Synchronous and opposite roles of the parietal andprefrontal cortices in bistable perception: A double-coil TMS-EEG study

Cortex

Volumn 64, Issue , 2015, Pages 78-88

  Vernet, Marine ^a   Brem, Anna Katharine ^a   Farzan, Faranak ^a   Pascual Leone, Alvaro ^a,b  

^a HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b University Institute affiliated with the Autonomous University of Barcelona   (Spain)

Author keywords

Conscious perception; Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; Intraparietal sulcus; Stabilization; Switching

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BISTABLE PERCEPTION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVOKED RESPONSE; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTRAPARIETAL SULCUS; MALE; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; PARIETAL CORTEX; PERCEPTION; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; TASK PERFORMANCE; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; ATTENTION; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PARIETAL LOBE; PHYSIOLOGY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; ATTENTION; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PARIETAL LOBE; PERCEPTION; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84909606727     PISSN: 00109452     EISSN: 19738102     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2014.09.021     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Amassian V.E., Cracco R.Q., Maccabee P.J., Cracco J.B., Rudell A., Eberle L. Suppression of visual perception by magnetic coil stimulation of human occipital cortex. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1989, 74(6):458-462.
2. Bonneh Y.S., Pavlovskaya M., Ring H., Soroker N. Abnormal binocular rivalry in unilateral neglect: evidence for a non-spatial mechanism of extinction. Neuroreport 2004, 15(3):473-477.
3. Britz J., Landis T., Michel C.M. Right parietal brain activity precedes perceptual alternation of bistable stimuli. Cerebral Cortex 2009, 19(1):55-65.
4. Brouwer G.J., Tong F., Hagoort P., van Ee R. Perceptual incongruence influences bistability and cortical activation. PLoS One 2009, 4(3):e5056.
5. Carmel D., Walsh V., Lavie N., Rees G. Right parietal TMS shortens dominance durations in binocular rivalry. Current Biology 2010, 20(18):R799-R800.
6. de Graaf T.A., de Jong M.C., Goebel R., van Ee R., Sack A.T. On the functional relevance of frontal cortex for passive and voluntarily controlled bistable vision. Cerebral Cortex 2011, 21(10):2322-2331.
7. de Graaf T.A., Hsieh P.J., Sack A.T. The 'correlates' in neural correlates of consciousness. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 2012, 36(1):191-197.
8. Delorme A., Makeig S. EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 2004, 134(1):9-21.
9. Deng Z.D., Lisanby S.H., Peterchev A.V. Electric field depth-focality tradeoff in transcranial magnetic stimulation: simulation comparison of 50 coil designs. Brain Stimulation 2013, 6(1):1-13.
10. Huang Y.Z., Rothwell J.C., Edwards M.J., Chen R.S. Effect of physiological activity on an NMDA-dependent form of cortical plasticity in human. Cerebral Cortex 2008, 18(3):563-570.
11. Ilmoniemi R.J., Virtanen J., Ruohonen J., Karhu J., Aronen H.J., Naatanen R. Neuronal responses to magnetic stimulation reveal cortical reactivity and connectivity. Neuroreport 1997, 8(16):3537-3540.
12. Intaite M., Koivisto M., Ruksenas O., Revonsuo A. Reversal negativity and bistable stimuli: attention, awareness, or something else?. Brain and Cognition 2010, 74(1):24-34.
13. Kahkonen S., Komssi S., Wilenius J., Ilmoniemi R.J. Prefrontal TMS produces smaller EEG responses than motor-cortex TMS: implications for rTMS treatment in depression. Psychopharmacology 2005, 181(1):16-20.
14. Kanai R., Bahrami B., Rees G. Human parietal cortex structure predicts individual differences in perceptual rivalry. Current Biology 2010, 20(18):1626-1630.
15. Kanai R., Carmel D., Bahrami B., Rees G. Structural and functional fractionation of right superior parietal cortex in bistable perception. Current Biology 2011, 21(3):R106-R107.
16. Kleinschmidt A., Buchel C., Zeki S., Frackowiak R.S. Human brain activity during spontaneously reversing perception of ambiguous figures. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 1998, 265(1413):2427-2433.
17. Knapen T., Brascamp J., Pearson J., van Ee R., Blake R. The role of frontal and parietal brain areas in bistable perception. The Journal of Neuroscience 2011, 31(28):10293-10301.
18. Kornmeier J., Bach M. The necker cube-an ambiguous figure disambiguated in early visual processing. Vision Research 2005, 45(8):955-960.
19. Kornmeier J., Bach M. Ambiguous figures - what happens in the brain when perception changes but not the stimulus. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2012, 6:51.
20. Leopold D.A., Wilke M., Maier A., Logothetis N.K. Stable perception of visually ambiguous patterns. Nature Neuroscience 2002, 5(6):605-609.
