POY software. Documentation. Available at: http://research.amnh.org/scicomp/projects/poy.php. Accessed April 1, 2012.
56. Wang, L-S., Leebens-Mack, J., Wall, P.K. et al. 2011. The impact of multiple protein sequence alignment on phylogenetic estimation. IEEE Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform. (TCBB) 1108-1119.
57. Warnow, T., Moret, B.M.E and St. John, K. 2001. Absolute convergence: true trees from short sequences. Proc. 12th Annu ACM/SIAM Symp. Discr. Algorithms (SODA01) 186-195.
58. Wheeler, T., and Kececioglu, J. 2007. Multiple alignment by aligning alignments. Proc. 15th ISCB Conf. Intell. Sys. Mol. Biol. 559-568.
59. Yang, J., and Warnow, T. 2011. Fast and accurate methods for phylogenomic analyses. BMC Bioinform. 12.
60. Yu, Y., Warnow, T., and Nakhleh, L. 2011. Algorithms for MDC-based multi-locus phylogeny inference: beyond rooted binary gene trees on single alleles. J. Comput. Biol. 18, 1543-1559.
61. Zwickl, D.J. 2006. Genetic algorithm approaches for the phylogenetic analysis of large biological sequence datasets under the maximum likelihood criterion [Ph.D. dissertation]. University of Texas at Austin.