21. Litvak V., Komssi S., Scherg M., Hoechstetter K., Classen J., Zaaroor M. Artifact correction and source analysis of early electroencephalographic responses evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation over primary motor cortex. Neuroimage 2007, 37(1):56-70.
22. Lumer E.D., Friston K.J., Rees G. Neural correlates of perceptual rivalry in the human brain. Science 1998, 280(5371):1930-1934.
23. Mathes B., Struber D., Stadler M.A., Basar-Eroglu C. Voluntary control of Necker cube reversals modulates the EEG delta- and gamma-band response. Neuroscience Letters 2006, 402(1-2):145-149.
24. Meenan J.P., Miller L.A. Perceptual flexibility after frontal or temporal lobectomy. Neuropsychologia 1994, 32(9):1145-1149.
25. Miniussi C., Harris J.A., Ruzzoli M. Modelling non-invasive brain stimulation in cognitive neuroscience. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 2013, 37(8):1702-1712.
26. Miniussi C., Ruzzoli M., Walsh V. The mechanism of transcranial magnetic stimulation in cognition. Cortex 2010, 46(1):128-130.
27. Muller T.J., Federspiel A., Horn H., Lovblad K., Lehmann C., Dierks T. The neurophysiological time pattern of illusionary visual perceptual transitions: a simultaneous EEG and fMRI study. International Journal of Psychophysiology 2005, 55(3):299-312.
28. Nakatani H., van Leeuwen C. Transient synchrony of distant brain areas and perceptual switching in ambiguous figures. Biological Cybernetics 2006, 94(6):445-457.
29. Pearson J., Tadin D., Blake R. The effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation on visual rivalry. Journal of Vision 2007, 7(7):1-11. 2.
30. Perini F., Cattaneo L., Carrasco M., Schwarzbach J.V. Occipital transcranial magnetic stimulation has an activity-dependent suppressive effect. The Journal of Neuroscience 2012, 32(36):12361-12365.
31. Pitts M.A., Gavin W.J., Nerger J.L. Early top-down influences on bistable perception revealed by event-related potentials. Brain and Cognition 2008, 67(1):11-24.
32. Preston T.J., Kourtzi Z., Welchman A.E. Adaptive estimation of three-dimensional structure in the human brain. The Journal of Neuroscience 2009, 29(6):1688-1698.
33. Raz A., Lamar M., Buhle J.T., Kane M.J., Peterson B.S. Selective biasing of a specific bistable-figure percept involves fMRI signal changes in frontostriatal circuits: a step toward unlocking the neural correlates of top-down control and self-regulation. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis 2007, 50(2):137-156.
34. Ricci C., Blundo C. Perception of ambiguous figures after focal brain lesions. Neuropsychologia 1990, 28(11):1163-1173.
35. Ruzzoli M., Marzi C.A., Miniussi C. The neural mechanisms of the effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation on perception. Journal of Neurophysiology 2010, 103(6):2982-2989.
36. Silvanto J., Pascual-Leone A. State-dependency of transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain Topography 2008, 21(1):1-10.
37. Slotnick S.D., Yantis S. Common neural substrates for the control and effects of visual attention and perceptual bistability. Cognitive Brain Research 2005, 24(1):97-108.
38. Stewart L.M., Walsh V., Rothwell J.C. Motor and phosphene thresholds: a transcranial magnetic stimulation correlation study. Neuropsychologia 2001, 39(4):415-419.
39. Thut G., Ives J.R., Kampmann F., Pastor M.A., Pascual-Leone A. A new device and protocol for combining TMS and online recordings of EEG and evoked potentials. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 2005, 141(2):207-217.
40. Thut G., Northoff G., Ives J.R., Kamitani Y., Pfennig A., Kampmann F. Effects of single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) on functional brain activity: a combined event-related TMS and evoked potential study. Clinical Neurophysiology 2003, 114(11):2071-2080.
41. van Loon A.M., Knapen T., Scholte H.S., St John-Saaltink E., Donner T.H., Lamme V.A. GABA shapes the dynamics of bistable perception. Current Biology 2013, 23(9):823-827.
42. Veniero D., Bortoletto M., Miniussi C. TMS-EEG co-registration: on TMS-induced artifact. Clinical Neurophysiology 2009, 120(7):1392-1399.
43. Wang M., Arteaga D., He B.J. Brain mechanisms for simple perception and bistable perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2013, 110(35):E3350-E3359.
44. Weilnhammer V.A., Ludwig K., Hesselmann G., Sterzer P. Frontoparietal cortex mediates perceptual transitions in bistable perception. The Journal of Neuroscience 2013, 33(40):16009-16015.
45. Windmann S., Wehrmann M., Calabrese P., Gunturkun O. Role of the prefrontal cortex in attentional control over bistable vision. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2006, 18(3):456-471.
46. Zanto T.P., Gazzaley A. Fronto-parietal network: flexible hub of cognitive control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2013, 17(12):602-603.
47. Zaretskaya N., Thielscher A., Logothetis N.K., Bartels A. Disrupting parietal function prolongs dominance durations in binocular rivalry. Current Biology 2010, 20(23):2106-2111.